I'm using ASP.NET MVC 2 Beta. I made a sample code to describe my question.
In the /Controller/HomeController.cs
using System;
using System.Web.Mvc;
namespace MvcApplication9.Controllers
{
public class HomeController : Controller
{
//
// GET: /Home/
public ActionResult Index()
{
return View();
}
}
}
I am trying to convert some repetitive html into a user control. Here is the HTML :
[Code]....
And here is where I am slotting it in to my original HTML :
[Code]....
I need to do this dynamically, is there any way around this?
I want to store an instance of my SignedInMember class inside the Session object but when I go to retrieve it inside a ViewUserControl, it doesn't work. It works if I retrieve it inside the View but not inside a control, can someone tell my why and how to get the result I want?
View 2 RepliesI'm trying to override all the Html.TextBoxFor etc. methods. I want to make them non-static methods in a class that extends ViewUserControl. But, according to intellisense, Html does have access to these methods; they simply don't appear. So basically I want to do something like:
[Code]....
But I'm not getting the syntax right.
Basically just trying to wrap the TextBoxFor call so that my ViewUserControl can drop in a unique id each time.
i have this thus far
[Code]....
when getting the properties of the image i get this:
http://localhost:2953/Belts/Edit/System.Web.Mvc.FileStreamResult
I want to pass custom param to my ViewUserControl using custom Model.
1. I have created model
[Code]....
2. I have created custom ViewUserControl
[Code]....
3. I am rendering my custom ViewUserControl and passing new Model
[Code]....
The problem is that I don't know how to get acces to my model instance inside my custom ViewUserControl
I want to do something like this where item is a local variable in the .aspx page:
<p:ProgressBar runat="server" Progress="<%#item.Completed/item.Total%>" Width="100" />
the binding expression isn't detecting the local page level variables. Is there a way I can accomplish this wihtout using RenderPartial?
I read this about the Response.Expires from the MSDN:"The Expires property specifies the duration of time before a page that is cached on a browser expires"what does the term "cached" stands for here?
View 5 RepliesI see that I have version 3.0.20229.0 of ajaxcontroltoolkit.dll on a server and on my local machine I have version 3.0.0.20820.0 of ajaxcontroltoolkit.dll in a AjaxControlToolkit-Framework3.5SP1 directory. So does 3.0.20229.0 correspond to 3.5 pre sp1?
I found the following at http://www.ajaxcontroltoolkit.com/Default.aspx:
This release includes over 10 patch fixes provided by members of the Toolkit community. We would like to specially thank all the patch contributors for their effort which helped make this release possible. We recognize their names on the
Toolkit Patch Hall of Fame.
Setting up the environment to use the Toolkit: This Toolkit release targets two different versions of the .NET Framework:
Version 3.5.20229 for .NET Framework 3.5 and Visual Studio 2008:
Download the AjaxControlToolkit-Framework3.5.zip or AjaxControlToolkit-Framework3.5-NoSource.zip.
Version 1.0.20229 for ASP.NET AJAX version 1.0 and .NET Framework 2.0:
Download the AjaxControlToolkit.zip or AjaxControlToolkit-NoSource.zip.
Note: Toolkit version 3.5.20229 is only for users who are building on top of .NET Framework 3.5 using Visual Studio 2008. If you are using .NET Framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005 then you should use
Toolkit version 1.0.20229.
It sounds like the Toolkit version does NOT correspond to the version of ajaxcontroltoolkit.dll.
Hhave a table of user which contains created date and based on that i want to get the list of user in hourly time difference like 9:00 am , 9:30 am, 10:00 am .... likewise and with that i want an appropriate user name and count that how many users are registered between the time from db like ( user 1 have 3 count between 9:00 am to 9:30 am ) and for that i have userid,createdon date (with time), username
View 4 Repliesmy understanding static/shared objects will be saved in a memory that is shared by all instances of the asp.net application,so if we set a value to shared object from inst1 & i should be able to access it via instance2(may be in same computer or anywhere)Actually:In my vb.net application,previously they defined shared dataset to hold some information specific to the user,still now i cant reproduce the error that same value shared across all application instances.Please help me to solve or clarify this.
[URL]
Hi,
I'm attempting to develop an n-tier web application that makes use of the ObjectDataSource on a page. The page shows the classic 'user details' page to allow create, read, update and delete actions for an object within the users collection. Let me explain
that again as I think it might be the root of my issue. I have a class named 'user', I also have a class named 'users' which exposes a list of 'user' objects. It's this 'users' class that is the source of my ObjectDataSource control.
What i'm hoping to have happen is that the page will display a 'user' object from the 'users' class (which it does) and that the end user can then amend the values in a formview before updating them (it kind of does this). The problem I'm running into is
that all the 'user' objects are getting updated with th ealtered values and not just the currently displayed object. I suspect that this has something to do with the web being stateless, but i'm going 'round in circles trying to figure out where i'm going
wrong.
I can post code if required, but what i'm looking for is a decent (read as: easy to follow/understand) site where I can get a better understanding of what i'm supposed to be doing.
My environment is VS2010, C#, .NET 2.0, but I don't think the environment is the issue, merly the chair-keyboard interface.
