i can assign a simple anonymous function and it works, but i'm having trouble with a more complex one.
i am attempting to disable an image button after it is pressed.
any alternatives would be welcome, but i think this is the recommended
[Code]....
I've been looking into how best to do this and wisdom would be appreciated. For read only purposes, I've been happily using LINQ and binding it to a grid. For editing purposes, I've used the LinqDataSource control, enabled the Edit/Delete operations in the process, and I have a nice editable grid bound to some or all of the table's fields.Now I have a situation where I want to edit a few fields in table A, but there are various values in linked table B that I want to display in that grid too (no editing of those). So my query looks like the below. The fields in tblDupes (cleared, notes) are what I want to edit, but I'd like to display those tblVoucher ones.
var theDupes = from d in db.tblDupes
where d.dupeGroup == Ref
select new
[code]...
A similar but different question LINQDataSource - Query Multiple Tables? sent me looking at scott Guthrie's blog entry http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2007/09/07/linq-to-sql-part-9-using-a-custom-linq-expression-with-the-lt-asp-linqdatasource-gt-control.aspx, where he handles various events to have a LinqDataSource with a custom query across tables. This still seems aimed at explicitly designed classes though, even if the class has only a subset of the fields.
So my question is: is there an easy way to allow committing of the changes made to the anonymous collection (a changes.Submit type action), or just an easy way to 'display' fields from another table while not involving them in the updating?EDIT: Thinking more, it doesn't have to be anonymous really. I'd be happy to define a class to contain the elements in that query, since it won't change often. But, those elements would be across two tables, even though only one needs updating. Not sure if that suggests entity framework would be more suitable - I get the feeling it wouldn't - I don't want the whole 'model' always grouping the fields in this way.
I'm trying to call a Page Method using a jQuery 'attached' event function, in which I like to use the closure to keep the event target local, as below, but page method calls declare several 'error' functions, and I would like to use one function for all of them. If, in the below code, I was handling an error and not success, how could I use my single, anonymous handler for all 3 error functions?
$(":button").click(function () {
var button = this;
PageMethods.DoIt(
function (a, b, c) {
alert(button);
});
});
This example passes an anonymous function for the success callback. There is only one of these. If I was passing an error callback, how could I use 'function (e, c, t)' for all 3 error callbacks?
ADDED: What I would like to do here is trigger an AJAX call whenever the user clicks a toggle button (checkbox), but to improve responsiveness, I want to toggle the button state immediately, and only 'untoggle' it if the AJAX call fails.
Now, in my client-side click() event handler, I would like to use anonymous functions inside the scope of click()' so that the functions have access to thethisevent argument, but I don't want to 'declare' three functions for theonTimeout,onError, and 'onAbort arguments of the PageMethods.MyFunction function. if I declare a named function outside of the click handler, it no longer has access to the 'this' parameter of the click() event handler.
In my gridview I have fields for inserting a new record in the footer.
In my objectdatasource selecting event if no records came back I bind a single mock row to force the footer to show so they can still add records. Since the row does not contain real data I hide the row.
[Code].....
I want to pass to an array of controls' IDs to a javascript script function so it will switch control's enable state.
For example, in C# it would be like this:
func(false, new[] { "Control1", "Control2", "Control3" });
In that function I want to find corresponding controls and disable/enable them. For one control I do this next way:
<script type="text/javascript" language="javascript">
function switchControls(value, arr) {
for (var n = 0; n < array.length; n++)
document.getElementById([n]).disabled = value;
}
</script>
<asp:CheckBox runat="server"
onclick="switchControls(this.checked,
[
'<%= Control1.ClientID %>',
'<%= Control2.ClientID %>'
])"
Text="Take?" />
How to implement this properly? Have I to use jQuery?
is it possible to get the result of an action into a string variable
I need something like this:
public ActionResult Do()
{
var s = this.Index().GetStringResult();
...
}
I am currently implementing a client-side paging solution using ASP.NET, jQuery and JSON.
