What is the best way to obtain an attribute such as the DisplayNameAttribute of a model's property using the property's name. I am using the following method currently:
[Code]....
Looking at this long statement, I cannot help wondering if there is a better way to do it.
I am developing asp.net mobile application. I am using LINQ to XML to query XML file. I am using the following query to retrieve the name & value of the query dynamically as follows
var TotalManifolds = from MF in FieldRoot.Element("FIELD-DEFINITION").Element("MANIFOLDS").Elements("MANIFOLD")
join SLT in FieldRoot.Element("FIELD-DEFINITION").Element("SLOTS").Elements("SLOT")
on (string)MF.Attribute("MID") equals (string)SLT.Attribute("PARENT")
select new
{
SlotName = (string)SLT.Attribute("NAME").Value,
SlotValue = (string)SLT.Attribute("NAME").Value
};
In the following statement of above query I want to retrive the name of the attribure dynamically without explicitly specifying the name of the attribute SlotName = (string)SLT.Attribute("NAME").Value Here I am explicitly specifying the name. I want to code which can dynamically retrieve the name of the attribute. I am new to Linq to xml. how this can be done programatically? or can you provide me the link through which I can resolve the above issue ?
I have a large string containing a custom HTML tag (xxx). The tag also has two attributes. How would I retrieve the value of the two attributes and then place the tag and its content with a new string derived from those two attributes?
View 2 Replieshow to select the mac element value. Here is my code that not working.
[Code]....
I want to disallow entering html tags inside specific textFields using custom attribute HtmlRemove, but I don't know how can I acces property/Field value? Model:
[Code]....
My custom Attribute
[Code]....
I am trying to create a minimum length validation attribute which will force users to enter the specified minimum amount of characters into a textbox
public sealed class MinimumLengthAttribute : ValidationAttribute
{
public int MinLength { get; set; }
public MinimumLengthAttribute(int minLength)
{
MinLength = minLength;
}
public override bool IsValid(object value)
{
if (value == null)
{
return true;
}
string valueAsString = value as string;
return (valueAsString != null && valueAsString.Length >= MinLength);
}
}
In the constructor of the MinimumLengthAttribute I would like to set the error message as follows:
ErrorMessage = "{0} must be atleast {1} characters long"
How can I get the property's display name so that I can populate the {0} placeholder?
here's my situation - I've created some ActionFilterAttributes that I want to apply to a custom Controller class that my other controllers can inherit from. The problem is, I need to set a property on the attribute from the final inheriting controller. So I have something like this :
[Code]....
[Code]....
So, I've got an contact form in my MVC 2 application.
I'd like to programatically email all properties of my "ContactModel".
Here is what I'd like to do in psuedo-ish code:
[Code]....
In case it matters...ContactModel sets up the DisplayName attributes like this:
[DisplayName("First Name")]
public string FirstName {get; set ;}
I'd like to keep this nice and DRY by not repeating the DisplayName names.
Specifically, I'd like to enumerate over each property in my ContactModel, get its DisplayName, and get its submitted value.
I think I might have stumbled onto a bug in ASP.NET MVC 3 RC. When I setup my MVC2 project in a new MVC3 project, copy paste classes, code, change name spaces, etc, etc, I ran into an issue in the following, simplified for explanation purpose, scenario:
Model:
public class WineDetails
{
[SkipRequestValidation]
[Required(ErrorMessage = "Beschrijving verplicht")]
public string Description { get; set; }
}
ViewModel:
public class ViewModelCreateWine
{
public MasterData MasterData { get; set; }
public WineDetails WineDetails { get; set; }
}
ActionMethod:
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult CreateWine(ViewModelCreateWine viewModelCreateWine)
{
GetMasterDataRegions(viewModelCreateWine);
if (Request.Params.ToString().IndexOf("Save") > 0)
{
if (TryValidateModel(viewModelCreateWine.WineDetails))
{
m_wineService.CreateWine(viewModelCreateWine.WineDetails);
return RedirectToAction("index", "Admin");
}
}
return View(viewModelCreateWine);
}
The ActionMethod "CreateWine" needs to call the "CreateWine" method in the WineService so that in the end a new Wine is added to the Database. So far it looks ok. As shown in the above code the [SkipRequestValidation] is set on the "Description" property of the WineDetails model so that the user can add Rich Text to the description and HTML elements are allowed during the Request validation. This works perfectly fine until the Params collection of the Request is accessed in the code to check if the Save button is clicked. When this line of code is trying to execute the following exception is thrown:
Exception Details: System.Web.HttpRequestValidationException: A potentially dangerous Request.Form value was detected from the client (ViewModelCreateWine.WineDetails.Description="<p>HTML Content with...").
