DataSource Controls :: Static Variables Vs Linq2sql DataClassesDataContext Objects
May 6, 2010
im developing a silverlight project using silverlight 3, vs2008 and linq2sql. when projects starts, im storing all the data from database into some static list variables. so when ever i need data, im reading it from those static list variables. all i want to know is, is it good to store data in static list variables and use it when ever necessary or is it good to get data directly from DataClassesDataContext object like db.mytable. which is the rite and fastest way or retrieving data. i mean which will use less connections to database?
View 2 Replies
Similar Messages:
Mar 5, 2011
whats the exact use of static variables in overall programming in .net and for asp.net...
Recently i went for the interview where interviewer asked me 2 question which i was not sure for the same..
whats the use of session object, i said sessions are the server side object, they are used when you want to store user specific data at server side, then he asked what if i want to use static variables for the same, i was mum, can anyone tell me how asp.net will behave if i store the user specific information in static variables.If i use cookies which are the best option to store the data at client side (not sensitive one), but what if user has disabled cookies on his machine, will my application would crash.
View 3 Replies
Jun 21, 2010
firstly a static class only ever exists once and is not an instance. Any static members (ie static int NoOfPeople;) is stored in one place and is shared between all sessions (like the old global variables).
Now static methods is where i'm not 100% sure. If I have a static method that doesn't use any other static members could this cause inconstant results, example (this is a fairly pointless method but just a quick example of the top of my head)
[Code]....
So in this example if two sessions (or threads) were to call this at the same time - would they both get back the expected results, because the method only uses private data (a, b and totalToReturn).Im sure this sounds a little simple but I will be using static methods to build user objects and various other objects that there will have to be a 100% garentee that the objects will not get mixed up between sessions and the wrong things return to the user.
View 5 Replies
May 10, 2010
Is it safe to access asp.net session variables through static properties of a static object?Here is what I mean:
public static class SessionHelper
{
public static int Age
{
get
{
[code]...
Is it possible that userA could access userB's session data this way?
View 2 Replies
Feb 1, 2011
I am not familiar much with linqtoSQL and I need a better way to write this code:
[Code]....
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
Jul 7, 2010
I'm got 2 model objects. Category and CategoryItem. I try to add a CategoryItem to Category in my Controller but It wont save to database, and I know why because I don't know how to call the submitChanges on the add while using repository, I dont got the DBContext right there is you know what I mean?.. here I will show you with code.
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
Feb 5, 2010
I am using the followign object in my asp.net page
private static Dictionary<string, List<Guid>> OpenNodes = new Dictionary<string, List<Guid>>();
//Page start
if(!OpenNodes.ContainsKey(Session.SessionID))
[code]...
View 3 Replies
Mar 9, 2010
I know what they are and how they are used but i am not sure about their feasibility. Their use is always advised to be avoided. can some one explain me when they should be used and when not?
Aif i have a choice between static veriable and session for just storing an integer which one of these should i prefer??
View 3 Replies
Feb 13, 2011
I have some WCF services. These services run in ASP.NET. I want these services to be able to access a static variable. My problem is, I'm not sure where the appropriate server level storage mechanism is. I don't want to use the database because of speed. But, I want the static variables to stay in memory as long as possible. In fact, I'd like it to stay until I restart my server if it all possible.
View 2 Replies
Oct 6, 2010
i am developing a website in asp.net i have created a class "Utility" in App_Code Folder this class contains a static object of another class(LoginInfo) as described below:
[Code]....
This LoginInfo Class is my business object which only contains 2 properties UserID and UserName
Now what i am doing on my login page, after user authentication i am setting these properties with current logged in UserId and UserName
[Code]....
I am using this CurrentUser object on my webpage to get userid and username. It works fine, but after few minutes my CurrentUser.UserID and CurrentUser.UserName is set to blank string. I am not able to figure out what is the problem. may be due to asp.net recycles.
