HttpHandlers / Modules :: Getting Exception Info From Catch Block To Application_Error Event Of HttpModule?
Oct 7, 2010
regarding one issue I am facing. I created a httpmodule for hadling the unhandled errors and I need to log those errors using log 4 net in database.Everting working fine but I am not getting any error information once the error was hadled and I need that info too. I want to make it as a centralize module which can trap all errors and log those errors.How call application_error event of httpmodule from catch block...so that I can log that info there and I no need log in every catch block..
View 1 Replies
Similar Messages:
Jan 24, 2010
I have written simple http module just to print Hello. but it is not working.
View 10 Replies
May 12, 2010
I just updated my project to ASP.NET 4. All of a sudden, some of my HttpHandlers are giving ValidateRequest errors. This is because the user HAS to be able to put an XML string in the querystring.I know how to disable ValidateRequest on a page, but how do I do it on an HTTPHandler?
View 1 Replies
Feb 15, 2010
I am trying to access the page object in module and change the hyper links urls. Page object is being access properly, but changes I am making are not effecting the output. I mean here I am changing the url to TestURL.aspx, but this is not comming. could
View 1 Replies
Jan 23, 2010
as subject, how can i read Response Headers inside an httpmodule?
i need the "Content-encoding" header value.
View 2 Replies
Jul 27, 2010
In IIS6 the scenario below is working perfectly.I have an HttpModule called URLRedirect which examines URLS and by using RegEx rewrites of applicable. An example is a URL "/doc47.pdf" gets redirected to docpdf.ashx?id=47 Then the docpdf.ashx used the id value and, using a database builds an application/pdf document and returns it. Since I need to validate that the user has access to the data, the first line of the ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) function is:if (context.User.Identity.IsAuthenticated) ..... This is where the problem occurs, but more details first.
On a webpage, access to which is restricted to lgged on users who meet certain criteria there is a link which allows the user to present the page as a PDF document. This is achieved by using javascript to open a popup window using the window.open("/doc47.pdf", ... ) function.This all works fine under IIS6 and under IIS7 if I change the mode to Classic. But, under IIS7 in integrated mode, the following happens.The line in doc.ashx described above raises an exception because context.User == null. But, and this is interesting, if instead of using the link that opens the popup window I instead type /doc.pdf?id=47 into the address bar, the PDF document displays correctly.So this indicates to me that the URLRedirect Module is somehow losing the logged on user information.
View 1 Replies
Jan 2, 2011
am trying to write an HttpModule that will work in IIS7 with integrated pipeline mode AppPool. Within this module I need to access Session variables and to be able to capture the Session Start and End events. I have found a couple of articles on this topic that indicate the need to modify the behavior of the HttpHandler in PostAcquireRequestState to force the Session for the context to be initialized. The article I am using as a template is posted here:[URL]In my case I am getting the following error:
[NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.] System.Web.PipelineModuleStepContainer.GetEventCount(RequestNotification notification, Boolean isPostEvent) +30 System.Web.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error) +1112
System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb) +113 System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context) +616
I believe that this error implies a problem with attempting to attach an event handler multiple times. I am aware that the modules Init function can be called more than once and have set a static initialization flag which ensures that I will only ever attach the event handler once.In the most condensed form my code is as follows:
public class HttpModule : IHttpModule, IRequiresSessionState
View 1 Replies
Jan 21, 2010
I have tried this on two different controller methods now, and both times, even if the linq2sql doesn't allow the data to be saved, the code never jumps into the catch block.
I've watched the noun object in the middle of the trace, and the isvalid property is false, but the modelstate isvalid is true. Either way, the code never jumps into the catch block.I'm pulling my hair out about this. I feel like it will be something really silly.
The code all works similar to nerd dinner.
NounRepository nounRepository = new NounRepository();
Noun noun = new Noun();
try[code]...
I'd rather not have to add code in this manner though, as it seems like an unnecessary duplication.
