I would like to select an element that is in the same TR as another element I found with a selector. The selector itself: $("input[name='sMessageValue']","#messageTable") Now I have this element and got its value I would like to find a checkbox located in the same TR, i tried this as starting point : $(this).(':parent').val(). But seems not the right thing to do.
So what changes should i make to the jquery.openid.js to make it work?
I mean in the first case the $this refers to form.openid:eq(0) In the second case the $this refers to #text.openidd and the form is never submitted.
I guess something like this one $this.FindParentForm exists in JQUERY, but i have no clue!
I added the div tag as enclosure for the elements. The form contains other <li>'s etc that jquery messes with. And i would not like that! That's why in my post i believe that the work has to be done in the jquery.openid.js file... something like
I'm trying to find an ajax.net extender element with a dynamically generated ID. I'm trying to wire up an event handler to close all ajax.net modal popups when 'escape' is pressed. I'm confused why one of these works and one does not.
$find('ctl00_MainContent_ucUserControl1_mpePopup'); //returns the element $find('[id="ctl00_MainContent_ucUserControl1_mpePopup"]'); //returns null
The ultimate goal is to be able to find the element without hard wiring the ID into the selector: $find('[id$="_mpePopup"]'); //return all elements that end with "_mpePopup"
I have a form element which submits some data to a server. The server responds with a new version of a page.I added jquery code to hijack the form: validate it (using jquery validate) and if correct send post request. The success function then should find one div and one span elements (they have id's set ("board" and "calcSpan")) in the returned html-page and replace the old one's with the received elements.
For some reason it finds only the second div, the result of the search for the first div is jquery-object containing no html.Here is the javascript-code:
I could also write every validation for each object separately, I have only a few elements who uses a required validation but it would be nice that I could do this in one shot instead of repeating the $("input").rules("add .....
You're making a website with ASP.NET 4.0/C#, although xml alone is suitable for this example. The site will have a site map and a default page with a menu control, as follows:Web.sitemap
I have a C# ASP.NET MVC application which has been using jquery 1.3.2 in VS2008 environment.
I decided to upgrade to 1.4.2 and added the file to my project. Changed the reference in my masterpage header to the new version. But now nothing works, it's like it can't find the jquery library.
I have a few controls (a panel containing some textboxes and dropdownlists) that are hidden until the user clicks a button to toggle their visibility. The toggling is done via JQuery and works great. One thing that bothers me is that although this panel is hidden when the page finishes loading, you can see it while the load/render process is taking place. So you can see it and then all of a sudden it fades out. Is there a way to hide it earlier in the process so we don't see it at all? I did try putting visible = "false" on the panel definition, and then you can't see the panel on loading which is good, but then my JQuery code won't toggle it to visible. Perhaps my JQuery code needs tweaking.
i designed a gridview and innergridview. design seems below
Master Data Detail Data Master Data
i have some hidden control in the master record, in child row when i click an link button then i want to read that hdden value so, i use below code var data1 = closestTR.find('input:hidden[id$=hdnData1]').val(); but its not working , the same code is working with the event from Master Record. may i know how to read that master row record from the child row using jquery.? for this master and child row concepts i used below syntax
<gridview> <HeaderTemplate> <table> <tr><td>This is for Master Row Header</td></tr> </table> </HeaderTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <table> <tr><td>This is for Master Row Data</td></tr> </table> </ItemTemplate> <innerGridview> <HeaderTemplate> <table> <tr><td>This is for Detail Row Heading</td></tr> </table> </HeaderTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <table> <tr><td>This is for Master Row Data</td></tr> </table> </ItemTemplate> </innerGridview> <gridview>
At first, I should confess that I am not sure if it is a good practice or not. I have came out with the idea due to my practice of jQuery.ajax().
What I want to achieve is depended on this design:
//Server Side; an .asmx file contains a method like this: [WebMethod] public string NewContent(string parameter) { string renderedHTML = string.Empty(); switch(parameter) { case ("person"): // create an asp.net panel with // some controls in it that has form elements to enter person data // render control and assign its html to renderedHTML break; case ("department"): // create an asp.net panel with // some controls in it that has form elements to enter department data // render control and assign its html to renderedHTML break; } }
And from the client I want to do this:
// Some html in the page <script type="text/JavaScript"> jQuery.post('ajax/myWebServices.asmx/NewContent' function(returnedPanelContent) { $('.result').html(returnedPanelContent); }); </script>
Question is:
How can I make it work? Briefly to have a webservice method that returns different asp.net Panel control content created programmatically so that I can get this control rendered as HTML in my client-side and insert it to my web page?
would like to sort an UL dom element having some LI elements.I'm stuck and some plugins I found are not correctly working, so I maybe need some custom code.The UL :
[Code]....
So the li elements contains the span element that has the real text that needs to be sorted, it is important that the li should be moved as the custom attribute id is required for another purpose.
I want to catch click event on every link in one element for example my html looks like this : [Code]....
and my function is this:
$("#test").children("a").click(function (e) { e.preventDefault(); $("#okno2").append("Kliklo se z prvnĂho okna!"); });
but it catches only the click event on the first link but on the nested link in <p> it doesn't respond. Is there any way how to get all children not only the straight, but also the nested ones?
I am trying to auto fill city and state value after user typing 5-digit zip code. The Ajax part works perfectly, the problem is I have two sets of zip/city/state fields in one web page. I searched this issue for quite a while, using next(),nextAll() even slice(), none of them work in my situation.
Web page related part:
[Code]....
After using Ajax function I get returned value for city and state. For each city textbox I give a "city" class, for each state dropdownlist I give a "state" class. I wonder how can I put those value into right position?
i am developing an ASP.NET website with a master page,i want to get an element in masterpage from another page inheriting the master page i know how to do this in c#, but i want to make this from jquery.
I want to replace a form element with a div and keep the inner html of the form inside the inserted div element. i tried jquery it gives me unkown html element as selection result,
I have and problem of validate my element from the out side the form tag.
Here I am describe what I have done and what i need :
[code]...
now this TxtSite element is out side that SiteDetail form and i want to validate this element when i have submit data this validation should be validate.
I have an containing a list of divs that jQuery turns into progress bars. On .ready, I build a list of all of these progress bars and for each one, call a webservice that gets a value indicating how full the progress bar should be. In order to do this, I need to pass the ID of the div to the web service.
Because the divs are inside a ListView, I manually set the id to be id="completionbar_<%# Eval("MilestoneID") %>"
However, when I pass this id into my web service, it comes up as "undefined" every time. When I view the source, it looks like it's set correctly.