i have changed the routes and now the layout is not working
this the new route
[Code]....
this is where iam calling the MostraAds
[Code]....
this is the view
[Code]....
this is the controller
[Code]....
the problem is not showing the layout
[Code]....
On a MVC 3 site I have a area named "CMS" on on CMSAreaRegistration I have:
[Code]....
All the CMS controller are under the namespace Site.CMS.Controllers And in Global.Asax I have:
[Code]....
The CMS routes seem to work as expected. But the following link on my site root:
[Code]....
I tried many options to try to solve it but I always get something wrong.
I am learning .net and I have implemented SiteMapPath on a site i'm developing which uses Url Routing. It is working fine for static routes but i am trying to get it to work on a dynamically generated route that passes a {date} and a {title} but I can't find any information on it anywhere, I have a book but it doesn't go in to SiteMapPath with UrlRouting.
I have set up routes in Global.asax file:
[Code]....
My web.sitemap currently looks like:
[Code]....
I'm trying to prevent direct file requests from being accepted, and have tried this:
[Code]....
None of these worked. I want the rule to exclude any file of any filename in any directory with a matching extension. How can this be done?
No matter what I set on the radiobuttonlist, it still renders are an unordered verticle list.
<asp:RadioButtonList runat="server" ID="myCtrl"
RepeatDirection="Horizontal" RepeatLayout="Flow" style="margin-bottom: 0px" >
< asp:ListItem Text="Add it!" Selected="False" />
< asp:ListItem Text="No, thank you." Selected="false" />
< /asp:RadioButtonList >
I am common table layout return in pure html which has 4 columns
<table>
<colgroup span="1" width="20%"/>
<colgroup span="1" width="30%"/>
<colgroup span="1" width="20%"/>
<colgroup span="1" width="30%"/>
<tr>
<td colspan="3">
question data.......
</td>
<td colspan="1">
Answer data......
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
question data.......
</td>
<td colspan="2">
Answer data......
</td>
</tr>
</table>
This layout should work fine with first row columns should have width of 70 and 30% resp
and second row should have width of 50 and 50 resp. But the output what i see different.
what could be the problem and how to fix it. I couple of solutions for it
1. defining width at column level will work
2. defining a blank row with four columns above or below.
I have my body height to 100%. I then have a containers height set to 100%. If the window is smaller than the content of my container a vertical scroll bar is added but when I scroll down my container div is no longer 100%.
Please see the attached image.
I then add overflow:auto which sort of works but because it puts a scroll bar inside my container and not the window and my two images are the width of the container they no longer fit next to each other. grrrrr.com
Here is my code and css:-
<%@ Page Language="VB" AutoEventWireup="false" CodeFile="Default.aspx.vb" Inherits="_Default" %>
Code:
html, body
{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-image: url('~/Images/background-vertstrip.jpg');
[Code] ....
I need my main container to extend with its content with out scroll bars because if the vertical scroll bar shows there is not enough to have my two images side by side.
This is bizarre and seems like a bug to me.Using a table in SSRS, I have a details row, with a parent group and finally a header row. For my header row, I am referencing a particular cell in the parent group.I am doing this so that i can have the header row repeat on each page of the group.his works fine when I'm not in Print Layout mode. However, when i switch to print layout mode, or print the report itself, the data that is presented on the screen is different then what is presented when not in print layout mode. WHAT THE F*!@!??
I've been battling this for a while now and i'm at my wits end. Has anyone else experienced different results from when you are in print layout mode as opposed to being in print layout mode?
I am trying to create an Area for running DynamicData with scaffolding as an administration part. It's probably working as it should but I can't get the routing to work.
In my global.asax I have the following function to register the routes:
[Code]....
Unfortunately the "best" thing that happened to me so far was that when I check the default tables I get a message about (MetaModel.VisibleTables)
[Code]....
The problem is that I don't know why this is. Is it the routing or something else? Is it perhaps some security thing or can I not put dynamic data inside an area?
The DynamicData folder itself is located in the root of the application since that is the convention it uses and I have no intention to override that.
After some code change I have published my AJAXised web application to the server and the application failes to work properly - something weird is going on, as all .aspx pages are displayed as an ASPX markup text (page declaration, html controls, etc.), rather than a page is being rendered as an html. I have not changed the webconfig, only changed my pages' content/code behind.
View 4 RepliesFor our ASP.NET project for school we had to build a sport event management web application.
We provide the application in three languages (English, Dutch & French) which you can switch all the time. This has worked all the time for all users, well that's what we think anyway.
Yesterday I found out that switching from one to another language isn't working for 2 of our users. So I started testing a bit and I always got this error.
I'll try to explain what happens behind the doors when changing the language:
First of all the current language is saved in a session so we don't have to check the user row every time a page loads. Besides that we save the language in the users row in the database.
Users Table:
Id int
Unchecked
Email varchar(150)
Unchecked
I have a server that has been using ARR 2.0 on IIS 7. I recently added MVC 2.0 to my ASP.NET site. After adding it the ARR routes return the following error: The virtual path 'null' maps to another application, which is not allowed. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.ArgumentException: The virtual path 'null' maps to another application, which is not allowed. Source Error:
[Code]....
