I have a gridview with several columns, 3 of which I'd like to sort. The source for the data is held in the session.
protected void MyGridHistorySort(object sender, GridViewSortEventArgs e)
{
var TheColumn = (e.SortExpression).ToString();
TheDataHistory = (List<ViewDataHistoryModel>)Session["SessionDataHistory"];
var test = "data.DataDate";
var NewDataSource = from data in TheDataHistory
orderby test
select data;
MyGridHistory.DataSource = NewDataSource;
MyGridHistory.DataBind();
DataDate is a valid column in the list but the orderby statement doesn't work. Ideally, I'd like it to sort with the variable TheColumn by writing something like test = "data."+TheColum; and then add a sort direction based on a boolean. I looked at the OrderBy extension method NewDataSource.OrderBy(test); but that doesn't work either.
Loading data into gridview, retieving data using linq,I have a method that accepts two paramters that would sort specific field and return the object to the gridviewi.e.
passing into the method GenerateData(string sortExp, string sortDir) sortExp = "Name", sortDir = "descending" linq query://works
I have written a page which uses Linq to query the database and bind the resulting IQueryable to a datagrid. I have a partial class which contains extra properties which derive their values based on other values brought in from the database.
Sorting works fine on fields that are actually in the database but not for the derived fields. When I attempt to sort on such a field I get an error saying "The member 'Trip.Difference' has no supported translation to SQL. how to allow sorting on these derived fields?
I have a gridview which is having coloumns Company name, Industry type, country, employees, revenue. i want to add dropdown at the top of each coloumn so that if user select industry as agriculture, all agriculture industry rows may be sorted, and same for other dropdown also.. i it may be possible,
Just spent about 8 hours googling and looking through this forum for a solution on how to make sure that I can dynamically sort. Here is the situation.
I have 1 Gridview that displays 10 different scenarios based on what button is clicked.
I am also returning only top 10 records. I am doing all of the data binding pragmatically. So I have BoundFields, HyperLinkFields etc.
I also want to sort some records. When I change DataSource SQL statement the gridview somehow remembers what the last sort value was and it errors out saying that value "x" cannot be sorted because it does not exists.
Here I get an error that says that the data source does not support sorting? Doesnt it say gridview1.allowsorting = false;
I also tried gridview1.sort("", SortDirection.Ascending); This does nothin... except query my database one more time because i have a onSorting event that looks like this:
[Code]....
Here is an example of just one of those SLQ statements inside GetSQLQuery:
string strCondition = "FirstName=='abc'" from p in People.Where(strCondition) select p
In our architecture we are usign both Linq-Sql as well Linq-Entity. So please give some thoughts wehter it is possible or not and is there any way to perform this?
If there's a better way to accomplish what I'm attempting I haven't found it yet. That being said, I have create a gridview like the one here,[URL]And with some minor tweaking it working great for all my fields, checkboxes, etc. The issue is my last column is another gridview, and I'd like it to function the same. that is, a dynamic gridview inside of a dynamic gridview. I get that I have to create it initially with null values or it won't show up. I guess what I'm having trouble figuring out is instead of go will null data in the parent gridviews column, do I place my blank child gridview. Do I create and bind the child gridview first, or second. Generally just not sure. Also, as far as storing the data from the child gridview goes, will each one need it's own datatable?
I have a gridview with data. I want a button which is not part of the gridview. Then if I press a button the gridview is sorted by two colums. i.e column1 ascending column2 descending.
I am not looking to work with a Sqldatasource as I use a data access layer. So the sort would have to be from a datatable and databind or directly with the gridview.
how to indicate which columns I would like returned at run-time from a LINQ To SQL statement?I am allowing the user to select items in a checkboxlist representing the columns they would like displayed in a gridview that is bound to the results of a L2S query.I am able to dynamically generate the WHERE clause but am unable to do the same with the SELECT piece. Here is a sample:
var query = from log in context.Logs select log; query = query.Where(Log => Log.Timestamp > CustomReport.ReportDateStart); query = query.Where(Log => Log.Timestamp < CustomReport.ReportDateEnd);
I have a table created on the fly. The table structure is dynamic.