View 3 Replies
Oct 7, 2010
while doing debugging i found a blue dotted corner around catch block, while hovering it is showing system.exception...what does it mean and what to do
View 1 Replies
Jan 27, 2011
We're trying to implement functionality that intercepts, inspects, and alters if needed data in the Request.QueryString and Request.Form collections.
Since Request.QueryString and Request.Form are readonly, is it possible to use a HttpModule to do this without Reflection or Response.Redirect?
We're thinking that we can construct a new HttpRequest, and replace the original one. Would there be any implications in doing this?
I know mocking this object is impossible without using HttpRequestWrapper, but wasn't sure whether ASP.NET sets other things beyond the constructor.
View 2 Replies
Mar 31, 2010
I've tried to implement two different solutions that use either and HttpModule or and HttpHandler to do URLRewriting for me. These work great on IIS 7 within my local development environment in Integrated and Classic modes. Currently the production server is running IIS 6.0 on a shared hosting environment. It appears that the request at least hits both the Module and Handler as the URL above redirect to the particular friendly url, but it doesn't redirect and hit hte Module or Handler again. Instead I get a 404 error for the friendly URL.
View 2 Replies
Nov 11, 2010
i have written httphandler which will display text of a label but processrequets of httphandler event is not being fired.
View 2 Replies
Apr 22, 2010
A developer has created a custom control in ASP.NET using VB.NET. The custom control uses a repeater. In certain scenarios, the rpt_ItemDataBound event is encountering a data error. My goal is rather than having the user see the yellow screen of death, give the user a friendlier error explaining exactly what the data error is. I figured I would be able to use a Try/Catch block as shown below throw the exception, however, it appears that the event has nowhere to be thrown to and stops executing at the "End Try" line.
Protected Sub rpt_ItemDataBound(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.Web.UI.WebControls.RepeaterItemEventArgs) Handles rpt1.ItemDataBound, rpt2.ItemDataBound
Try
ProcessBadData...
Catch ex As Exception
Throw ex
End Try
End Sub
In VB.NET, I can find where the repeater's DataSource is being set, however, I can not find a DataBind event. how I can capture the exception in this ASCX control so I can report it to the user? Edit: The stack trace looks like this. There is another repeater within the repeater that is actually causing the error (rptOther) and I'm able to catch the error, but I can only throw it to the rpt_ItemDataBound. I can't figure out how rpt_ItemDataBound is getting called without a DataBind event.
at Company.WebForms.Control.rptOther_ItemDataBound(Object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.OnItemDataBound(RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.CreateItem(Int32 itemIndex, ListItemType itemType, Boolean dataBind, Object dataItem)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.CreateControlHierarchy(Boolean useDataSource)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.OnDataBinding(EventArgs e)
at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Repeater.DataBind()
at Company.WebForms.Control.rpt_ItemDataBound(Object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
View 1 Replies
Jun 18, 2010
I have a module that subscribes to PreRequestHandlerExecute event, which uses the Session object. When i set the webconfig compilationdebug flag to false, the Session object is null when making requests to the web service. It works fine for .aspx requests, but only have problems for .asmx. When i set the debug flag to true everything works fine. I need to set this flag to false for production, but can't seem to get it work.I'm using II7 and the integrated pipeline, so this event will fire for all requests.
View 1 Replies
Jan 22, 2010
I have the following settings. Asp.net 2.0 / Vs.net 2005 / Web.config -> customErrors mode="on"
<customErrors mode="On" defaultRedirect="~/ErrorPages/Default.aspx">
View 6 Replies
Jan 27, 2011
Looking for best practice focused answers here with explanations.
Should the presentation layer of an ASP.Net app catch and handle exceptions thrown from the business layer, or should these be allowed to bubble out, where they can all be logged and handled uniformly in the Global.ascx's Application_Error handler?
[code]....
View 2 Replies
Jan 26, 2010
After adding a custom module, Module list is showing MyModule "Entry Type" as "Local".
and Entry Type of all other modules is "Inherited".
what is Entry Type and difference between "Local" and "Inherited"?
