I have a requirement to build a simple ASP.NET web page which sends some parameters to a web service, and then displays the string which was returned. I'm a complete .NET newby and the only examples I can find seem really really complex. I just need something mega simple, but which an handle parameters being sent to the web service. Can anyone point me in the direction of a simple bit of C# which will do this with no frills or fuss?
I have been given access to a web service that I can use to pull valuable data for my company. The issue I am having is I don't know where to begin writing out the returned values. I am using an asp.net VB web file to connect to the web service and call the wanted procedures. I have added the web service as an web reference in my project, other than that I am stuck. Here is what I have so far;
[Code]....
So basically I am writing out an array but it comes out like this;
[Code]....
This is not the expected the return but from what I understand the VeroWebService.SaleModel is like the parent xml/SOAP element.The expected return is more like;
This is my first time trying to send a SOAP request in C#. When I click the Test button I should be passing a XML string to the web services and then getting a response. The lblTransactionNum label updates with "System.Net.ConnectStream" when it should be returning a transaction number within an unparsed response.
I'm not sure if the way I went about this is ideal but it is just from what I learned searching.
Here is my code
[Code]....
what I am missing? I have a desktop application that uses this web service in the same way but it is in VB.
Here is the VBscript from the desktop app if it contains some extra parsing steps that I will have to add to the C# for my web application but right now I am just trying to get the SOAP request and response wired up.
Im trying to send some xml inside a soap request to a webservice using the HttpWebRequest class. I know this isnt the best way, but my hands are tied by company policy so i have to do it this way. My webmethod has an input parameter "SourceXML" so my soap request has this node
<SourceXML></SourceXML>
I need to insert the xml in this node but whenver I insert it and try to send it to my web method I get an error "400 bad request"
Is this even possible ? I need to insert the xml as a string literal and read it in the web method
I have an application that is using a traditional web reference (not WCF service reference). I'd like to capture the request and response SOAP envelopes being processed for my referenced service (under the hood). I know how to do this with custom behavior using WCF, but how do I do this using a traditional web reference?
We currently have the code in WCF to sign the outgoing client requests' SOAP Body, however we need the same code for use with WSE 3.0. I can't find any examples of this.
i generated a private key like- keytool -genkey -alias mview -keypass mviewpass -keystore /keystore then exported it in form of certificate file as- -export -alias mview -keystore /home/d261733/keytool_keys/keystore -rfc -file testcert.cer this gives me two files sitting in c:
1) testcert.cer (which is the certificate)
2) keystore (which is private key)
Now i wan to sign an xml soap request like below in c# in .NET
I am using a third party Web Service. I am passing a string to a function in that service, that string, which i am reading from a UTF-8 text file. The problem it that the string contain some non ASCII characters.
Now if i save that text file to ANSI format, read it in a string and pass that string to Service then it works smoothly but with UTF-8 encoded string the service throw exception [Code]....
NON ASCII characters UTF-8 encoding SOAP
I am using ASP.NET.
Third party sevice is in java. I also tried it by making a web service in .net, but there was issue there too.
When user requests http://localhost/WebApp1/Default.aspx, txtApplicationPath.Text should be assigned "/WebApp1", while txtAbsolutePath.Text should be assigned "http://localhost/WebApp1/Default.aspx", but instead both textboxes display empty strings.
I there a way to know if a request is a soap request on AuthenticateRequest event for HttpApplication? Checking ServerVariables["HTTP_SOAPACTION"] seems to not be working all the time.
public void Init(HttpApplication context) { context.AuthenticateRequest += new EventHandler(AuthenticateRequest); } protected void AuthenticateRequest(object sender, EventArgs e) { app = sender as HttpApplication; if (app.Request.ServerVariables["HTTP_SOAPACTION"] != null) { // a few requests do not enter here, but my webservice class still executing // ... } } I have disabled HTTP POST and HTTP GET for webservices in my web.config file. <webServices> <protocols> <remove name="HttpGet" /> <remove name="HttpPost" /> <add name="AnyHttpSoap" /> </protocols> </webServices> Looking at ContentType for soap+xml only partially solves my problem. For example, Cache-Control: no-cache Connection: Keep-Alive Content-Length: 1131 Content-Type: text/xml Accept: */* Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate Accept-Language: ro Host: localhost mymethod: urn:[URL]
Some clients instead of having the standard header SOAPAction: [URL], have someting like in example above. "mymethod" represents the method in my web service class with [WebMethod] attribute on it and [URL] is the namespace of the webservice. Still the service works perfectly normal. The consumers use different frameworks (NuSOAP from PHP, .NET, Java, etc).
