WCF / ASMX :: Allow Web Methods To Be Call From Javascript
Jan 8, 2011
i have created a simple WCF webserivce and it is running at http://localhost:2699/WCFServiceClient/myService.svc
with method
[Code]....
i have tested it from a wcftestclient it is working fine.
but when i try to call this method from jquery, it doesn't response.
my jquery code
$.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "http://localhost:2699/WCFServiceClient/myService.svc/GetData", data: { 'value': 5 }, contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8", dataType: "text/xml; charset=utf-8",
success: function (msg) { alert$(msg.d); }, error: function (e) { alert("Unavailable"); } }); }
View 1 Replies
Similar Messages:
Nov 5, 2010
I'm doing a project in asp.net with a web services. My web services and my asp.net project is separate and my asp.net projet have a reference of my web services. i'm using visual studio 2008 framework 3.5 and my service web is in vb.net. i want to call the web methods of my web services in javascript my script manager is declared
<asp:ScriptManager runat="server" ID="scriptManager" EnablePageMethods="true" >
<Services>
<asp:ServiceReference path="http://localhost:2931/ServiceCompas.asmx"/>
</Services>
</asp:ScriptManager>
the javascript fuctions
<script type="text/javascript">
function test() {
alert('test');
Service1.Liste_Carte(Onsucced);
}
function Onsucced(resultat) {
alert('je suis passée');
}
</script>
service1 is the class of my Webservice and i call the function test with my button <input name="btnRecherche" class="btnRechercher" type="button" value="Rechercher un emplacement" onclick="test()" /> the problem is : JavaScript say Service1 is not defined but why .... What's the problem ? I've checked many forums and videos every body did it
sorry for the french variable
View 3 Replies
Mar 20, 2010
At me is user control. I cannot change its property from JavaScript in any way(SectionName) . I can not understand in what a problem?
ratingElement = document.getElementById('ctl00_MainContent_rating_rating_RatingExtender_ClientState');
function handleStateChange() {
if (xmlHttp.readyState == 4) {
[code]...
View 8 Replies
Jan 11, 2011
all My web app is calling webservice which resides in same virtuall directory as web app . In this scenario i have a javascript function like this which works perfectly.
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
Nov 23, 2010
Pinging back to a webservice in ajax from the client keeps the user's session alive, I don't want this to happen. More extensive summary For a website we're developing, we need the client to ping back (in js) to a webservice (ASMX) on the server (IIS7.5). This happens to let the server know that the user is still on the site, and hasn't browsed away to another site. This is as our customer wants to let users lock records, but if they browse away to other sites, then let other people take over those locked records. Perhaps the distinction between the client being on the site but inactive and on another site seems unimportant, but that's kinda irrelevant, I don't get to write the UI spec, I just have to make it work.
My problem is this, the ping stops the user from being timed out on the server through the standard forms authentication timeout mechanism. Not surprising as there is that 30 second ping in the background keeping the session alive. Even though we want to know if the user is still on the site, we want the normal forms authentication timeout mechanism to be honoured. I thought I might be able to fix this by removing the ASP.NET_SessionId and .ASPXAUTH cookies in the XMLHttpRequest that is the server ping, but I can't figure out how to do this. This is how my web service & method are defined:
[WebService(Namespace = "http://tempuri.org/")]
[WebServiceBinding(ConformsTo = WsiProfiles.BasicProfile1_1)]
[ScriptService]
public class PingWS : WebService
{
[WebMethod]
public void SessionActive(string sessionID)
{
// does stuff here
}
This is how I'm calling it in js (request is over HTTPS, :
$.ajax({
type: "POST",
url: "PingWS.asmx/SessionActive",
data: 'sessionID=' + aspSessionID + '}',
beforeSend: function (xhr) {
xhr.setRequestHeader('Cookie', '');
xhr.setRequestHeader('Cookie', 'ASP.NET_SessionId=aaa; .ASPXAUTH=bbb;');
},
dataType: "json"
});
I was trying with the setRequestHeader, but that just appends to the header rather than overwrites the header, and IIS is happy to ignore that junk I added. I'm thinking maybe I should be trying to do this at the server end, someone take PingWS.asmx out of the loop so that it doesn't keep the session active, but I'm not sure how to do this. Although the title of the question is focused on clearing the cookie in the header, I'd be super happy if anyone points out that I'm being really stupid and there is actually a much better way of trying to do what I'm doing.
I'm thinking at this stage maybe I need to add something to the webmethod that says how long this particular page has been inactive, and use that knowledge to timeout manually. That actually sounds pretty easy, so I think I'll do that for now. I'm still convinced that there must be an easy way to do what I originally wanted to do though. Update I'm thinking I'm pretty screwed in terms of cookie manipulation here as both the .ASPXAUTH and ASP.NETSessionId cookie are HttpOnly, which means the browser takes them out of your hands, you can't access them via the document.cookies object. So I would say that leaves me with:
Updating my SessionAlive webmethod to track each request so I can tell how long the user has been sitting idle on a page and timeout if needs be Marking the .asmx page somehow on the server end so that it's taken out of the normal authentication/session tracking flow I know how to do 1. so I'll start there but 2. seems much cleaner to me.
