SQL Reporting :: PDF Or Print A .rdlc Report Without A Reportviewer
May 6, 2010
I hope that I am posting this in the correct forum and its not a duplicate...
I have the following code that from a click of a button will create a PDF of a .rdlc report. It works great but I have to have a reportviewer setup on the page in order for it to work.
Is there anyway via VB code to PDF the report without having to incorporate a reportviewer on the screen? What happens if I have a report with more than 1 tableadapter configured in it?
Also, how can the code be set to Print the report without a reportviewer?
I have multiple reports that take the same parameters. Need to create a master report with all the reports merged together. I dont want to copy paste the rdlc files into one large file. found a control by Telerik called ReportBook but it costs money!! [URL] anyone knows something similar? or am i missing something very obvious? using visual studio 2005... will subreports solve my problem? not sure how these work. so say i have a report that lists employers and i create a subreport that lists all employees for a particular empoyer. is it then possible on one rdlc to have the list of employers and a bunch of subreports for each employer's employees?
In VS2008 C# web applications when using Microsoft Reportviewer to create an embedded rdlc report you can generate a report on the screen but when you try to send that same report to the printer by clicking the printer icon on the toolbar you get an error stating:
"unable to load client print control"
How do you get the report to print on the printer?
I have this rdlc report which i created in visual studion, set it's datasources, etc.. when i publish the web application to the local iis on my machine if i print the report i will see a print dialog(correct behaviour) but then when i published the application to a hosting server i cannot at all print the report, at first i used to get a javascript error with "access denied as error message" and on top of the screen download active x control,was able to donwload the atcive x control but now when i click print dialog i get internet exploer has stopped working.
I have a problem while printing rdlc report (local). The number of pages of the report in viewer is fewer than that in the print. This leads to a problem while printing the report from - to a particular page. For eg: The report viewer shows 9 pages while viewing but when I go for print it prints 14 pages. The data is not lost but records from page 1 are transfered to page 2 while printing.
I'm designing a layout for a report in VS2008 using SSRS/RDLC format. And every time I setup a part of that report i test it on my workstation to see if everything is ok. But, today, i finished the first page of that report and uploaded it to my hosting server (were it's going to be used), and when i press the button to convert the report to .pdf and download it the layout is completely ruined :-/ When i do the same thing in my workstation every thing 'comes out' beautifully, but up on the server it doesn't .
When designing an rdlc report using the VS 2010 report designer, report items such as charts demand a dataset. After designing the report, I add a ReportViewer to a webform, and it demands all of its own datasources. How do I hook up the DataSet I have coupled to the report without duplicating the DAL functionality in the viewer page?
I am having trouble with .rdlc field sizing. Regardless of the table/field size settings in my .rdlc report, the reportviewer always shrinks the fields and table. I have tested everything I can think of, and searched the web for a solution to this problem, but no luck yet.
I have also tried just about every size setting there is and even looked in the output html, but nothing seems to be decreasing the width. I have attached two images. in the first image, I have added a black border around my table, and a red border around one of the fields to demonstrate the auto-shrink issue. the second image shows my vs report settings.
I am using asp .net 4.0 report viewer...how is bind rdlc dynamically using stored procedure..send me some useful links r some example using stored procedure.in asp .net4.0 .
Can you please point me to an example of how to implement drill down in RDLC? I am in a situation where the first report appears perfectly, but when I click on a drill down link , i get an error A data source instance has not been supplied for the data source 'RecuirtmentDataSet_ProfileTracker'.
I have created many reports in my ASP.Net 3.5 app's and using VB Code-behind. I have the following code that will take the report from the reportviewer and on a click of a button, export it to PDF. So now, I can hide the reportviewer and just have the button click events generate my PDF's. I do not know how to tweak this code to enable me to print directly from another button's click event without the reportviewer being visible.
[Code]....
What I am looking for is how to fill the tableadapter that I am using in the .xsd dataset file to the I do not have to incorporate reportviewers anymore?I know my code above would need to be adjusted so that its not looking at ReportViewer1 for the Report/Data... But I do not know how to do this.
So here is the situation. We have a very simple report on a report server, which is the same server as our application server. When viewing the report directly on the report server, printing works fine. Also, when running my asp.net application locally in debug mode printing works fine. The only time we have a problem is when we deploy to the application server and access the reportviewer embedded in the page. When pressing the print button in this situation, nothing happens at all. Then when pressed a second time, I get a javascript error saying "Permission denied." with no further information. Then the page automatically refreshes and that cycle starts over.
I am getting an error : Unable to load Print control with the defalt print option of the report viewer
there is a RSClient.cab which we would need to install to get the print control running in every client but then all the clients in the organization would not have a the admin rights to install it.