The same exception is thrown when I put the [ValidateInput(false)] attribute on the action method. When I comment out the "if" statement and its content there is no issue and the model validation works just fine and skips the Request Validation on the Description property as expected.
In MVC2 the above code worked fine with the [ValidateInput(false)] attribute on the action method.As I said I'm not sure if this is a bug, it very well might be my own stupidity, but I thought it would be worth to mention here. So any feedback is more than welcome.
I'm building a custom web control with a public property which I only want to be available in design time (i.e. make it unavailable in code behind). The DesignOnly attribute promises to do just that, but when I set [DesignOnly(true)] it has no noticeable effect whatsoever:
[Bindable(true)]
[Category("Appearance")]
[DefaultValue(null)]
[Localizable(false)]
[DesignOnly(true)]
public string MyProp
{
get
{
return ViewState["MyProp"] as string;
}
set
{
ViewState["MyProp"] = value;
}
}
The property still appears in code behind IntelliSense. Setting a value to it in code behind works. In these respects, the behavior is just as if the attribute had never been set. And I've cleaned and rebuilt the complete solution. Twice.
I am using repeater control and in that i am having div in item template. Now I am setting its id using eval. I want to access this div in item databound for that i am making it runat=server. But in doing so I am getting :
"The ID property of a control can only be set using the ID attribute in the tag and a simple value."
<div id="<%# Eval("RENTER_ID") %>" style="display:none"></div>
How to achieve this functionality. One more thing i am using master page and repeater is in content page.
I have a User Control (ascx) and a property which a want to display in my categories tab in Visual Studio in the category named "Styles".
[Code]....
And here is the problem: Actually I do not need a get, because I only have to set the property (write only property). But when I omit the get, the property is displayed in the "Misc" category in the categories tab in Visual Studio. Only when I code the get as well, then the property is displayed correctly in the "Styles" category in the categories tab in Visual Studio.
Does anybody know why? How can I display the category correctly only with set?
how to retrieve the selected row cell value if it is visible property is false in gridview?
View 1 RepliesI have create a list of public properties in our custom page. However, when I want to assign the property on any aspx file, it does not show in intellisense and when I use it it said it is a invalid attribute of element "Page".So, 2 question.How do I make it such that it shows up in intellisense?Can I set any localize variable as a value of the property in the page directive?here is the property on my base page:
/// <summary>
/// Robot meta tag
/// </summary>
[code]...
<asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server">
<Columns>
<asp:TemplateField>
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" onchange="calculate()" runat="server" Text="0"></asp:TextBox>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
</Columns>
</asp:GridView>
I'm getting this error on the above markup: Message 1 Validation (ASP.Net): Attribute 'onchange' is not a valid attribute of element 'TextBox'.
I have a problem with my web site 1stSigBdeAssn.org. I have made no changes to the site but I now get the following error message:
Parser Error Message:
Unrecognized attribute 'targetFramework'. Note that attribute names are case-sensitive.
Source Error:
[code]....
