As I understand it, I should be able to change an aspx file in VS, update in the browser and then see the changes without rebuilding the entire solution. For me thats not the case...
Edit: I use VS 2008, .NET 3.5 and development server. It is a Web Application project and I always need to rebuild to see the changes in the aspx files. I use master pages and aspx controls. I use edit and continue and have no problem updating the code behind files without rebuilding.
I was working on a .Net 2.0 application. Late at night I upgraded it to .Net v.4. Then, as SVN was complaining I started to do manual conflict resolution. Even later than that I tried to check in my changes, then hit some conflicts so manually merged changes from the two different .csproj files.
I can't get back to where I was and rolling back to the previous version makes me lose all the code that has been written for it.
So I'm looking for a quick/dirty and reliable way of making sure my application code doesn't get lost?
I've got a solution that contains several projects. There is a main exe project which I'll call MyProj.exe that references several other projects which reference yet other projects in the solution. Additionally a few projects in the solution are not in MyProj's reference chain and aren't regularly built. There is 1 project (a class library project) named Payment which is giving me a particularly hard time. The two of MyProj's references have a project reference to Payment.dll. So the reference heirarchy looks like this:
When I right click MyProj in the Solution Explorer and choose Build, everything works fine, but when I choose Rebuild, I get the following results:
Payment.dll is deleted but never rebuilt. It doesn't exist in the output directory MyProj.manifest in the output directory doesn't have a reference to Payment.dll. (What is this file? I don't remember normally seeing it in other project's the output directories.) 19 of the project .pdb files are deleted and not rebuilt This is a big problem for me because this is a ClickOnce application and when I'm publishing, Payment.dll isn't getting included in my deployment which is a problem I suspect is closely related.
I want to know how can I load my files (file1.aspx and file1.aspx.vb) in a container on my index.aspx. My index should have my menu and my container. My problem is that i don't know how do that... options wich i tried:
Iframes: yes work it... but in html 5 iframe will dissapear...
MasterPage: isn't the solution because this refresh all index page.
Ajax: yes.. charge my File1.aspx in the container but i can't call the functions of File1.aspx.vb...
I upgraded my site from asp to asp.net.This means that all of my previous asp files became obsolete.I don't want to lose my Google Ranking of the old pages.
What is the proper way to redirect?I tried to catch all of the old asp pages is my 404 and then to:
if Request.QueryString("aspxerrorpath").contains("index.asp") = true then Response.Status = "301 Moved Permanently" Response.AddHeader("Location", "http://www.domain.com/index.aspx") Response.Redirect("/index.aspx") end if
I have a designer working on several pages in Dreamweaver. The designer is creating .aspx files with the Page directive at the top. These are getting shipped to me and I'm adding them to the Visual Studio ASP.NET WebForms Web Application Project. The problem is that there's no code-behind file by default, and I'm trying to find a shortcut to have them autogenerated as if I've added a fresh page from Visual Studio.
If we are deploying ASP.NET web application, Do we need to copy both *.aspx and *.aspx.cs files on the server?Also what if I am using different framework version? I mean 1.1 / 2.0 /3.0 /3.5 /4.0? What will be the answer in different .NET Framework versions?
I need to change the encoding from Western European... to Unicode... for every file in the project. I do not want to have to check out, open, change encoding, save and check-in every file, is there a faster way?
I created dynamic the tabpanel of tabcontainer, and the tabpanels change depended on the item which chooses from dropdownlist but the problem is tabcontainer keeping the last tabpanel and create another tabpanel and I couldn't remove them how I can rebulid the tabconatiner each postback
I'm working on an ASP.NET MVC web application and I've made my own authentication module, which is session-based (no cookies). The problem is: When I rebuild my application, I'm automatically logged of (session is empty).
Normally this is not a big problem because my application is not 'automatically' rebuilding in a production environment. But I've also made a module that changes the resource-files and after a modification of a resource file, the application seems to rebuild automatically.
So my actual question: Is it possible to 'keep' the session variables/stay logged on after a rebuild?
