Specify CLR Namespace Of Auto-generated Web Service Proxy Class?
Sep 10, 2010
When you add a Web Reference in an ASP.NET project in Visual Studio the web application's root namespace is always added.So, if I add a web reference called MyWebService and the default namespace of the application is MyApplication the namespace of the generated proxy class will be: MyApplication.MyWebService.
However, I want to be able to specify which namespace to use for the generated class (to skip the default namespace and have the namespace be called simply MyWebService).Is using wsdl.exe through the command line the only way of accomplishing this? I don't want to manually edit the generated class (since it can get re-generated).
When you create and use a Web Service proxy class in the ASP.Net framework, the class ultimately inherits from Component, which implements IDisposable. I have never seen one example online where people dispose of a web proxy class, but was wondering if it really needs to be done. When I call only one method, I normally wrap it in a using statement, but if I have a need to call it several times throughout the page, I might end up using the same instance, and just wondered what the ramifications are of not disposing it.
i'm worried about doing this since my changes will be overwritten when the dbml file is auto generated again (as they often are).
i'm thinking of doing a partial class and writing out the same properties to annotate them, but worried that it will complain about duplicates, and the reason i can't even experiment brings me to the second part of my questions...
... that, the expandable arrow on my dbml file listing is missing, right clicking and selecting "View Code" just displays an empty partial class as below...
Partial Class FPDataContext End Class
I'm using VS2010 RC and am just developing an MVC 2.0 app where i want to be able to use the UI Annotations such as [UIHint("RelativeDateTime")]
edit:
here is my VB version edit as an example...
Imports System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations <MetadataType(GetType(CommentMetaData))> _ Partial Public Class Comment End Class Public Class CommentMetaData <UIHint("PostedSince")> _ Public Property DateAdded() As DateTime End Class
I have a "database explorer" page that is desgined to be pointed to an unknown database and allow users to browse the data, so it basically uses the SQL system tables to develop its queries and pull in data to tables using auto-generate columns.The problem that I have is that I would like certain types of columns to have certain formats and I'm wondering the best way to go about it. I could format the column in code in the RowDataBound event I assume, but I'm wondering if there some better standard way to do this? Is there a setting of any kind that I can use? For example I want all of the datetime fields to be formated for short date, like {0:d}, I want decimal fields to have 4 decimal places, etc.
i write a simple webservice code in asp.net when i build the service and run the service it is working fine. when i try to access the webservice it is giving some problem , problem means i am not getting that method (webservice method). After completing writing the webserivce i take a asp.net page (.aspx) and in solution explorer i add a webservices and it is added successfully. but when i adding namespace it is not getting the service name ( i not able to add the namespace of websercice
I have a Solution in which I have A WCF Service web site project which then hosts two separate WCF Service Libraries (each in their own project). One of the Web Services is a Client to the other. When I click the ClientService and select Add Service Reference, it all adds properly, but when I go to build it, I get this error in the reference.cs (the generated file).The type name 'HostWCFService' does not exist in the type 'ClientService.ClientService' C:Users...Reference.cs I don't want it to create a ClientService.HostWCFService namespace, I want to be able to use the HostWCFService as its own namespace. I believe I've had this setup working before at one point; that is, I had this arrangement working before, but am not sure now if the host service was in a sub namespace of the project.
When I do server side soap service programming, I create proxy classes first using some xsd schemas.
Xsd schemas are already defined by another company.my problem is these schemas have master xsds and child xsds which means on master xsds there are references to child xsds.
In this case I have 2 different questions.
1) Is it possible to use xsd schemas directly to build soap service without generating proxy classes.
2) If it is not possible, I am using vs command prompt by typing xsd /c /l:vb nameofmasterfile.xsd
but while there references to child xsds, I am getting an error msg. thats why I had to flatten these xsds in the past. Is it possible to generate all classes in one shot. any external program also ok.
i am trying to follow this: http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?page=2&cid=E8E8CE970C6AB073
but i am having trouble with the first bit. i have built the pages, but i cant work out the whole proxy class bit. I cant find wsdl.exe or operate it... ive downloaded sdk's and still cant find it..
i have xp home, so does this mean no iis?
is there another way to achieve what the tutorial is doing without having to build a proxy class etc?
I know that Visual Studio auto-generates a lot of code when you develop a web application. How do I know which code is auto-generated? I do a lot of code editing and tweaking by hand (Im not a WYSIWYG guy), and I want to make sure I'm not editing something thats going to get over-written later by the auto-generator!
I'm trying to call a Soap Web Service, and I need to pass an Address Object to the Server. I can pass an existing address.Id to update an existing address, or if I leave the address.Id empty, it should be saved as a new Address. The Problem is that the Id is of long type, and it allways has a value of 0.And this makes problems for the server, because even if the Id=0, the Server Side function will take the Address as Existing one, and it will start to search on the Database for an Address with Id=0. Of course there is no such address, and it throws an error. When I try to call the Web Service with WebService Studio or SoapUI, and I delete the id manually, then It works as expected, as soon as I put <address id="0"> then it returns me an error - Address with Id=0 not found.So the question is, how to change the webservice definitions, or the proxy classes so that it does not generates this id="0" at all?P.S. I cannot change the Server Side method, it would have been the easiest solution, but unfortunatelly is not possible.
I used the auto generated models to use my existing SQL server in a new website.in some forms I use rich text editor (CKEditor) so I added [ValidateInput(false)] to those post back actions. but that is a bad solution 'caus I have lost of other from items which needs validation. I came across a potential solution to that using [AllowHtml] which I need to add to the model properties. I tried that:
[Code]....
but that is an error "type or namespace couldn't be found.."any ideas about where the [AllowHtml] attribute should be?
In a database table, let's say I have a non-null field named "Description" with a default value of (''). If I drag this table onto the .dbml view in Visual Studio and click on the Description field, the properties will indicate that the Auto Generated Value is set to false, thus ignoring my default value of (''). This is fine, as long as I always explicitly set a value for Description when I perform an insert/update, but I ran into a problem today when I tried to do an insert without specifying a value for Description: Cannot insert NULL value into Description. The default value I set for the field was being ignored. To try and fix this error, I went back into the .dbml and set Auto Generated Value to true, and tried again - no error this time, but the data I tried to insert was ignored, and the default value, (''), was inserted instead. I do not want to explicitly set every field to a default value programmatically when I perform inserts. Is there any other way to resolve this issue other than making the fields nullable?
I'm creating a column through ItemTemplate in my gridview, how can i adjust it to be my last column, unfortunately .net is making this column to be the first in grid view i want it to be the last column. The rest of the columns are automatically created by this code.
Split off from http://forums.asp.net/t/1654957.aspx/1?Validation+in+MVC+using+JQUERY+OR+JAVASCRIPT. Start new questions in a new thread.
Hey thanks a lot!!!
The following link worked fine http://geekswithblogs.net/stun/archive/2010/02/27/asp.net-mvc-client-side-validation-summary-with-jquery-validation-plugin.aspx
However, I am Having one other problem. There are four solutions in my project. All my controllers and Views are declared in the Presentation solution. There are auto-generated class files in the solution named DomainModel. So, my views inherits these auto-generated files from the DomainModel solution. The problem is that I can't modify these auto-generated files by using Data Annotations in there. Hence, cannot accomplish my validation. I tried by creating partial classes but no result. By creating a class file in my Presentation solution and then binding it with the view the validation works fine. But my views are binded with the class files (auto-generated) from the DomainModel.
Can you/anyone help me work it out so, that validation works with those classes without modifying it.
