I could not find any suitable forum for this problem. So, please forgive me if I am posting this to a wrong forum.
I have a page which i don't want to be cached in the client browser. As the page is displaying some data from db which are frequently changed.
To disable the cache I wrote,
Response.Cache.SetExpires(DateTime.UtcNow.AddMinutes(-1));
Usually when we create an aspx page and then open the aspx.cs page we can see a protected void page_load().So my question is why that should be protected in default.Can we give other access modifiers.
View 1 RepliesWhen I want to cache I View or an Action like this :
<%@ Page title="" language="C#" masterpagefile="~/Views/Shared/MemberHome.Master" inherits="System.Web.Mvc.ViewPage<IndexViewData>" %>
<%@ OutputCache duration="400" varybyparam="divId;regionId;page" %>
I know that it cache all data in my page ... But in my page I have a condition like this :
<% if(Request.IsAuthenticated) { %>
<a href="/fr/Advertiser/Search"><img src="/content/images/v_2/bot.jpg" alt="Entreprises liées à vos passions" title="Entreprises liées à vos passions" /></a>
<% } else { %>
<a href="/fr/Advertiser/OpenSearch"><img src="/content/images/v_2/bot.jpg" alt="Entreprises liées à vos passions" title="Entreprises liées à vos passions" /></a>
<% } %>
I dont want to cache this variable : Request.IsAuthenticated ... because some result depend of this condition ... I try the donut caching by scottgu's but it return (I think) just some text not a bool ...
http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2006/11/28/tip-trick-implement-donut-caching-with-the-asp-net-2-0-output-cache-substitution-feature.aspx
Now I'm tired to try anything that come to my mind .
We have a wfc layer that wraps the business classes and database access and use a client that lives on the database layer. Amongst our group we are attempting to form standards. Some want to have the client call the web method and pass the page they are requesting and the page size. Pass that to the database and then page in SQL Server use RowNum.Some want to cache the full list of objects in http cache on the service tier and page in memory. They concern here is memory use on the server.
Which would be best for a medium number of users with potentially large number of records to manage (say 30K) Is it better to cache them all in memory and work from there or page at the database as the application scales?
I need to enable caching in my asp.net application, but I do not want to use the webserver's memory for holding cache objects. If I add the page directive for output caching will the page be stored in the asp.net cache object?
View 2 Replieswhen I try to open a Music ASP.NET website from Visual Studio 2008 (Visual Web Developer) using "LOCAL IIS" option I get the message that the website is not marked as an application in IIS.
View 1 RepliesI am using mailbee object for sending bulk mail with smtp authentication but when i am sending the mail, all mails are marked are spam.
View 3 Replies[Code]....
Im getting the error message:'User.Id.get' must declare a body because it is not marked abstract or externWhat does this mean? What am I doing wrong?
learning asp.net and prepare my final year project. i've problem in dropdownlist hope i found answer here. I've two dropdown list each consist four listitem as follows
dropdownlist1
uk,usa,india,singapore.
dropdownlist2
uk,usa,india,singapore.
if anyone of the country selected from dropdownlist1 then dropdownlist2 that particular country automatically get masked or readomly
I have a normal web form with code behind, in this code behind I can instantiate a couple of classes I have in the root folder, such as:
public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page
{
Helper helper = new Helper();
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)[code]....
It's working fine but I now want to move my class files (Helper.cs for example) to the app_code folder but when I run the application I get error on
SharePoint sharePoint = new SharePoint();
public string id { get; set; }
must declare a body because it is not marked abstract or extern,
I am using an EntityDataSource with a FormView on VB.NET application. The FormView contains an AjaxControlToolKit TabContains with multiple tabs. Due to the fact that each tab is a naming container, Bind doesn't work properly for updating values (as discovered from reading other posts on stackoverflow). I instead have to declare UpdateParameters on my EntityDataSource. Example markup is as follows:
<asp:FormView ID="fv" runat="server" DataSourceID="eds" DataKeyNames="ID">
<EditItemTemplate>
<asp:TabContainer ID="tc" runat="server">
<asp:TabPanel ID="tp" runat="server" HeaderText="Tab 1">
[Code]....
This works great, until a customer is edited and their name is set to nothing (assuming in this case, a null name is allowed). The Name UpdateParameter is set to Null but the ObjectStateEntry is not set to modified for Null properties, even if previously the Entity had a value specified. As long as the name is changed to something other than Null, everything is updated correctly.
I found a workaround by putting the following code in the Updating event of the EntityDataSource.
Dim ose As ObjectStateEntry = context.ObjectStateManager.GetObjectStateEntry(action)
For Each p As Parameter In eds.UpdateParameters
ose.SetModifiedProperty(p.Name)
Next
This makes sure that each property in the UpdateParameters has its state set to modified. It works, but it seems like a hack and I can see it causing problems down the road. Is there anything else I could do?
Specifically we're making our application compatible with the Out Of Process Session State server where all types saved in session must be serializable. Is there a way to see at compile time that any type put into HttpSessionState is marked with the Serializable attribute. Something along the lines of this 'non-valid' code
public static void Put<T>( string key, T value ) where T : IsMarkedWitheSerializableAttribute
{
HttpContext.Current.Session[key] = value;
}
I'd like to pass data from one asp.net page to another. I've seen that using System.Web.Caching.Cache is a good way to accomplish this. I'm wondering if it's a good way to do it and also is there any cleanup or other things I need to keep in mind when you the Cache?
I'm not passing very much, at most two integers.
I have a Web Application where I have one and only one master page and with 100's of diffrent content pages
So to speed up my Web app How can i CACHE the mater oage but not the content page??
