Architecture :: Create The Usual Asp.net Website With Only One Page?
Feb 25, 2010
A classic scenario for you to ponder over and feedback to me.I have been requsted to create a website. So far so good.But the site will have a total of 1 (ONE) page only.The page itself will only contain a form that users will submit.it will:1 - Register the details in the form into a single database table.2 - Send an email out to the customer and form admin to processI am thinking 2 ways of doing this:Plan A - Create the usual asp.net website with only one page saving directly onto database table.Plan B - Create a HTML page only,use javascript to send the data to a WCF service, which processes and saves the data.
I am try to create architecture design for WCF service.
We have WCF service that we have to expose to third party so then can request with xml and get back xml response.
The wcf service should do the following:
- Accept the request call with xml
- Check xml against the schema
- Parse the xml
- Authenticate the incoming xml by username and password that will be in xml
- Send back the response
If anybody can let me know what kind of design I can use or is there any pattern available that I can take it and then extend it as per my requirement.
I want to put my website project and admin website under same project as I want to use session and authentication of the main site. Also I want to show the admin, the page, where he has made changes. But the problem is whenever I will change anything in admin pages, I've to build the entire website. I don't want to do that. Can I build that separately?
I don't want to choose the option of building all pages separately as well.
Is there any alternatives of doing that. Separate projects for admin and website will come up with many other challenges. So I would like to avoid that.
I was tasked to create 3 tier web application. However, i browsed through many books & tutorials. The examples are doing it using Object data source which my lecturers claimed that it is not 3 tier at all. Shouldn't be dragging any data source into deisgn view. Any comprehensive examples for me to take reference from?
I've inherited a multi-technology project which comprises a Flash user interface contained in a web-browser-like host and has an ASP.NET piece which provides web services to the Flash UI, background/watchdog services plus a web application for administration of the system.
Our transatlantic project conference calls are getting confusing due to the various terms people use to describe the ASP.NET piece. Indeed, ASP.NET has its' own project terminology including 'Web Site' and 'Web Application' to both of which one can add a 'Web Service'.
I am trying to create a login page on my website. When I view the page in a browser and enter the login name and password, I receive the following error message:
Server Error in '/membership' Application.
Cannot open database "aspnetdb" requested by the login. The login failed. Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITYNETWORK SERVICE'.
Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Cannot open database "aspnetdb" requested by the login. The login failed. Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITYNETWORK SERVICE'.
Source Error:
[Code]....
Stack Trace:
[Code]....
I was able to connect to the aspnetdb database using the Web Site Administration Tool. The aspnetdb database is not in the App_Data directory.
I am working on 3 tier architecture: UI, BL, DAL. In my UI i have following code for Asynchronous page processing:
[Code]....
But I want a database fetch operation to be performed in this asyncronous method. And due to 3 tier arch. i am unable to do this in UI Layer. Can anyone guide me that how can I implement Asynchronous processing in 3 tier architecture? Note: If you are going to place EndAsyncWork1 in DAL then show that how can I return a value back to UI layer from this function.
I want to create a download link for my Windows Forms application. I know you can do that using ClickOnce but I don't want a ClickOnce app so a added a setup project to my application that I just got to work the way I want so now I want to make it downloadable from my website. Should a I a web service or a WCF Service to do this or something else and what else should I do?
I'm in the middle-end of written a big website that work a lot with the db. In every call a page runs 5-12 different queries.What I did was build an execute class that uses MySqlConnector API, which get string that represent the sql and the parameters and then just execute the query and return DataTable. In addition to that I have a class that hold all the function that call the execute class functions. For example in the class I have getAllProducts, getOldestProducts etc... and in each and every one of them theres sql statements.
Recently I watch the LINQ video series(How Do I with LINQ - on this site) and it looked good.As I sees it my way is very good because it just open connection execute the sql get the result and close the connection.The question is what is the best performance wise way to build this site? Is it my way that I use all along? Is it using LINQ? Or working with DataSet/TypedDataSet is the preferred way?
How to build a web application using ASP.NET , this web app isa portal and i can edit in the interface of each web page at runtime ,[URL]How can i do that ???? , is that require sharepoint WSS , sharepoint designer , PathInfo , Forms server ????And if that web app require these apps , how can i use them to build web app like , i looking for a tutorial
We are using a .net web application and my environment is as follows:-
SERVER : Server: Windows 2003 .NET FRAMEWORK : 3.5 ASP.NET FRAMEWORK : ASP.NET 2.0 Template used : ASP.NET Web application project ( not a web site)
I have code in global.asax.cs which is like below. This code dynamically loading the web.config. Is this right? Since the deployment accidentally the web.config been copied mutlitple times (in past) which was bringin uat web.config to prod and causing the prod to point to uat databae, we did this way, i.e dynamically reading the param values from a file and loading them to web.config dynamically.