View 3 Replies
Sep 16, 2010
I am beginner in web applications development. I started one little project and host it on source forge "https://homoco.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/homoco". And I started implementing authentication in this application to learn how it works. From my experience people never use out of the box things so I want to implement this stuff alone (like in real world projects). So some questions:
1) Is there any reason to use membership out of the box? To use database table schema, stored procedures etc. that tool generate for developer. I think that this lower control over code and I decided to implement it my self. I don't know if I am right.
2) Is my approach in this demo project good or bad (if someone have time I like to do just a little code review)? I created database based on business rules. Not using database schema that membership provider require. Extend "MembershipProvider" class to satisfy my needs. Implement queries to database myself.
3) Now, this question is a little wired but I have to ask it. If we make custom Membership Provider and do sql queries alone, implement all MembershipProvider class methods ourselves, and in application use Membership.blabla() why is this approach different from not extending MembershipProvider class and putting all this methods in some unique class and call its methods then? I hope that someone understand what I ask here.
I am sorry for three questions, but I really trying to find the best way to implement this feature in my demo project like it is a real world application.
View 3 Replies
Mar 21, 2011
i have a repository class inside my model folder; this repositiry contains many methods , which are called from Action methods in the controllers; so my question is :- if i have a method insidle my model.reporsitory which calls a stored procedure, then can i call it an "action method"? or "action method" expression only apply to controller methods?
View 4 Replies
May 5, 2010
if i have the web application with many pages like add order page, edit order page, and delete order page actually they also interact with the Sql Server 2008 and i also create web service page call Sales_Service.asmx. i know just i need to put something like query into Web Method in Sales_Service.asmx but i have a lot of queries, i don't know which query i should put into it and how the web page call the Sales_Services.asmx
View 2 Replies
Mar 29, 2010
How to call Synchronous service call for combo boxes? As I know Synchronous calls do not create a good user experience because the application is hung waiting for the Web service call to return. Then it is my requirement.
View 1 Replies
Mar 17, 2011
I have a .net app developed in .net 4.0 version. And I implemented an asmx web service in this. Now I want to call one of the webservice method in another classis ASP application java script function.
View 2 Replies
Jan 6, 2011
I was trying to overload two web methods by adding the MessagName descriptor.
[WebMethod(MessageName =
"GetFiles")]
public
[Code]....
But I am getting the following Server Error
Server Error in '/Test.Service' Application.
Service 'TestService' does not conform to WS-I Basic Profile v1.1. Please examine each of the normative statement violations below. To turn off conformance check set the ConformanceClaims property on corresponding WebServiceBinding attribute to WsiClaims.None.R2304: Operation name overloading in a wsdl:portType is disallowed by the Profile. A wsdl:portType in a DESCRIPTION MUST have operations with distinct values for their name attributes. Note that this requirement applies only to the wsdl:operations within a given wsdl:portType. A wsdl:portType may have wsdl:operations with names that are the same as those found in other wsdl:portTypes.
- Operation 'GetFiles' on portType 'TestServiceSoap' from namespace 'http://www.Test.com'.
Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Service 'TestService' does not conform to WS-I Basic Profile v1.1. Please examine each of the normative statement violations below. To turn off conformance check set the ConformanceClaims property on corresponding WebServiceBinding attribute to WsiClaims.None.R2304: Operation name overloading in a wsdl:portType is disallowed by the Profile. A wsdl:portType in a DESCRIPTION MUST have operations with distinct values for their name attributes. Note that this requirement applies only to the wsdl:operations within a given wsdl:portType. A wsdl:portType may have wsdl:operations with names that are the same as those found in other wsdl:portTypes.
- Operation 'GetnFiles' on portType 'TestServiceSoap' from namespace 'http://www.test.com'.
To make service conformant please make sure that all web methods belonging to the same binding have unique names.
Source Error:
[Code]....
Stack Trace:
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
Dec 23, 2010
I have an ASP.NET 3.5 web application that uses ASMX web services that are called synchronously. I want to see if I can call them asynchronously because some of the web methods take a long time to process and I'm concerned that this is affecting scalability.
I found this article that explains how to use Asychronous web methods, from 2002: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa480516.aspx. It says:
For asynchronous requests, during reflection the ASMX handler looks for Web methods with a certain kind of signature that it recognizes as being asynchronous. In particular, it looks for a pair of methods that have the following rules:
There is a BeginXXX and EndXXX Web method where XXX is any string that represents the name of the method you want to expose. The BeginXXX function returns an IAsyncResult interface and takes as its last two input parameters an AsyncCallback, and an object respectively. The EndXXX function takes as its only parameter an IAsyncResult interface. Both must be flagged with the WebMethod attribute. When I create the reference to my web service, I don't see any BeginXXX and EndXXX methods. I only see a XXXAsynch method and the article doesn't mention that method. I've done further research and every other article I've found also mentions the BeginXXX and EndXXX web methods.
