I'm trying to use both the default Membership and Profile Providers and can not for the life of me get both to work at the same time. I'm using MS Visual Web Developer 2010 Express and when I create a new Project I get access to the Membership but not the Profile. When I create a new Website I get just the opposite i.e. access to Profile and not Membership. What do I need to do to get access to both?
View 2 RepliesI'm trying to update/create the user profile for a specific user that will not be the logged on user of the moment. I'm able to do this with the following code:
'Dim p As ProfileBase = ProfileBase.Create(Email, False)
I can't get my profile providers (supported databases are SQL Server and MySQL) working if I use DSN in connectionstrings like "dsn=dsnName;User ID=userif;Password=psw;". Profiles are working fine with "normal" connectionstrings.
View 2 RepliesOur site has got two ASP.NET membership providers. The built in one, and a custom one (SqlMembershipProvider.
I am able to log into both no problems, but I don't necessary require the ability to have both logged in at the same time.
The issue I have is as follows:
User "person_a@site.com" logs into the built in provider. They then navigate to the section of the site where we require the custom provider.
On this page, I can check if they are authenticated, and get their username. I can then get a MembershipUser object form the custom providers GetUser method. (HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name)
It is possible (and very likely) that the username "person_a@site.com" could also exist in the users for the custom provider.
But, I don't want them to be logged in here, as they haven't authenticated against the custom provider.
So, is it possible to check which proivider HttpContext.Current.User was generated from.
I have built two websites, both of them use a custom membership provider I have written myself.
One of these sites is already a long time online and runs fine. Now I have installed the other site on the same webserver in the same Web as a different application. Also have I given a seperate ApplicationPool for each solution.
If now the client logs on to one site, he looses the session on the other and vice versa. It's not possible to be loged on on both sites together. All the rest works fine.
What is the connection between the two sites. Is it necessary to change something in my membership providers?
Using the a Membership provider and the MVC framework, is it possible that routes are dynamically changed so that a already logged in user goes to his own page, rather than the default.
At the moment I go to the default. If the user is already logged in or not, there I do a redirect to their own page. This can't be the correct way! Can it?
In RegisterRoutes I have this
routes.IgnoreRoute("{resource}.axd/{*pathInfo}");
routes.MapRoute("Default",
"{controller}/{action}/{id}",
new { controller = "Home", action = "Index", id = "" }
);
I know this question is asked (and answered) a lot already, but I believe my situation is unique.
We are using the ASP.NET SqlMembershipProvider. However, we also have some less-secure content we would like to secure by adding users directly to the web.config, like so...
<forms loginUrl="login.aspx" defaultUrl="default.aspx">
<credentials passwordFormat="Clear">
<user name="user1" password="123" />
<user name="user2" password="456" />
</credentials>
</forms>
Is it possible to use this method alongside a SQL Membership Provider? If so, how?
I know it's bad practice to do this. This is only a stepping stone as we move parts of our website into the asp.net application. We would like some of those password to be easily editable without going to the database.
I am writing a login routine that uses a .NET login control and I have a membership provider as well and set it all up in the config file. But I don't plan on using a connection string as I will be calling a web service in my ValidateUser function. Do I need the connection string in the config because it seems to throw an error if I don't have it.
In that case if you need it then wouldn't it be better to treat this membership provider class more as a normal class and just make calls to it directly like any class and not put any setting on my login control and remove the entry from my web.config
In my web application am using ASP.Net Membership for authentication ann role management.But now i have a situation where i need to authenticate multiple clients against different DB based upon the URL request being send. Below is my web.Config Details.
<authentication>
<forms loginUrl="Login.aspx" defaultUrl="Login.aspx" />
</authentication>
<membership defaultProvider="QuickStartMembershipSqlProvider">
<providers>
<clear/>
<add connectionStringName="MEMBERSHIP_AND_ROLES" minRequiredPasswordLength="5"
minRequiredNonalphanumericCharacters="0"
enablePasswordReset="true"
requiresQuestionAndAnswer="false"
applicationName="SecurityQuickStart"
requiresUniqueEmail="true" passwordFormat="Hashed" name="QuickStartMembershipSqlProvider" type="System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/>
</providers>
</membership>
<roleManager enabled="true" defaultProvider="QuickStartRoleManagerSqlProvider">
<providers>
<clear/>
<add connectionStringName="MEMBERSHIP_AND_ROLES" applicationName="SecurityQuickStart" name="QuickStartRoleManagerSqlProvider" type="System.Web.Security.SqlRoleProvider, System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a"/>
</providers>
</roleManager>
ConnectionString.Config:
<add name="MEMBERSHIP_AND_ROLES" connectionString="Data Source=x.x.x.x;Initial Catalog=xxx;User ID=xxx;Password=xxx" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>
Am using form authentication for user authentication. In my login page am using Membership.ValidateUser(username,password),which is using default membership provider. Now my situation is i need to override the default DB and connect to multiple DB based on URL request send to my web server.
