How can I properly receive these Array of Inputs on asp.net?
[code]....
In php you can access field by $field = $_POST["field"]
$field["name"] and $field["age"] are simply arrays containing names and ages.
I am just wondering how you'd iterate through elements in a form input array when you get the FormCollection object on postback?
View 3 RepliesIs it at all possible to inject a request into IIS for a page, have IIS and ASP.Net handle it as normal, but get the response as html handed back to me programmatically?
Yes, I know that I could connect to port 80 using WebRequest and WebResponse, but that becomes difficult if you are accessing the IIS server from the same physical machine (loopback security controls et al).
Basically, I want to inject the request (eg for [URL]) between the points at which IIS would normally talk to the browser, and the point at which it would route it to the correct ASP.Net application, and get a response back from IIS between the points at which ASP.Net/IIS applies the httpfilters and hands the html back to the browser.
I'm predominantly working with IIS7 so if there is a solution that works just for IIS7 then thats not an issue.
there are a form in a page like this :
[URL]
how we can request that form dynamically and make it in my webform ?
HOW TO Force C#/ASP.NET to not rename input elements to work consistantly with Form.GetValues.
ASP.NET changes the "name" property of input elements set with "runat=server" to match their ID property at run time. This causes server-side calls to HttpRequest_Page.Form.GetValues to now be able to get the expected Form element.
Example:
.aspx page...
<input type=text id=txtMY_NAME name="MY-NAME" runat=server>
<input type=hidden id=hidMY_SECRET name="MY-SECRET" runat=server>
.aspx.cs file:
string csNAME = HttpRequest_Page.Form.GetValues("MY-NAME"); // Fails...
string csSECRET = HttpRequest_Page.Form.GetValues("MY-SECRET"); // Fails...
The reason why this fails is because ASP.NET changes the "name" properties of these controls to match their "ID". Thus at run time they become as such:
.aspx at run-time
<input type=text id=txtMY_NAME name="txtMY_NAME" runat=server>
<input type=hidden id=hidMY_SECRET name="hidMY_SECRET" runat=server>
I do not want ASP.NET doing this. I do not want to change the naming convention of my id properties either. In fact, I need the ID to be different than the name, as I use client side script to change/create/delete controls on the fly.
What can one do?
I am trying to bind a dynamic array of elements to a view model where there might be missing indexes in the html
e.g. with the view model
class FooViewModel
{
public List<BarViewModel> Bars { get; set; }
}
class BarViewModel
{
public string Something { get; set; }
}
and the html
<input type="text" name="Bars[1].Something" value="a" />
<input type="text" name="Bars[3].Something" value="b" />
<input type="text" name="Bars[6].Something" value="c" />
at the moment, bars will just be null. how could I get the model binder to ignore any missing elements? i.e. the above would bind to:
FooViewModel
{
Bars
{
BarViewModel { Something = "a" },
BarViewModel { Something = "b" },
BarViewModel { Something = "c" }
}
}
I am working on some ASP.NET web forms which involves some dynamic generation, and I need to add some onClick helpers on the client side. I have a basic outline of something working, except for one huge problem.
There are multiple HTML tables, each generated by a different ASP.NET web control. Each table can contain overlapping field names, which is causing a problem with my JQuery click event handlers. The click event handler is linking to unintended form fields in addition to the intended form field.
I have provided a simplified sample version of the code below. This code is trying to set the value of textbox box1 when a particular radiobutton is selected in the table with id=thing1. Obviously, the jquery code will be triggered for the form fields in both tables.
The tables are dynamically added to the webpage based upon different conditions. It is possible that no tables will be loaded, only 1 table, or both tables might load. In the future, other tables could be added. Each table comes from a different .net web control.
Other than renaming the form fields to make sure they are unique across all user controls, is there a way to have JQuery act only on the intended form fields? In other words, could the table ID be incorporated into the JQuery code in a manner that does not become a nightmare to maintain later?
[code]....
This is the basic question , but I am not sure how the HTML data is handled when submitted through any registration form.