Function inside the service simply returns string separated by some delimitor. This string is then used by JS function to assign to a jQuery datatable. Is there a maximum limit on size of this string? I have about 2000 rows with 6 columns each. I get an error (failed handle) when I return them all. But if I do only top 500, it works fine.Is there any size limitation?
ASP.Net 2.0 Web Services automatically create both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2 bindings. Our web service, however, has SOAP extensions and custom exception handling that make the assumption that only the SOAP 1.1 binding is used (for example, the SOAP extension uses the HTTP SOAPAction header to control behavior).
I am looking to correct the code that makes these assumptions and make it work with either SOAP 1.1 or SOAP 1.2 properly. I am running into a bit of a problem in the generation of elements for our SOAP faults.
Consider the following web method implementation:
[Code]....
The SOAP 1.2 response now has the wrong qualified name for the detail element. It should be <soap:Detail>, but instead is merely <detail>, same as the SOAP 1.1 response.
It seems that the ASP.Net 2.0 framework has done quite a bit to transform a SOAPException into the appropriate form for the SOAP version, but neglected to properly handle the detail element. Additionally, they don't seem to have exposed the correct SOAP 1.2 qualified name for the detail element as was done with the SoapException.DetailElementName property.
So, what is the correct way to add a detail element to a SOAP fault response that works for both SOAP 1.1 and SOAP 1.2? Do I need to detect the SOAP version myself and hard-code the SOAP 1.2 qualified name for the detail element?
I need to sign my soap request to a 3rd party. The provided an example what the call should look like. And I am trying, rather unsuccessfully to make this call with wcf. I need to make a wcf soap call where the header contains BinarySecurityToken, Signature, and SecurityTokenReference. Here is the example they sent me (with some of the values omitted) I have a certificate for signing, but I cant for the life of me figure out how to make this work
How to get the raw SOAP request from within a WebMethod?
public class Service1 : System.Web.Services.WebService { [WebMethod] public int Add(int x, int y) { string request = getRawSOAPRequest();//How could you implement this part? //.. do something with complete soap request int sum = x + y; return sum; } }
This is so frustrating to me. I'm doing this via standard .NET 2.0+ web services (not WCF). My application is in .NET 3.5 but I'm just adding a service reference. I've not done any SOAP WSDL sending before. I've used NVP which to me seems much more error prone and burdensome because you have to create all the wrappers yourself and if any of that third party API changes, it breaks your code. I have not a clue how to make a call using the latest PayPal WSDL. I added the service reference and I see proxy classes such as [className]Request and [className]Response but how do you actually make the CALL and send the request over the wire?
I see people have used the outdated (.NET 1.1) PayPal SDK. We do not want to use an SDK just to send a request. Isn't it much easier nowdays in .NET when using any SOAP API to invoke the request? People for example using PayPal are relying on a caller class from that SDK but again it's way, way outdated. So onto today, .NET 2.0+, I thought that you don't need all that plumbing anymore?
How would I do this? I see no good documentation on the net period on .NET 2.0 or 3.5 web services especially SOAP and it's frustrating. Sure add the service reference, use the WSDL and proxy generated class wrappers but outside this HOW to make a request is impossible to find. I'm seeing legacy ways of doing this in .NET and then I hear this is all done under the covers for you in .NET..I guess that must be .NET 2.0+ ?? Is it as simple as just making the proxy class method calls and .NET under the covers takes care of the plumbing to actually send the request over Http unlike .NET 1.1 where you had to do all the plumbing yourself?
Have an application which publishes XML data across webservice using SOAP.
The data is pulled directly from an Oracle database and parsed into XML but for some reason the data being pulled out of the DB is throwing the following invalid XML exception.
Have done a bit of research and it looks like it may be a NULL character somewhere in the data which XML parser doesn't like.
Just wondering if anyone had seen this before and if so were they able to fix it at application or database layer?
Here's stack trace...
[code]....
UPDATE: Here is a selection of data being published.Just plain text basically, this is how it exists in database columns, have included as comma separated.