Is this right? The web site is loosing connection string once a while and making the site to go down. One thing i noticed is in DEV / QA / UAT we have the ASP.NET version tab in iis set to 2.0, but in prod it's been set to 1.1. I told them to change, but somebody arguing how it worked for a while and suddenly stopped. I don't know the answer. Could somebody tell me or point me to a direction to fix this.
private void LoadConfig() { string xml = null; FileStream fs = null; StreamReader str = null; System.Xml.XmlDocument xmlDoc = null; System.Xml.XmlNode xmlNode = null; EventLog _eventLog = null; try { // Get the Config path from registry, parse and set the static properties of the class. string configFile = CompName.CoreLib.SystemUtilities.RegistryUtility.ReadValue("ConfigPath") + @"ApplSettingsConfig.xml"; //string configFile = @"C:" + @"Common.Config"; // Read the XML Config File fs = File.OpenRead(configFile); str = new StreamReader(fs); xml = str.ReadToEnd(); str.Close(); fs.Close();..............................
I'm conducting a project in which a website should have multi-language support.Now, this website is supposed to serve about 500K+ visitors a day, so it must be super-efficient.
I've created a table of parameters {[ID],[Name]} AND a linkage-table {[objectID],[parameterID],[languageID],[value]}. I think it's the best way to deploy multi-language support while having the privilege to translate different parameters for each language.
As far as I know, server's memory is much faster than a physical HDD. Therefore, I'm planning to store ASP.NET Application State objects for my translation architecture.[URL]
I've been all around the net for weeks now trying to figure out the best way to set up a Multi-tenant website (building a web app that multiple companies and their employees will use). As far as a database goes, I am interested in using one database with a copied set of tables for each company. As far as managing the login and security in MVC2 I am lost with the myriad of examples (mostly old and not MVC) that I have seen. So ideally my app would allow a company rep to register their company and then be able to add their own employees to the site. Then all employees could login and be securely associated with their own company's tables (table names would be appended with their AccountID).
I'm not sure if this would be handled using routing or session variables or what the more ideal and up to date methods might be. Like others who have discussed this issue, it seems like this should be a much more fleshed out solution as it is becoming a more common use on the internet. I'm even willing to simplify the database down to one set of tables that stores an AccountID in each row if needed.
I need to create a search engine for my website that searches my entire content and files stored in a database.What is the best way and easy to accomplish this?If can, please provide a few samples or links.
We are using a custom MembershipProvider to authenticate the user.This works just fine. But when installing this at a new customer ValidateUser() suddenly takes a "long" time (15 sec) to finish.It usually takes less than or just 1 sec. The users find this very annoying (so do we).Does anyone have an idea where to start adjusting settings or what to look in to?
I reffer users from my website to another website (not my own website, I dont have any access to code).How can I detect a user registered in this website I have reffered to....
There are various website speed test online tools available. Few of them are listed on: [URL] I tested my website using iweb and selfseo. My website is showing 0.03KB Average speed per KB everywhere. Even google also is giving same kind of results.I tested the site using Page Speed and YSlow. I have already followed most of the recommendations suggested by these tools like efficient use CSS, contents across the domains, caching, compression and all. But still I am getting the same average speed per kb. Page speed is showing around 85/100 as my page speed score, so I guess I have optimized my site a lot. My questions here are:
1. What are the other factors affecting the avg speed per kb of a website?
2. How to improve the Avg speed per kb?
3. Is there anything related with the Server Software and Hardware that I have to check?
Note: I tested by uploading a plain html page with simple text "Hello World", but the avg speed per kb is the same for this page as well. Same is the case with the rest of the pages.
Application Platform : ASP.Net 3.5, C#3.0, LINQ as Data Access, SQL Server 2008
I want to create a suite of three products. One is a website, so that is set in stone. Another is a mobile application, so that will be written as an application (for whatever devices). The third product is something that the user can use locally on their machine. However, I'm not sure if I want to make it a desktop application or a local website. With a desktop application, if I make a significant change to my business rules, I have to make it in three places (assuming the dll change needs a GUI change). However, if I make it a local website, then almost everything would be the same as the regular website. Desktop applications seem to provide more controls that are easier to use though. And since I'm taking this project on alone (right now) easy sounds best. But I don't want to sacrifice easy now for easy later.
The website I want to write will be using MVC architecture. I'm not even sure how to deploy a website yet either to a server or to a local machine. The only thing I've done was set up a local website before for a website that was already created in house by my co-workers. And that was solely ASP.Net, no MVC architecture.
My questions are:What do you guys think would be best in the long run; a local website that mimics the regular website or a desktop application?
Is there a way to create an install package to install a website so the user doesn't have to tinker with their computer at all?
I have a asp.net website in the IIS which is available on internet as www.xyz.com now I have been asked to prepare another website which will be accessed via www.xyz.com/abc.
For this, do I need to create a virtual directory under the website folder XYZ in IIS? or is there any other way to achieve this.
