WCF / ASMX :: Partial Classes With In Web Services Proxy File?
Jan 28, 2011
I am implementing a simple complex number calculator web service. I am trying to pass an object from the service to the client. I declared a single complexnumber class in my .asmx file, I later use this class in webmethods
I want to create two partial classes for the single aspx file. I am using vs2005 dotnet 2.0. i could not able to access method from one partial class in another partial classes.
Partial class 1 : my main aspx page public partial class _Default : System.Web.UI.Page {[code]...
i could not able to access meth method in partial class 2
I am following the Nerd Dinner tutorial as I'm learning ASP.NET MVC, and I am currently on Step 3: Building the Model. One part of this section discusses how to integrate validation and business rule logic with the model classes. All this makes perfect sense. However, in the case of this source code, the author only validates one class: Dinner.
What I am wondering is, say I have multiple classes that need validation (Dinner, Guest, etc). It doesn't seem smart to me to repeatedly write these two methods in the partial class:
[code]....
This doesn't "feel" right, but I wanted to check with SO to get opinions of individuals smarter than me on this. I also tested it out, and it seems that the partial keyword on the OnValidate method is causing problems (understandably so). This doesn't seem possible to fix (but I could very well be wrong).
I have a serializable POCO called DataUnification.ClientData.ClientInfo in a .NET class library project A.It's used in a parameter for a web service defined in project B:
public XmlDocument CreateNewClient(ClientInfo ci, string system)
I now wish to call this web method from project C and use the original DataUnification.ClientData.ClientInfo type in the parameter. However due to the generated proxy class it has now become a different type: WebServices.ClientDataUnification.DataUnificationWebService.ClientInfo.As far as .NET is concerned these are not the same types.
I'm about a custom WSDL File Generation for a Classic ASP.NET XML Web Service.
The issue is I didn't find out how to specify mandatory parameters in my WSDL, since ASP.NET Web Services are generated on ?WSDL location, I thought I would do that from Web Method Annotations, but I found no issue.
Also I have been on a pose where the developer could hide WSDL Generation by specifying a custom WSDL Binding. But in my case I need to let other system access ?WSDL location with a Customized WSDL.
I have a WSDL, and I need to write this web service. (I am not the client, I am the provider of this service) Is there any tool and/or best approch to create this Web Service?
I'm using Entity Framework to create my data objects. Here's what my designer.cs file looks like:
[code]....
But my validations aren't loaded. If I try to submit the form with no value for Name, I get an error message saying The value '' is invalid. instead of my error message.
I have an asmx file that was created using notepad. Then I created the proxy class using wsdl.exe. Now I have a dll that I want to put it in GAC. GAC needs the DLL to have a strong name. How can I create a strong name for the web service?
When I do server side soap service programming, I create proxy classes first using some xsd schemas.
Xsd schemas are already defined by another company.my problem is these schemas have master xsds and child xsds which means on master xsds there are references to child xsds.
In this case I have 2 different questions.
1) Is it possible to use xsd schemas directly to build soap service without generating proxy classes.
2) If it is not possible, I am using vs command prompt by typing xsd /c /l:vb nameofmasterfile.xsd
but while there references to child xsds, I am getting an error msg. thats why I had to flatten these xsds in the past. Is it possible to generate all classes in one shot. any external program also ok.
I am trying to setup a base product class that will be inherited by a more specific class later. Here is my scenario. I have a table called ProductBase, it contains three fields, BaseProductId(PK), CatalogNum, and ListPrice. Every product in the system will share these attributes. Next, I have a table called Shirt, with three fields BaseProductId(PK, FK), Color, and Size.
I then setup an Entity Data Model that pulled in both of these tables, and created to classes BaseProduct and Shirt.
So, in my model, I want to do something like this:
[Code]....
The problem I have with this approach, is that I cannot force the properties for the Shirt. What if I make a change to the BaseProduct? What happens when I have multiple product types, will I have to repeat this code?
I've been tinkering for hours and I can't figure this out. Seems like it should be pretty straight-forward. Is it possible to use reflection to get a reference to a partial page class given the page's name and path so that I can iterate through the page and examine its controls? I am not looking to examine the currently loaded page, but another page within the same website.