View 4 Replies
Jun 8, 2010
is httpmodules executed each and every time in request and response cycle ?? if Yes is it possible to disable a specific http module ??
View 3 Replies
Sep 14, 2011
I get this error in the browser:
Code:
Thread was being aborted.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted.]
System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +486
System.Web.ApplicationStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error) +501
System.Web.HttpApplication.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb, Object extraData) +123
System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestInternal(HttpWorkerRequest wr) +379
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.3053; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.3053
I have try{}catch(Exception ex){} in the right place:
Code:
protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
// all processing occurs inside here
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
}
}
I even created a global.asax file and on the Application_Error event, I wrote a code that would email me the error (and i'm not getting an email regarding that error when I get the error shown above). I know for a fact that the thread is going inside the "try" statement because I send emails to myself whenever it finishes certain codes inside of it. So how come I'm getting that error in my browser instead of it being handled in my "catch" statement? I have two problems here, one, why is the exception not going to my "catch" statement, and two, why am I getting that error in the first place.
Note: my web app calls a webservice.
View 2 Replies
Jul 2, 2010
I have written an Http Module that hooks onto the Response.Filter property of the current request and does various replacements within the HTML before it is sent to the client.All the work is done in the Write method which is overriding Write in the base class Stream.
The Write method is called multiple times for a single response - the HTML seems to be written to the output stream in chunks. My problem is that I don't have an efficient & reliable way of telling if the current chunk is the last chunk (for why I want to know this see below). The only way I have come up with is to check if the chunk contains a closing html tag - but this is not very efficient or reliable.
The reason this is needed is that the module must add the "Refresh" HTTP header to the response, but only if the HTML fulfills certain conditions (and there are certain conditions that mean the header must not be added). So, only when the last chunk has been seen does the code know if the header can be added or not. So, I either need a test for the last chunk, or on each call to Write I add the header if the current block of HTML passes the test (if it has not already been added) or remove the header if the current block of HTML fails the test (if it has already been added).
So, is there a better way to test for the last chuck OR is there a way to test for a particular header being in the response and delete it (there doesn't seem to be a way to do this - only to append headers)?
View 1 Replies
Nov 30, 2010
i am new in asp.net mvc. Sometimes i have an exception in Application_Error and i write it to my log file:
[Code]....
I trying debug but i not see file name? How to see witch file cannot be found ?
View 1 Replies
Aug 31, 2010
I have to call the function, when exception occured. Is it possible to call the function in Catch block (Try-Catch)? I have tried it but the function did not get invoked. What i have to do for it? Shall we unable to call the functions in Catch block? I have shown my code below.
Try
Catch ex As Exception
ErrorHandlers.LogErrorDetails(ex, Session("UserId").ToString, "")
Throw ex
End Try.
I knew, We can invoke this function in Finally block but i do not need as per my requirements.
View 3 Replies
Mar 31, 2010
When to write try catch block?
Should I write it for each method or only in event handlers or ????
What happens when an exception occurrs? What is the stack for exception?
If I use it at entry point (event handlers) then how do I get actually at which line error occurred?
Suppose an exception was thrown from Data Access Layer How do I get it in presentation layer that exactly in which class method at which line why that error occurred?
Is it true that excessive use of try catch makes application slow?
View 3 Replies
Jul 22, 2010
i have the following code which show error from a string when there is a error
is there any way that i can make this in catch block?
main()
{
try
{
if (a==1)[code].....
Like below:i have the following code which show error from a string when there is a error
is there any way that i can make this in catch block?
main()
{
try[code]....
View 6 Replies
Aug 13, 2010
Possible Duplicate:
Performance Cost Of ‘try’
I am being told that adding a try catch block adds major performance cost in the order of 1000 times slower than without, in the example of a for loop of a million. Is this true?
Isn't it best to use try catch block as much as possible?
View 7 Replies
