Web Forms :: Custom Paging Values Not Able To Set Properly
Feb 14, 2012
Not able to set the first / next, prev, last & record values properly
I have used session variables for this
I have
pagesize=100;
Session["TotalRows"] = GetTotalRows();
Session["LastPageIndex"] = Convert.ToInt32(Session["TotalRows"]) / pagesize;
int pageindex = Convert.ToInt32(Session["PageIndex"]);
public int GetTotalRows() {
SqlCommand com = new SqlCommand("select count(*) from tbl", conn);
I'd like to implement a custom paging template for my formview that displays numeric paging as well as next/previous buttons. The pre-defined templates only appear to have numeric first last as an option. Can anyone recommend a good article that covers this?
I have an array object with another nested arrayobject within it. I am binding the outer arrayobject to a gridview and on row data bound event i am refernecing the nested array object and populating a dropdown list in atemplate column of a gridview row. Thgis works fine but when i implement paging and handle the PageChanging event then the data binding of the nested array does not complete properly. See code below. For each page in the gridview the dropdown list is repeatedly populated with the same data
I have read your article from aspsnippets.com about custom paging it really work, but there are a problem that if there are more record in database (2000 to 5000) than number of page index will be goes in large number. like 1 to 200, any way which can divide it like 12345678910...2000.
I've managed to render TreeView using custom made Hierarchical Datasource based on Linq queries on self referencing table. Rendered output looks well but... Every Node in NodeCollection has the same index = 0. Therefore when I click on any collapse button - the whole tree Collapses. In generated html every node has the same id = MainContent_TreeView1n0 I suppose n0 should increment to n1 n2 n3 and so on.
currently it works if i remove the PagerSetting or remove the PagerTemplate so if have both (PagerSetting & PagerTemplate) then my page number not display.
my qeustion is: how can i display both (PagerTemplate and PagerSetting) togather at the bottom of the Gridview? plese see the below source code.
As a part of requirement, I need to bind a table data to the Gridview, but the data content in the table is too large. I need not want to bring in all the data into the dataset, rather I need to bring only the rows that are needed to be displayed(Eg, if the page size is 10, i need only 10 records to be filled in dataset
I have a gridview control which contains aproximately 2,040 records of IP addresses. Right now I have setup my gridview control with the following options: AllowPaging="True" PageSize="255".
This has the effect of placing each IP range on its own page. So for instance 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.255 is on page 1, and 192.168.1.0-192.168.1-255 is on page 2 and so forth. The issue is that finding the IP range I want in the application is really a pain and I usually have to click page by page through the gridview to find the range I want to edit.
I'd like to have a custom paging and instead having pagination which says 1,2,3,4,5,6 etc had more meaningful labels like "192.168.0.x Range", "10.10.10.1 Range", "172.22.50.x range" and so forth. So that I can immediately jump to the page that I want. note that in most cases I need to browse the data not search for a specific element so creating a searchbox isn't neccessarily the answer. I just need more efficient paging.
I'm not really sure how to accomplish this. I've tried searching google for custom pagination + gridview etc and I'm not having much luck. Maybe I don't have the right combo of search terms.
I have custom paging for a grid with first next prev last. My issue is with current code it takes a lot of time for post back & going to next page & displaying records, even page loading takes time, so I needed to load the records on request....
Means suppose the pagesize is 50 records per page on initial page load only 50 records will be displayed from database instead of all say 2000 records & then when user clicks next next 50 will be loaded from database to grid & so on .....
I have developed a ASP.Net Server custom control in C# for 3.5. named "myCheckBoxList" inherited from CheckBoxList web control. Working is very simple. It just works as a two option buttons. I have taken a CheckBoxList which will show two fixed checkboxes always. When I check one checkbox then another will uncheck as vise versa. This control works perfectly only when I have placed only one instance of that control on web page. If I place more than one instance of control then it doesnt works.
I need solution from expert minds from developers as stackoverflow users.
here's a situation and I would appreciate your response.
I have programmatically created the Wizard control:
Page_Load(obj s, evargs e) { Wizard ClaimDetailWizard = new Wizard(); foreach(int item in selectedItems) { //create new step //added custom control to new step //add step to wizard } //added wizard to a placeholder on a page }
Based on List I get from Session i added new steps to my wizard To each step I had added a custom control
Each custom control in tern contains another custom Gridview Control in it.
So here's the problem when the page loads for example for two steps. All is good Wizard does what it's supposed to do.
But when I try to use sorting or paging in that custom Gridview. Somehow it displays the gridview I should see in the next step of the wizard.
Also what I'm noticing through debugging. Is that when I press next in the wizard I go back to the original page where I do all of the code specified above, and it recreates the wizzard. But it goes to the next step. Is this the way wizard supposed to work? Just doesn't seem very efficient.
Im pretty confused on this and would appreciate any suggestions.Im trying to implement custom paging because my database has some 400,000ish records and i want to show 20 at a time in a gridview. I don't want to use a datasource in the html because this gridview gets populated using a dataset in the .cs (c#) because the user first filters on params. I have two sp (on to get the total record count and one that filters). Both sp work.
[Code]....
and...
[Code]....
Does anyone know how i can tell my gridview (and if i need to implement a datapager) the total number of records, to get the page numbers on the bottom correct and then pass the parameter @PageNum @PageSize@sortExpression?
I'm doing a tutorial on custom paging. It makes sense to use this for a high volume site. I haven't worked with caching yet but that also seems very useful for a high volume site. Are these two things typically used in conjunction with each other?
Can someone offer some guidance on when to use or not to use these together?
Is there any way to have the gridview page by categories instead of pages. In other words instead of at the bottom having some sort of page numbering scheme there would be categories from a specific column (kind of like a group by in sql) arranged along the bottom and when I would click one it would page to the start of all those matching rows (preferably return all of them rather than just say 10 or 20).
I am using ObjectDataSource controll to bind gridview and using custom paging. Everything working fine but the problem arises when last page contains only one record and i try to delete it-- gridview disappear.
Below is ObjectDataSource declaration..It is working fine..only problem is with deleting from last
i have a gridview with paging[index 10] enabled on my webpage, now i want a simple dropdownlist in footer or below gridview to have list of no 20,30,40.so that when user selects 20 from it the gridview shows 20 records on same page,when 30 is selected the gridview should show 30 records.i cant figure it out that how to do it, whether it requires coding at database(MYSql) or can be done at the page itself.
i have a gridview with textbox in last column. user can enter the value in all the textbox's of rows. if user clicks the paging navigation i need to have the values entered by the user. how to do this. any good way to handle this..
