I have stored the datasource of my datagrid in a session
Session["datagrid"]=dataSource.ID;
On retriveing I am setting the gridview datasource to the session.
resultgrid.DataSourceID=Session["datagrid"].ToString();
resultgrid.DataBind();
But I am not getting anything on the page.
ALTER PROCEDURE insertdetails2
View 9 Replieswhich place(exact folder) the session & session id will be stored?
View 8 RepliesIs it possible to use mixed cookieless sessions with cookie sessions? I've an application that captured user details and then redirect for payment to an ssl page. I was wondering if this is possible? [URL] redirects to [URL] Note: the session Id in the latter url. So in essence, we use the standard cookie session for the majority of the application but when we transfer to an ssl page we pass the SessionId to the https url to pick up the session. I've tried this locally but it starts a new session.
View 1 RepliesI am using Visual Studio 2008 and SQL Server 2008 and have added a SQL datasource to my form.
When I configure the datasource, I choose my connection string which looks like this in my webconfig:
<connectionStrings>
<add
name="PSFSPRD_ConnectionString"
connectionString="Data
The database I am using has a schema called EQB and as such, my stored procedures are named as EQB.usp_SelectFunds, EQB.usp_SelectAccount, etc.
On the select tab of the Configure Data Source screen, I choose to use a stored procedure. The dropdown shows my stored procedures, however, the schema name does not show up in front of the stored procedures in the drop down. I see only usp_SelectFunds, usp_SelectAccount, etc.
I select one of the stored procedures and when I click TEST, I get the message that the stored procedure is not found. If I instead choose to use a SQL statement instead on the configuration screen and enter EXEC EQB.usp_SelectFunds and click TEST, it works fine.
Why are my stored procedures not showing up correctly in the stored procedure drop down and how can I fix this?
This is a really strange problem for something that should be simple.I'm storing a URL - which contains search strings - into a session so I can create a 'back to search' link on the item page. It works in Firefox but in IE it only brings back the URI without any parameters
[Code]....
and then to read it...
[Code]....
In Firefox I get the full URI but in IE it only returnshttp://localhost:6666/Search/Default.aspx
This is surareddy. i nead some small clarification in the "Stored Procedure"
how to convert the oracle Stored Procedure to sqlserver2005/2008 Stored Procedure.
right now i am enhancing the project that project already developed the oracle Stored Procedure. now our company is using sqlserver 2005/2008.
how to convert the Oracle Stored Procedure to sqlserver 2005 Stored Procedure
Initially, I have tried to use stored procedure. But I changed my mind and preferred to call sql query in codebase with command text. However, it stills tries to find initially-called stored procedure (which is neither called or exists).I think that it is related caching. But I tried it with different browsers it did not work.What might be the reason?
View 4 RepliesThe Setup:Account controller with the typical logon / logoff stuff that comes baked in from the template. Not much modification here on the logon page. Using a custom membership provider (SQL), but I don't think that is impacting what I am trying to do here.The Requirements:The client wants to handle licensing by limiting concurrent users and not by total users. So, after referencing this post here, I set out to make this work for what I need to do. And that is to track maximum and current users for each organization that has signed up for our application. No problem, just have an application("max") and application ("current") which are both hashtables with the key being the organization id and the value being current or max users for the organization. On Session_Start, I would increment the current users, check if it exceeds max and either a) redirect to an error page or b) let them go on with what they need to do. On Session_End, I would decrement the count.
The Problem:When using formsService.signIn, what is actually stored in session? I cannot seem to gather any information about my session in the session_start except for the session ID. So, I cannot increment the correct number for user tracking. And I cannot add a variable to session as session_start will have already fired before I get the opportunity.
keeping 1000 records in a datatable in session and do paging using that?
Or
doing paging in stored procedure level and requesting 35 records each time?
more info:
datatable of 40 columns
number of users is 200 users
7 application are running on IIS
Oracle DB server is not the same server for IIS
Edit: the user may update a row, and submit it to database. which will refresh the grid by requesting the whole data from database.
Edit2: Every user is loading different datatable which coming from same table in database
im having some problems with jagged arrays stored in session for ASP.net i have some code which creates a jagged array, them populates, and then stores this populated jagged array into session
protected string[][] answersJArray;
answersJArray[0] = new string[4]("test","test1","test2","test3"};
answersJArray[1] = new string[4]("test","test1","test2","test3"};
Session.Add("answersJArray", answersJArray);
how would i loop through each jagged array in the session ?? if they were not in session i no i could do the following
for (j = 0; j < answersJArray[1].Length; j++)
{
label.Text = (answersJArray[1][j].ToString());
}
how would i do the above by looping through the session ??
First of all, here comes the load part.
Structure MainStruct
Dim Ans1 As String
Dim Ans2 As String
End Structure [code]....
The question is how can i read back the contents of the list, stored in the Session?
I mean something like...Build = Session("MyData")
Does anybody if it is possible that a stored procedure returns rows which is the result of the execution of another sp? Something like..
[Code]....
i want to return output parameter from 1 storeprocedure. into another stored procedure.
View 7 RepliesI have a grid with one TemplateField which is a checkbox and say 2 bound fields.
In Page_Load on postback I rebind the grid with cached dataset stored in session. If user selects checkbox on the grid, upon postback i can iterate on the grid and get those checked values, everything works fine.
If I move the code of grid binding on postback to OnInit instead of Page_Load then i loose those user checked checkbox data. Why? Should the postback data not overlay on top of the grid after oninit?
