C# - Host A WCF Service Using Mono's XSP Web Server?
Jun 28, 2010
I have made a very simple Asp.net web site with a WCF service - "Person.svc" - that runs fine when hosted on Asp.Net development server(visual web developer 2010), but if I host on Mono's XSP 2 and access some parse error is thrown. Can WCF services live inside a XSP Web site?
Need to execute .aspx page & .vb code from PHP server.
Therefore i have downloaded MONO for windows from link: [URL] .... And installed as per the guidelines provided on website: [URL] .... Now, how should i use it on PHP Server .....?
I have a domain(www.fortunebells.com) in hosting server zetnetindia.I have created wcf service and added service reference in my project.I want to host the service reference in the domain. how can i do this?
I want to develop my own REST service, so I've created an IHttpHandler that is configured with verb="*" and path="*", the the application in ~/MyRESTsrv/ will handle any derived URL.
This approach works good in IIS7 with "integrated mode" and apparently in IIS6 if you map all the extensions to "aspnet_isapi.dll".
Is this possible in Apache/XSP with Mono? Do I have to do something special or it will work out of the box?
Apparently Mono replaces references to SQL Server membership provider with sqlite membership provider (see ASP.NET_Settings_Mapping). Is there any way to convince Mono to use SQL Server for the membership provider?
When I try to log in to my web app, I get the following:
System.Configuration.Provider.ProviderException: Operation aborted due to an exception (see Trace for details). at System.Web.Security.SqliteMembershipProvider.ValidateUser (string,string) <0x003bb> at DirectMail.Controllers.AccountMembershipService.ValidateUser (string,string) [0x00000] in [file].cs:404 at DirectMail.Controllers.AccountController.ValidateLogOn (string,string) [0x00040] in [file].cs:346 at DirectMail.Controllers.AccountController.LogOn (string,string,bool,string) [0x00000] in [file].cs:79 at (wrapper dynamic-method) System.Runtime.CompilerServices.ExecutionScope.lambda_method (System.Runtime.CompilerServices.ExecutionScope,System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase,object[]) <0x001c1> at System.Web.Mvc.ActionMethodDispatcher.Execute (System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase,object[]) <0x00028> at System.Web.Mvc.ReflectedActionDescriptor.Execute (System.Web.Mvc.ControllerContext,System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, object>) <0x0015b> at System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethod (System.Web.Mvc.ControllerContext,System.Web.Mvc.ActionDescriptor,System.Collections.Generic.IDictionary`2<string, object>) <0x00036> at System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker/<InvokeActionMethodWithFilters>c__AnonStoreyB.<>m__E () <0x00092> at System.Web.Mvc.ControllerActionInvoker.InvokeActionMethodFilter (System.Web.Mvc.IActionFilter,System.Web.Mvc.ActionExecutingContext,System.Func`1<System.Web.Mvc.ActionExecutedContext>) <0x00125>
The top of the file /usr/local/etc/mono/4.0/settings.map on one Debian Linux machine is:
When I make changes to a file, Mono ASP.NET doesn't see my changes, I have to do this:
sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 restart
I remember when Mono ASP.NET executes ASP.NET it caches the compilation somewhere. Before, when the updated page doesn't come up, I just delete that cached compiled code. I just forgot the exact path
How to make Mono ASP.NET detects the changes I made in program, without restarting the web server?
i get HTTP 404 not found error when trying to access WCF service hosted in MVC3. the same service accept calls if i host it in ASP.NET web site i posted question in WCF forum but didnt get any help: [URL]
Is there any way i can create and host a WCF service, and my client apps just send username and passwords to the service to suthenticate them selves, without using Certificates, on client and Server side???
IF NOT:
Then is there any way i can do the above, but just using certificates on server side, i dont want all of my client apps' machines installing the certificate?
I am tired of the flase advertise, Only recommand on free host servers that you are using, If you can please also post you site url,I need to host my facebook Ifame application, because I didn't succeed to work in development mode (E.g working against the localhost don't render FB tags)If you used cheap server also recommandion and link we be acceptable
I am developing an ASP.NET Web Service and a PHP Web site consuming the Web Service. They are meant to be run on different machines. However, only for development purposes, I need to run both on my machine. I cannot use virtual machines.
I would like to know if it is possible to configure IIS Apache to host both my Web Service and my Web site? Or, do I need to host the PHP site using Apache?
