Security :: 401.2 Error Not Being Caught By Web.config?
Jul 6, 2010
I have the following definition in my web.config
[Code]....
But when I get a 401.2 it still gives me the ugly Access Denied Screen instead of my redirect page. The files are in the root with no security on them.
View 6 Replies
Similar Messages:
Sep 14, 2010
I am having an issue where if I change my url to .asp from .aspx i get a 404 error but it is not handled by my custom errors. If I change the url to def23947823h.aspx it is caught and redirects to correct page.
[Code]....
View 8 Replies
Feb 11, 2011
I have (pretty much) the following code in my protected void Application_Error(object sender, EventArgs e) method in Global.asax....
Exception ex = Server.GetLastError();
if (ex is
System.Security.SecurityException)
Response.Redirect("Logon.aspx");
else
Response.Redirect("ErrorPage.aspx");
If I navigate to a page before I log on the exception is caught and I am redirected to Login.aspx as I would expect. However, this is only working when debugging using VS on my local machine.When uploaded to the live environment, the exception is not caught and the user is presented with "Security Exception - Request for principal permission failed."
View 1 Replies
Oct 12, 2010
Using VB, VS 2010, I am wanting a remote web app to send me an e-mail when it finds an error using the try catch. What is the best way to do that?
View 4 Replies
Feb 9, 2011
In our project WCF service is acting as our BLL.
i had scenario where i had to fill list of object class without knowing its type see code:
Added contract
[OperationContract]
dynamic GetReferenceTableData(string tableName);
method in service:
public dynamic GetReferenceTableData(string tableName)
{
try
{
dynamic tableData = ReferenceTableDAL.GetReferenceTableData(tableName);
return tableData;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw;
}
}
method at DAL(ReferenceTableDAL):
public static dynamic GetReferenceTableData(string tableName)
{
Database db = DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase(Flags.ConnectionStringKey);
DbCommand dbCommand = db.GetStoredProcCommand("USP_GETTABLEDATA");
dynamic objDynamic = null;
if (tableName.ToLower() == "a")
{
objDynamic = new List<A>();
}
else if (tableName.ToLower() == "b")
{
objDynamic = new List<B>();
}
else if (tableName.ToLower() == "c")
{
objDynamic = new List<C>();
}
try
{
db.DiscoverParameters(dbCommand);
dbCommand.Parameters["IN_TABLENAME"].Value = tableName;
DataSet dsTableData = db.ExecuteDataSet(dbCommand);
if (tableName.ToLower() == "a")
{
foreach (DataRow dataRow in dsTableData.Tables[0].Rows)
{
objDynamic.Add((A)dataRow);
}
}
else if (tableName.ToLower() == "b")
{
foreach (DataRow dataRow in dsTableData.Tables[0].Rows)
{
objDynamic.Add((B)dataRow);
}
}
else if (tableName.ToLower() == "c")
{
foreach (DataRow dataRow in dsTableData.Tables[0].Rows)
{
objDynamic.Add((C)dataRow);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw;
}
return objDynamic;
}
@ Aspx
try
{
using (DataServiceRef.DataServiceClient petService = new DataServiceRef.DataServiceClient())
{
dynamic tableData = petService.GetReferenceTableData(tableName);
//tableData is null ,exception
}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw;
}
There is no exception at dal or service end when i debug list gets filled ok but when returns to aspx error at aspx(no exception gets caught at @ service) but exception at aspx i.e:
Message:The underlying connection was closed: The connection was closed unexpectedly.
Stack Trace: at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.WaitForReply(TimeSpan timeout)
View 3 Replies
Aug 9, 2010
I developed a site for a client a couple of years ago. It uses the the standard ASP.NET Membership, authentication, etc. I just added the profile section with (2) fields: CustID AgntID. Now whenever I load the page with any Profile code in it I receive this error: Violation of UNIQUE KEY constraint 'IX_aspnet_Users'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.aspnet_Users'. The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK__aspnet_Pr__UserI__3CA9F2BB". The conflict occurred in database "broo001", table "dbo.aspnet_Users", column 'UserId'. The statement has been terminated. The statement has been terminated. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Violation of UNIQUE KEY constraint 'IX_aspnet_Users'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.aspnet_Users'. The INSERT statement conflicted with the FOREIGN KEY constraint "FK__aspnet_Pr__UserI__3CA9F2BB". The conflict occurred in database "broo001", table "dbo.aspnet_Users", column 'UserId'. The statement has been terminated. The statement has been terminated. Source Error:
[Code]....
Stack Trace:
[Code]....
