I am creating a Console Application and in its code I need to Publish a MVC 3 P1 Application in Release mode.
Just like I do when, in VS2010, I right click the project, click Publish and set the folder to which it should be published.
How can I do this?
Basically I am trying to create a Console Application that publishes an MVC Application and copies some other folders to a Release Folder.
how can i tell the diffence between a website that has been published in release mode and the same website that was published in debug mode
View 4 RepliesMy requirement is to check whether my application is in debug mode or release mode in DLL class.
View 6 RepliesI got a project when after opening in visual studio 2005 in build mode drop down, only debug mode is shown but release mode not shown.Project builds successfully in debug mode is there a way to enable release mode.
View 1 RepliesPossible Duplicates: Debug/Release difference Performance differences between debug and release builds
What exactly is the different in compiling and running an asp.net/c# project in Debug mode VS Release Mode?
is there a way to use sql server to debug locally and mysql onthe remote published version ? perhaps with web.config and AppSettings ?
View 3 Replieswhen i publish my asp.net application in Release mode i am getting .pdb files in Bin folder.
My doubt is
1. does .pdb files get generated in release mode also.
2. Why is .pdb needed in release mode.
3. how can i remove .pdb files in release mode.
any way to deploy code with both release and debug mode together. I know it is logically impossible.
My requirement is to deploy debug based aspx page(for temporary) in release mode build in prod.. the concept is to avoid to put full release build on production again & again.
I am developing a web site in Visual Studio 2008. I have a project for the web application and several class libraries as references. When I add the references I select the file under bin/debug in the class library folder. When changing the project to release mode the references still point to the .dll in the debug folder. Shouldn't this change automatically. How should I add the references so that debug and release are properly referenced?
View 1 Repliesi am trieng to create a batch task that will publish my site in release mode
but with no luck...my script for doing so is this:
aspnet_compiler -errorstack -nologo -fixednames -v / -p "C:projectsmysiteCOMPONENTSsitefolder" -f -u "C:projectspublish-mysite"
my site has about 10 other projects in the solution. so i expect them to all be published in release mode. (the site refrence those projects)
I have a gridview with Edit buttons, which turn into Update buttons when pressed:
[Code]....
It worked fine before I added DBInterfaceGridView_RowEditing handler:
[Code]....
Now it seems to be working in Debug mode, but in Release when I press Edit, the gridview just disappears.
I'm trying to find a definite explanation of what effect compiling in release mode has on a .Net 3.5 web application versus debug="false". So far it looks like setting debug="false" has the same effect and compiling in release mode has been depreciated but I can't find any firm evidence this is the case.
This question looked promising but seems to be answering what's the difference between debug and release builds rather than release mode and debug="true":
[URL]
However it does link to this article:
[URL]
"This new compilation model makes the Configuration Manager for a web site obsolete. The only option appearing in a Visual Studio 2005 web site "project" is a Debug configuration. Don't fret - it means nothing. The web.config file now rules the school."
Now that is the closest I've had to an answer and it does seem to imply that release mode has been depreciated in favor of debug="false" but I can't find any confirmation of this on MSDN or any other source.
clarify this is a "Web Application Project" I am referring to.
To rephrase my question slightly, if I have the following setting in web.config:
<compilation defaultLanguage="c#" debug="false">
What effect (if any) does release and debug mode compile have?
I came across a strange behavior with this property. I had a winform with 2 buttons "button1" and "close". In the button1_clicked event I had the following code. I did not put any code in the for loop
int len=ConfigurationManager.AppSettings.Count;
How to run ASP.NET C# web application locally???
How to publish web application done on Visual Studio 2010, OS windows-7 and after that how to view it locally.
I'm using Visual Studio (VS) Professional Edition 2010 and IIS 7. I'd like to publish a wpf application for download from a website. But for some reason, when I go to Build > Publish in VS, select a publishing location, select that users will install the application from a website, and then try to browse to a URL on my machine, VS gives me an error message saying:
To access local IIS Web sites, you must install the following IIS components:
IIS 6 Metabase and IIS 6 Configuration Compatibility ASP.NET
I'm not really sure why this is happening. I'm running IIS 7 on my computer, and it was my understanding that Metabase has been rendered obsolete in the latest version of IIS..
How i can publish web application without code. I mean when i upload page it's be for example: Default.aspx , Default.aspx.cs , the user can download this pages and edit on code , what i need the user can't see the code after publish such .EXE
View 7 Replieshow can I publish a web application to the internet
View 2 RepliesI had first build an database and populated it with various information, set some properties related to FTS and other things.
Now, in the asp.net MVC application, I am able to add the database ServerExplorer->Connect To Database-> Data Source= MS SQL SERVER->Server name->OpAmp-pc. Now, I was unable to add the database by copying the file in app data folder.
My doubt it how can I share the website+ database with my fellow batchmate or put the whole website online.
Build->Publish Sirte, didn't solved the pupose.
I have published an asp.net application to a sub directory of my IIS application. I know that the web.config must exist at the root for several of the properties to work. So I have moved my web.config to the root of the application. I get the following error:
Could not load type 'ProjectName.myTypeName'.
I suspect that not having the web.config in the same directory as this aspx file is causing the issue. How do I config this so that my web.config can live in the root while the aspx file lives where I need it to?
I'm building an ASP.NET MVC application and I'm trying to deploy it on a free host (0000free) which does support ASP.NET. I tried a couple of things, but none of them worked (i.e. I only see the directory structure when I browse to my web site):
Publishing to a local folder and then copying the published files via ftp over to my host (in the public_html directory).