Consider I am having a Registration form where I am entering new customer. And while entring the details of customer I have put some HTML data into the textboxes(simple textboxes ) provided for. Show should I handle this.
Do webstandards allows that?
I have...a dynamic populated select box several input boxes a submit button form fields are loaded initially using cookies several dynamic populated divs
I want... start loading the content of my DIVs after all FORM elements have been loaded completely (= filled with data, select boxes are populated)
Sample code:
[code]....
I have an ambitious requirement for an asp.net 2.0 web page that contains a table (gridview), and each row in the grid contains 6 select (dropdown) controls for data entry. The number of rows that will be displayed is dependent upon the user's search parameters, which are specified in another area of the page. Unfortunately, with the default (and even basic) search parameters specified, the grid could contain several hundred rows. I've noticed that the browser, in this case IE8, starts behaving rather erratically once I reach a large number of rows -- no documented evidence for the number of rows where this begins to be a problem. For example, trying to view the source of the page results in a message from IE stating that there was a problem with the page that forced the browser to reload it, and I never get the source. Obviously the page loads and renders rather slowly also.
I know that my solution is probably going to involve paging the gridview such that it only displays 20 or so rows per page, and I'll have to write code to handle the saving of changes in the dropdown values when the user changes pages. I can probably turn off viewstate on the gridview also. However, the question I really want to pose is this -- has anyone seen a documented rule indicating the maximum number of input controls that an HTML browser form is supposed to be able to contain? I could not find anything on the Internet after doing a search, and I suspect the answer may be whatever the browser can handle based on the machine configuration it is running on. Any rules of thumb you use?
i have found out a way to find controls on content pages by using
var txt = $('input[id$=TextBox1]'). But how to access html elements like "<p>" tag and others in jquery when the html elements are in content page only.
I know the < and > characters will cause this error, but what other characters/inputs will cause this error?
I'm testing for this error in the Global.asax, and reridrecting to an error page where I want to list all possible values which cause this error, so the user can go back to their page and get rid of them.
I've done some googling, but all I see so far are the < and > characters...surely there are more out there.
I have a form that a user fills out and can input html or other text into a textarea. I have the validaterequest attribute set to false on the page. However, when I submit the form with any html characters it bombs saying that it detected the potentially dangerous request field and to make validaterequest=false. I've already done this so I'm not sure why it's not working. I've done this many times before and never had this problem. Anyone run into this before and if so, is there a fix? I don't want to update my web.config and apply it site wide.
View 1 RepliesI'm using HttpModule to capture requests to the web server. Before processing the page I'd like to check the values contained in some keys of the Request.Form collection and according to some logic change if necessary. I'd like to do this when BeginRequest event is fired. The problem is that the Request.Form collection is readonly.
View 4 RepliesI have a page that renders a hidden value from the model:
<%=Html.Hidden("myName", model.myValue) %>
Since I am passing a value in the value parameter, you would think it would output that value, but it doesn't.The code for rendering input fields has the following:
string attemptedValue = (string)htmlHelper.GetModelStateValue(name, typeof(string));
tagBuilder.MergeAttribute("value", attemptedValue ?? ((useViewData) ? htmlHelper.EvalString(name) : valueParameter), isExplicitValue);
Basically, if the ModelState (which contains posted values) contains a value for the "name" passed, it will use that value instead of your passed value to the helper method. In my case, I updated the model and my updated value wasn't outputted.If I pass a value to a method, I expect that value to be rendered.
My Request.Form keys are all prefixed with ctl00$container name$ and then the key I want.
How can I get the regular key name working?
Visual example from the immediate window:
I want to use:
? request.Form.Item("stationIdea")
but it won't work because the key is:
ctl00$content_innovation_body$stationIdea
as retrieved by
? request.Form.Keys("4")
so only this works:
? request.Form("ctl00$content_innovation_body$stationIdea")
We're trying to implement functionality that intercepts, inspects, and alters if needed data in the Request.QueryString and Request.Form collections.
Since Request.QueryString and Request.Form are readonly, is it possible to use a HttpModule to do this without Reflection or Response.Redirect?
We're thinking that we can construct a new HttpRequest, and replace the original one. Would there be any implications in doing this?
