Web Forms :: Concurrent Requests (Transactions And Concurrency)
Mar 26, 2016How to control concurrent requests for web sites?
View 1 RepliesHow to control concurrent requests for web sites?
View 1 RepliesMade my first application in aspx, and connect to mysql, the issue is how concurrency control (transactions), ie that when users log dam not, nor information loss...
View 3 RepliesI have a strange problem in my ASP.Net 3.5 application. When multiple users try to access the same page (which has some long running methods), the application crashes at a point where it tries to open a connection to the database (a static method inside a static class). It appears that the connection is already open. However, this does not happen when there is only one user using the application. What I cannot understand is that how do actions of one user affect the other in a web application?
I double checked that all my open connections are being closed after performing their operation by appending a line of text to a text file whenever a connection is opened or closed. The number of opened and closed connections was equal. Also, the connections are opened and closed from one place only, where the close method is inside a Finally() block.
concerning requests being blocked from a main window after a popup window had initiated a file download. Further requests from the same session are being queued until the download is complete. So, is there any way to override this? Is there anyway to tell asp.net to not serialize same session requests? Is there any way to tell asp.net to ignore session for a specific request...httphander(module) or otherwise?
why requests from the same session are being queued until the download is complete. please tell me the funda behind it and how to overcome it.
we are using the WCF service and hosted using a console application, now we are using LoadRunner and hitting it concurrently
Where giving 50 hits at a time few requests (26) gets completed successfully and remaining gives error TCP error code 10061: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.
in one request i am updating session variable. in the other request, i am trying to access that session value, but it was blocked until the first request finish. I am using C# with ASP.NET 2.0 UPDATE: My page code looks like this.
while(int progress = DoWork() && progress <= 100 ){
Session["Progress"] = progress;
}
and my handler just return Session value.
context.Response.Write(Session["progress"].toString());
context.Response.End();
In my ASP.NET MVC2 web app I have a page which goes off and gets results from a number of different web service feeds. These return times vary so I want to basically display them as they return after the page loads. I also want my user to be able to kick of requests that can run concurrently with these other requests.
At the minute my page just seems to queue up the requests. The web service calls returning one at a time in the order they are called and then the user can kick of requests.
Is this a case for the asyncController or is there an easier/better way of working this?
Frameworks like Node.js, Tornado, and Twisted let developers create server-push applications that supports large number of concurrent hanging requests (10k+). From what I understand, they all achieve this by not creating threads to service each hanging request.
Can AsyncController be used to service large number of inactive concurrent requests?If so, are there any reasonably large ASP.NET MVC websites using this approach to create long-poll applications?
What's the simplest and most effective way to selectively redirect HTTP requests to your ASP.NET page to its HTTPS equivalent? For example, if my page site URL is [URL], I want to redirect some (or all) page requests to [URL] What's the easiest way to do that?
View 2 Repliesi have a hotle reservation system.
when a user select a room i want that it lockes and an other person can not select it.
i think it`s better that i have a flag in my table and when a user select room value of is false and if cancle reservation ,i changed it true.an other person can see room that they have true value .
I want to know how to handle the concurrency throughy code ? ie: I want to access the Concurrency issue or error ? Because if i get the concurrency user or issue I have to do some manipulation.
View 4 Repliesi got an requirement where in the user submits the database scripts,stored procedures ,triggers ,functions or packages.i have create those in the database .if it throws an error it must be roll backed.how can i achieve this.
View 7 RepliesI have a requirement to log all/most forms authentication transactions that take place within my page. For example, if someone is kicked out because of forms authentication, I'd like to get their username, time when kicked off, and where this happened. Is there a good way to do this. Better yet, has anyone done this already and is willing to share some code or post a link?
View 3 RepliesI just want to know the concept of commit Transaction and Begin Transaction in Asp.net with c# language, I have a certain code in c# given below... where I declare commit transaction and begin transaction. my code is:
public void dial(string traid, string trakey, string account, string ttref)
{
try
{
string[] result = new string[4];
SqlConnection sqlconn_cms = new SqlConnection(sqlconn_cmsstr);
[code]...