I'd like to know if its possible to use two membership providers within a single application. I need to have a membership provider "power users" and administrators on a site and a different one for clients and customers who will want to register on the site. I'd like to know if its possible to have two different membership providers to handle these two different sets of users. If it is, how do i go about it?
View 4 RepliesI'd like to know how membership providers works under the hood, if it uses cookies, session, the principal and identity thread objects, etc.. etc.. where can I find information?
View 3 RepliesI am now using SQL Server 2008 EXPRESS x64 on a PC running WINDOWS 7 ULTIMATE x64 bit.
how to configure ASP.Net Membership Providers because I can't attach a database created after this example :
http://aquesthosting.headtreez.com/doc/29423088-74cd-4d51-b2ee-3cb958f08d1a
(I have created runproviders.sql with my Visual Studio x64 Win64 Command Prompt (2010) )
Still now working...
Every time I run ASP.NET Configuration -> Provider -> Select a single provider for all site management data and TEST for
AspNetSqlProvider
I get the following error every time :
"Could not establish a connection to the database.
If you have not yet created the SQL Server database, exit the Web Site Administration tool, use the aspnet_regsql command-line utility to create and configure the database, and then return to this tool to set the provider."
I can tell you for sure that my new created database is working because i used a web page with a CreateUserWizard1 control and I can create new users.Even I can see the new creted user with ASP.NET Configuration -> Security.
I am new to using the membership provider. I have been working in a small shop that has very focused programming and we are starting to venture out as our needs have grown. My question is the following:
Once I have created the asp schema and I set up users. How do I perform database access using those user accounts? I know how to perform access using a database account (schema), but do not understand how to use a user that only exists in a user table to access data tables.
Do I use an anonymous account and control access on the front end?
How to I track audit fields?
I want to know if we can use multiple membership providers simultaneously in a single ASP.net application.
View 1 Replieshow do i do that through config file?
View 11 RepliesI have created two custome membership providers that I would like to add to my web.config. The first one would be the default that the asp.net application would use. The second would be called by a WCF service that I have in the same application.
The providers in the membership section of my web.config looks like the following:
<add name="SiteProvider" type="MyNameSpace.SiteProvider, MyNameSpace" ApplicationName="Si2" EnablePasswordReset="true" PasswordStrengthRegularExpression="(?=[w$#_ ]{8,})(?=.*?d)(?=.*?[A-z])[w$#_ ]*" ResetPasswordMinimumLength="8" ResetPasswordPattern="USL9SLU9SLU9SLLLL" ResetPasswordAllowDuplicateCharacters="false" />
<add name="WCFProvider" type="MyNameSpace.WCFProvider, MyNameSpace" ApplicationName="Si2" EnablePasswordReset="true" PasswordStrengthRegularExpression="(?=[w$#_ ]{8,})(?=.*?d)(?=.*?[A-z])[w$#_ ]*" ResetPasswordMinimumLength="8" ResetPasswordPattern="USL9SLU9SLU9SLLLL" ResetPasswordAllowDuplicateCharacters="false" />
I receive the error "Item has already beed added. Key in dictionary: 'SiteProvider' Key being added: 'SiteProvider'" any time I browse to the site.
This doesnt make sense to me sense they have unique names. If i remove the second provider the site is browseable.
To begin with I work on the large application, that has a WinForms client and server. Server in our case is the set of WCF services. There is one service that is responsible for authentication of users. The logic of authentication is custom and complex and authentication service uses different membership providers.
We want to protect the access to server services for non-authenticated users. The users must firstly authenticate and than use other services (users in this case are the other systems, services, WinForms client, etc.). On this basis, we decided to use the ASP.NET Url/File Authorization feature.
So, I set on the ASP.NET compatibility mode, allowed cookie in all binding configurations, added AspNetCompatibilityRequirements attribute to our services and added the followingconfigurations to config:
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms cookieless="UseCookies">
<credentials passwordFormat="Clear" />
</forms>
</authentication>
<authorization>
<deny users="?" />
</authorization>
...