Thanks,
Mike
Well i want to know how many architecture approaches we can use in asp.net web application. i was asked about it. i told him that i use a appcode for dal and bal and the presentation layer. but he was not convince. basically i want to ask what web application architecture an asp.net web application guru would use keeping in mind the different metrics ( i am talking minus web services or any SOA thing)
View 1 RepliesI have a few pages that need to use SSL and I am confused bc I read you should set the forms authentication section in the web.config to use SSL. so if this is the case, the user logs in (login page is using ssl) the forms auth cookie is created and now if i redirect to the non ssl enable home page, does this mean the auth cookie will not be transmitted, so i can't display like a welcome module or know the username of the user who logged in?
View 6 RepliesI want to use RenderPartial twice in my view with different models associated. The problem is that some properties are present in both models (nickname, password). They have no prefix, so even the id's or names are equal in the output. Now, if I have model errors for nickname or password, both fields get highlighted.
Main View:
[code]...
How can I change this?
I'm using both spark and .aspx view engines. My partial is in aspx so i'm tring to call from my spark engine.
I've seen something like the following
${Html.RenderPartial("HeaderControl")}
Seems like i'm missing a reference, can't really see what.
Dynamic view compilation failed. d:WebsiteViewsRetailerIndex.spark(11,23): error CS1061:
'System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper' does not contain a definition for 'RenderPartial' and no extension method 'RenderPartial' accepting a first argument of type 'System.Web.Mvc.HtmlHelper' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
spark
<use namespace="MvcContrib.UI"/>
<use namespace="MvcContrib.UI.Grid"/>
<use namespace="MvcContrib.UI.Pager"/>
<use namespace="MvcContrib.UI.Grid.ActionSyntax"/>
<viewdata model="EStore.Domain.ViewModel.RetailerViewModel"/>
<content name="MainContent">
${Html.RenderPartial("HeaderControl")}
</content>
I am trying to understand the difference between a RenderPartial and RenderAction. I guess that RenderPartial is like a UserControl and RenderAction is like a server-side include.
View 3 RepliesI've got a container object that holds the various objects required by the partial views contained in a regular view. I changed from passing the entire object into each partial view to passing just the object the view needs, but I ran into an odd error.I'll post the code. The first RenderPartial that's called worked just fine. The second one, which is identical in every regard I can see but the actual contents, is the culprit. I get a HttpCompileException, stating that:
...ProjectUpdater.ascx(97): error CS1061: 'DSC.Data.Model.Shared.ProjectUpdaterInfo' does not contain a definition for 'ProjectUpdater' and no extension method 'ProjectUpdater' accepting a first argument of type 'DSC.Data.Model.Shared.ProjectUpdaterInfo'
could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
Here's the view code:
[Code]....
I get intellisense for the Model.ProjectUpdater, and nothing shows up with the squiggly lines indicating an error. Here's the properties of the model class:
[Code]....
So there's the ProjectUpdater I'm getting an error saying doesn't exist. What's driving me nuts is that the first RenderPartial is working fine.
Also RenderAction and Action. RenderXXX akaik write directly to response stream and XXX use additional string buffer. I don't really want doing benchmark my myself, so maybe someone already do it.
View 2 RepliesI have an action that generates active vacancies. The code is below;
[Code]....
I want to use this list on several pages so i guess the best thing to use is html.renderpartial.
I then created a view by right clicking inside the action and create a .ascx and a strongly typed view of Vacancy. I chose a view content of "List".
I then added this line to the required page;
[Code]....
I upgraded a MVC1 project to MVC2, now all my calls to RenderPartial are throwing
System.ArgumentNullException: Value cannot be null.
However this does works:
<% Html.RenderPartial("~/Views/Shared/LogOnUserControl.ascx"); %>
And this does not (works in MVC1):
<% Html.RenderPartial("LogOnUserControl"); %>
Did the behavior of RenderPartial change?
I am making my first attempt at using RenderPartial to display a list of objects, but so far having little success. Here is my code, can somebody give me some guidance on what I am doing wrong?
[Code]....
im getting the following exception for use into a master page the helper html.renderpartial(). This works on mvc views that uses this master page, but im trying to execute an old aspx webform page that uses the same masterpage. And here comes following exception:A ViewMasterPage can be used only with content pages that derive from ViewPage or ViewPage.This is the code of my master page:
<body>
<%Html.RenderPartial("PartialView"); %>
<div style="background-color:Aqua;">
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="MainContent" runat="server">
</asp:ContentPlaceHolder>
</div>
</body>
I would like to render some partialviews on my master page. Is it possible?
I am working in an environment with many teams who are responsible for specific content on pages. Each team is sharing specific information (common class libraries, and master pages) that each are going deliver different types of content.Is it possible for an MVC application to do something similar to RenderPartial and pass a model to another MVC application Controller/Action to return content?
So the code for this might look like:
(http://www.mydomain.com/Home/Index)
<% Html.RenderAction("ads.mydomain.com", "Home", "Index", AdModel) %>
Maybe this is not a good idea as another thread has to spin up to server a partial view?
What I'm trying to do is use one master page with two different layouts. Currently we have a "master" master page that has all the common elements and two master pages that use it for the two different layouts. This gives us 3 master pages and there's developer confustion and it is a bit of a hassle to keep them consistent. What I'd like to do instead is say "if there's anything in the MainContent ContentPlaceHolder, show the single column layout, otherwise show the two column layout".
From what I've read you're supposed to be able to do this by using something like the following:
[Code]....
But this.MainContent.Controls.Count retuns zero when the ContentPlaceHolder uses Html.RenderPartial. For example, this works fine:
[Code]....
This causes this.MainContent.Controls.Count to return 1. If I remove MainContent from the view, it returns 0, as expected. However, if I do this:
[Code]....
Then this.MainContent.Controls.Count returns zero.