I created a simple Master Page in Visual Studio 2008:
<%@
Master
Language="VB"
CodeFile="MasterPage.master.vb"
Inherits="MasterPage" %>
<!DOCTYPE
html
PUBLIC
"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
and got green underlined 'Master' with two warning messages: 1.Validation (ASP.NET): This attribute name must be followed byan equal (=) sign and a value. If the value is in quotation marks, the quotation marks must match. 2. Validation (ASP.NET): Attribute 'Master' is not a valid attribute of element 'Control'.How I can get rid of the messages?
I have a tag:
<asp:ListItem
CssClass="LabelCSS">Executive</asp:ListItem>
and I am getting the error message
Validation(ASP .Net):Attribute CssClass is not a valid attribute of element ListItem.
What attribute would I use for Css with ListItem?
i'm trying to host an .net framework4.0 application in IIS7. i got an error while clicking on the manage module in modules .like ("Unrecognized attribute 'targetFramework'. Note that attribute names are case-sensitive. ") .I changed my application poll to .net4.0.I am able to browse my application
</system.serviceModel>
</configuration>
I installed Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate Trial and converted existing asp.net 2.0 web application and I am getting this error: znrecognized attribute 'targetFramework'. Note that attribute names are case-sensitive. It's coming from this section in the web.config which was auto-generated by VS2010 when I converted the project:
<compilation defaultLanguage="c#" debug="false" targetFramework="4.0">
<compilers>
<!--<compiler language="c#" type="Microsoft.CSharp.CSharpCodeProvider, System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B77A5C561934E089" extension=".cs" compilerOptions="/d:DEBUG;TRACE" /></compilers> -->
<compiler language="c#" type="Microsoft.CSharp.CSharpCodeProvider, System, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B77A5C561934E089" extension=".cs"/></compilers>
<assemblies>
<add assembly="Microsoft.JScript, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B03F5F7F11D50A3A"/></assemblies></compilation>
I am trying to achieve a SSO implimentation across my websites so i am using the machine key attribute to do so.now the trouble starts here as the website the user logs in is on the .net 1.1 framework and the website it it navigating to is .net 4.0.I have share the same machine-key across both the application . It works fine in my testing environment but as i move to the deployment server ,it just dosent work !So what i could do is read this article on MSDN :
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/eb0zx8fc.aspx
this tells me to add a domin attribute like below
<forms loginUrl="~Login.aspx" defaultUrl="Default.aspx" protection="All" timeout="80" name=".ASPXAuth" domain="asbc.com"/>
but this thing just dosent work on the 1.1 application and throws an error Unrecognized attribute 'domain'.
Where do i get to mention the domin in my 1.1 application.?
So what I'm trying to accomplish is this
[Code]....
The user control has public properties named accordingly and the page has protected properties accordingly which I've verified have the desired values.
For some reason the values are always empty strings or 0s in the usercontrol, no matter what the page property is.
Can anyone add a complete input about how to create Parent Property with multiple child properties or in short nested properties.
Example: Style tag: which has properties like font, color, display... etc? which accept objects and its value.
[code]....
As soon as Rainbow property is typed, user should get intellisense for list of number of colors. Then accordingly user can select list of those colors and assign a value to them.
Is there any difference between accessing a property that has a backing field
private int _id;
public int Id
{
get { return _id; }
set { _id = value; }
}
versus an auto-property?
public int Id { get; set; }
The reason I'm asking is that when letting ReSharper convert a property into an auto property it seems to scan my entire solution, or at least all aspx-files.
I can't see any reason why there should be any difference between the two from outside the class. Is there?
In the Web.Config we have a timeout property. Ex:
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms loginUrl="~/Login.aspx" timeout="2880"/>
</authentication>
When loggin in, we can specify a ticket expiry date. Ex:
FormsAuthenticationTicket ticket = new FormsAuthenticationTicket(
1, id.ToString(), DateTime.Now, expiryDate, true,
securityToken, FormsAuthentication.FormsCookiePath);
Why there's two places where I can set expiration info about forms-authentication? What's the difference between them? What has more relevance?
