I've run into a wall with the ViewData construct, but not sure exactly where the limitation lies or the best way to get around it. I have a complicated View that needs to contain many dropdown listboxes. I am loading up ViewData objects in the controller for the view. Apparently, I have hit some limit and cannot add another ViewData object for another dropdown. I'm not sure if the limit is the number of distinct objects in ViewData, the amount of memory in my test server, or the overall amount of data I am trying to load into the ViewData collection.
We are currently building a site in ASP.net MVC 2 and we have discovered that the URL's we have specified are not supported by MVC. This is what our developers are telling us anyway. I'd like to get feedback form this forum. My asp.net MVC knowledge is limited (I am an old school ASP 3 guy who hasn't programmed for years) but am trying to learn as much as I can so I can understand the limitations. say for example the app is a jobsearch site in the healthcare sector e.g. we would like the urls to be the following:
1. (non advanced searech) [URL]
2. (advanced search) [URL]
they are telling us that they need to send all parameters in the url even if they are blank so our example 1 here would not be possible. It would need to contain all of the possible advanced parameters in the search like this: [URL] most seaerches are basic i.e. looking for job in a location. but users have the optyion to do an advanced search also. The dev is telling us that we must send all params empty in the URL even in a basic search. Has anyone come across this limitation beforee and if so how did you combat it?
i have deployed my website on a particular server. i have some limitations in using viewstate and session variables. those pages in which i have used ViewState variables (for storing some information), i user accesses that page and does not do any activity for 5 minutes and if after 5 minutes he does any kind of activity (click on Link or button etc) then he receives following error: "Validation of viewstate MAC failed. If this application is hosted by a Web Farm or cluster, ensure that configuration specifies the same validationKey and validation algorithm. AutoGenerate cannot be used in a cluster."
how i can avoid above error? another problem is with session. My session expires just after 2-3 minutes. What should i do for maintaining session for long time? i can not use cookies, as if user has disabled the cookies then my website will not work...
explain me or provide me with a links of good articles/tutorials on "Benefits AndLimitations of Service Oriented Architecture" ?I mean Where to Use and Where not, the SOA.
have a page that has a validation summary control. On this page I have a nested user control (Control1). nside Control1 is another nested control (Control2). I have a CustomValidator on a textbox inside Control2.
Although the validation works on this textbox, the error message doesn't get bound to the ValidationSummary control. Is there limitations to the ValidationSummary control with nested controls?
I'm investigating a simple url rewriting setup for iis6 / net 2.0 sites.
I've added a . wildcard mapping in IIS that points to the .net executable. I'm also using the urlMappings element in the web.config to add some rewritten urls. I've moved the config outside of the web.config so I can make changes to the list without forcing application restarts, like so:
I'd like to allow our content management to add urls to this file so that we can have extensionless friendly urls. <add url="~/someurl" mappedUrl="index.aspx?page=123" />
This works just fine, but I'm concerned about limitations in the number of entries that I can map in the urlMappings config. I can't seem to find any documentation on this. Has anyone found any limitations?
What is the different between the vs 2010 Web Developer Express and the full version of 2010?With the vs 2010 Web Developer Express will I be able to use all types of databases (MSSQL, MySQL, Access, ect) and enitity frame work?
Just wanted to get clarification that methods like HTML.TextBoxFor() exist ONLY for the benefit of compile-time parameter type checking.
From my experimentation, these appear to ONLY accept a simple "expression lambda" syntax, which simply provides reference to a member property, and will not allow more robust use of "statement lambda" syntax. Other places in the .NET framework where lambda's are used, "statement lambda" syntax can be used, such as :
( x => { x += 7; if(x < 9) return x * 3; } )
... in effect, multiple statements of "in-line" code.
The type checking benefit is great - I just wanted to understand if there is additional capability which I have not recognized.
I need to limit the access of web application based on the number of days!
For example the application should not work more than ten days, if our client has 10 day license limit,when the user try to access the application after ten days , it should give a message like "the demo period has expired"!!
what is the lmitations and obstacles to make validations on credt cards or payment via my websitewithout use validaton form from any websites like authorize.net
I am trying to develop the nerddinner mvc website, so I downloaded Visual Studio 2010 Express but I do not see an option for MVC or even asp.net website. Can I download this for Visual Studio?
I am trying to export my Model to an Excel sheet. I have 31 fields out of which only 29 are exported. Among the 3 fields that I am not able to export 2 are of type Enum and one of DateTime. Their is another DateTime field also, but that is exported properly. Here are few fields of the model :
[EnumDataType(typeof(Suffix)), Display(Name = "Suffix *")] [Required(ErrorMessage = "Suffix is Required")] public Suffix NameSuffix { get; set; } [EnumDataType(typeof(InquiryStatus)), Display(Name = "Status")] [Required(ErrorMessage = "Status is Required")]
[Code] ....
Among the 4 fields above, NameSuffix, Inquiry_Status & FollowUpDate are not exported. InquiryDate is exported.
I know the content palcehlder does not have a size ,I have a masterpage and content page, the master page has a table with a header, content area, and footer, header and footer are fixed size, content area is 100%. As the user sizes the browser the content area grows and shrinks and the footer stays at the bottom of the browser window - perfect!
