I have a ProductService class that defines the following methods. It doesn't work, as I will explain further below, but it gives the compile error CS1061: 'ProductService' does not contain a definition for 'GetByid'. Unless I've dropped the ball on method overloading, why is the public overload of GetById not seen by other code?
When I compile, this error message comes up: 'Framework.ImportControllerFactory.CreateController(System.Web.Routing.RequestContext, string)': no suitable method found to override I have navigated to the definition in the DefaultControllerFactory, and it's (snipping the comments):
I am trying to create my own membership system. Therefore I created my own membershipuser class and membership provider class. But I am getting the following error on Createuser method of My membership provider class; no suitable method found to override
This is how my CreateUser method looks like:
public override MyMembershipUser CreateUser(string username, string password, string email, string status, int registerd_on, out UserCreationStatus creation_status)
I have applied your code to print all pages of grid view, and it is throwing an exception that grid view control must be placed in Form tag with runat=server, my gridview control is already in Form tag with runat=server,
Then I tried to override VerifyRenderingInServerForm even as you explianed, i am using asp.net 2.0, when i write
publicoverridevoid VerifyRenderingInServerForm(Control control) { /* Verifies that the control is rendered */ }
It gives an error that no suitable method found for override...
I've been scratching my head for what seems like ages. I'm sure its really simple to fix but I can't see it.
I have a class in App_Code that uses a bit of Linq.
var siteMap = SiteMapWrapper.BuildSiteMap(true); var currentTopLevelParent = siteMap.Single(s => s.IsActive); if (currentTopLevelParent != null)
I've developed this locally and all works fine. When I transfer to IIS hosting the same class fails to compile. I receive:
does not contain a definition for 'Single' and no extension method 'Single' accepting a first argument of type 'SiteMapWrapper' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
I confirmed that the virtual dir is running .NET 2.0 as it should. I also confirmed that the correct assemblies are being loaded in the web.config.
I'm getting this error below, but it is in Admin pages so it will never be a potentially dangerous request. Is there a way to override it?
A potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the client (ctl00$MainContentPlaceholder$FormView1$FCKeditor7="<p><p><...").
Description: Request Validation has detected a potentially dangerous client input value, and processing of the request has been aborted. This value may indicate an attempt to compromise the security of your application, such as a cross-site scripting attack. You can disable request validation by setting validateRequest=false in the Page directive or in the configuration section. However, it is strongly recommended that your application explicitly check all inputs in this case.
Exception Details: System.Web.HttpRequestValidationException: A potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the client (ctl00$MainContentPlaceholder$FormView1$FCKeditor7="<p><p><...").
I have created a custom control as can be seen below. this custom control will be used by alot of web form. The question is how to override CheckAllData method in each webform, so i can write my own checking in each webform.
Am running asp.net application.I try to build sample site using gridview.I got compilation error as below,CS1061: 'ASP.gridedit_aspx' does not contain a definition for 'GridView1_RowUpdated' and no extension method 'GridView1_RowUpdated' accepting a first argument of type 'ASP.gridedit_aspx' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)
Line 13: <asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" DataKeyNames="ID" Line 14: AutoGenerateColumns="False" Line 15: DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1"
CS0016: Could not write to output file 'c:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Files oot7529765bd6c35794App_Web_uclogin.ascx.5a9fc98b.zqr8lwaw.dll' -- 'Access is denied. '
I am new to ASP.NET MVC and using ASP.NET MVC 2 with XVal. I am not using DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider and instead using NHibernateValidatorNHibernateValidator attributes. I would like to know that, when failing to provide a value for a non nullable type, how can i override the vanilla messages.There are actually two scenarios for non nullable type with model binding failure
1) when the data the user entered isn't compatible with the data type (for example, typing in "abc" for an integer field). The default message for this is: "The value [AttemptedValue] is not valid for [Property]."
2) when the user did not enter any data for a field which is not nullable (for example, an integer field). The default message for this is: "A value is required."
I know that the [Required] validator from DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider is treated specially during model binding failures on non-nullable types, so that you're not stuck with the vanilla message 'A value is required.'.
Also The DefaultModelBinder uses [Required] attribute for the second scenario only.Since I am not using DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider, I can not use [Required].Bearing in mind that I am already doing all the attribute validation and other business rules validation in my domain layer using XVal , What are my options here?