View 3 Replies
Jun 27, 2010
If I declare a static field in a type instantiated within an ASP.NET application, hosted within IIS, is the same variable (i.e. same memory location) used by all of the worker threads used by IIS, opening up concurrency issues?
View 1 Replies
Apr 4, 2011
Possible Duplicate: Where are static variables stored in asp.net aspx page Hi can someone please tell me where the static variables are stored in asp.net aspx page.Is it in the view state? If so I guess you wouldn't want to stored big complex objects?
View 1 Replies
Jun 22, 2010
Let's say I have the following;
public static void TryOut(int intOne, int intTwo, string strone, string strtwo){....}
And after I created dll, I will use it like that;
TryOut(1,3,"bla bla bla", "bla bla bla");
But I want the last variable to be optional. I mean this method could be used like that;
TryOut(1,3,"bla bla bla", "bla bla bla");
And Also like that
TryOut(1,3,"bla bla bla");
I know it is possibel but how I could do that I have no idea !
View 5 Replies
Nov 11, 2010
For reasons I would rather not discuss, I need to create a custom authentication system for my app. I was just reviewing the system and am having some doubts if my solution is thread safe. My goal was to create a solution that would allow my app to authenticate a user one time and that users authentication info would be shared by all master pages, pages, classes, user controls, etc that are used. (But not share the same info between users) Here is my setup: PageHttpModule.cs - this is added to the web.config as a httpModule.
public class PageHttpModule : IHttpModule
{
public void Init(HttpApplication app)
{
app.AuthenticateRequest += new EventHandler(OnAuthenticateRequest);
}
public void OnAuthenticateRequest(Object s, EventArgs e)
{
CurrentUser.Initialize();
}
public void Dispose() { }
}
CurrentUser.cs
public static class CurrentUser
{
public static bool IsAuthenticated { get; private set; }
public static string Email {get; set;}
public static string RealName {get; set;
public static string UserId {get; set;}
public static void Initialize()
{
CurrentUser.AuthenticateUser();
}
Note: this is a scaled down version of my authentication code.
public static void AuthenticateUser()
{
UserAuthentication user = new UserAuthentication();
user.AuthenticateUser();
if (user.IsAuthenticated)
{
CurrentUser.IsAuthenticated = true;
CurrentUser.UserId = user.UserId;
CurrentUser.Email = user.Email;
CurrentUser.RealName = user.RealName;
}
}
}
UserAuthentication.cs
public class UserAuthentication
{
public string Email { get; set; }
public string RealName { get; set; }
public string UserId { get; set; }
public bool IsAuthenticated { get; private set; }
public UserAuthentication()
{
IsAuthenticated = false;
Email = String.Empty;
RealName = String.Empty;
UserId = String.Empty;
}
public void AuthenticateUser()
{
//do some logic here.. if the user is ok then
IsAuthenticated = true
Email = address from db
UserId = userid from db;
Realname = name from db;
}
}
I have tested between 3 different browsers and it seems to work fine, but I am still learning and don't want to make a huge mistake. If my logic is totally wrong, then how should I do it so I dont have to put user lookups on every page directly?
View 4 Replies
Feb 17, 2010
is there any way to stop share the static variable at multiple users....I need to create a new insatnce of static variables or not accessing the same static variables across multiple who are using the same site.....while googling i found like hisSystem.Threading.Interlocked.Increment(ref MyClass.InstanceCounter); by using can I do....or is there any other way to stop accessing the static variables accross multiple instances of my site......and in my scenario i cannot use rely on session variable also
View 2 Replies
May 28, 2010
In page behind classes I am using a private and shared object and variables (list or just client or simplay int id) to temporary hold data coming from database or class library. This object is used temporarily to catch data and than to return, pass to some function or binding a control.1st: Can this approach harm any way ? I couldn't analyze it but a thought was using such shared variables may replace data in it when multiple users may be sending request at a time?
[code]...
