I am using javascript file for validtion. Now I have to localize that javascript file. I want to HttpContext.GetGlobalResourceObject() in .js file. Can I use HttpContext.GetGlobalResourceObject() in my .js file? Is there any other option to locaize javascript file.
View 1 Repliesi have problem accessing HttpContext.Current.Application From global.asax its seems to be null every time i try to access it. How can i to this?
HttpContext.Current.Application.Lock();
HttpContext.Current.Application["Actions"] = "hello";
HttpContext.Current.Application.UnLock();
During Application_End() in Global.aspx, HttpContext.Current is null. I still want to be able to access cache - it's in memory, so want to see if I can reference it somehow to save bits to disk.
Question - is there a way to reference cache in memory somehow when HttpContext.Current is null?
Perhaps I could create a global static variable that would store pointer to cache that I could update on HTTP requests (pseudo: "static <pointer X>" = HttpRequest.Current) and retrieve a reference to cache through that pointer in Application_End()?
Is there a better way to access Cache in memory when there is no Http Request is made?
While developing I've seen a couple different ways to get local resources values from the resx files. Which one is considered the best practice?
Using the GetGlobalResourceObject method:
<a id="myLink" href="#"><%= GetGlobalResourceObject("Filter","Diary")%></a>
Or using a control and setting the value directly in the resx.
A WCF web service with the right class and method attributes can be accessed as a JavaScript file in a script tag. That is:
<script type=".." src="http://someserver/someservice.wcs/js"></script>
Is it possible to do the same thing with System.Web.ApplicationServices.AuthenticationService?
I'm creating a PhoneGap application developed in static HTML/JavaScript, so I cannot use the script manager.
Is there any potential pitfall for using HttpContext.Current.CurrentHandler for runtime view access?
public static GetView<T>(T view) where T : IView
{
return HttpContext.Current.CurrentHandler as T;
}
i want to access a javascript function which resides in a script file from another page with iframe.
my sample code :
Page from which javascript need to be accessed.
<iframe id="FRAMESET" src="default.htm" width="0%" height="0%">
<p>
Your browser does not support iframes.
</p>
</iframe>
default.htm
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<link href="Scripts/main.js" type="text/javascript" />
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
main.js
function helloWorld() {
alert("hello World");
}
i want to access this function on main page. i tried document.getElementById('FRAMESET').contentWindow.helloWorld(); but gave me error "that document.getElementById('FRAMESET').contentWindow.helloWorld();" is not a function.
I built a base controller class inherits from Controller class to add some custom behavior to all controllers which will inherit from this base class.
My issue is when I try to access HTTPContext and Session objects in my custom base class, they are always null.
Am I doing something wrong or need missing something?
My custom base class definition:
public class ApplicationControllerBase : Controller
controllers classes definition:
public class HomeController : ApplicationControllerBase
using ASP.NET MVC 1, .NET 3.5.
UPDATE:
It seems the issue is I try to access HTTPContext in the constructor while HTTPContext is not ready yet, I tried it in the OnActionExecuted event handler and it works fine.
My question is what is the best place to access Session object in my custom controller class, that will guarantee executing my code with all controllers.
I am using JavaScript's PageMethod functionality where I am invoking a PageMethod which works like a gem. However I am having an issue in accessing the HttpContext's state which returns me a value "SYSTEM" for
HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name
which is not the actual current User Name.
I know there are couple options like storing HttpContext.Current in a Session or saving Context's state in some other custom container but given a web farm environment I am assuming that this will not work as expected.
Here is the code I am working on with
function MyFunction(){
PageMethod.MyPageMethod();
}
here is the signature of the server method
[System.Web.Services.WebMethod()]
public static void MyPageMethod()
{
// gives me "SYSTEM"
var user = HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name;
}
Also if I use the above code to access user name in OnLoad event of the page then it works fine and returns me the CurrentUserName.
I am trying to get the above code to work in an ASP.NET Webform... :)
So I am wondering if there is a way to access the current actual user in page methods without making use of sessions.
We're migrating an application to use IIS7 integrated mode. In library code that is designed to work either within the context of an HTTP request or not, we commonly have code like this:
if (HttpContext.Current != null &&
HttpContext.Current.Request != null) {
// do something with HttpContext.Current.Request
} else {
// do equivalent thing without HttpContext..
}
But in IIS7 integrated mode the check for HttpContext.Current.Request throws an exception whenever this code is called from Application_Start.
protected void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SomeLibrary.DoSomethingWithHttpContextCurrentDetection();
}
Results in:
System.Web.HttpException: Request is not available in this context
How can I detect whether the request is really available without wrapping these calls in an exception handler and taking action based on whether an exception is generated or not.
Looking at HttpContext in Reflector I see it has an internal bool HideRequestResponse field but it's internal so I can only get to it with reflection and that's fragile. Is there a more official/approved way to determine if it's ok to call HttpContext.Request?
This blog post about the subject says not to use HttpContext, but how, in generic library code, can you determine if it's ok to use HttpContext?
http://mvolo.com/blogs/serverside/archive/2007/11/10/Integrated-mode-Request-is-not-available-in-this-context-in-Application_5F00_Start.aspx
I'm using the work-around mentioned there which is to use Application_BeginRequest and an initialized field to only initialize once as part of BeginRequest, but that has to be done in every calling application whereas I'd prefer to make the library code more robust and handle this situation regardless of where it's called from.