This is the table structure generated by the end of year 2010
DealerCode, 201010, 201011, 201012
This is the table structure generated by the end of Jan 2011
DealerCode, 201011, 201012, 201101
What I need to do is selecting all data and then bind it into a gridview
To build a LINQ query, we need to drag the table into dbml file first. As we don't know how the table look like, can we add it in dynamically? Are there any other solutions?
I am writing a function in which i generate autocode in specific format i want to make this function generalize so that i send tablename and columnname parameter and function return the next code. I am using linq to sql with MVC e.g. i want to make table name and column name dyanamic
I'm trying to do something that on the face of it is very simple.
If I have 5 text boxes, and 1 of them is blank, I want to exclude that textbox from the query, rather than searching for where a field is blank.
I've tried to do a bit of research into dynamic linq queries, but have come up empty handed, or what I've found doesn't seem to quite answer my question.
Is it possible to generate dynamic LINQ statements? I need to be able to build conditional "WHERE" clauses for some of my LINQ statements. I don't want to write a giant block of code to hand every possible combination of filters, sorts and groups. I found a article online that outlines how to use string based where clauses here. Does LINQ in framework 4.0 no longer support this? Every example I've found has giant walls of virtually unreadable, must likely unmaintainable code.
I'm looking for a way to sort the rows of a datatable without setting the DefaultView.Sort to a specific column. I have a datatable in session that users can add records to. I want them to be able to sort the data by clicking on a button. But new records added after that need to show up at the bottom of the list until the sort button is clicked again.
I have a page with filters and accordingly to what the user selects, it has to generate a query. I'm using this code:
[code]....
However Linq-To-Sharepoint doesn't convert most of this to CAML and the list I'm querying has more than 50000 items. It takes about 4-8 seconds to retrieve the items which is not acceptable.
I've been trying to generate a dynamic query but so far I haven't been able to get it to work.
With AND and OR operations to generate the query I could put all those conditions on code and increase performance.
I have one sproc with Dynamic Temp Table. Sproc returns dynamic temp table rows and when I drag and drop the sporc on to Linq to Sql Designer I am not getting Return Type as "(Auto-generated Type).
I have this query for getting data through Entity Framework, which works today. Thing is, i want to create the query dynamically, i.e build it up in blocks, but i can't figure out how exactly to do it. I believe if i can somehow save one of the values that i retrieve in the beginning i can do it, but now i retrieve it twice (probably a bit slow as well? Unless the compiler fixes it before quering). Makes sense? Here is the LINQ:
is it possible to make a Linq query dynamic in the following pseduo code (to show what I'm trying to do)
[Code]....
where a2 and a3 and a4 are being populated from user controls and only one will apply. So query is done by state, zip or by city, but not by more than one, so the other two would be null. So the operator is really "OR" but I haven't found anything on a "or" or "whereOr" operator.
I have two text boxes for the user to enter UserName & First Name, both these fields are optional and not mandatory to fill.
once the user presses the Search button, i execute the following query to fetch matching records.
[Code]....
The problem is, in cases where User leaves both the textbox or one of the textbox empty/blank, in that case that particular field should be removed from where clause.
More like if something is entered then search for that particular record otherwise search for all the records.
I'm using Dynamic Data and LINQ to SQL for some admin pages on a .NET 3.5 web app. All my admin tables have a CreatedBy, CreatedDate, UpdatedBy, and UpdatedDate.I'm looking for a way to inject the setting of these properties before the objects are inserted and updated.
I've seen an object_inserting hook if you have a linq to sql datasource in the web form, but I'm using dynamic data...is there an easy way to generically set that? And I've also looked at modifying each of the partial classes for my admin objects, but the closest hook I see is to implement the OnValidate method with the Insert action.
