DataSource Controls :: Implementing A BLL / Contacts Table, The Select Method Is A Sql Query Against A Sql Server 2000 Database?
Feb 17, 2010
I'm implementing a BLL layer and have a few questions. First, in my DAL, there is a contacts table, the select method is a sql query against a sql server 2000 database. The preview data returns everyting as expected. The query is
[Code]....
The BLL method is built like so
[Code]....
When using the BLL method to a gridview, the results of the subquery are not displayed. There are also other methods, each having a different where clause for ContactRole_ID and each is having the same issue of not displaying the subquery reult in the gridview. No error, but no data is displayed for the subquery either. Here is the templatefield of the gridview
[Code]....
Another item that is causing an error is in trying to update a record. Here is the DAL update method
[Code]....
And the BLL update method
[Code]....
The error says i have extra parameters, but have no clue where the extra parameters are being picked up. The error isObjectDataSource 'odsContacts' could not find a non-generic method 'UpdateContact' that has parameters: _ContactID, _Active, _ContactName, _Office, _VirtualOffice, _Pager, _Fax, _Home, _Cellular, _Email, _ContactRole_ID, Active, ContactRole_ID, ContactName, Office, Email, VirtualOffice, Pager, FAX, Home, Cellular.And the objectdatasource
I want to know whether an index is disabled in SQL Server 2000. In SQL Server 2005 we can do this by querying sys.indexes. Is there a way to find disabled indexes in SQL Server 2000?
I want to synchronise two databases from two different platforms i.e. MS Sql Server 2000 and MySql. I have two applications one is desktop application which uses Mysql and other is Web application which uses MSSql. When any changes made to MySql from Desktop application, then that changes should get reflected to MS Sql database and vice versa. I am novice for this kind of situation.
I need to select a field value from a database table. If the value read is '1' then I need a 'Y' to display as output in the select statement. I haven't figured out how to do this yet and queries I tried that did not work.
select IsIata from Table_1 CASE WHEN (IsIata = '1') THEN 'Y' select IsIata CASE WHEN (IsIata = '1') THEN 'Y' from Table_1
By right clicking on my database i created a query in server explorer. But where are this query stored can't find them back. I should aspect that their is a folder query's like there is a folder tables but this isn't the case.
i have 2 tables company(companyId,companyName,City,state,country) and people(peopleId,peopleName,City,state,country) i want to display the total no of contacts and Total no of companies with respect to countries
i tried with group by: select country,count(*)companyId from company group by country is displaying the total number of companies with respect to country select country,count(*)peopleId from people group by country is displaying the total number of peoplewith respect to country
but i want to combine these two quries i want the output as :
Country Companies Contacts India 10 5 USA 0 10 (usa is having only contacts ,i doesn' have the companies) UK 8 0 (ukis having only companies ,i doesn' have the contacts)
<asp:sqldatasource id="SqlDataSourceX" runat="server" connectionstring="<%$ ConnectionStrings:MyConn%>" providername="System.Data.SqlClient" selectcommand="SELECT ItemNum, MIN(DateAdded) as [DateAdded] FROM Items WITH (NOLOCK) WHERE [DateAdded] between @DateFrom AND @DateTo
[Code]....
When I call select in codebehind, after 30sec it throws timeout expired SqlException:
[Code]....
again , this select took up to 3 sec to be executed. In application I tried to use SqlConnection and SqlTableAdapter instead of SqlDataSource, with the same query, and again it took up to 3 sec.
If I choose tighter interval (e.g '2011-01-20 00:00:00' - '2011-01-21 00:00:00') , there is no timeout exception, so I know that sqldatasource select is executed correctly. So the conclusion is that sql server is not using index while executing query sent from sqldatasource, but is using index whenever else. I have also checked the index statistics on sql server and it is like that. In profiler i can see slight difference between this two cases. As for SqlDataSource, in events table, in first column "EventClass" after 30 sec, there is this: "RPC:Completed" and application throws timeout. If i use SqlConnection and SqlTableAdapter then at the same place there is this: "SQL:BatchStarting" and "SQL:BatchCompleted" and application does not throws timeout(the index has been used).
what is so special on SqlDataSource connection, that Sql Server performs differently compared to other types of connections?
I have partitioned a table and it has been partitioned according to an account id. ie also rows that have accountid =1 will be in A partition and all rows that have accountid = 2 will be in B partition. so now if i execute a query with where condition accountid =1 sql server will search only in A partition. Suppose if i add another condition to it ie where accountid=1 and place="aaa" will this query search only A partition or the entire table?
I have inherited a very old SQL Server Database for a live site, but have been asked to add a new table for invoice recording to it. Fairly easy to do for any new record added from now on, however I run into some issues with selecting older records.I need to find a way to select from 3 tables, see if a record exists in the new table and if not insert a new record to it.My stored procedue so far is (The new table is [Invoicing]:
The drop down list is used to determine what search criteria will be used to find an invoice. I tried to set the Select method in the switch statement. I don't understand how to set the Select Method and the select parameters programmatically though . I tried a few different ways but can't make the compiler happy. My ODS is in scope in the code behind. I'm not able to access it's properties though. The BAL resides in a separate project that is a ClassLibrary. I also have a using statement for the ClassLibrary project in the code behind.
I have 5 GB data, when I move from SQL server 2000 to 2008 with Import and Export wizard, my LDF size is increased to 30 GB, Can I reduce my LDF file or move. In my one of the table contain around 20 Lakh data which i have normalized in 2008 and create 4 tables, so my data is entering in normalized form in 2008. But due to size by hard disk is full. I have used shrnik command but it reduce to only 1 GB.
I have one Store Procedure that generating report ..
For storing the data there , i used many temp. tables. There is many Select Query , little less insert and delete query.
Now if there is huge data around 1 lac in temp table my select query taking to much time and also may be insert and delete query
I added Primary key to all auto Increment Field in temp table. Also defined Clustered index on that primary key as unique Clustered index to improve the performance .
But there is not so much improvement in case of huge temp table.
Right now the whole Store Procedure is taking time to complete around 1.5 days or around 30 hours ..
So i want to increase the performance as much that it completes on nearly 3-4 hours.
Unable to read local eventlog (reason: The data area passed to a system call is too small). This error is recorded in the event log every minute in the production server, and because of this the SQL Server 2000 performance is very slow and the box is also working slow. This indirectly affects my application and productivity.
Is there a way to select data from multiple tables other than the UNION ALL statement. Addtionally I need to select data from a different database.
My current statement is as follows (there are alot more fields but I have shortened it ):
SELECT server.dbo.SRFILE.SR_GROUP, server.dbo.SRFILE.SROWNERSHIP, server.dbo.SRFILE.SRCONMAE, BSFLBWF_1.Incidentx, BSFLBWF_1.Severityx FROM server.dbo.SRFILE INNER JOIN BSFLBWF AS BSFLBWF_1 ON BSFLBWF_1.Incidentx = server.dbo.SRFILE.SRONUMBER WHERE (BSFLBWF_1.Closex IS NULL).........