I have written code to access a text file in another server from my application in javascript. This code works fine in IE but fails in mozilla firefox. Below is the code i have written.
var httpRequest;
httpRequest = new XMLHttpRequest();
httpRequest.open('GET', url, true);
httpRequest.setRequestHeader('X-PINGOTHER','pingpong');
httpRequest.setRequestHeader('Content-Type','application/plain');
httpRequest.onreadystatechange = function() {alertContents(httpRequest);
httpRequest.send('');
function alertContents(httpRequest){
if (httpRequest.readystate == 4){
if (httpRequest.status == 200) {
alert(httpRequest.responseText);
}
}
}
I have designded a asp.net server control that have an embeded javascript file.
document.getElementById("div_Messages_Back").style.left = 0;
document.getElementById("div_Messages_Back").style.top = 0;
document.getElementById("div_Messages_Back").style.width = document.documentElement.clientWidth;
document.getElementById("div_Messages_Back").style.height = document.documentElement.clientHeight;
document.getElementById("tbl_Messages").style.left = (document.documentElement.clientWidth - 250) / 2;
document.getElementById("tbl_Messages").style.top = (document.documentElement.clientHeight - 120) / 2;
function btn_Close() {
document.getElementById("div_Messages_Back").style.visibility = "collapse";
document.getElementById("tbl_Messages").style.visibility = "collapse";
}
I want the first 6 line of my javascript file run at runtime. But I recieve error at runtime:
Error: Object Required.
I have some processes that run without an HttpContext in an ASP.NET MVC web application. This process needs to be able to determine the physical path to the Contents directory of the application for reading/writing data. But, since it is without an HttpContext, I don't get to use fancy things like Server.MapPath and such.
View 2 RepliesIn ASP.NET, if a file was downloaded on a page that was protected by SSL, through a server-side postback that writes to HttpContext.Current.Response.OutputStream, is the transmission that file ALSO protected by SSL?
View 1 RepliesDoes anyone know how to use httpcontext.response.transmitfile or any other httpcontext function to download a file from a network drive instead of local drive? When I tried to use context.Response.TransmitFile(DownloadPath) to download files, the DownloadPath has to be local drive. If it's a network drive, the download failed.
View 2 Replies1. SetSession.aspx page sets value for a session variable and redirects to default.aspx page using Response.redirect() code.
2. Default.aspx page tries to create an object of class in app_codecommon.cs file.
3. In app_codeCommon.cs file, I am trying to access the session variable set in step1 using HttpContext.Current.Session object.
but step 3 gives error that object reference not set to an instance. as HttpContext.Current.Session is null.
I surf abt it on net, and seems to be problem with asp.net framework.
I'm trying to create a ZIP file on the fly which might contain a few thousands of pictures.
[code]....
My question:
Is there a way to initiate the download (let the download manager on client side popup), and then start writing on the stream?
I monitored w3wp.exe (IIS) process, and it seems that the data is being written on memory instead of Stream.
When w3wp.exe memory usage riches a certain number, it releases the memory and nothing happens (no download).
Does anyone know how to use httpcontext.response.transmitfile or any other httpcontext function to download a file from a network drive instead of local drive?
When I tried to use context.Response.TransmitFile(DownloadPath) to download files, the DownloadPath has to be local drive. If it's a network drive, the download failed.
I have a static class with serveral static methods. In these methods, I'm trying to access the current thread's context using HttpContext.Current. For example:
var userName = HttpContext.Current.User.Identity.Name;
However, when I do that, I receive a NullReferenceException, the infamous "Object reference not set to an instance of an object."
I want to be able to maintain certain objects between application restarts.
To do that, I want to write specific cached items out to disk in Global.asax Application_End() function and re-load them back on Application_Start().
I currently have a cache helper class, which uses the following method to return the cached value:
return HttpContext.Current.Cache[key];
Problem: during Application_End(), HttpContext.Current is null since there is no web request (it's an automated cleanup procedure) - therefore, I cannot access .Cache[] to retrieve any of the items to save to disk.
Question: how can I access the cache items during Application_End()?
I simply want to create one file and then delete it, means I want to access one file subsequently. I am getting the very familiar error as shown in title. (Process can't access the file,) I have tried using file stream and all other stuff that I found from Googling but no success so far. Does any body have small and neat solution? in short, I would like to run the following statements without any error.File.Create("C:\hsp1.txt");
File.Open("C:\hsp1.txt", FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.None);
i have an asp.net application
c# code
i have adtabase in access and i craete adatset from it
i want to create excell file
I have been experimenting with code that will clear all of the cookies in an HttpContext.Response.Initially, I used this:
DateTime cookieExpires = DateTime.Now.AddDays(-1);
for (int i = 0; i < HttpContext.Request.Cookies.Count; i++)
{
HttpContext.Response.Cookies.Add(
new HttpCookie(HttpContext.Request.Cookies[i].Name, null) { Expires = cookieExpires });
}
this will error with an OutOfMemoryException because the for loop never exits - each time you add a cookie to the Response, it also gets added to the `Request.
i'm using an example in which i can fake the session.It's for use in a unittest of a mvc controller.In the test i create a controller and then i do this:
FakeHttpContext httpctx = new FakeHttpContext(null,null,null,null,mSessionItems );
ControllerContext ctx2 = new ControllerContext(httpctx,new RouteData(), target);
here mSessionItems is my session and target is my instance of a controller,and indeed, when i'm in a controller reading this.ControllerContext.HttpContext.Session, i have a session, great!but.... i also read the session outside the controller, and there i use HttpContext.Current.Session, and that is null (or actualy, the HttpContext.Current is null).
I have 4 file uploader in my form to upload 4 images in the DB for each article submitted. My issue when I want update/edit my article with some new pictures and I want delete or update the old pictures with the replacement with the new one.
How I can implement it? I am using ASP.NET based on VB.NOT .... NOT C#