View 2 Replies
Apr 4, 2011
where the static variables are stored in asp.net aspx page.Is it in the view state? If so I guess you wouldn't want to stored big complex objects?
View 2 Replies
Feb 13, 2011
i declared a static variable in global.asax file like below
<%@ Application Language="C#" %>
<script runat="server">
static string Sv;
void Application_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
// Code that runs on application startup
}
i want to access this variable in aspx page. how can i access this variable.
View 2 Replies
Oct 24, 2010
I've noticed that once I've instantiated 3-4 objects now, my ASPX page is running slower. The response from the server (which is my own PC) is taking longer.
With one or two objects, the performance is same. After I instantiate 3, it slows a little, and 4 just completely wears it down.
I've read this article: [URL]
that says to avoid using session variables especially storing objects into them. Well thats exactly what I'm doing. My object has about 10 methods(~30 lines of code each) and 20 fields.
My question is, if I want to persist object in memory for each user session, how else could I store them on each postback if not in the session variable>? I can't use application variable because thats shared and not thread safe.
View 3 Replies
Jan 11, 2010
So I started working on my first asp.net application that involves logging in and databases, and soon after i started messing around with a static class. I "discovered" that if you make a variable static, all sessions share that variable (I for some reason was originally assuming that each session had its own copy of that "static" class). Anyway, after discovering this I thought to myself "how could this possibly be useful to me" and thought that itmight be a good idea to make a single static database connection for all of the sessions, rather than storing that as a session variable for each session. Does anybody know what would be the pros and cons of this approach?
View 5 Replies
Aug 19, 2010
I'm coding a business layer for an ASP.NET application. I've created database methods in my BLL as static. I've created public static Func variables to be compiled and used in several different methods, like this:
namespace BLL
public class User
{
public static Func<Context, variable, result> selectUser;
private static void CompileQuery()
{
if(selectUser == null)
{
selectUser = CompiledQuery.Compile......
}
}
public static UserClass Select(int id)
{
CompileQuery();
//uses selectUser
}
public static SomethingElse DoSomethingElse()
{
CompileQuery();
//also uses selectUser
}
}
It'll be used in ASP.NET layer like this: using BLL;
private void AddUser()
{
UserClass user = User.Select(id);
}
My question is, since static variables are not thread-safe, is this a bad design decision? I'm thinking of either implementing a locking mechanism, which makes me think if it'd slow down the application, or using instantiated class approach which makes me wonder if query compiling would be beneficial.
View 1 Replies
Jan 19, 2011
I have a website wich runs like a charm locally, but when i take it online it cannot find the dbml, i have imported the dbml class but it says: Compiler Error Message: BC30002: Type 'DataClassesDataContext' is not defined. Source Error: Line 201: Dim dc As New DataClassesDataContext
And i have uploaded my .dbml file to the server. I have some experience of linq before and this has never happened before I dont understand why its doing this... I rechecked on my webserver, and the correct .net version was installed. but it works locally so it must be problems on the webserver. but what? I've checked with the web-host and theres nothing wrong with the .net version.
View 1 Replies
Jan 27, 2010
I have 2 Linq to Entity queries, here they are:
[Code]....
In "query" there are several columns, 2 of them are NIIN and Qty. In "objViewDDRT" there are only 2 columns, they are NIIN and AvailBalance.
What I need to do is for each row in "query" check to see if the NIIN is in "objViewDDRT", and if it is get the AvailBalance for that NIIN from objViewDDRT.
View 3 Replies
Jun 10, 2010
I was put in charge of a database that has no source control, and all work was done in the database. I want to pull all the objects (stored procs, views, tables) from the database, and add to my new source control.
Is there a way to get all the objects into individual files out of a database?
Our database is SQL 2005. I have Visual Studio 2005/2008/2010 (beta 2) at my disposal.
View 5 Replies
Apr 5, 2010
Entity framework easily allows for this but how can I detach objects in linq to sql?
View 1 Replies