Master page loads each time whenever content page is requested..
This thing is possible,I have seen it on many diffrent websites where the Website's Master Page Remains Intact and only the content page changes (best example would be Facebook)
How can i have the same effect in my Web Application?
Is it correct to implement my caching object like this in my controller :
[code]....
And I Use it like this :
[code]....
What are the "optimal" parameters for creating an AppFabric cache when you will be storing session state in the cache? MSDN Cache-Related Commands
Powershell command line:
New-Cache [-CacheName] <String> [-Eviction <String>] [-Expirable <String>] [-Force [<SwitchParameter>]] [-NotificationsEnabled <String>] [-Secondaries <Int32>] [-TimeToLive <Int64>]
[code]...
Since I don't want my sessions to be removed unless the session has been abandoned either via code or Session Timeout...For eviction, I would think "None" and for expireable, I would think False.I have tested and calling Session.Abandon does remove the object from the cache. I have also tested to see if by extending my session, the session object in cache is also extended. This does seem to work the "correct" way.
We have a data driven ASP.NET website which has been written using the standard pattern for data caching (adapted here from MSDN):
public DataTable GetData()
{
string key = "DataTable";
object item = Cache[key] as DataTable;
[code]...
The trouble with this is that the call to GetDataFromSQL() is expensive and the use of the site is fairly high. So every five minutes, when the cache drops, the site becomes very 'sticky' while a lot of requests are waiting for the new data to be retrieved.
What we really want to happen is for the old data to remain current while new data is periodically reloaded in the background. (The fact that someone might therefore see data that is six minutes old isn't a big issue - the data isn't that time sensitive). This is something that I can write myself, but it would be useful to know if any alternative caching engines (I know names like Velocity, memcache) support this kind of scenario. Or am I missing some obvious trick with the standard ASP.NET data cache?
We are using HttpRuntime.Cache API in an ASP.NET to cache data retrieved from a database.
For this particular application, our database queries feature a LOT of parameters, so our cache keys look something like this:
table=table1;param1=somevalue1;param2=somevalue2;param3=somevalue3;param4=somevalue4;param5=somevalue5;param6=somevalue6... etc...
we have so many parameters that the cache key is several hundred characters long. is there a limit to the length of these cache keys? Internally, it is using a dictionary, so theoretically the lookup time should be constant. However, I wonder if we have potential to run into some performance/memory problem.
I have use Nhibernate in my MVC Project by me known, Nhibernate have cache on Session and Object. now, I want use HttpContext.Current.Cache (system.web) for cache data something in project. my code same that have problem, haven't it. and that's right or wrong.
View 2 RepliesI've got a web application that runs of a state server. It looks like soon it may need to distributed and there will be two web servers behind a load balancer.
This works great for session state but my next challenge is Cache
My application leverages heavily of cache. I understand ASP.Net 4.0 will be offering more here but nothing much has been said about the how too.
There are two challenges that I face
1). Each webserver will have its own copy of cache whereas it would be more efficient to put this to a third server the same as session state is put to state server.
2). The real challenge is keeping cache in sync if a simple dataset derived from the database is changed my code dumps that cache item and reloads the cache. That's all well on one webserver but webserver number two wont know to drop that particular cache item and reload it. This could cause some unexpected problems in the application.
For scenario number 2 I could attempt to do some smart coding so server number two knows to dump the cache and reload it.
My guess is someone else has already been here before and there's probably a better implementation approach rather than writing extra code.
Does anyone know how I could achieve the goal of keeping Cache in sync between multiple webservers or even better farm Cache management to another server?
I want to be able to maintain certain objects between application restarts.
To do that, I want to write specific cached items out to disk in Global.asax Application_End() function and re-load them back on Application_Start().
I currently have a cache helper class, which uses the following method to return the cached value:
return HttpContext.Current.Cache[key];
Problem: during Application_End(), HttpContext.Current is null since there is no web request (it's an automated cleanup procedure) - therefore, I cannot access .Cache[] to retrieve any of the items to save to disk.
Question: how can I access the cache items during Application_End()?
I am wondering if there is anyway to grab the html that is generated from an ASP page.I am trying to pull a table from the page,and I foolishly used a static html page so I would not have to be constantly querying the server where this page resides while I tested out my code.The javascript code I wrote to grab to unlabeled table from the page works.Then when I put it into practice with the real page and found that the ASP page does not generate a viewable page with a jquery .get request on the URL.
Is there any way to query the page for the table I need so that the ASP page returns a valid page on request?(I am also limited to using javascript and perl for this,the server where this will reside will not run php and I have no desire to learn ASP.NET to solve this by adding to the issue of proprietary software)
Is there any other way to disable the caching of the page? cause i have a page where in the background image in a DIV that keep on changing for every refresh. the problem is when a post back is trigger the background image wont refresh bec. it is cache in the browser. I've tried using this commands in server side
Response.ExpiresAbsolute = DateTime.Now.AddDays(-1d);
Im building a image gallery which reads file from disk, create thumbnails on the fly and present them to the user. This works good, except the processing takes a bit time.
I then decided to cache the processed images using the ASP .NET Application Cache. When a image is processed I add the byte[] stream to the cache. As far as I know this is beeing saved into the system memory. And this is working perfect, the loading of the page is much faster.
My question is if there are thousands of images which gets cached in the Application Cache, will that affect the server performance in any way?
I have a web form where most of the aspx markup never changes. Only a few controls change from time to time. As I have read through some articles it seems I have to create a custom control to enable partial page caching. Is there another way where I can cache all but a few controls?
View 3 Replies