In asp.net is it a requirement to rebuild the whole page during every callback? For example my web page is split into three distinct areas and I have an update panel for each area. Lets say I want to update the third area, do I have to bother with any processing of the other two areas?
For example lets say there is a grid view in area two. The update panel in area three callbacks to update its content. Do I have to rebind the grid in area two?
I have several small web apps that were developed in VS 2005. Included among these are several class libraries used by many of the apps. I've begun to develop in VS 2008. Today I had to add to one of the libraries that was originally generated by VS 2005.
My question, now that I've rebuilt the class library using VS 2008 do I need to rebuild all the small apps that use this library?
Background: We have a production website that is composed of several small webapps. The dlls reside in the bin folder and the .aspx pages in the appropriate folder within the website structure. If I move this changed library dll to the bin folder, are all the pages that used the old library dll going to break? The changes I made to the library class will not cause them to break.
I have a solution containing 4 class library projects and one "web site" project. The web site project contains references to the 3 class library projects, whenever I make changes in any of the class library projects, the only option I see is to rebuild the web site which takes a lot of time. Is there any option that I can only update the dll references and the changes are reflected in the web site project?
I have a web application project. I have DLLs that I reference in the project stored in my bin/ folder. Well, whenever I do a rebuild or clean from Visual Studio, it will delete everything in that folder. How do I prevent this from happening?
I recently purchased the source code of an existing DotNetNuke module in order to make a few modifications. The source of the module contains various .ascx, ascx.resx and .ascx.vb files. as well as a main.dll file. Lets call them:
I've made a few changes to "myfile.ascx.vb". When I rebuild "my_module" via Build --> Rebuild my_module, I get confirmation that there are no errors in the Error List. I then upload a fresh copy of "mydll.dll" from the "/obj/release/" folder on my local machine up to the "/bin/" folder on my DotNetNuke site.
The issue that I'm having is that the changes that I made to "myfile.ascx.vb" are not appearing on my DotNetNuke site. Are there additional files that need to uploaded? I've checked timestamps on all of my local files and the only files that are updated after the build is "mydll.dll".
I have a strange problem with the session. I have global.asax with code in the session_start event. This code calls some code that I have in a helper class. When I first run the project in debug everything is fine. However when I stop debugging and then re-run the project it fails and I have discovered that once the code in the helper class is hit the session is null. If I look in the global.asax session_start code the session is instantiated before it enters the helper class. If I then re-build the project and the re-run it everything works fine again! Why does the session suddenly become null and why does a re-build fix the problem?
I'm working on a VS2010 Solution containing an ASP.NET Website Project and 8 c# class libraries. All projects are set to compile under .NET 3.5
When I set a breakpoint somewhere in the class libraries, the debugger breaks correctly and everything is fine. If I then stop debugging, modify code in the class library, and start debugging again (which of course rebuilds the libraries which were modified) the debugger ignores the breakpoints.
Has anyone else experienced anything like this? I'm lost and it's extremely frustrating to not be able to debug after making even a single line change and rebuilding.
Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate Windows 7 Professional 64-bit
I'm designing a simple framework for small websites to be used in an intranet. The websites will all be similar, but there will be a few pages, or controls on pages, that are different. I would like to be able to version and maintain the common framework part of the websites as if they were a regular library - if I need to update CSS then I only have to do it in one place. Can I package-up ASPX files, images and CSS and distribute them like this? What am I missing?
My goal is to allow the developers of the few core content pages to get up and running with the websites quickly, with standard styles and images.
I was wondering whether there is away to compare two .aspx pages. I have a website on my local machine and the same website on a production server. What i will like to do is compare .aspx page from my local and production server to see what the differences are.
<%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeBehind="MyPage.aspx.cs" Inherits="MyPage" %> <script type="text/javascript"> //<!-- I want to inject a JSON string here, which is generated per side-request --> function doStuffToMyData(){ // ..... } </script>
how I can inject a JSON string here? I got no problem generating the string, or parsing it in the browser..
It could be there's an easier way to do this? I basically want to manipulate the looks of the side, depending on changes to this data, so I figured it would be easiest to have the data as a JSON string.