Publishing via ftp to the root folder: ftp.mywebsite.com
Publishing via ftp to the public_html folder: ftp.mywebsite.com/public_html
Usually I would just drop the html files in the public_html folder, but I'm getting the feeling that the deployment process for an MVC application is slightly different. Do I have to modify the Web.config or some other filer? How does one usually deploy an MVC application (on a free host)?
Update:I have learned that the host uses Mono and supports .NET 4.0, but I'm still not able to deploy.
I have Visual Studio 2010 and I used its Publish Feature (i.e. right click on the project name and click publish) and I tried several things:
Publish method: FTP to the root folder.
Publish method: FTP to the publich_html folder.
Publish method: File System to the root folder.
Publish method: File System to the publich_html folder.
Publish method: File System to a local directory on my computer and then FTP to root and also tried the public_html folder.
I went into the cPanel (control panel) to try and see if ASP.NET has to be added/enabled for my web site, but I didn't see anything there.I can't browse to Index.aspx nor can I redirect to it from index.html (as suggested from other posts on the host forum), right now I have a link from index.html to Index.aspx but it's not working either (see http://www.mydevarmy.com)I've also tried renaming Index.aspx to Default.aspx, but that doesn't work either.
The search utility of the forum of the host is somewhat weak, so I use google to search their forum: http://www.google.com/search?q=publish+asp.net+site%3A0000free.com%2Fforum%2F&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
I've been reading Pro ASP.NET MVC Framework and they have a chapter about publishing, but it doesn't provide any specific information with respect to the location of publishing, this is all they say (and it's not very helpful in my case):
Where Should I Put My Application?You can deploy your application to any folder on the server. When IIS first installs, it automatically creates a folder for a web site called Default Web Site at c:Inetpubwwwroot, but you shouldn't feel any obligation to put your application files there. It's very common to host applications on a different physical drive from the operating system (e.g., in e:websites example.com). It's entirely up to you, and may be influenced by concerns such as how you plan to back up the server.
Here is the error I get when I try to view my Index.aspx page:Unrecognized attribute 'targetFramework'. (/home/devarmy/public_html/Web.config line 1)
Description: HTTP 500. Error processing request.
Stack Trace:System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: Unrecognized attribute 'targetFramework'. (/home/devarmy/public_html/Web.config line 1)
at System.Configuration.ConfigurationElement.DeserializeElement (System.Xml.XmlReader reader, Boolean serializeCollectionKey) [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
I recently developed a LINQ to SQL web application in Visual Studio 2010 on my desktop (Windows XP). It uses a connection to an SQL Server 2008 Express database on a remote server running Windows Server 2003.
When I test the application (Ctrl + F5), it works well. Now I want to publish the application on the remote server, but have run into difficulties.
I packaged the application using the "Build Deployment Package" option in Visual Studio. I installed msdeploy.exe on the server and transferred the package over. I ran "application.deploy.cmd /Y" to deploy
the application and got output indicating that files had been copied.
The deployment created a virtual directory under the default web site in IIS 6.0 and copied the necessary application files to the C:InetpubwwwrootApplication directory. However, when I attempt to browse
to the site from IIS Manager, I get a 404 error. This happens for all pages (not just the main page). So I can't get to http://localhost/Application_deploy/ and I also can't get to http://localhost/Application_deploy/Default.aspx. I mention this because
when I googled the issue, I found a lot of help for people who could get to Default.aspx but not to the main page. I don't think this is my problem.
I should mention that there is another virtual directory on the default website (I think it installed with IIS 6.0) that seems to be working fine. I was also able to publish the website on my local machine
using the one-click publish method and that works fine. My local machine runs IIS 5.1. At this point, I believe it's probably a configuration issue, either in IIS or in the application itself, but I haven't been able to solve it.
My operating system is Vista SP1 and vs.net 2008, I created windows application project but when I publish it , it display error
Failed to connect to 'http://localhost/project' with the following error: Unable to create the Web site 'http://localhost/project'. The Web server does not appear to have FrontPage Server Extensions installed.
I have created a web applcation and i need to publish that in a sharepoint server with single sign one.
View 1 RepliesI'm working in Visual Studio 2010 Professional. I have a web application based upon the standard ASP.NET Web Application, which contains the aspnetdb.mdf SQL Express database for forms based security. For testing deployment, I'm trying to use the Publish option to publish the web app to IIS 7, which exists on the same machine that I'm building the web app on. The machine is running Windows 2008 R2.
I went through the Help file to set up the deployment of the database, using the Package/Publish SQL tab in the site properties. I followed the help file to the letter, or so I thought. I go to publish to the virtual directory I set up on IIS and it gives me errors, specifically saying the following:
Web deployment task failed.(The database'|DataDirectory|aspnetdb.mdf' could not be created.)
I took this to mean the the path isn't valid for publishing to, which makes sense. So I changed the destination path to the fully qualified path (C:WebAppsApp_Dataaspnetdb.mdf) and ran it again. This time I got the following error:
Web deployment task failed.(Cannot connect to the database 'C:WebAppsAppDataaspnetdb.mdr'.)
I looked at the security for the folder and everything seems fine. Now I'm stuck.
My question is - can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong, or supply a list of steps to follow, or give me a link to a site that has clear steps as to how this is done?
I'm trying to use WCF Callback to implement publish/subscribe pattern. I would like to send the message from UserA to UserB or UserA to every clients at the moment. I got an example from here
In my app, I use asp.net as a client to connect wcf service instead and I found a problem when I subscrib to wcf service.
The wcf service does not hold any other clients object. So when I call GetAllClients(_guid), It will return only 1 client which is itself.
Here is the code in asp.net page (i put every control inside updatePanel)
[code]...
Is it possible to implement this publish/subscribe with asp.net and wcf callback? (I already tried on window app and it worked fine)If it is possible, how can I keep all clients that is connecting to WCF Service so I can use those GuId to call callback method.