Possible Duplicate:
Performance Cost Of ‘try’
I am being told that adding a try catch block adds major performance cost in the order of 1000 times slower than without, in the example of a for loop of a million. Is this true?
Isn't it best to use try catch block as much as possible?
I have tried this on two different controller methods now, and both times, even if the linq2sql doesn't allow the data to be saved, the code never jumps into the catch block.
I've watched the noun object in the middle of the trace, and the isvalid property is false, but the modelstate isvalid is true. Either way, the code never jumps into the catch block.I'm pulling my hair out about this. I feel like it will be something really silly.
The code all works similar to nerd dinner.
NounRepository nounRepository = new NounRepository();
Noun noun = new Noun();
try[code]...
I'd rather not have to add code in this manner though, as it seems like an unnecessary duplication.
I have to call the function, when exception occured. Is it possible to call the function in Catch block (Try-Catch)? I have tried it but the function did not get invoked. What i have to do for it? Shall we unable to call the functions in Catch block? I have shown my code below.
Try
Catch ex As Exception
ErrorHandlers.LogErrorDetails(ex, Session("UserId").ToString, "")
Throw ex
End Try.
I knew, We can invoke this function in Finally block but i do not need as per my requirements.
When to write try catch block?
Should I write it for each method or only in event handlers or ????
What happens when an exception occurrs? What is the stack for exception?
If I use it at entry point (event handlers) then how do I get actually at which line error occurred?
Suppose an exception was thrown from Data Access Layer How do I get it in presentation layer that exactly in which class method at which line why that error occurred?
Is it true that excessive use of try catch makes application slow?
i have the following code which show error from a string when there is a error
is there any way that i can make this in catch block?
main()
{
try
{
if (a==1)[code].....
Like below:i have the following code which show error from a string when there is a error
is there any way that i can make this in catch block?
main()
{
try[code]....
Can somebody show me a better approach of looping through a Try -Catch statement. I have something like this:
Try
dbConn.Open()
Catch ex As Exception
errmsg = ex.Message
End Try
I need to try to connect 5 times before logging an error. My first thought was to nest Try - Catch 5 levels but I didn't like that idea. I'm sure there is better solution to it.
is final run if htere is a return in catch blobk ?
example
try{
}catch(){[code]....
Since everyone yells at me that MessageBox doesn't work when the project is uploaded to the server, I need to migrate to javascript alert box. As I was changing my MessageBoxes, I tested and found that they weren't being produced. I'm not sure if it matters, but they are in a try/catch block, which is shown here:[Code]....
This all worked before when I had MessageBox - it showed, then the page redirected when I clicked Ok.
I either don't understand how try/catch works, the javascript isn't adding, or Response.Redirect is executed before I can see the alert box and click Ok on it.
(just as a note, everything works fine, but the alert box doesn't show)........if I add the (javascript) code before the try block, the alert box comes up, so it's not something wrong with the writing of the javascript or executing it at least (I think).
I wrote a stored procedure call with the format:
bool isValid=true;
using (OracleConnection myConn = new OracleConnection(connectionString))
{
OracleCommand myCmd = new OracleCommand("sproc", myConn);
myCmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
myCmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("p1", a1);[code].....
Second format just doesn't feel right but I am not that experienced. I am curious if there is any downfall to that other than exception not being type specific.
I am trying to call a JavaScript function from my ascx control code behind in the catch blockI have tried the below two ways but they don't seem to work.
Page.ClientScript.RegisterClientScriptBlock(typeof(string), "script", "test();", true);
ScriptManager.RegisterStartupScript(Page, GetType(), "err_msg", "alert('error');", true);
How/Can I Set the try, catch statment to catch a specific Error. For example i am getting the following error:
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Incorrect syntax near '='., [SqlException (0x80131904): Incorrect syntax near '='.]
Basicly The = is part of my SQL string which points to a table that currently doesent exist. I want something like catch ex as SqlException (0x80131904) or catch ex as SqlException = "0x80131904" or even catch ex as System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException = "Incorrect syntax near '='." I just want something so i can put "table doesnt exist" in the error message without having to use:
catch ex as System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException
As i have other code on my page that could result in a different type of sqlExeption.
while doing debugging i found a blue dotted corner around catch block, while hovering it is showing system.exception...what does it mean and what to do
View 1 RepliesIn ASP.NET I would like your opinion regarding what is the best way for Handling Exceptions Would you to use try/catch blocks? Better to use try/catch blocks on every single piece of code/component? Or in wich situations?
View 5 Repliesregarding one issue I am facing. I created a httpmodule for hadling the unhandled errors and I need to log those errors using log 4 net in database.Everting working fine but I am not getting any error information once the error was hadled and I need that info too. I want to make it as a centralize module which can trap all errors and log those errors.How call application_error event of httpmodule from catch block...so that I can log that info there and I no need log in every catch block..