Here is the code from my web.config:
[Code]....
Here is some of my page code:
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
Mar 25, 2010
aspnet_regiis.exe -pdf "connectionStrings" c:web.config And this is the error I got. Error - "The configuration for physical path 'C:Web.Config' cannot be opened. And the permissions of that file is not read only.
View 2 Replies
Apr 6, 2010
We use Sharepoint to control our websites. We build the sites, then load them into the sharepoint server. My question is if I use windows authentication, how can I get my role security in my web config file to coencide with the asp.net controls that use the Forms authentication. Is there a differenence? Our security uses a session variable for security but there is no where to set up their permissions except in active directory. I hope this makes sense because I would like to implement the LoginView with Role groups but how can I give them the role="administrator"? Do I have to go into active directory and give them these permissions(would take awhile due to the size of the company)? Or do I have to set up priveladges in the web.config file for each user(difficult I think)?
View 5 Replies
Nov 22, 2010
My question is, I have a PL, BL and DAL layered architecture (In which all these components are hosted in a single web server).
With the above architecture, i have only placed try catch block in all my events in aspx.cs pages in PL ALONE and NO TRY CATCH BLOCK IN BL AND DAL.
There is one command timeout exception happening at the DAL layer and the exception bubbles back to the PL(aspx page event which is having the try catch block). This try catch block catches the exeption and logs the exception information to database and displays useful information in the UI.
WIth the above approach, sometime very rarely(only once till now) exception is not caught in the PL for the commandtimeout exception thrown from DAL implicitly.I confirmed the exception is not caught because the exception information is not logged into the database and also no useful information displayed in UI.
Why the exception from DAL dint bubble down to PL? Do we need to explicitly throw exception from DAL or BL i.e by having try catch block in BL and DAL ?
View 1 Replies
Jul 6, 2010
[Code]....
When doing some custom validation on DateTime fields the thrown exceptions are not caught and simply cause the application to end.
View 4 Replies
Jan 21, 2010
I have tried this on two different controller methods now, and both times, even if the linq2sql doesn't allow the data to be saved, the code never jumps into the catch block.
I've watched the noun object in the middle of the trace, and the isvalid property is false, but the modelstate isvalid is true. Either way, the code never jumps into the catch block.I'm pulling my hair out about this. I feel like it will be something really silly.
The code all works similar to nerd dinner.
NounRepository nounRepository = new NounRepository();
Noun noun = new Noun();
try[code]...
I'd rather not have to add code in this manner though, as it seems like an unnecessary duplication.
View 3 Replies
Jun 22, 2012
I'm sending emails inviting contacts to login to setup an account on a customers website. I'm using SMTP from web methods in code behind... These emails have clickable links that make them get caught as spam.
Code:
<html><body>Please use this link <a href="http://xxx.yyy.zz.aa/asdfasdf.aspx?invite=' + CAST(@guid as varchar(100)) + '">Click Here</a> to create an account.</body></html>
How can I avoid this?
View 3 Replies
Dec 18, 2010
I have basic client-side validation working in my MVC3 RC2 application, but I'm now interested in recommended practices for conveying server side validation errors, as well as server side exceptions, to the client. I know I can add properties to my view model and display these if populated, but I don't want to reinvent the wheel, and I would like to tie in with MVC's way of doing things. So, how should I, a) notify the user of server side validation errors, and, b) notify the user of server side exceptions, e.g.
View 1 Replies
Nov 11, 2010
I know there are a few posts on this issue already, however I haven't found the answers I was really looking for.
My situation is like this: I have a DLL project containing my business logic. Then I have a web application that refers to this DLL, and calls a function from it. And I have a global.asax which handles errors on Application_Error
Sample:
// MyWebsite.aspx.cs
using MyBusinessLogic;
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
MyBusinessLogicClass.DoSomething();
}
// global.asax.cs
protected void Application_Error(object sender, EventArgs e)
[Code].....
View 6 Replies
Feb 12, 2010
I have a page here with a few list views on it that are all bound to Linq data sources and they seem to be working just fine.I want to add validation such that when a checkbox (IsVoid on the object) is checked, comments must be entered (VoidedComments on the object).
Here's the bound object's OnValidate method:
partial void OnValidate(ChangeAction action)
{
if (action == ChangeAction.Update) [code]....
Despite there being a dynamic validator on the page referencing the same ValidationGroup as the dynamic control, when the exception fires, it's caught in JavaScript and the debugger wants to break in. The message is never delivered to the UI as expected.
