I ask if i can use static variables in my web application, what are the alternatives to (static)? when i use static variable in specific page and more than one user use the application , it make conflict data(incorrect data).what are the limits of static members using?are static members are shared in memory?
Since we can access the private data member of base class in the derived class with the help of friend function. How can we do the same in C# asp.net? I mean whats the alternative of friend function in C# asp.net
I get this error: Cannot refer to an instance member of a class from within a shared method or shared member initializer without an explicit instance of the class.
Partial Class _Default Inherits System.Web.UI.Page <WebMethod()> _ Public Shared Function ParseData() As String Dim value as string = GetValue() End Function Private Function GetValue() as String Return "halp" End Function End Class
I know it has something to do with the fact that the first function is shared and the second function should probably be Public as well but I don't fully understand the reason behind it. Probably not relevant but I'm calling the web method from some javascript.
If for example you have a function Public shared function GetStockByID(StockID as Guid) as Stock Is that function common to all current users of your application? Or is the shared function only specific to the current user and shared in the context of ONLY that current user? So more specifically my question is this, besides database concurrency issues such as table locking do I need to concern myself with threading issues in shared functions in an ASP.Net application?In my head; let's say my application namespace is MyTestApplicationNamespace. Everytime a new user connects to my site a new instance of the MyTestApplicationNamespace is created and therefore all shared functions are common to that instance and user but NOT common across multiple users. Is this correct?
I have a private static field in my Controller class in an MVC web application.
I have a static method in that controller that assigns some value to that static field, I want to apply lock on that static field until some other instance method in the controller uses the value stored in the static field and then releases it.
DETAILS:
I have a controller named BaseController having a static ClientId field as follows and two methods as follows:-
public static string ClientId = ""; static void OnClientConnected(string clientId, ref Dictionary<string, object> list) { list.Add("a", "b"); // I want the ClientId to be locked here, so that it can not be accessed by other requests coming to the server and wait for ClientId to be released:- BaseController.clientId = clientId; } public ActionResult Handler() { if (something) { // use the static ClientId here } // Release the ClientId here, so it can now be used by other web requests coming to the server. return View(); }
I have a question about C Sharp ASP.NET:Is there a difference (in code speed, resources) between:public static variable declared in public static class MyGlobals in a 'Code File' template;and the variable declared in a normal 'Class File' template;I use this variable in 2 different Class Files and also in _Default Page codebehind cs file.In fact in my case I need about 20 global variables of type List<string>.
I have several Include files in asp classic that I would like to convert to the class in C#, I have bunch of variable, Constraint, functions, DB connection. Is class the best way to convert them?
Our site has a page for maintenance of existing members (e.g. adding / changing roles, etc.)This page currently uses a gridview to show a complete list of all members, based on GetMembers() method to populate it.However, as the number of users has grown to several hundred, it has become difficult to locate a particular user by paging through several pages.Is there a way to narrow down this list, maybe with a filtering textbox, so that as you start typing into that textbox, only members whose name contains the typed characters will show up in the gridview?
I have a base class called BasePage, and a master page called SiteMaster. All my content pages inherit BasePage using BasePage instead of System.Web.UI.Page. Now, I need to access some functions in BasePage from my master page SiteMaster, let's say, the function is called "DisplayClientName()". How can I do it? Searched the Web, have found tons of similar questions but not solid solutions.
I'm trying to create a class, DataCommon, to contain all my SQL Data manipulation functions. I've created a Subroutine called Init that initializes a SQLDataAdapter:
[Code]....
From my other classes I am creating an instance of DataCommon, calling Init, and calling another subroutine in DataCommon that pulls data from SQL and loads the data into my dataset. This part is working great -- no problems at all. I'm loading three different Datatables in the Dataset with no issues.
At this point, I'll perform my various manipulations on the datatables -- add/delete/modify rows -- again with no problems. All of this is creating postbacks...and this is where my problem begins. After I've done all my manipulations to the data and am ready to update my SQL tables, I have to re-initialize my SQLDataAdapter. I thought I could do something like: [Code]....
