ó Not Allowed In Xml File But Allowed In .net Resource File?
Jan 11, 2011
i'm parsing a few .net resource files (.resx).In that, i have this piece of data:informaciónThis works in my .net app, but when i try to load this file in my xml document
XDocument xmlDoc = XDocument.Parse(s);
i get this error:Reference to undeclared entity 'oacute'.
I get the Subqueries are not allowed in this context. Only scalar expressions are allowed - i am going to run into this quite alot so I figuredI'd better see what the right way is!
When I re/build my ASP.NET website I do not receive any errors. However when I PUBLISH the site, it gives me a 'Circular file references are not allowed.' error.
I read a little on the web about this, and it provided a batch='false' option, which I tried and does nothing.
The page, has a master page, which may call on the same control twice; however, this control does not refer back to anything
I want to limit the allowed uploaded file types to images, pdfs, and docs. What is the recommended way to approach this?I assume checking the file extension alone is not enough, since an attacked can change the file extension as he wishes.I also thought about checking against MIME Type using PostedFile.ContentType.I still don't know if this is adding any further functionality than checking against file extensions alone, and if an attacker have and ability to change this information easily.This is basically for a course management system for students to upload assignments and teachers to download and view them.
I have a class library and was to add a resource file to it to support both English and Spanish. Any tips as how I can do this? The language will be dictated by the user visiting the site. Would like to have to only load each resource file once and cache or set in static variable and avoid any overheads.
How can allow this page to run on IIS server...It does not work on localhost..... it works when I open it directly... It gives the error "it is not allowed...!
The working Example..! I want this.. ""
the Erorr:
<html> <head> <script src="jquery.js" type="text/javascript" language="javascript"></script> <script src="jquery.xml2json.js" type="text/javascript" language="javascript"></script> <script> function sayHello(msg) { alert(msg); } function dcSetRate(obj,value){ document.getElementById(obj).value = value.toFixed(4); } function dcSet(obj,value){ document.getElementById(obj).value = value; }......
As far i think # is not allowed in valid url but i have to allow this in my application..very first step i have taken in reg expression i allowed # ...but wen user click that inspite of valid url i am getting crash
i am getting the error below while sending email in aps.net 3.5.
Mailbox name not allowed. The server response was: sorry, Authentication failed or timed out. Please do get messages first to authenticate yourself.(#4.4.3) in asp.net while sending mail
Ultimate goal is to provide protection against programming mistakes. I want to make sure that every page in a portion of my web application has a role specified like below. Ideally I would like to programatically check all requests coming in ( think IHttpModule ) and make sure that the page being requested has a role specified.
I can't seem to find how to get programatic access to the allowed roles.
I am taking over the code of another person. This person is allowing double clicks to occur on RadGrids (Telerik Control).. I personally hate the idea of allowing double clicks in a web application. I tihnk it is not natural.
Is there any good argument against double clicks in web apps? Or am I wrong and double clicks in web apps are good for some reason?
OK, I've seen a lot of ambiguous errors, but this was is in the top 20 or so. I have a RenderPartial that looks like this:
[Code]....
When the view loads, I get this error:
The relative virtual path '~Areas/User/Views/Shared/ProjectStats.ascx' is not allowed here. That really helps. Why isn't it allowed there? What's wrong with it? Just above it I have other PartialRender calls that work without a problem. They're created exactly the same way. Here's another:
[Code]....
This works fine. I thought maybe it was due to accessing a view from another Area, but I added a partial view to that Area's folder and it still didn't work.
When I try to depoly my web project then it throws an exception as "Circular References not allowed" Those are two same exceptions for my template.master and Forummaster.master file. When I build my code then very rarely it throws an exception but I can not deploy my web project because for deployment everytime it throws same exceptions at the time of building web project for deployment.
In our web application we need to keep various company's settings. For eg "DiamondProdRefIDCaption","Shippingpickup","ZipCodeCaption","DefaultCountry","AllowToEditInvoice", etcThese settings are different for various companies and are placed in web.config as key-value pair.Initially, we have tried do simplify this process by adding a company_settings table in the DB so as to allow us to add companies on the fly. However, this method makes it very difficult to add a new setting
I have a textbox and button in my child page it inherits a master page.the textbox should allow to key in only alphabets,comma,dot,space,single quote. And also consecutive comma dot single quote should not be allowed to key in. first and last character should be alphabets.
I have a javascript but it does not check for consecutive comma,dot,single quote...
I have been spinning my wheels now for awhile trying to figure out how I can possibly unit test the following code. At first I was going to use Moq to mock everything, but it doesn't include the ability to mock sealed classes. I know I need to abstract out the calls to the implementation (Configuration) using an interface? but I can't seem to make it all work right. The code can be altered but I would prefer to keep the methods static, unless you can present a compelling reason not to. You can add interfaces or create whatever seams are needed. Also, GetConnStringByName() can be refactored to return the relevant string instead of a ConnectionStringSettings. Thoughts?
namespace Stackoverflow.Rocks { /// <summary> /// Utility class for progmattically selecting values from the Web.config file. /// </summary> public class WebConfigStrings { //private static Configuration myConfiguration = System.Web.Configuration.WebConfigurationManager.OpenWebConfiguration(HttpContext.Current.Request.ApplicationPath); /// <summary> /// Retrieves the desired connection string value based upon the target name. /// </summary> /// <param name="connectionStringName">The target connection string referenced in the Web.Config</param> /// <returns>The value specified in the Web.Config by your connectionStringName</returns> public static ConnectionStringSettings GetConnStringByName(string connectionStringName) { Configuration rootWebConfig = System.Web.Configuration.WebConfigurationManager.OpenWebConfiguration(HttpContext.Current.Request.ApplicationPath); ConnectionStringSettings connString; connString = rootWebConfig.ConnectionStrings.ConnectionStrings[connectionStringName]; return connString; } /// <summary> /// Retrieves the desired application string value based upon the target name. /// </summary> /// <param name="applicationStringName">The target application string referenced in the Web.Config</param> /// <returns>The value specified in the Web.Config by your applicationStringName</returns> public static string GetAppStringByName(string applicationStringName) { string appString = ""; appString = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings[applicationStringName]; return appString; } } }