Above is the field in the gridView. My question is very simplet that whatever the number of rows in a grid in one column, I just want to show the sum of the values of a column in the Footer Row.
I don't want to use javascript. I have tried following code but there is displaying "0" in the footer of the respect column instead of sum.
[Code]....
I need assistance in the code which I provided. I want something like this:
I need the yoy var %, bm % yoy bps, and opps generated to have a backcolor of gold. before it was a itemtemplate it was easy to change it in the codebehind but now that it is a itemtemplate it wont change anymore.
The following seems reasonable, but it returns an error:
<asp:Repeater ID="RepeaterF" runat="server" DataSourceID="DSF" > <ItemTemplate> <% If Eval("Item_Batch") = 0 Then %><tr><td></td><td colspan="2"></td><td></td></tr><% Else %>........
Error: "Databinding methods such as Eval(), XPath(), and Bind() can only be used in the context of a databound control."
I am finding it difficult to accept that the whole Repeater approach has any benefits over just creating a loop in code, iterating through a recordset, and building a html table into a variable, then dumping it to the page. This repeater is spawning pages of code and objects, and surely this is all using up server resources.
I have done the itemtemplate and edittemplate,when I click on the button in itemtemplate, the edittemplate will show.But that row in itemtemplate will disappear.How can I keep that row in itemtemplate and ecotent in edittemplate both appear?
i want to know, if is better to make an entire page in the aspx file or in the aspx.vb file. If you have to decide, which one do you choose? ie in aspx:
Code: <asp:Table ID="Table1" runat="server" Width="980"> <asp:TableRow> <asp:TableCell> SOME TEXT </asp:TableCell> </asp:TableRow> </asp:Table> ie in aspx.vb: Code: dim tabla as new table tabla.id = "Table1" tabla.width = 980 dim fila as new tablerow dim celda as new tablecell celda.text = "SOME TEXT" fila.cells.add(celda) tabla.rows.add(fila) form1.controls.add(tabla)
currently i had two columns written in the page, both have a ItemTemplateI tried to bind an ArrayList into the gridview, and it worksProblem is:The binded data is added behind of the columns I written, and I want to set the visible="false" for the 3rd column and so on, when I did tat, it prompt an error message telling me the index was out of range, I tried to set the visible in Page_LoadComplete eventI able to set the 1st and 2nd written columns visible to false, what is the cause?
I want when I am search any another college then show my url
http://localhost:1682/FinalTest/searchcollege.aspx?CollegeId=20&id=3&cid=5 means only change my CollegeId=25 to 20 and other parameter is not change. Use only javascript.
i write css like above for datalist label. but it is not working. which way i have to write cssclass to binding datalist. as i notice you have use css class at jquery to set value like below.
I have the web page [URL] written in html. I have also created a form on this web page, but I do not have any idea how to create the aspx page to capture and email to me (via my mailserver), the data the user enters and submits through the form
For reasons that are probably not worth mentioning in this post, I have decided to stop using ASP.NET controls and simply use regular HTML controls for my .aspx pages. As such, to dynamically generate HTML, I use c# inline to the .aspx to do what I need to do.
For example: this .aspx snippet shows how I am dynamically creating a <select> element where the <option> elements are driven by looping through a generic list of objects.
<select name="s"> <option value="-9999">Select an entity...</option> <% foreach (MyEntity e in this.MyEntities) {%> <option <% if (MyEntityInScope.ID == e.ID) { %>selected<%} %> value="<%= e.ID %>"> <%= e.Name%></option> <%} %> </select>
Functionality-wise, I prefer this method of creating HTML (I feel more in control of how the HTML is generated vs ASP controls). However, syntactically (and visually), I think it's cumbersome (and ugly).
Is there a "better" way (another syntax) to dynamically generate HTML w/out resorting to using ASP.NET controls?
I have an ASPX page that I intend to use as a template to generate some HTML. I have defined my markup and data bound controls and built a function to do all the data binding, call this.Render and return the HTML. The function works just fine when called from Page_Load.
My intent was to bypass page request and directly call the method and get the page HTML, but when I call the function without making a HTTP Request, none of my server side controls are initialized.
Is there any way I can call a method on a page, pass some params and get the HTML output without making a HTTP Request. I believe Server.Execute could do it but i cant find a way to pass params in it.
I am calling the function like this
MyPage ThreadHTMLGenerator = new MyPage; string threadHTML= ThreadHTMLGenerator.GenerateExpandedHTML(param1, param2, param3);
it is possible to do a request for another page on internet from page_load? I mean if it is possible to aquire markup code with informations from another page and display them on my aspx site? For example something like this:
I'm trying to use the Response.Write() method to dynamically insert content in the < head > section of an aspx page. I need to inject a string value from a property on a code-behind object which is a link to my CSS file. However, it is not being processed properly at run time. The object is public on the class and is hydrated in the Page_Load() event. Down in the body of the page I can successfully inject other properties from the Corpoartion object with no problem at all.Why does this not work in the < head > section?This is the part that does not expand correctly:
Is there a way to test sending an XML file as a request to my ASP.Net web page within Visual Studio 2008? k, no one has answered this in a helpful way. I have a situation where I have an ASPX page that I send an XML file too and receive an XML response from. In order to debug this, I need to step into the page while providing an XML request. I This is what I need to figure out how to do?
I use ASP.NET Ajax in my web site and I am monitoring the HTTP requests per each page. I am surprised by the excessive call of ScriptResource.axd with different query string variables. I am pasting a sample of HTTP trace below. The call for ScriptResource.axd take lots time percentage out of total response time. Is this by design or there is something wrong with my AJAX configuration in web.config?
[Code]....
Actually it is degrading the performance of the application. And the user experience becoming very poor in case of lower bandwidth.