But I get the error: Exception inserting Class. Thread was being aborted.
In my initial data load from SQL, each datatable is getting loaded from a single SQL table, so I was hoping to use the autogenerated Update/Insert/Delete statements by the SQLDataAdapter. As a test, as soon as I filled the dataset initially, I added a new row to one of the datatables and used the SQLDataAdapter.Update() method before a postback occurred, and it worked perfectly.
So, with all that being said, I guess my question is, how do I reconnect the table mappings between my SQLDataAdapter and dataset to autogenerate the updates after a postback occurs? I've tried researching this, but I get confused after reading about FillSchema vs TableMappings vs everything else I've read about.
If a static class is put in App_Code, does that imply only one instance will be created, shared by different http requests?Or each request still brings one request?
is it ok to use something like this in the web: (my application is on asp.net mvc)
public static class DbUtil { public static int Insert(object o, string cs) { using (var conn = new SqlConnection(cs)) using (var cmd = conn.CreateCommand()) { conn.Open(); return Convert.ToInt32(cmd.ExecuteScalar());
So i have some existing functionality from an older ASP.Net app that is a static class.
Say there's a static method in that class that returns a dataset that I would like to bind to something like a gridview or whatever I can build using MVC3.
I am using <%# MyFormatClass(Eval("fieldname")) %> to display data in a grid view on my page. MyFormatClass works fine, but now I want to move it to a central location that can be used by many pages. When I try to access the class <%# Utils.MyFormatClass(Eval("fieldname")) %> it no longer works. Is this something we are allowed to do?
Since I'm using Postgresql and can't use LINQ to SQL, I wrote my own wrapper classes.
This is a part of the Student class:
[code]....
It works now! I replaces all Run methods in the Student class with DB.Run
But I want to know if it will work fine with a lot of people online, not me only. I'm not sure how static things work with ASP.NET, maybe it'll eat a lot of memory?..
I would like to generate my links automatically via a static class in each of my aspx pages (or in a common BasePage).Currently I use this:
private const string TEMPLATE = "~/One.aspx"; public static string Link () ( string link = String.Format(TEMPLATE); return link; )
But the name of my page, One.aspx is hardcoded. Is it possible to generate the path instead of this hardcoded constant TEMPLATE. You should know that I do not instantiate the class before creating the link.
I have a method that returns an array of custom class objects that are created by parsing a text file. At the moment every time I use it I am rereading the file which isn't very efficient.
What I wat to do is create an array containing the objects when the page loads and store them in an array which can then be used later.
[Code]....
I thought I could create the static object using something like:
static Album myAlbums[] = readArray("Albums.txt");
but I am getting the following error:
A field initializer cannot reference the nonstatic field, method, or property 'B2M._Default.readArray(string)'
I am new to C# so this is probably something dumb. (Feel free to poke fun in my general direction if this is the case!)
I have some confusion with singleton class, below are my some points:
1.Can singleton class have static method?,if yes then how we call that methods? 2.what is main difference between Static class and Singleton Class?
I have created my singleton class as follows:
[Code]....
In Above class structure I have created two method one is Static and second is non static, When I am trying to access Static Method it gives me compile time error.
I have a static class I'm using as my data layer in my website. In this class, I have string arrays that store queried information that I can access later. Here's the part of my class and the method in question:
public static class data_layer { ivate static string[] items; private static string[] description; //will return description for an item id. if no item id is found, null is returned public static string getDesc(string key) [code]....
I hate to see the name of the class used as a string parameter like "FileDownloader" in the code, and I would like to use something like this FileDownloader.Name(), where FileDownloader is name of the class. Only problem is that I can't find out how to do that without instantiating object or creating a static method...
Is there a way to get a class name in .net without having the object instance and without creating a static method that returns the name of the class?