View 2 Replies
Mar 23, 2011
I have a .exe application that runs daily. I want to avoid sending emails each time an exception is caught.I want to compile a list of errors (in a unique log file fileupload[mm/dd/yyyy].log) while the application runs. Then send an email with the log attached after it the application finishes.What would be the approach for this?
View 1 Replies
May 7, 2010
For the first time in my career, I'm working on an ASP.Net (v3.5) project that has been set up as a Visual Studio 2008/10 Web Site Project.
I'm not keen on this way of working this way for various reasons but for the moment and until such time as the company sees the virtue in working in an environment with namespaces, designer and project files etc., I have to continue with the existing codebase.
I've run into some odd issues since I began this but perhaps the oddest one of all is that althought VS lets me build the code, it doesn't reliably pick up compilation errors so these are not noticed until runtime.
I know the website model allows dynamic/hot compilation when a request is made for a specific but I can't see why it wouldn't do this when I manually (F5) build/rebuild the project. Its immensely annoying as you can imagine and I can't find a workaround.
View 3 Replies
Oct 17, 2010
When the Stored procedure is executed through SQL Server Management Studio, its taking 23 seconds,When the same Stored proc is called through web app, its throwing below copied exception. It is noticed that when the data is more than 100k records this exception is thrown other wise expected records are shown in UI. Another stored proc from the same app returns over 150k records without any excetpion. Can't conclude that the exception is in Stored proc, because it works from SQL Server Management studio, but throws below exception from Web app.
[Code]....
View 5 Replies
Apr 7, 2010
Im uysing my custom login for user,and suppose im having a group of user who can login in.and rest of other should be deniedso how i can maintain that in web.config,
View 2 Replies
Feb 6, 2011
I have done forms authentication a couples of times before but this time I cant get my head around something.Somehow altough the user authenticated,the destination page does not get this.The destination page is called Approval.aspx and is located in the /Admin directory which is secured by having its own web config with those settings:
[Code]....
If I remove the <deny users="?" />,then everything works fine but obviously everyone has access to that page.I only want that the user of role Admin can access it. I have implemented the standard VS 2010 login controland the user gets to the destination page with a response redirect:
[Code]....
Why does the destination page not realize that the user is authenticated and does not treat the useras a user in role "Admin"?
[Code]....
While debugging the login page I can see that the user has the right role "Admin".
View 9 Replies
Jan 8, 2011
Within my site structure there is a folder called { Account } where I only want certain users to have access to. At University, my lecturer provided us with the following instructions:
Create new website and delete the default.aspx file in the Solution ExplorerRight click on the website path at the top of the Solution Explorer window and add a new folder. Name the folder Secure.To set up the security, select Website and then ASP.NET configuration.Select the Security link and in the Users column click "Select Authentication Type" and on the page that appears check the "From the Internet" option. Then click the "Done" button.Still in the security section select "Create Access Rules" and then click on the Secure folder and select "Anonymous Users" and "Deny". Then click OK. You can now close down this window.In the Solution Explorer click the "Refresh" button and you should see two web.config files appear.I am following his instructions to the letter, but I am not getting the {web.config } for my { Account } folder ! What am I doing wrong ?
PS. Is a users table in a database redundant in ASP.NET because there is already a user's table with roles built into ASP.NET ?
View 1 Replies
Jan 26, 2010
I need to set my logged in time in web.config but I do not know how? I get logged out after a while if I do no do anything in the website but I wanna be logged in for 120 minutes.
View 3 Replies
Jan 2, 2010
i have mail setting in web.config
[Code]....
Now how i encrypt only the Password ?
View 6 Replies
May 3, 2010
I am wondering how to encrypt the below information in the "web.config" file of the "Account" folder (where we have the secured pages):
[Code]....
My issue here is that even after I compiled my application (using "aspnet_compiler -v /reports c:
eports"), the information inside the web.config file of the Account folder still not encrypted, and I want to publish my site to the customer server. So, since this server is a customer server, then they can access this "web.config" file and change our web-application security behaviour (correct me if I am wrong). Basically, I don't want the customer to even have access to our secured pages when they access our web-application using the web browser. How to solve this issue?
View 2 Replies
Feb 2, 2010
I have a basic intranet website for my company but there is one page that cannot allow anonymous as I need to grab the user's login. I created the site and everything works perfectly on my development machine. once moved to the production server it no longer works.
Here is the problem: I can get the login prompt when going to the secure page, but when trying to login I get a "401.1 - Unauthorized", even when trying to login as a server administrator. Here is the authentication portion in my web.config:
[Code]....
I have done this before and always gotten it to work. I hope I am just missing something very simple...
View 5 Replies