- Allow the model binding validation errors to occur, and then ignore and remove them from ModelState in my action method and refill it with my custom validation errors?
- Derive a custom model binder from and defaultmodel binder and override the onModeUpdated method ignoring all the validation?
I am getting a compilation error with ReportServer.Asp.net 2.0 ReportServer 8.0Works fine on my Dev box and the Test Server.However on Production I get the following error....
Using VS2008 SP1, .NET 3.5 SP1, C# Web Application Project
As we know, Web Application Projects (unlike Web Site Projects) compile the entire site for deployment. We have discovered a situation where the visual studio compiler doesnt catch and error. Then when we deploy the dll to the website (or even just run it in the built in web server) it catches the error and displays it as a "compilation" error during runtime. This is obviously disturbing. Let me explain the error:
Take a single web page in a new C# web app project, such as the default.aspx. Add a checkbox. Create an event handler for the checked changed event. Note that it modifies the .aspx file to add oncheckedchanged="yourmethodhere" in the checkbox item. Compile and everything is fine.
Now change the name of the method in the .aspx file, say for yourmethodhere to yourmethodhere_1 and compile again. Note you havent change the code behind, so you SHOULD get a compile error. But you dont. Now if you deploy or debug it, you will get a compilation error during runtime.
Note: If you do exactly the same thing in a web SITE project, the validation compile that it does when you choose to "build" the project DOES catch this error. In other words, only c# web APPLICATION projects have this problem.
This line fails with an "unhandled compile" error when I run the program and enter "storemanager/edit/388" in the address bar. I have gone over every bit of code I can find and it compares perfectly to the tutorial.
Everytime I compile my asp .net project it states the following:
'Sessions' does not contain a definition for 'Select'.
In the page this happens on if I change something put it back and save and re-compile it tends to go ok, but at the moment it is happening every time. It does contain a definition for Select I can type it in plus the page does not show an error where this code is and works when it does compile ok?
I am creating an Asp.net web site which will support dynamic data. When I am creating a dynamic web site from Scratch (from template in VS) all is working fine. But when I am trying to add dynamic entity (.edmx) file and running the application I am getting following error
"The method 'Skip' is only supported for sorted input in LINQ to Entities. The method 'OrderBy' must be called before the method 'Skip'. "
I don't know what I'm making wrong.I have a submit button, and on click it should execute the funktion in the code behind, but I get the error that the funktion is undefined.this is my code in the .aspx webform:
I have seen 2 methods to handle error in project. One is using try catch in every method and another is using custom page and error log file .I know both method. Which one is the best method?
As that title says my aspx page shows a compile error on the @Page directive that says "ASP.NET runtime error: Cannot load file or Assembly 'Microsoft.SqlServer.BatchParser' or one of it's dependencies". The project compiles with our error and it runs with no problem. The only real problem that this causes it that the intellisense for anything other than simple HTML is broken so I can't type asp:Controlname and have intellisense show me a the list of items or properties in a control. I get a green squiggly line under all the asp tags saying "Unrecognized tag prefix or device filter 'asp'". This project doesn't directly use SQL SMO but it does reference a project that does. However, I removed that reference and the problem still doesn't go away. I have installed on my development machine the full SQL client and for both SQL 2005 and 2008 (including the SDK) from the Developer editions of both versions. This was not a problem on VS2005 and the project compiles without error in VS2010 too.
I've tried to override error message when input incorrect data type in input field on HTML form.For example I have the model like this.
public class Person { public string FirstName {get;set;} public int Age {get;set;} }
For view, I put text input for Age to get it value.When type some string in Age text box like 'test' and press submit button. I got this error message ,The value 'xxx' is not valid for AgeHowever, I want to change this message and try many way. There 's nothing effect this message value.
I have a base class that has a specific parameterized ctor. I use it as the base for several concretes. These concretes have zero need to alter ctor behaviour, and thusly, I see no reason to define one. However, as you may guess, I get the "class has no ctor that takes 0 arguments" error on compile. Is there a keyword I can place on the base class ctor that will prevent the error? Or maybe another way around it? This is indenpendant on any ioc usage by the way. It's merely a set of objects that MUST take an argument, and it so happens, the base class handles everything that it needs. The derivations simply no reason to re-declare the ctor, just to pass it on to base();