I have been following the excellent article from encosia: http://encosia.com/2008/08/20/easily-build-powerful-client-side-ajax-paging-using-jquery/
In my Web Method I retrieve my data from the database as a DataTable:
DataTable categoryProducts = ProductViewerAccess.GetCategoryProducts
("AA", 4, 0, Page.ToString(), out howManyPages, "FALSE", 0, "CostPrice", "asc", destinationList);
I then retrieve the data from the DataTable into an anonymous type:
var feeds =
from feed in categoryProducts.AsEnumerable()[code]....
This all works great.
However, I would like to extend the code to perform some evaluation checks (e.g., check that various columns in the DataTable are not NULL) and other pre-processing (e.g., call various functions to build the image URL based on the image ID - which is another column in the DataTable not shown in the code fragment) before I return the resulting rows of the DataTable as an anonymous type to the client-side.Basically, I want to iterate through the DataTable, perform the evaluation checks and pre-processing, while building my anonymous type manually as I go. Or maybe there is a better way to achieve this?
I have a GridView in a div wrapper, there is some row headers along the left side that need to be always visible. This all works so far, but I need the wrapper to have a variable width to fit the browser size.
I got the desired width of the wrapper based on the browser width using some javascript but I can't figure out how to set this width as the wrapper.width.It doesn't have to update the wrapper width after the page loads or check for browser resizing.
my poor attempt at diagramming:
| |column headers |
| R |--------------|
| O | gridview data |
| W | |
| | this part |
| H | will scroll |<--->
| E | while the |
| A | Row headers |
| D | stay there |
| E | |
| R |______________ |
| S | scroll bar |
asp:(see edit below)
<pseudocode>
<table>
<tr><td>row headers</td> [code]...
I either need a way to set the wrapper.width = Width or a completely different and hopefully better way to achieve this.
I tried using a % for the width but it doesn't use the browser window as 100%, it takes the % of the full width of the whole GridView
which does nothing for me.
Edit: added some code
<script type="text/javascript">
var Width = window.innerWidth - 275 || document.body.clientWidth - 275;
var divElement = document.getElementById("wrappist");[code]....
This is just an efficiency question really.. I'm interested to know if there is a more efficient or logical way that people use to handle this sort of scenario.
In my asp.net application I am running a script to generate a new project my code at the top level looks like this:
[code]....
I create a boolean and each function returns a boolean result, the next function in this chain will only run if the previous one was successful. I do this because an asp.net application will continue to run through the page life cycle unless there is an unhandled exception and I don't want my whole application to be screwed up if something in the chain goes wrong (there is a lot of copying and deleting of files etc.. in this example).
Without giving away specifics: basically, I have a bunch of users adding content to my site. What happens now is ajax sends the text to a web service which does its thing, sends the info to the DB, Sends the user an e-mail, and then returns a response to the browser to do something.
What I would like to do is change that order. I want to return a response to the browser so the user is not waiting on the e-mail to send before they get their response. Basically, I'm trying to gain every milisecond I can to quicken the response, and there's no reason for the user to wait for the server to send their e-mail before it tells them that everything worked ok. If the info went to the DB, that's all the user needs to know, they'll know the e-mail sent when it shows up in their inbox. I notice this is an issue on my local machine which has no SMTP server and can actually hang the page response up for a few extra seconds because it's throwing errors trying to send something with no SMTP server.
So, I know in my function when I say
[Code]....
it WORKS, but I want to send the e-mail after the return. Is there ANY way to get this to happen?
I have the following code in my sql report:
[Code]....
What I want to do is display only those records where where sFileName does not exist.
I have a problem in my spilt function. When I pass the parameter, the data is getting splitted by given second parameter and it will return the result as table format. The resultant data is getting truncated. I have to create the dynamic update statement by using this table. Below I have shown the function and parameter.
View 2 RepliesI am implementing a CustomAuthorizeAttribute. I need to get the name of the action being executed. How can i get the name of current action name getting executed in the AuthorizeCore function which i am overriding?
View 1 Replieshow to call a ASP.NET MVC controller action from a javascript function in related view.