View 1 RepliesIn the Script documents that asp.net automatically generates how can I surround the whole generated scripts with try/catch statement to avoid 'Microsoft JScript Compilation error'
My issue is: i got a DevExpress control (ASPxGridView) that added and set-up in run time, since i activated the grouping functionality in the grid I still get JS error says ';' expected whenever i use (click) on one of grouping/sorting abilities, I activated script Debugging for IE, in the JS code turns out that there is no missing ';' and once i click ignore for the error msg that VS generates every thing works fine, and surly end-user can't see this msg so i figured out if i try/catch the script that may help avoid this error.
no Massagebox not working in the web
at catch I want appear windows and retuen to....
tryÂ
{
}
catch (Exception ex) {Console.WriteLine("Error reading from", ex); }
I'm using MS Enterprise Logging Application Block in an ASP.NET website.
For production launch, I will set up a log listener in one of these locations:
Sql Server database
Windows event log
Text files
Which has the least impact on performance?
NB - I can't switch to Log4Net or ELMAH at this point, so don't suggest that in your response.
Here is the code copied from [URL] In asp.net code behind, I use try-catch try to catch any error but never catch it. In SQL database, if I rename Employees to Employeesx or change column DepartmentID to DepartmentIDx, record will not be deleted (it is right) without any error (it is wrong, suppose catch an error).
CREATE PROCEDURE DeleteDepartment
(
@DepartmentID int
)
AS
BEGIN TRANSACTION
DELETE FROM Employees
WHERE DepartmentID = @DepartmentID
IF @@ERROR <> 0
BEGIN
ROLLBACK
RAISERROR ('Error', 16, 1)
RETURN
END
DELETE FROM Departments
WHERE DepartmentID = @DepartmentID
IF @@ERROR <> 0
BEGIN
ROLLBACK
RAISERROR ('Error', 16, 1)
RETURN
END
OMMIT
I need to find the Sum of the Cost ,I tried doing it , but i am not aware of the syntax.
var pss = new PrintingServiceDataContext();
var strActualvalue = pss.PrintJobs.Where(s => s.OwnerID == txtOwnerID.Text && s.CreatedOn >= firstDay && s.CreatedOn <= today).Select(s => Sum(new {PCost = s.Cost }));
In my asp.net application, I want to show the user that when he is submitting the form how much time does that stored procedure is going to take. Is there any way I can find out from asp.net application? Just like we have estimated query plan with estimated cost in sql server. Can we show it on asp.net webpage?
View 2 RepliesOne of my relatives is going to start a small salon. I would like to develop a small web-site (that is pretty basic: display information, book an appointment, display product/service information, show directions to the salon, etc). I can use a XML file as a basic data storage and am not intended to use any database for this. I can deal with the coding development of the web site, but I have not developed any web-site independently and have no detailed knowledge about how to host the site, etc. factors. I also would like to know that whether it's possible to develope such a web site using ASP.BET (Visual Web Developer) with NO cost?
View 8 RepliesI get this error in the browser:
Code:
Thread was being aborted.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted.]
System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +486
System.Web.ApplicationStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error) +501
System.Web.HttpApplication.System.Web.IHttpAsyncHandler.BeginProcessRequest(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb, Object extraData) +123
System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestInternal(HttpWorkerRequest wr) +379
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.3053; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.3053
I have try{}catch(Exception ex){} in the right place:
Code:
protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
try
{
// all processing occurs inside here
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
}
}
I even created a global.asax file and on the Application_Error event, I wrote a code that would email me the error (and i'm not getting an email regarding that error when I get the error shown above). I know for a fact that the thread is going inside the "try" statement because I send emails to myself whenever it finishes certain codes inside of it. So how come I'm getting that error in my browser instead of it being handled in my "catch" statement? I have two problems here, one, why is the exception not going to my "catch" statement, and two, why am I getting that error in the first place.
Note: my web app calls a webservice.
I have a user defined function GetAddress which takes address id (int) as a parameter and returns a address which may contain some 200 to 300 characters...In the execution plan for that function it is displaying cluster index seek cost as 100%...I have clustered index for address id in the address table..is that costing the resources more...How to decrease the cost of the function or a query...!!
View 1 RepliesI have menu item on my master page that has block around the text when the page is first run. I wrote in the css on the link and visited property to change the color to match the image color that it is on. When a menu item is clicked the color changes to the right color. How do I get it to the right color on when the page first opens or is there a way to get rid of the block or make it transperant?
View 1 RepliesI have developed a website in asp.net framework 2 . This website is being hosted in two different servers without any change in code. My issue is about the performance of these 2 sites. One website is taking much time for inserting datas to the DB (SQL server 2005). 2 websites are having different DB server.
I think the issue is for the DB server. How can we rectify the DB performance while insertion and Is there any other cause for this permance issue?