It does work with page_load, I'm assuming that when i rebind the grid, I'm overlaying my data on grid which has postback data, since the checkbox column is not bound i do not overwrite postback data.
NOTE: viewstate is disabled on my grid, i bind data (stored in session) on everyback postback. Also something weird, when I'm using OnInit, on every postback i get the first page of the grid, no matter which page the postback was triggered.
I would have a dataset that I would break into 5 new generic LIST<>. Now the user needs to see one record at a time and navigate through the list
Fields like
From date : Text box with calendar
To Date : Text box with calendar
Manager Reporting To : Drop down list
Buttons on Move Back and move Forward
Now I would have 4 such similar lists which I have to pick up from the audit table. When the user clicks on move back and move forward buttons he should be able to navigate through records in my list that I have fetched in the beginning . I can store itin a session or viewstate till it gets updated again. How do I achieve this.
Should I be writing a webmethod to go back and pick up the next record agian and display
Can I also a gridview instead of textboxes.
I have a form where users can upload Pdf files(about 30 pages to one document or so). I want to delay storing these Pdfs in the database until the user submits the entire form. The problem is that the collection of files uploaded must be able to persist through postbacks. That being said, I am considering storing these as session variables, however, would this be too much data to store, or are session variables meant to store a couple strings here and there? If this method is not acceptable, is there an alternate method?
View 2 RepliesI'm using Session variables inside a web service to maintain state between successive method calls by an external application called QBWC. I set this up by decorating my web service methods with this attribute:
[WebMethod(EnableSession = true)]
I'm using the Session variable to store an instance of a custom object called QueueManager. The QueueManager has a property called ChangeQueue which looks like this:
[Serializable]
public class QueueManager
{
[code]...
I have an ASP.Net app that retrieves a collection of roles for a given user. Each role is a string. There's rarely more than 2-3 roles for any one person.I wanted to store the colelction of roles in Session state to save the time accessing the DB on each request.I basically want to write code that checks if a given string exists in the collection to test if the user has that role or not.My question is...what's the best way to do this? Is an array the best collection to store the role strings in Session with? Or is a dictionary better? I figure an array will take less memory (I don't really need a key + value) although a dictionary might lookup faster.
View 4 Replies[Code]....
SelectCommand="Execute ClassesSelect" runat="server">
<SelectParameters>
<asp:ControlParameter Type="Boolean" Name="@all" ControlID="chkAll" PropertyName="Checked" />
</SelectParameters>
</asp:SqlDataSource>
I was reviewing my old post about this issue with a accessdatasource and that was simple since the Select, Update and Delete were all written within the datasource.
But this page im having issues with is using SQLDataSource and pointing to Store procedures. My issue is that i have created the sqldatasource with Insert(storeprocedure), Select(actual select statement), Update(storeprocedure) and was trying to take advantage of gridviews capabilities for editing when connected to a datasource that has all those elements setup.
Here is my datasource and gridview code: The gridview row goes into edit mode, but the changes never take affect on the database.
[Code]....
I am storing a custom "Organisation" object as a session variable. One of the properties of the Organisation object is "OrganisationID" (integer). I have a DataSource that requires a parameter value to run, and I want to use a SessionParameter to populate this. In a previous version, I stored the OrganisationID directly as a session variable. In that case, I could easily access it like this:
[Code]....
However, how do I now access the OrganisationID property of an "Organisation" type session variable (called "Organisation")? I have tried this, which does not seem to work: <asp:SessionParameter Name="OrganisationID" SessionField="Organisation.OrganisationID" Type="Int32" />
l am facing a problem with session.
If many users access the site, the session gets crashed and data which i store to access across pages is getting lost.
a best way to store data (as session does) so that i can use the data across my web application.
I would like to wrap Session variables in a manner similar to that discussed on CodeProject.
[code]....
Here is my question: if I have to access CurrentUser multiple times in the same page, would I get a performance improvement by assigning it to a local variable instead of accessing the wrapping property? Or does the HttpSessionState make sure the object is only deserialized once per request, so that subsequent calls in the same http request don't cost any more?
I'm working on adding a new webapp to an existing website. I've been directed to write the webapp in ASP.NET. The existing website is written in ColdFusion. For the most part, the ASP.NET webapp is completely stand-alone, but it needs to interact with the ColdFusion code in one important way - if somebody logs in to the ColdFusion site, we don't want them to have to log in again when visiting an ASP.NET page.
When someone logs in to the ColdFusion site, their username is stored in a cookie, along with a login token that can be looked up in our database. My .NET is a little rusty, so I'm having trouble visualizing how the ASP.NET code should use this data. I've already written a simple MembershipProvider that can be used to log in/out out the ASP.NET app using the data in our existing database tables, which are shared with the ColdFusion code.
What I'd like to know is - how can I make sure the ASP.NET app detects the cookies set by the ColdFusion app (I imagine they'd be sent to the ASP.NET pages, since everything is hosted on one domain), and automatically logs the user in using the MembershipProvider and Forms Authentication, using the credentials supplied in the cookie? I'm thinking that putting some kind of cookie check and log in function in the Global.asax file, set to run every page load for every page... but that seems kind of clunky. Also, do people still use the Global.asax file anyway? I had thought there was a more modern method.... Also, how can I manually log someone in using Forms Authentication and a custom membership provider? Currently my code allows the user to log in using the provided login control, but I'm not sure how to log the user in without them having to do anything.Looking over the MembershipProvider tutorials and the MSDN documentation it seems to me like the answer should be staring me in the face, but for some reason I just can't see it. Maybe not enough coffee....