The symbols won't load for a partial class (i.e. MyPage.aspx.cs code behind) and I need to debug that part of it. How do you get the symbols to load for a partial class and thus debug it while attached to process?Some other details: I publish my website (its an ASP.NET 2.0 site) which is with "Use Fixed naming and single page assemblies" checkbox which just creates a .dll for each aspx.cs code behind but no .pdb version of it. There are other ways to deploy like a single .dll file.
I have a virtual directory called "MySite.web", and a folder inside this directory called "Sell" where I have my webform Create.aspx and several user controls like CreateAd_CarsAndTrucks.ascx and CreateAd_Motorcycles.ascx.When I try to compile, I get several errors in Create.aspx stating that public partial class Sell_CreateAd_CarsAndTruck, Sell_CreateAd_Motorcycles are not recognized. I am looking at both classes right now (they're in the same folder), so I have no idea why the compiler's not finding them.One odd thing is that, for a moment, it did find one of them (Sell_CreateAd_CarsAndTruck), but from an assembly in either folder "Temporary ASP.Net" under c:Windows or the one in c:usersusername. So I closed my IDE, and deleted both folders. When I open the solution once again, it recreates "Temporary ASP.Net" under c:usersusername and then creates a "App_Web_createad_carsandtrucks.ascx.5a5f4927.ebg000r0.dll" that it uses as definition for the class. But it never uses the actual class as a definition. Basically, when I right-click on the class instance to view its definition, it takes me to metadata.
Why are Razor views not generated as partial classes? Making them partial classes gives us the option to have a code behind where we can do some of the stuff we're forced to do in the template itself in the code behind file.
Yes, I know the standard "go-to" thing is Html helper but I don't want to use Html helpers for these things as they are too specific to the view in question and besides, having a clutter of extension methods is just not the way to go.
I'd like to see Razor views generated as partial classes.
I have written a t4 template that basically replaces the work done by StronglyTypedResourceBuilder to give design time access to string resources as properties of classes, one class per resource file. Why? Well I needed to add some customer code that handles string token substitution and a few other customizations. Anyway, the template is working out really well and I may blog on it soon.
In the mean time though, following a common pattern, I have one .resx file for each view, master page, controller, etc. I would really like my t4 template to add a property to each such entity that gives quick access the custom resource class associated with it. For controllers this is easy. T4MVC is ensuring that they are a all declared partial. All I need to do is create the appropriate partial class in my output that declares a readonly property that returns an instance of the appropriate generated resource class.
The Problem:
I would like to do the same thing, inject generated code, into my views. Were this traditional ASP.Net, each .aspx page would have a .aspx.cs page and possibly an .aspx.designer.cs page that are all partial classes extending in the aspx page's class definition. There is no such thing by default in MVC and for good reason. However, I think for my purposes, if there is a way to do this, it would be the way to go.
I could subclass ViewPage and add a generic type parameter and a property that returns the class of that type but that has certain complications. I think adding auto generated code to each view via partial class (that is what partials are for after all) is the way to go.
I have made a basic attempt. I have created a .aspx.cs file for a view and placed a code behind attribute in the page declaration but the class generated from the view seems to reside in a different assembly any my "partial class" ends up as its own class in the same assembly as all my other code.
One of our client uses squid proxy and tries to connect to our asmx web service(which is deployed on our server over internet) via our windows application. But windows application fails to connect to our web service and gives below error.."This method call needs the custom bla bla.. " Soap ExceptionProxy (squid) shows this error:127.0.0.1 - - [10/Aug/2010:14:35:55 +0300] "POST http://abc:83/service.asmx HTTP/1.1" 500 759 "-" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; MS Web Services Client Protocol 2.0.50727.4927)" TCP_MISS DIRECTWe have used soap header security and we are also passing soap header credential while calling the service. Application runs well at our end but can anybody guid me, what could be the problem ?
Do we have to do something special to have ASP.NET partial classes aware of controls that are declared in our user control's base classes? The partial classes keep generating declarations for controls in the base class which mean the controls in the base class get hidden and are null.
want to create one web service but I have many classes. I want to call all classes in single wsdl.For example [Assume web service implemented in this class]
[Code]....
my Asmx file is User.asmx.Now when I add webservice reference in website, I want to access as following way