I am using
IIS 7.5 Apache HTTP Server 2.2 (NOTE: I have nothing against Apache. In fact, so far I like it more than IIS, however, I would rather not have two Web server applications installed in the same machine.)m PHP 5.3.4 .NET Framework 2.0 3.0 or 3.5 (whichever comes with Visual Studio 2008)mod_aspdotnet for Apache 2.2
I made a simple WCF web-service inside an ASP.net website.
The web-service is hosted by IIS and works fine on localhost, ie when accessing for exemple to [URL] I get the correct "Hello World" response as expected.
But accessing to it by my computer hostname [URL] gets me an error 404 response. This is particularly confusing as the remaining of the site (mainly aspx pages) is accessible without any problem from both ways.
I created a WCF Service Library and there're 2 services (http endpoint and https endpoint) in the App.cofig file. The WCF Service Host had not problem to host the http endpoint but failed to host the https endpoint with these messages:
WCF Service Host cannot find any metadata. Additional Info: The service cannot be started. This service has no endpoint defined. Please add at least one endpoint for the service in config file and try again.
I know why runat="server" is currently required (ASP.NET why runat="server"), but the consensus is that it should not be required if you incorporate a simple default into the design (I agree of course).
Would it be possible to modify, extend, decompile and recreate, intercept or otherwise change the behavior of how ASP.NET parses ASPX and ASCX files so that runat="server" would no longer be required? For instance, I assume that a version of Mono could be branched to accomplish this goal.
In case specific requirements are helpful, the following highlights one design:
During parsing, when configured namespace tags are encountered (such as "asp"), default the element's runat property to "server" During parsing, when configured namespace tags are encountered (such as "asp"), if the element's runat property value is available, then that value should be used in place of the default New page-level setting introduced (can be set in the page directive or web.config) that specifies the default runat value for a specific namespace tag
I have created my site using ASP.NET Personal Starter Kits 3.5. I use Visual Studio 2008 only . .with its built-in SQL Server (2005 Express) ... my database in App_Data is ASPNETDB.MDF ...
I have created some of my tables also ....in ASPNETDB ..
In my local PC the site was running fine ...
But when I publish my site on production server it doesn't work and shows the following error
Notes: The current error page you are seeing can be replaced by a custom error page by modifying the "defaultRedirect" attribute of the application's configuration tag to point to a custom error page URL.
My hosting provider gave me the connection string to connect to the SQL Server 2005 but it doesn't work...
I don't understand why my site was running fine using the production SQL Server 2005 in my local PC when I include ASPNETDB.MDF file in App_Data in my local pc only ..if I remove file ASPNETDB.MDF from App_Data of my local pc ... the site stops working ...
Can anybody tell em how to fix this ... !! I am very tensed since last 3-4 days
My kind webhost (1and1) royally asked me to go elsewhere to do something like this.
I have 2 sites. One of them was developed by a .Net programmer. Now I am contracted to implement a PHP site and fetch data from the .Net site.
There is an ASP.Net form that a customer fills and when they hit submit, the data gets stored in SQL Server DB. How do I also store the same data in MySQL parallelly? I cannot directly use some database connectors with ASP.Net since MySQL connectivity is not supported on 1and1 Windows hosting (biz account, no less!).
What I thought of is to publish an RSS feed of entries in ASP.Net site and routinely scrape that data into MySQL on Linux host. It is an overkill, I know. Not efficient.
I have one IIS entry with AppPool integrated mode. There are 5 or more host headers assigned. The application pulls data based on the host name from Request.Url.Host. When I have 2 or more sites open at the same time the value of the Request.Url.Host is the same across all the sites. About every 30 seconds it resets itself to the correct value from the last request and shows that value on the other sites. So ultimately the sites are loading the same data. The value in the HOST server variable is incorrect as well.
Is it true that ASP.NET and IIS hosting is more more expensive that PHP and Apache? Say I want to host a dedicated server, then will the difference be that big?
- Another thing, do I really need a license for SQL Server database and IIS or something like that when I pay for a company for the dedicated server or they will pay that?
I have heard of the pains of setting up IIS. On a windows box, can I simply drop a ASP.NET application into Apache server and have it work? Or are there any other server alternatives? I am relatively new to web server concepts. I have heard suggestions for the server in mono but it doesn't seem practical using mono on a windows box, I could use a Linux box with mono, which wouldn't surprise me if it worked better then a windows solution, but for arguments sake this question is directed towards a windows box.
I am creating an application on my test machine at home. It will require logins, roles, memberships etc.
Just a quick question, will there be any problems when uploading database to my host as its has all my asp.net configurations in the database? Is there anything I need to specifically?