I know mocking this object is impossible without using HttpRequestWrapper, but wasn't sure whether ASP.NET sets other things beyond the constructor.
This is a input
<input type="image" src="<%=Url.Content("~/images/shopping-cart.jpg")%>" alt="shopping cart" id="btnshoppingCart" name="btnshoppingCart" value="shoppingCart" />
when i browse the page with firefox and click on the input Request.Params["btnshoppingCart"] != null or Request.Form["btnshoppingCart"] != null is statisfied.
When i browse the same page with internet explorer 8 and click on the same input Request.Params["btnshoppingCart"] != null or Request.Form["btnshoppingCart"] != null is not satisfied. When i used the watch i saw that there is no key by the name of "btnshoppingCart" in either Request.Form or Request.Params if input is clicked from internet explorer. However when it is clicked from firefox there is value "shoppingCart" inside Request.Form and Request.Params against "btnshoppingCart" key. One more strange thing that i observed was that are two keys "btnshoppingCart.x" and "btnshoppingCart.y" inside both Request.Form and Request.Params whenver clicking is done from both internet explorer and firefox. This is happening against all inputs of type image irrespective if the input is present inside a html form or not. Forms are created like this
<% using (Html.BeginForm("Action", "Controller", FormMethod.Post)){%>
The version of internet explorer is 8.0 and firefox is 3.6.6
So I am new to ASP.NET MVC and I would like to create a view with a text box for each item in a collection. How do I do this, and how do I capture the information when it POSTs back? I have used forms and form elements to build static forms for a model, but never dynamically generated form elements based on a variable size collection.
I want to do something like this in mvc 3:
[Code]....
How do I do a text box for each guest? And how do I capture them in the action method that it posts back to?
Currently, I have a list of PhoneNumber objects that I display. Here's an example of the output of the view:
[Code]....
Notice the naming of these elements: name="existing_phone[labels][6]", name="existing_phone[numbers][6], name="new_phone[labels][]", name="new_phone[numbers][].Back in the Classic ASP days, I recall being able to do something along the lines of:
[Code]....
And that would give me a 2d array of phone numbers to work with. This doesn't seem to work in .NET. Has anyone tried to do something similar that can point me in the right direction?For new phones, I should simply be able to iterate through each item and insert into the database. For existing phones, I should be able to update (or delete if the label or number are blank) records based off of the id number supplied in the array.OR..if anyone has a better, alternate solution, I'm open to something else.
I have a form with a bunch of labels and images on it. Is there a way I can capture parts of that form into an images file (jpg/bmp, etc)? Ideally I could specify the x-y coordinates, and save that to a jpg.
View 3 RepliesAs you know froms could lead to accessbility issues and unlike PHP when I was dealing with it, everything in ASP.NET we can say is wrapped inside a form. As you know not every elements is a form element and from accessbility point of view the screen readers have what is called 'forms mode' which only interact with form elements. Can anyone calrify why is that in ASP.NET?
View 6 RepliesI have a xaml page. I can access all its controls in xaml.cs. Is there anyway I can access the controls of the xaml page in a different .cs class file?
View 4 RepliesI am creating a Payment request form that my customers are going to fill out and submit so they get paid I would classifi it as an invoice. Does any one have any examples or point me to a good place to read about creating this type of form and the database tables to support the application?
The form will basically have some fields they will fill in for the header then in the related stuf come charge amounts with there types aka partnumbers of sorts and also the ablity to put in there own types / aka partnumbers and there amounts. I wont be housing any amounts they will supply all the information of payment amounts and types.
I have been tasked with implementing a strategy to catch all errors in an ASP.net application which cause a user request or interaction to crash and then e-mailk this exception to a support team in advance of a user calling about the error.Some errors however are not causing the page to crash or be redirected to the custom error page but these are being emailed to the support team instead of simply being loggedMy requirement is to seperate what exception types will cause a page fail and which will not.Example I am currently receiving a System.Web.HttpUnHandledException which is not causing any page to fall over and therefore is not of relevance to the support team. this can be logged but does not require emailing.
View 1 Replies