I have an HttpModule and I'd like to choose the HttpHandler for the current request, is that possible? Also web.config is not an option because the condition is not based on path or extension. My googling skills have failed me, no matter what keywords I use all the results are "IHttpHandler vs IHttpModule".
View 3 RepliesAs i know that asp.net fulfill all the requirements for any web application but what are the ground rules for creating custom httphandler and httpmodule in asp.net.Edit:For example I want to fetch image from database then what i should i use httphandler or normally read image from database.If httphandler then why?
View 4 RepliesI've tried to implement two different solutions that use either and HttpModule or and HttpHandler to do URLRewriting for me. These work great on IIS 7 within my local development environment in Integrated and Classic modes. Currently the production server is running IIS 6.0 on a shared hosting environment. It appears that the request at least hits both the Module and Handler as the URL above redirect to the particular friendly url, but it doesn't redirect and hit hte Module or Handler again. Instead I get a 404 error for the friendly URL.
View 2 RepliesIs it possible to register a custom httphandler in a stand alone assembly? I'm writing a control toolkit that uses httphandlers to perform AJAX and I would like to make the use of the toolkit as low friction for the web developers as possible. There will be quite a few handlers and I dont want the developer to have to register them all in the web.config.
View 2 RepliesI've a custom Httpmodule which handles PostAuthenticateRequest & PreRequestHandlerExecute events.
However, when I try to use the module on page with ReportViwer (which needs ScriptManager) I get a bunch of browser errors such as following and the report viewer does not work as expected i.e. it doesn't show any result.
ASP.NET Ajax client-side framewook failed to load.
'Sys' is undefined
Syntax error (WebResource.axd)
'Type' is undefined (ReportViewerWebControl.axd)
If I comment out the module from web.config everything works as expected (obviously without the module code).
I have written an Http Module that hooks onto the Response.Filter property of the current request and does various replacements within the HTML before it is sent to the client.All the work is done in the Write method which is overriding Write in the base class Stream.
The Write method is called multiple times for a single response - the HTML seems to be written to the output stream in chunks. My problem is that I don't have an efficient & reliable way of telling if the current chunk is the last chunk (for why I want to know this see below). The only way I have come up with is to check if the chunk contains a closing html tag - but this is not very efficient or reliable.
The reason this is needed is that the module must add the "Refresh" HTTP header to the response, but only if the HTML fulfills certain conditions (and there are certain conditions that mean the header must not be added). So, only when the last chunk has been seen does the code know if the header can be added or not. So, I either need a test for the last chunk, or on each call to Write I add the header if the current block of HTML passes the test (if it has not already been added) or remove the header if the current block of HTML fails the test (if it has already been added).
So, is there a better way to test for the last chuck OR is there a way to test for a particular header being in the response and delete it (there doesn't seem to be a way to do this - only to append headers)?
I'm writing a multi-tenant app that will receive requests like http://www.tenant1.com/content/images/logo.gif and http://www.anothertenant.com/content/images/logo.gif. I want the requests to actually map to the folder location /content/tenant1/images/logo.gif and /content/anothertenant/images/logo.gif
I'm using asp.net Mvc 2 so I'm sure there's probably a way to setup a route to handle this or a custom route handler?
I developed a .Net 3.5 x64 web application that includes a custom HttpHandler in the config:
<add path="*.class1" verb="GET" type="ClassLibrary1.Class1Handler"/>
This works when the platform target for ClassLibrary1 is set at x86.
However, when I set this to x64 I get the following error when I run web application starts (it compiles just fine): Configuration Error Description: An error occurred during the processing of a configuration file required to service this request. Please review the specific error details below and modify your configuration file appropriately. Parser Error Message: Could not load file or assembly 'ClassLibrary1, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect format.
Does this mean that a HttpHandler can be compiled at x86 only?That doesn't make much sense to me.Does anyone have an idea of what could be going on?Edit 1:The ClassLibrary1 project is just an empty class library project with a single HttpHandler added (which is also empty).Edit 2:I am also getting these warning messages when compiling, I am pretty sure they have something to do with this problem: Assembly generation -- Referenced assembly 'mscorlib.dll' targets a different processor HttpTestEdit 3:I manually edited the project file to force references to the x64 assemblies, like this:
<Reference Include="$(Windir)Microsoft.NETFramework64v2.0.50727System.dll"/>
This does supress the above warning message, but the problem isn't resolved.
I'm trying to get custom HttpHandler working in my sample web application. I've been experiencing a lot of issues, but finally got stuck with error 500. Application pool is being run in Classic ASP.NET 2.0 mode. Server is IIS 7.5, OS is Win 7 Pro.
Here's a code of my handler:
[Code]....
I'm using a custom ashx HttpHandler to retrieve gif images from a database and show it on a website - when the image exists, it works great.
However, there are cases when the image will not exist, and I'd like to have the html table holding the image to become invisible so the "image not found" icon is not shown.
[code]...
I create a custom http handler to block download of .wmv files e.g. www.pakdev.net/videos/file.wmv (blocked by httpHandler).
But the problem is that now silverlight cannot also stream these video files as they are blocked too.
On my website, www.pakdev.net, I create screencasts to which are streamed through silverlight.