Stack Trace:
[Code]....
In my web.config I can remove the modules attribute runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests and the ARR works, but it makes the MVC routes stop working.
I created an MVC 2 RTM Project and created 2 Areas (Admin and Applicants) The code belows was added into the global.asax: AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas(); I also ensured that duplicate Controllers were managed as i have a homecontroller in the root and the Admin Area. The code used was; new string [] {"MyAppName.Controllers"} This too went into the global.asax The error i got is below; A route named 'Applicants_default is already in the route collection. Route names must be unique. Parameter name: name how to resolve this?
View 6 RepliesI am having an issue with MVC-3 generating outgoing routes for me. This is the address of the page I am on for both scenarios: [URL] Here are the map routes:
[Code]....
Scenario 1:
From the controller:
[Code]....
From the view:
[Code]....
The resulting link that gets created. [URL] If I change the controller code to read as follows:
[Code]....
I didn't make any changes in the view, only added those two lines to the controller and the following link is created: [URL] What am I missing here? This is consistent behavior, I was able to reproduce this in other areas of my application.
I am trying to set up dynamic routes in an MVC app, and I have this so far...
[Code]....
And that is working great for now, the only issue I am having is that I would like to have the ability to specify a comma delimited list of optional arguments in the database that I could pull out like...
Array optParams = rdr["parametersOpt"].ToString().Split(',');
But I was not sure how to stick those params into the route object properly. Could just be a minor C# syntax I am not familiar with.
I understand the basics of setting up routes, I am trying to get a handle on how to organize more complex routes. Does the Route name do anything? I havn't seen a place it's actually used. If I have the route: controller/action/id/paramA/paramB/paramC. ParamA-C could be defining multiple parameters so First/Last/Zip or Phone/Zip/Birthday. Is it common practice to name the additional parameters with a generic name like paramA vs trying to differentiate a separate route for each?
Lastly, if you have multiple sites/functional areas in 1 site, lets say the asp.net site, each area MVC, Ajax, Forums ect were all different functional areas. Is it best to create a different group of routes such as hard coding the controller like:
MVC/action/id
Ajax/action/id
Forums/action/id
or is there a better way? What I am running into is 1 piece of the site overriding the other route because of the number/type of parameters.
I been looking for hours on the web to find a good tutorial where I can do a database localization with mvc 2, I can't find any its all resource files. So I'm trying to reach out to you guys and see if you got any links, books or suggestions on this topic? I would love for it to be url routes based localization but that I can figure out somehow i think.
View 10 RepliesI'm creating a new ASP.NET MVC 2.0 web application that will have 5 main pages:
- Home
- Services
- Contact Us
- Terms & Conditions
- Priva
We are working on a project which has lots of routes that can be changed on-the-fly or new routes can be added dynamically. What are the best practices about managing lots of routes and adding routes on-the-fly without recompiling? Reading-Writing from-to database or from Xml Document in Application_Start?
View 4 Replies how to do routing. My problem basically relates to "logged in" and "logged out routes" and having both as "/".
i.e. I have home/index for logged out user which appears as "/" but this has got me confused as to how I can have home/home for logged in user and still have "/".
I keep getting 127.0.0.1/home/home
I could modify like 127.0.0.1/home - but I want it like "/". My confusion relates to the fact that the "/" [127.0.0.1/] is bound in the routes collection to home/index.
how I can modify the routes dictionary (which will be binded ONCE at the start) so that the "/" can be shared for logged and non-logged users ?
I'm looking to add more organization to my Views folder by adding subfolders to the existing structure.
Views
Configuration
Controller
View View
Controller
View
Controller
View
Controller
View
So in order to add the "Configuration" subfolder, I attempted to add a route to the routetable:
[Code]....
This results in a 404 error.
All of the similar posts I've seen on this site and the web have to do with adding "areas" which don't seem to be applicable in the MVC3 arena.
How to get url from RouteTable.Routes collection by key?
View 2 RepliesI am using .NET Page Routing (not MVC) to get pretty URLs (or at least removing the file extensions) on my site.On my search page, when a user searches for "stuff" it redirects then to /search/stuff for the results. However when I put in something like "stuff yes:" it gives me a HTTP 400 Bad Request Error.
I tried using javascript to encode the search value before being submitted, and confirmed that "stuff yes:" was converted to "staff%20yes%3A", yet when it performs the routing redirect, in the URL it shows "staff%20yes:" and causes the bad request. Why is it not saving the encoding for the typically illegal characters and how can I make it so?
I have an Asp.Net website which should have a variable as a string in the url.
The content of the website changes depending on the year. the idea is to have this year in the url in a clean way.
http://localhost/YEAR/index.aspx
I have done this in MVC with routing, but i have no idea how to do it in asp.net I basically need just 1 route I guess. so all URL's will be as they were before (index.aspx, ...) basically in stead of having ?year=2011 behind EVERY url in the website i'd like to have this value in the route.
I'm reading about URL routing at How to: Define Routes for Web Forms Applications and there's something in the example I don't understand. If you look at the example provided below,
routes.MapPageRoute("", "SalesReport/{locale}/{year}/{*queryvalues}", "~/sales.aspx");
