MVC :: 3 Hyperlink - Implement Roles Authorization On ActionLinks?
Mar 14, 2011Is there to implement roles authorization on those ActionLinks?
View 5 RepliesIs there to implement roles authorization on those ActionLinks?
View 5 RepliesIn a standard, generated list view, how can I hide certain ActionLinks based on the roles the logged in user belongs to?
View 1 RepliesI am using ASP.NET MVC 3 and am trying to do something that should be really straight forward...
My application uses Forms authentication and that is working perfectly for controllers/actions. For example if I decorate either a controller or an action with the attribute below only members of the administrators group can view them:
[Authorize(Roles="Administrators")]
However I have a folder under the default Scripts folder called Admin. I only want members of the Administrators group to be able to access scripts within this directory so I created a new web.config in the directory with the following inside:
[code]....
However no matter whether a user is a member of the Administrators group or not they receive a 302 Found message and are then redirected to the login page.
If I change the web.config to allow user="*" then it works. It also works if I add an allow users="Username" for a specific user I am testing with.
We're writing an app that has a requirement for allowing/disallowing access based on user role.In a traditional .net app of course you set the security trimming attribute in the web.config and set the nodes in the web.sitemap file and you were set.
View 2 RepliesIs it possible to specify that multiple roles are required inside the authorization element of the web.config file? I currently have this block in one web.config of my site for a specific directory:
<authorization>
<allow roles="Global, Region" />
<deny users="*" />
</authorization>
I've just identified a special case where a person with two lower-level permissions than Global and Region should also have access to this directory. Roughly, I want something like this:
<authorization>
<allow roles="GlobalManager, RegionManager, SiteManager && FooSite" />
<deny users="*" />
</authorization>
I realize I probably should have a new role for this scenario, but I'd like to avoid that.
I am building a subscription based web site, which currently has three subscription levels, i.e. Horses, Soccer, and Horses and Soccer. I was thinking of implementing standard role based authorization, where a Horses subscriber would get roles including those to use the Horses section, etc.
Should I use a standard role provider, and when a member subscribes to the site, assign roles for his subscription to him, or use a hierarchical role provider, that when asked for the roles for a member, only then uses the member's subscription level to 'calculate' a set of roles for the member.
Where can I find a good tutorial on setting up roles and authorizing them? I'm using Windows Authentication for an intra-net based app and need to figure out how to grant the users access to the various pages.
View 5 RepliesI'm trying to use a custom Principal (with custom Identity) for security. This all works fine for logging in, out etc. I am now trying to limit access to unauthorised users within my code as follows:
[Code]....
Again, all is fine there. Except I need some more complicated rules, something along the lines of "Allow Admins. Allow Buyers, provided they have the correct department ID and are allowed to see this customer's credentials". All of that information exists within a database.
I have a client asp.net website that uses ASP.Net Membership, Roles and Profile providers and Login controls. I need to expand the application so was going to use WCF Workflows, the ASP.Net website will be hosted on a different server than the WCF Services so what I want to do is get the ASP.Net Website to auth via the WCF Service. So process will go:
ASP.Net Website ------------------> WCF Service ------------------> SQL Database (Membership, Roles, Profile, Workflow Persistence Data and Business Data)
I tried creating a custom Membership and Role providers but I have had problems managing the users (Membershipuser class) saying null when a vaild user has been return by the WCF Service as can access the properies but not the methods.
I have used standard asp.net roles and membership provider in my asp.net mvc project. The resources like creating an employee and setting its role can only be done by administrator. Now at first delivery of software to client, there will be no user, i want to implement a functionality where if there are no users in the system user can directly create new employee and assign roles without logging in. Once the roles are assigned user will have to log in to access authorized resources. Can i implement custom action filters that will assist me in implementing this functionality? How can i impelment this functionality?
View 1 Repliesbest Sample for Authentication and Authorization in Asp.Net.
View 3 Replieshow to write/implement custom authorization filter , i am using my own custom Authentication module and roles and not ASP.net forms authentication and have my user and role information in my sessions...
say Session["role"] = "Admin" or Session["role"] = "User"
how can i write custom filter to prevent users to access certain functionalities i.e Controller actions.
I am "DomainMyDomainUserName" If I do this:
[Code]....
I can access the website I've created on my local machine in debug mode; and with my domain account as a local administrator, if I do this:
[Code]....
I can still access the website; and with my domain account in a Domain Group named "DomainDomainLocalSecurityGroup", if I do this:
[Code]....
I can still access the website; HOWEVER, if I create a Local Group on my machine named "LocalMachineGroup" and I add "DomainMyDomainUserName" to this group and I do this:
[Code]....