Particularly I am trying do do this from a recursive timer function like this:
script type="text/javascript">
function ShowTime() {
var dt = new Date();
document.getElementById("<%= TextBox1.ClientID %>").value = dt.toLocaleTimeString();
---> // the controller action call: "/Controller/ShowImage"
window.setTimeout("ShowTime()", 1000);
}
</script>
<asp:TextBox ID="TextBox1" runat="server"></asp:TextBox>
<script type="text/javascript">
// a startup script to put everything in motion
window.setTimeout("ShowTime()", 1000);
</script>
The action result is an image (JPEG serialized array) for display.
I'm trying to populate a treeview control using linq.
I use the following code
[Code]....
how can I declare c in fillChildren
have this site that has an api that can provide city name if I send my zip code as a parameter. http://www.postnummersok.se/api?q=16447the result is returned as a json object. Now i just want to read the result in my js function.I have tried the following but it always returns null:
function postnr() {
I have a query
"SELECT SUM(Mastery1) AS Mastery1 FROM TBLStudentEvaluation WHERE EmployeeID=@EmployeeID AND SchoolYear=@SchoolYear AND Semester=@Semester"
I want to display the SUM(Mastery1) AS Mastery1....how to display it in Label
In the procedure function, there will be queying several times based on conditions.
Suppose each query retrieves several records, can I caumulate those records in on table, then return that table.
Benifit I want to success here is that I want to save time, so instead of making several functions each has one query, each one requires a connection to databae, so it will take time.
I have this ListView that has a Drop Down List.Everything works fine (I think/hope) except that the drop down list are not showing its result correctly.This is the code.
Front-End
[Code]....
The code behind consist of the page_load and the ItemDataBound
[Code]....
I'm having a problem with my Linq to XML query. I'm getting the result data I want, but it's nested so deep that there must be a better way.Here is my XML:
[Code]....
I'm trying to get a list (simple string[]) of all Item IDs where Category Names contains "Other".Here is my Linq:
[Code]....
[Code]....
Here is a snapshot of my result from Visual Studio:The results I want are there ("item100", "item400", "item500"), but buried so deeply in the results var.
How can I get the query to return a simple
string[] = { "item100", "item400", "item500" }
I'm implement Comet in Asp.net MVC, I used timer to keep Async request in server, Async request will complete when timer elapsed 1 minute and response to client (to avoid 404 error) and then reconnect to Async Controller. I also wanna execute some Synchronous action during Async request was holding, but the problem is: When an Async action was executed and hold by using timer, the Sync Action wasn't called until Async action (comet long-live request) completed. I did test with firefox 3.6 many times, but the result is the same, so strange, Do you know why ? I have a sub some questions : To implement comet, using timer (response after some minutes elapsed) or thread (response after several time sleeping thread) to hold async request, which is better?
View 1 RepliesI am desiging a master and details page from a search page..user can search for something and I need to display the result in jqgrid if the result has more than 1 row or record.. if the result is just one record then i have to directly send then to details page by skiping grid page... I do have an action method for results page and one more action method for Jqgrid data..i am trying to check the row count for the database result and trying to redirect to details action results..but its not working at all..and showing an empty jqgrid..
[Code]....
Lets say I have a simple controller for ASP.NET MVC I want to test. I want to test that a controller action (Foo, in this case) simply returns a link to another action (Bar, in this case).How would you test TestController.Foo? (either the first or second link)
My implementation has the same link twice. One passes the url throw ViewData[]. This seems more testable to me, as I can check the ViewData collection returned from Foo(). Even this way though, I don't know how to validate the url itself without making dependencies on routing.The controller:
public class TestController : Controller
{
public ActionResult Foo()[code].....
My httppost action doesnt seem to have received my model. The code is below;
[Code]....
i put a breakpoint on the line; return RedirectToAction("Error", "Dashboard"); and i found that appQualif carried no values whatsoever from the form i submitted..
I've been using Html.Action("ActionName", "ControllerName") to invoke child actions across controllers without needing to have the view in ViewsShared. This has been working great for displaying things like session or cookie information.
Instead of just accessing cookies, I would like to pass additional parameters to Html.Action("ActionName", "ControllerName") so the action can execute different code based on the the data passed to the original view.
Should I be using a different method to pass parameters to a child action in a different controller?
