Then I found this solution online to handle the error if someone tries to upload file bigger than 10 MB
[Code]....
This works great on my local machine but when I try to run it from Production server , It still shows me the "Internet Expolrer cannot display webpage". I just want to display a nice message to user when He tries to upload file larger than 10 MB.
I am using pooling in my sql server application of min pool size 5. But some time i am getting the error
Exception: System.InvalidOperationException Message: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached. Source:
i think the issue coming in case of data reader .I have set try/catch/finally for closing connection for both execueNonQuery and ExecuteScalar, but not set for execute reader. how to catch the execption coming under execute reader.
I have created web application and wrote single connection string in a class file hosted at live server.
I'm getting error sometime "Connection pool size exceeded".
My other applications are hosted on same server [server1] and all application hit same server [server2] having database. Is it mean, my every application using same connnection pool because of same IIS or same memory and encountered error said "Connection pool size exceeded".
How can I get rid of this problem ? (I have already tried manipulation of pool size)
I am working on a web application now a days, when i have uploaded it on server it creates exception message ,"connection Pool max size", but i have opened and closed connection properly.
We have been getting this Oracle connection pool exception a lot recently for our ASP.NET website. This is the detailed exception message:
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
This is our connection string
User ID=user1;password=password1;DATA SOURCE=Datasource1
how to set max pool size to 1 so that I can debug it on my local?
what is the recommended pool size for a website with 10,000 users?
I get the below error when i access my ASP.NET 2.0 application when it trties to connect to SQL server.
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
How to solve this error?
Where is the max pool size set and how to change it?
I am using PageMethods to send a few parameters to a webmethod in my codebehind. The method runs a stored procedure and uses the results to build a string that I am returning from the method.
Everything works fine until I try to include too many records in my results..
Once the results I am trying to return hit about 70K, the pagemethod times out even though it is taking about 1 second to process the results.
Is there a buffer limit or limit on the size or results returned from a pagemethod and if so, where can this be set or changed?
Is there a setting in the web.config somewhere to handle pagemethod buffer size?
is there a way to increase the maximum 10 GB size limit of SQL Express? http://www.microsoft.com/express/Database/http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
In my asp .net project, my main page receives URL as a parameter I need to download internally and then process it. I know that I can use WebClient's DownloadFile method however I want to avoid malicious user from giving a url to a huge file, which will unnecessary traffic from my server. In order to avoid this, I'm looking for a solution to set maximum file size that DownloadFile will download.
I have developed an application using Winforms that connects to the Database using WCF services. All the services are working fine except those that return huge amount of data from the database. I did increase the size of the maxReceivedMessageSize and maxBufferPoolSize to 9223372036854775807 in the Config file of the client which I believe is the largest but I still get the error message "The maximum message size quota for incoming messages (65536) has been exceeded". I am using visual studio 2010 with VB.Net programming language on the client side and C sharp on the server.
I also goggled but the nearest solution I got was to increase the maxReceivedMessageSize which I did but in vain. Below is the detail of the error: "The server did not provide a meaningful reply; this might be caused by a contract mismatch, a premature session shutdown or an internal server error.
I have noticed how editing the web.config file in an application folder causes that application pool to recycle and pick up the changes.
How does IIS achieve this and is it possible to extend this functionality for another config file? Or is this dependency hard-coded somewhere? This is related to the possiblity of deploying configuration changes to a web server without having to edit the web.config, which is usually maintained by a different team.
Note that I don't want to manually invoke this recycle event, but have it work in the same way as with web.config. I'm aware that I could simply add these settings to web.config, but that's not what I've been asked to do.
I couldnt help but notice that if you have a FileUpload-control, and then try to upload a file thats bigger(in bytes) then the allowed maxiumsize, then the site crashes or some wierd "Connection problem"-page shows up, atleast for me in Firefox...
So my question is simply...is this just for me?..and if not, how do I fix this the best way?...cause the current "crash-page" aint a nice way of handeling the problem in my opinion...whould be much better to actually just show some custom-page that lets the user know that thier trying to upload a file thats way to big..
I am asking this out of curiosity. I got the following error when this is not enabledAn attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect formatThis is related to loading a class library but this particular class library is compiled for any CPU with VS2010 64 bit running on Win7 64-bit
I am working on Windows 2008 Server (64-bit). I want to execute my web service as a pure (native) 64 bit service. All the assemblies referred by the web service are currently built as 'AnyCPU'.
When I publish the web service to IIS, and configure it to run under a 64-bit application pool (by setting 'Enable 32-Bit applications' = false), attempt to access the web service gives the error 'Application is not a valid Win32 application' because of a BadImageFormatException. This appears to indicate that somewhere an attempt is being made to load a 32 bit assembly. But the error does not provide any information about which assembly was found with an incorrect format. I have checked all the assemblies in the bin folder using corflags and they are bit agnostic.
I tried using the fusion log and identified a bind failure with VJSharpCodeProvider (though my service is coded only in C#). The runtime is not able to find the VJSharpCodeProvider because it is present in the GAC as an x86 assembly.
Is VJSharpCodeProvider the cause of the problem? I guess this is not the case because of the type of exception (BadImageFormatException). If I am correct, then how do I identify the assembly that is causing this exception?
If I change the property 'Enable 32-Bit applications' to true for the application pool, the service works fine, but I need native 64-bit execution.
We recently installed a patch to one of our test servers (yes it was a very old patch for a very old version of .net). After installing, it seems the ASPNET account no longer has the same privileges that it once did. I get the following error in the application logs.
"aspnet_wp.exe could not be launched because the username and/or password supplied in the processModel section of the config file are invalid."
I have tried changing the user in the processmodel config file to one that I created, but I don't think I'm setting the proper permissions on all the files and locations that are necessary. All of the other app pools that we have run fine (we have 1.1 and 2.0 on this server as well). Running the 1.0 app pool as "local system" allows the process to start correctly, but I'm afraid of the security ramifications of allowing that process so much access.
My ASP.NET MVC 2.0 web application does not maintain any session state and My production machine has n (>1) core, .NET 4.0, IIS 7.5 Integrated mode.For increased performance, I am curious if I should increase the max concurrent threads in thread pool to 12*n or should I keep the max concurrent threads as 12 but assign n worker process (w3wp.exe) to my application pool. What are the pros and cons of one over another?
"My application (ASP.NET) writes certain files in folders on my servers. In IIS 6.0 I used to give write access to IUSR account so that IIS can write to the folder. Now what I see is my application pool runs under App Pool Identity account. That is good but users are able to create files in the folders without App Pool Identity user being given specific permission to do so.