I get an Access Denied error trying to access the website. What I want to do is, have a group on my local machine (for testing), on a test web server, and on a production web server named "MyWebsiteUserAccess" with the same Domain Group (filled with Domain Users allowed access to the site) in all of these local groups; so that when I test the web application on my local machine, on my test web server and on my production web server, I don't have to change the Web.config file to have it work on each AND if the Domain Group name ever has to change, it won't affect access to the website.
What am I overlooking or is this even possible to do this way? I understand that there is a way to do Role Management through ASP.NET but I don't understand that well enough yet to implement that (and will probably go that route once I've done the research on how to best implement it for purpose of access control of this intranet site).
i have my login fully working 100% but i when someone who is not an admin try to enter a web that is only for admins it crash
how can i make it to send a msgbox "admin only"(or something like that) instead of the crash of the web app ?
I have an live website and I need to enable roles and add it to a folder. What's the best way to go about it? Do I add code to web.config? Do I add code to individual pages? Do I use the membership provider service with V W D and recopy the website?
View 7 Repliesi would like to implement one route for my Adminitration user - roles management (http://<domain>/Administration/ManageUserRoles/<userName>/<roleName>), where Administration is the Controller and ManageUserRoles is the action and another for managing everywhere in the site where there is an id / name combination ((http://<domain>/<controller>/<Action>/<id>/<name>)).
From what i have tried so far, the Administration route catches all the routing that has the format http://<controller>/<action>/<param1>/<param2> and as a result the id / name url parameters are displayed as query url parameters.
how to implement a custom role provider which has support for parent and child roles?
I have a requirement to have high level Role permissions as per the usual Role provider functionality. However, I also have a requirement to further breakdown permissions into sub roles. I toyed with the idea of having further role instances for sub permissions but I'd prefer to have a native solution which allows for sub roles.
For instance:
[IT]
[IT] > [Admin]
[Extranet]
[Extranet] > [Admin]
In this scenario, the "Admin" role is actually 2 distinct roles, one for IT and one for Extranet scenarios. Ideally, there is no association between the 2 "Admin" roles because they are unique sub roles.
[Edit]: Following Igor's comment I feel I should clarify. The aspnetdb is already hosting multiple applications and therefore the use of the Application Name is not possible to segregate the sub roles as it is already being used to seperate the roles by application.
I need to implement field level security based on the roles. I have a page Employee.aspx . In that i have ten controls. If i am enter as admin role i need to show all the controls. If i am enter as user have to show only five controls. How to design the appplication for control level security?
View 5 RepliesI tried googling this and have had no luck. I would like to implement membership roles without any reference to email accounts or smtp. Does anyone have information on this topic?
View 4 Replieshow to implement click event for hyperlink as I am using hyperlink to logout the application and need to write the logout code in the event. For some reasons I am not able to use linkbutton.
View 8 RepliesI am developing a registration process in an MVC application. The process consists of 4 steps. I would like users to be able to see where they are in the registration process. i.e. I would like them to see a breadcrumb with each step displayed. If a user is on the first step, they should see all 4 steps displayed but only the first step should be enabled. If they are in the second step, they should only see the first and second steps enabled etc. The first link would take them back to the first step. I have considered using 4 action links to implement this. Is this the best way? If so, how do I disable and enable actionlinks?
View 6 RepliesWhen a user attempts to directly visit the url admin.aspx, and they are not an admin, they are redirected to the login page. However, the user then attempts to visit ViewWeek.aspx, it indicates that they are still logged in. Why does this ASP.NET authorization boot the user to the login screen, yet keep the user logged in? I'd rather it just direct the user to the default URL specified in the forms tag.
Here's my Forms Authentication:
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms name=".ASPXFORMSAUTH" defaultUrl="ViewWeek.aspx" timeout="50000000" />
</authentication>
Just wondering how to implement a user's list into website ? im using ASP.NET C#. I want to be able to:
add/delete usersadd/remove roles
I create custom principal for implement logic for users. In identity I store Id, Name. But it abnormally - this classes must use for authenticate and authorize.
I can implement custom MembershipUser, custom Roles and Membership provider.
How to do it? What best practices are?
[ASP.NET 3.5, FormsAuthentication, SQL Server]
In the Roles table there is Role, and RoleType.
I have 3different roles, 2 of which have sub-roles.
Example
Role----------------------Type
Adminstrator
Subscriber---Basic
Subscriber---Business
I need to implement Code Access Security, and URL based security using the roles & types...
For instance, the (Subscriber/Basic) would need to view a different set of pages, and have different access to things then a (Subscriber/Business).
I think I can handle the Code Access security with a custom attribute, but I am unsure to how enforce a User be apart of 2 roles in the URL Authorization.
I am currently using the web.config to deny/allow access to the directories/pages.
e.g.
/Areas/Admin/web.config
[Code]....
Is it possible to force the user to be apart of 2 roles with this technique?