I want to insert in two table at the same time.I write this:
DALBase MyDALBase = new DALBase();
int categoryId=Convert.ToInt32(MyDALBase.ExecuteScaler(System.Data.CommandType.StoredProcedure, "insertmainmenu", new SqlParameter[]{
new SqlParameter("@NodeName",txt_mainmenuname.Text),
[Code]....
but the problem is I havent access to categoryId before InsertI need categoryId to make a Urlstring url = txt_ MainEnName.Text + ".aspx" + "&CategoryId=" + categoryId;@Url =urlHow can i do it?
If multiple users access a web-form at the same time, how can I allow that using my code? Essentially each user reads and writes one variable in the application, and concurrent access is causing problem there.
View 5 RepliesHow to avoid concurrent login for same user?
View 1 RepliesIn what way is used optimistic concurrency?
I need to connect two tables together.
If you use optimistic concurrency at the same time, users will store data in a table?
In particular, I wonder what the difference is, if I save the aspx, or use optimistic concurrency.
My project includes a grid view with some updtable fields, some fields throw an error on update and some do not and it does not really make sense. WORK_STATION_ID does not cause an error, ROOM _ID cause an error, both are int? (I am using c#) and for update I use the code liste below.
[Code]....
[Code]....
I am trying to handle concurrency in my application. Basically if user A has a support ticket open which currently has a status of 'Active' and user 'B' opens the same ticket and closes it (changing its status to closed), I would expect a confict execepton to be thown when user 'A' tries to close the support ticket. For some reason this is not happening. I have checked that Update check is set to 'Always' in the dbml file. Here is an exerpt of my code. // Update 'Active' lead to 'Close'
[Code]....
I have the following problem:- I have a Settings table which has a value column, that is incremented everytime a Job is created (I use Entity framework to add the job and to update the value increment). So, I have something like this:
[Code]....
The problem is: I have a asp.net with concurrent calls to SaveJob Method. In this code, the value is shared, and if I call SaveJob 5 times for instance, the value column is 3, because the scope is not "locking" the other transactions until It's done, and the value is shared. I want to have the following scenario: Call SaveJob 5 times;Value column in Settings table is 5;Call SaveJob 3 more times;Value Column in Settings table is 8. I tried to implement something like pessimistic concurrency in EF, but I had no success. Whats the best way to handle that without using SQL Server queries directly? (like 'lock' and 'unlock' etc)
I tried to implement Optimistic Concurrency in the Movie MVC 3 project.
1. I added a new property
[Timestamp]
[ConcurrencyCheck]
[DatabaseGenerated(DatabaseGeneratedOption.Computed)]
public byte[] RowVersion { get; set; }
2. Modified controller to execute
var movie = db.Movies.Find(model.Id);
db.Movies.Attach(movie);
TryUpdateModel(movie);
db.SaveChanges();
return RedirectToAction("Index");
3. Added the RowVersion as a hidden field to the View page
@Html.HiddenFor(model => model.RowVersion)
It didnot work for me, can someone pls point me to the right direction?
i am in the process of creating a restful service with WCF, the service is likely to be consumed by at least 500 people at any given time. What settings would i need to set in order to deal with this.
Here is a sample of what i have so far;
[Code]....
And this is an example of a method being called;
[Code]....
I've been quite impressed with dynamic data and how easy and quick it is to get a simple site up and running. I'm planning on using it for a simple internal HR admin site for registering people's skills/degrees/etc.
I've been watching the intro videos at www.asp.net/dynamicdata and one thing they never mention is how to handle concurrency control.
It seems that DD does not handle it right out of the box (unless there is some setting I haven't seen) as I manually generated a change conflict exception and the app failed without any user friendly message.
Anybody know if DD handles it out of the box? Or do you have to somehow build it into the site?
I have an application, that is accessing by number of users at the same time. Those users, who are accessing the application getting the same id. Here what i am doing in the code is, when they are creating new user i am getting a max id from DB and increasing the value to 1. So that they are getting same ID. so that i am facing concurrency in this situation. How to solve this problem. I need to display different numbers when the users click on NewUser. I am using SQL server 2008 and .NET 3.5 and C#.NET
View 2 Replies