View 4 Replies
Oct 17, 2011
I'm teaching myself web services at the moment and I've hit a bit of a stumbling block:-I've implemented a set of services for ordering shutters.These services use an underlying object model consisting of an order and a shutter class.The CreateOrder Service returns an order object and I now want to be able to add shutters to it by calling myOrder.Add(myShutter).
The problem is that the asp.net site I'm using to test it can't "see" the Add method on Order. If I browse the object tree I can see the Order Object but when I drill into it no methods are visible. Is this something to do with the way I've added th reference. edit> I just found the class in the "Reference.vb" file and aded this to it:-
Public Sub Add(ByVal Shutter As Shutter)
End Sub
Just about to test that. edit>I found this site and what he sugests fixes the problem but...I've had to add a local reference to the ObjectModel project to the web site. That seems wrong to me. It's not a web reference so how will this work in the real world. Once I actually deploy the service a project on a remote client isn't going to understand a local reference is it?
View 5 Replies
Apr 1, 2011
On my local machine with the default ASP web server I am able to browse my web service's methods, which have with prompts and an invoke button.But when I deploy this same code to an IIS server and I browse the asmx page I just get a descritpion of the methods.
The web server is running windows 7 and IIS 6.
View 3 Replies
Nov 11, 2010
I am using GetMethods() method to get the list of all the available methods in WCF. But it returns everything, how can I only show the methods that I exposed to client.
[Code]....
How can I filter the methods only to WCF Servicecontracts?
View 3 Replies
Jul 8, 2010
given a url that references an asmx how would i go about displaying all of their method names? if assembly="http://.../something/something.asmx" and i was trying to display the method names of that service what should i do now that i have gotten myself this far? i cant seem to find a solution among the hundreds of examples ive looked at
public TestReflection(string assembly)
{
Assembly testAssembly = Assembly.LoadFrom(assembly);[code]....
View 6 Replies
Feb 2, 2010
[WebMethod(EnableSession = true)]
View 5 Replies
Sep 24, 2010
I need to run 5 different WCF methods but within a transaction. Is this possible in WCF? How can I do this in WCf, if it's possible?
The WCF methods will be called from the web service client, which could be an ASP.Net app or Winfoms app.
View 1 Replies
Apr 1, 2011
What is the best way for authenticating web methods in a web service? Is it right having authentication for every web method and verify user name and password for each web method? Is there a way to authenticate just once not for every web method? something like using sessions and etc?
View 2 Replies
Aug 20, 2010
it may sound a bit newbish question.We have a web service that comunicates with the database and exposes web methods that enables the application to access the database. Each method does only one operation (Insert, Update or Delete). What I need to do is create a transaction that will be consisted of multiple calls to the database, meaning multiple calls of more then one web methods. Can I do that? (I read that if the web method does not throw exception - or ContextUtil.SetAbort() is not called - the transaction will be commited automatically when the web method finishes executing, which I don't want to happen because I want to call another web method in the same transaction, and then manually commit the transaction)
View 2 Replies
Aug 25, 2010
Scenario is, I have a tab container inside which I placed 5 tabs and each tab having 4 Cascaded dropDown.Now for changing the tab page everytime refreshed and calling all 5 parent control dropwdown to fill.But can I prevent it in that manner so that for changing the tab only that parent webmethods will be called to populate.In page load itself it will call only the active tab parent Cascading dropdown web method.
View 8 Replies
Sep 17, 2010
INFO: IIS 7+ .NET 4.0
I have a webservice with a webmethod
[Code]....
I call it with
[Code]....
But the "InsertUpdateCategory" only execute the last part of the call specified (the one with Id 6), the first don't get executed
View 1 Replies
Apr 9, 2010
I have a WCF service with two operations GetLoan and GetBalance
I want GetBalance to be exposed to all the clients but GetBalance tobe exposed to specific clients
How can this be done?
View 4 Replies
Oct 1, 2010
I am using an AJAX dropdownlist control with two dropdownlist. Instead of using a webservice to populate the data, I used the pagemethod to populate. My problem is the second droplist won't populate. I get a server error, 500 in the droplist. The first droplist populates fine.
BUT here's the real kicker. If I reverse the order of the public static function such that GetHelloList2 comes BEFORE GetHelloList1 in the code, then the GetHelloList2 works ...... it just seems like it is only firing one pagemethod event and allowign only one.
[URL]
View 5 Replies
Mar 23, 2010
I have some WCF services that I want to return in different formats based on a querystring param. For example, [URL], [URL], [URL], etc... This would make it so that many different types of clients could consume the services whichever way was easiest for them, such as binary for a .NET client and json for an ajax or Flex client.
What I'm thinking is that I can have the WCF web methods return their .NET business objects and not worry about the output mode and then have a behavior that hooks in after returning from the web method which checks the querystring for this param and either:
1. Continues returning the business objects if the mode is dotnet.
2. Converts the business objects to xml if the mode is xml and returns a string of xml.
3. Converts the business objects to json if the mode is json and returns a string of json.
View 2 Replies