Problem: The contentpalceholder does not grow to fill the available content area. Now, the contentplaceholder gets its size from its contents, which in this case is a div holding a silverlight object.I was thinking I could hook the master or child page's re-size event and somehow pass that info onto the SL object, but as it turns out (and I'm surprised I never knew this) there is no aps.net page re-size event! (really?, wow.)
So is there a way to get a SL object hosted on a master page to size itself based on the size of the browser window?Or more generally, a way to size the contents (like a div or panel) of a contentplaceholder based on the browser? on a standard aspx page (not a master page) I CAN get the SL object to size itself based on the broswer, the problem seems to come from the fact that I'm hosting the SL object in a content placeholder.
I guess I could 'unroll' the master page into several standalone pages and have it work, but the menu is on the master page and I'm used to using them, plus it's already done...<sigh>
I am using TabContainer with some controls on each tab (asp: labels, text boxes). When redirecting to the page that contains the TabContainer, the tabs and their content loads as expected, but when there is a postback, and the page refreshes, the TabContainer UI changes - the font size of the labels gets bigger, the text boxes become bigger and their location changes a bit (not aligned as before), and the tab header is partially hidden. I am using IE7.
I dont know if this is relevant but in some of the text boxes i use edit mask extender as well for date. Also, I have used a table inside the TabContainer for layouting the controls.
I am using PageMethods to send a few parameters to a webmethod in my codebehind. The method runs a stored procedure and uses the results to build a string that I am returning from the method.
Everything works fine until I try to include too many records in my results..
Once the results I am trying to return hit about 70K, the pagemethod times out even though it is taking about 1 second to process the results.
Is there a buffer limit or limit on the size or results returned from a pagemethod and if so, where can this be set or changed?
Is there a setting in the web.config somewhere to handle pagemethod buffer size?
In login.aspx I have used login control to enter user name and password, the problem is: even my caps lock is off when I enter user name it prints in capital letters but size is small size (when I copy and paste in note pad or msword it paste in small letters not in capital letters), when I turn on my caps lock on and type - it prints in bigger size as if I am typing in capital letters.
ex: 1. temp is my user name if my caps lock is off it shows like this TEMP (but size in smaller than 2nd one)
2. if my caps lock is on is shows like this as if I am typing capital letters TEMP
As I know, by default Cache is stored in the memory and to the disk at the same time DiskCacheable=true).When the cached response is removed from the output cache due to memory pressure, it still remains on disk allowing a much larger set of pages to be cached. In addition, disk cached pages survive application restarts. And this is already in ASP.NET 2.0.I dont't know in which order the caches are removed from the memory and readen from disk instead? I would like to achive, that caches with the minimal trafic, or the longest last used, would be removed first from the memory. Is there some settings to do that, or even by default works that way?
Here's the scenario:I have an asp.net webpage which displays dynamic data in a gridview.I'm using a master page to display the header and footer of the page, and this gridview is being displayed inside a div in the contentplaceholder.
The Problem:What I want is that the size of the page that is displayed remains constant for a user and must be equal to the size of their browser's available display area and the content being visible by scrolling the div.Sort of like the header and footer remain at the same position and the content inside it is scrollable.
Where can I put these to bump them up? I've tried googling these settings, and I get sections of web.config that I don't have. I don't have a WCF client, either. Does this make sense to do from my web service, developed in VS 2010?
I'd like to just call his service without changing anything, get the error, and then go from there. I'm even getting that far because I got some other exception saying server was unable to process request, but it had nothing to do with exceeding a buffer size.
My admin set innodb_buffer_pool_size=512M, innodb_log_file_size=128M, and innodb_log_buffer_size=1M although in mysql query show global variables its showing what the value is set. When i restart my system also its showing what we set the data.(It means we set log file buffer file size to max and its working fine.) but when i try to upload a file of 58 mb again its throwing error as The size of BLOB/TEXT data inserted in one transaction is greater than 10% of redo log size.
I have a little MVC 3 challenge that I am trying to overcome.Here is my scenario:I have a controller called PersonController.cs with 5 methods:Add Add (post) Edit Edit (post) PopulateName(string EmailAddress) - POST
I have a viewdata class called PersonViewData.cs with 3 pieces of data:
Email FirstName LastName
I have 2 PageViews (Edit.aspx and Add.aspx)I have 1 PartialView (Details.ascx) - with 3 textboxes (Name, Email, Phone)I want to reuse this partial view in both the Edit.aspx and Add.aspx Views.
The user should NOT enter the First Name/Last Name - rather, once the user has entered the email address (OnChange of Email textbox), the First Name/ Last Name of person should be populated. This is done using the PopulateName(string EmailAddress) controller method. Meaning, I have an AJAX Form inside the partial view
Then once all 3 fields are populated. The user should be able to submit either the Add or Edit HtmlForm.
Code of Edit.aspx: [Code]....
Code of Add.aspx: [Code]....
The main issue is as follows:I have an AJAX Form inside the partial view. Since now we have a PageView Form and nested PartialView AjaxForm - Form within a Form - the Browser has a hard time with this concept. In fact, when a person enters an email address, the frmEdit/frmAdd gets submitted.
i need to show project information by value of dropdownlist.by using this code i get a list of data to drop down list.now how can i access the first data in ViewData(or record)