I create a custom handler to block the download of .wmv files from the url like [URL]
But the problem is now the silverlight has also stopped streaming files.
the purpose of this HttpModule? It's showing up on my HttpModuleCollection list, but I don't know what's it's for.System.ServiceModel.Activation.HttpModule
View 3 RepliesI'm trying to secure my web application so XML files it contains can't be downloaded. I thought it would be as simple as adding these to the "httpHandlers" section of web.config:
<remove verb="*" path="*.xml"/>
<add verb="*" path="*.xml" type="System.Web.HttpForbiddenHandler"/>
This failed - the XML files could still be downloaded easily. I tried different browsers in case they were caching, but everything could download the XML files without any trouble. I thought this might be due to some special handling of XML, so I tried mocking up an alternative based on ".txt123" files. I added this file with some dummy content:
[code]....
We have a handler to deal with .dat files.. everything is already setup and server is acknowledging the file type and doing its thing to handle it..
But the handler requires 1 bit of information along with the HTTP request which is a physical file path.. the file name it knows based on the file we call , but how can i pass a custom header along with the request so that the handler will use that when the request is made?
Basically when on our player.aspx page, i will have a button, when you click that button a request is made to the .dat file, but along with that request i need to send the physical file path.. how can i do that?
Considering the recent ASP.NET vulnerability, what should I look for in my httphandlers that would cause such a Padding Oracle vulnerability?
Asked in another way... what did MSFT do wrong and what did they fix in their handlers?
i've created my own custom model binder to handle a Section DropDownList defined in my view as:
Html.DropDownListFor(m => m.Category.Section, new SelectList(Model.Sections, "SectionID", "SectionName"), "-- Please Select --")
And here is my model binder:
public class SectionModelBinder : DefaultModelBinder
{
public override object BindModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext)
{
var value = bindingContext.ValueProvider.GetValue(bindingContext.ModelName);
if (bindingContext.ModelType.IsAssignableFrom(typeof(Section)) && value != null)
{
if (Utilities.IsInteger(value.AttemptedValue))
return Section.GetById(Convert.ToInt32(value.AttemptedValue));
else if (value.AttemptedValue == "")
return null;
}
return base.BindModel(controllerContext, bindingContext);
}
}
Now within my controller i can say:
[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Create(FormCollection collection)
{
var category = new Category();
if (!TryUpdateModel(category, "Category")
return View(new CategoryForm(category, _sectionRepository().GetAll()));
}
This validates nicely and the correct value for the section is assigned when the model is updated, however it does not select the correct value if another property doesn't validate.
I have been facing this problem for a while now, what I exactly want to do is ->
I have a 3- Tier Application. For a table (say Employee) I have following classes in my BLL and DAL
1. Employee.cs (Contains database fields as properties)
2. EmployeeKeys.cs
3. EmployeeFactory.cs (Main BLL which make call to DAL method)
4. EmployeeDAL.cs (The DAL)
Suppose I have 6 columns in Employee table.
I know that the DAL returns List<Employee> to the BLL and then the BLL in turn gives me the Employee fields.
I have no problem accesing it.
But suppose I have a dropdownlist control and wish to bind EmplyeeName and EmployeeId with the Dropdown.
Is there any way that I can implement that my DAL returns a Generic list containing only the two fields required to bind the Dropdown.
In short i want my list to return only 2 columns, not all the 6 like the List<Employee>
How do i implement this???
Do I need to create a custom List<CustomEmployeeData>, if so how can i implement it in the 3 tier application.
Basically i m looking to increase the efficiency by getting less data from database. Am i on the right track????
I am implementing HttpModule for compressing request.Below is the codee for HttpModule:
public class Global : IHttpModule
{
public void Init(HttpApplication app)
{[code]....
It's able to intercept and compress js and css in the development web server but when i run it from IIS 5.1 it is not able to compress js and css files.
Does the order of httpmodule execution match their order in the web.config or is it undefinied?
View 1 RepliesI have custom redirection implemented in a module. Do I have to modify each config for all sites or is there a more general approach?Also, I have files in App_Data for this module, which would cause replication.
View 1 RepliesI'm implementing a simple HttpModule, where I want some code to run when the web application is started. But I'm surprised to find that the Application_Start event I would normally use from Global.asax is not available from a HttpModule. Is that correct, or am I missing something here?
How do I hook into the Application_Start event from an HttpModule?
I'm considering making use of an HttpModule for localization purposes (based on the example in this article) - but I'm curious, is this safe?
Here's the code, for reference:
public class CookieLocalizationModule : IHttpModule
{
public void Dispose()
{
}
[code]....
I was under the impression that multiple threads could potentially service a web request. Is it safe to set the Current/Current UI Cultures in an HttpModule like this and have it respected for the life of the web request regardless of how many threads are involved in servicing it?
I am trying to implement a custom HTTPModule for ASP.NET. I have a very simple html page with an image in it and an HTTPModule that hooks into the BeginRequest event. When I debug with Visual Studio's dev web server, my module is called twice: one for the initial page request, then once for the image request. This is what I expected. However, when I deploy my application to IIS, the module is only being called once for the page request.
View 2 RepliesHow to access Js and css file in HttpModule?
View 1 Replies