<location path="AuthenticationService.svc">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
In the authenticate method of our authentication service I add the following code:
public AuthenticationResult AuthenticateUser(string username, string password)
{
AuthenticationResult result = new AuthenticationResult();
result = Authenticate(username, password);
if (result.IsAuthenticated)
FormsAuthentication.SetAuthCookie(username, true);
return result;
}
Next, I wrote the following code:
var authClient = new AuthenticationServiceClient();
var result = authClient.AuthenticateUser("user", "password");
var otherClient = new OtherServiceClient();
var temp = otherClient.DoSomething();
But after authentication I can't access to OtherServiceClient...
So, how can I share the call context between the WCF services calls? Could anybody provide some useful articles about this question?
After running the aspnet_regsql.exe tool, i notice a bunch of different tables pertaining to the ASPNET security (e.g. aspnet_Applications, aspnet_Membership, aspnet_Paths, aspnet_Personalations, aspnet_Profile, aspnet_Roles, aspnet_SchemaVersion, aspnet_Users, aspnet_UsersInRoles). Do the different providers (AspNetSqlMembershipProvider, AspNetSqlProfileProvider, AspNetSQLRoleProvider) relate or associated with certain aspnet_xyz tables? I imagine the AspNetSQLProfileProvider is responsible for the aspnet_Profile table correct? The AspNetSQLRoleProvider probably is tied to the aspnet_Users, aspnet_Roles, aspnet_UsersInRoles table? Any links documenting the relationship between teh providers and the aspnet_xyz tables?
View 1 RepliesI have a custom membership provider and a custom role provider in a .NET assembly dll called Qws.Web. The full namespace path to the classes are Qws.Web.Providers.QwsMembershipProvider and Qws.Web.Providers.QwsRoleProvider They both inherit MembershipProvider and RoleProvider respectively When I include the assembly using a project reference in VS2010 it all works fine. The minute I publish the website and project to the staging server (using IIS7) i get the following error: Unable to find the requested .Net Framework Data Provider. It may not be installed. You can see the site at [URL] I've tried all of the usual stuff and been trawling the internet for the last two days.
1. The Qws.Web.dll file IS in the bin folder
2. My Web.Config file is below:
[Code]....
3. The providers are not in the GAC and not in the machine.config file as I only want them available for this site.
Unfortunately, all the examples for Forms Authentication Code Behind w/ Custom Role and Membership Providers I find online are written with a VB.NET code behind and I need a C# code behind. I need a codebehind that will do the following:
authenticate user upon login button click
if user active_flag=0 (false) OR password!=@password, display error: "Access Denied"
if user admin_flag=1 & active flag=1 (true), redirect to admin_pageszipsearch.aspx
if user admin_flag=0 (false) & active_flag=1 (true), redirect to pageszipsearch.aspx
Default.aspx Code:
<asp:Login ID="LoginUser" runat="server" EnableViewState="false" RenderOuterTable="false">
<LayoutTemplate>
<span class="failureNotification">
<asp:Literal ID="FailureText" runat="server"></asp:Literal>
</span>......
This is the first time i would be using .net membership providers and i need to add some extra columns and chage a couple of existing datatypes of the exising columns.
my Q is:
1)can i do this without having to suffer down the road.
2)can i modify the existing sp's in sql08 or would i need to use additional sp's for the new columns that i add.
my user will use form authentication against Active Directory or database. Theres no Windows Integrated Authentication there!!
What i want is when the user submit the authentication form, it will try to validate the user against Active Directory and if it fail, try with the database.
How can i do that? What i had in mind was to build a custom membership provider that will encapsulate the logic but im not sure how to start.
In my web.config I have:
[Code]....
If I just have ADProvider1 it works, when I add ADProvider2, even though for testing I only use ADProvider1 I get an error: "Unable to establish secure connection with the server" Am I adding the second provider to the membership section incorrectly?
I have a web application which uses membership and profiles. I successfully used the WebProfileBuilder extension, so my profile class is correctly generated, and is working nicely. However, after a new request of my client, I need now to move that profile management part into another assembly (so I'd be able to get profile information in a windows service running on the same machine).
What I made is created the new assembly, moved my generated profile file, and tried to use it from the other assembly, but without any success. I always get a SettingsPropertyNotFoundException. My thought is that the profile system doesn't know where to find its connection information, so I tried to add the connectionstring and provider in the app.config of this assembly, but this doesn't seem to work.
I'm currently developing a web site that will make heavy use of asp.net membership. (Using Umbraco, but that just uses the regular asp.net membership provider).I want to store some extended information about a user and I'm considering if I should store the information in the profile or in a custom table. Is there any pros / cons to any specific method? Some properties like payment details are more natural to place in the profile, on the other hand, a transaction log seems less natural residing in the user profile (IMHO). Any thoughts on this?
View 2 Replies