Php - How To Add New Application Mapping In IIS6 And IIS 7 Programmatically Using WMI And C#
Feb 16, 2010
add php Extension to IIS6 and IIS 7 via Code in C# using WMi (System.Management). I cant use DirectoryEntry.
I am stuck with adding a new ScriptMap Object to IIS 6/IIS7.
I have read some posts at here and there and heard that adding new WMi object from Scratch is difficult.
I want to enable IIS 6/IIS7 to handle php as well as aspx files and be able to process them. I have extracted php zip archive to a directory on my system (not installed it). The propblem is i am able to modify existing ScriptMap objects but i dont get to understand the add a new ScriptMap Objects.
Also i am not sure whether adding the a new extensiuon handler to ScriptMap will solve the problem or not.
View 2 Replies
Similar Messages:
Apr 1, 2010
We're developping an application that uses forms authentication and URL rewriting (www.urlrewriter.net). In order to make extension-less URL rewriting possible we had to add a default application mapping for the asp.net aspnet_isapi.dll.
The problem we're experiencing now is that when the website is accessed by http://www.myapp.com/ then the aspnet_isapi.dll gets the request and forms authentication forwards it to our login site, so the user gets redirected to http://www.myapp.com/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2f instead of having default.aspx displayed (which is allowed to anyone).
Here's the part of web.config dealing with forms auth:
<system.web>
<authorization>
<deny users="?"/>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
<authentication mode="Forms" >
<forms slidingExpiration="true" cookieless="UseCookies" defaultUrl="default.aspx" loginUrl="default.aspx" name="gzfb_site_test" timeout="525600"></forms>
</authentication>
</system.web>
<location path="default.aspx">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="*"/>
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
I did quite some research on this problem but didn't find any solution. Is this scenario possible at all, or does default application mapping and forms auth using <deny users="?"/> interfere by design?
P.S. the problems only manifest when running on IIS 6, the ASP.net Development Server handles it without any problems
View 2 Replies
Aug 18, 2010
I've set up a web app on IIS6 with a "{controller}.mvc/..."-mapping. Everything is running fine - except for the root-path (http://www.myapp.com). The additional routes.MapRoute for "Root" is applied in global.asax (as in the MS-example "Listing 2 - Global.asax (modified with extensions)").In VS2010 debugging mode everything (including the root) works - as well as in the "published" app (on Win7 IIS 7.5). I've copied the whole published app to the IIS6.
View 4 Replies
Nov 5, 2010
I have a REST WCF service defined as follows:
[ServiceContract]
public interface IRest {
[OperationContract]
[WebGet(UriTemplate = "/test")]
int Test();
}
With the following web.config:
[code]....
EDIT: You can all reproduce this by creating a new WCF Service in VS2008 (new Project > WCF Service Application). Browse to the dummy method ('GetData')... you will notice it returns 400... that's fine because it shows it's still forwarding to WCF. However, if you enable wildcard mapping in IIS6 you will now get a 404, meaning WCF is no longer intercepting the request.
View 2 Replies
Jun 28, 2010
I've recently upgraded VS 2008 to VS 2010. On our server we have IIS6 installed and we can not change that in near future. Even though we will develop new applications to be deployed on IIS7 but if situation demands we may need to develop an application using .net 4.0 and to be deployed on IIS6, then in this case I wanted to know whether IIS6 supports .net 4.0 application or not?
If I can deploy, then do I need to take care of any configuration or any other setting I should change before deploying it?
View 4 Replies
Mar 2, 2011
What are the steps for creating an MVC3 application on a remote server running IIS6?
View 21 Replies
Jun 9, 2010
Can I use the <%: tag on an application that will be hosted on IIS6? What about on an application targeted for .NET 3.5?
View 2 Replies
Mar 25, 2011
I have created a handler in IIS7 on a Sample Web site and it works fine .That is i go to the InetMgr Open the Handler Mappings section create a new handler etc. It works fine .
Now i want the create the same handler on an web application which runs on an IIS6 and am unable access my handler . I have tried adding this under the httpHandlers section
<add verb="*" path="SampleHandler.discb"
type="Sample.Web.SampleHandler, Sample.Web" />
Im working on an IIS6 Asp.Net web application but on development server i have IIS7 installed. Nothing works . Am i missing out anything ?
Well this is the message i get when i open the Handler Mappings section
The applicattion is in an application pool that is running in classic mode , so you can manage ISAPI extensions and native modules that are mapped to paths . you must manage managed handlers (system.web/httpHandlers) directly in the configuration file.
View 1 Replies
Mar 14, 2011
I have an application with an HttpHandler that processes any requests for a .js file. I only want this handler to process *.js files that are requested in the root of the application.
The handler mapping looks like this:
<add name="HandleJS" path="*.js" verb="*" type="MyApp.JsHandler" resourceType="Unspecified" requireAccess="Script" preCondition="integratedMode,runtimeVersionv4.0" />
Currently, this handler processes ALL requested *.js files. Here is an example of the behavior I want.
This request would be processed by the handler: http://localhost/myapps/approot/script.js
and this one would not be processed by the handler: http://localhost/myapps/approot/dontProcessMe/script.js
I'd really like to avoid including the full absolute path in the handler path so I tried some other things first.
It doesn't look like the path property of the add element allows the use of the ~/ application root mechanism, so setting path="~/*.js" doesn't work.
I've also tried replicating the StaticFile handler that's built into IIS and doing something like this:
<add name="MyStaticFiles" path="*/*.js" verb="*" modules="StaticFileModule" />
or
<add name="MyStaticFiles" path="dontProcessMe/*.js" verb="*" modules="StaticFileModule" />
Both of which just return a blank response with an HTTP status of 200.
View 2 Replies
Apr 19, 2010
I had wrote a http handler to handle a new file extention . I cam to knw that we have to mapp the new extention to an ISAPI . I came to konw that we can mapp the extentin in iss cofiguration. I am using visual studio 2005 and am not installed an iss server in my machine, help to mto do the application extention mapping in vusal studio 2005.
View 1 Replies
Mar 2, 2010
What need to change in asp.net application if web server update from IIS6 to IIS7?
View 2 Replies
Feb 22, 2011
I've written a singleton class that exposes the web.config properties in a nice get property kind of way.
I want a Load method to parse the data in the config and set the public properties, and I want to throw exceptions (so they are logged in the EventLog) when a configuration key is missing or can't be parsed.
I tried placing the Load() code in Application_Start of the global.asax but then remembered this will only be run once, or until the application restarts.
Where is the best place to put code that you need to run 'everytime' your site is started/run by the user? I basically want the website to stop functioning if certain config properties cannot be loaded.
View 1 Replies
Feb 17, 2011
Our website has all of the publicly accessible pages at the root and private pages (login required) in a folder below the root (call it "private").Private pages are accessed as
www.oursite.com/private/somepage.aspx.I want to run the pages in the private folder in a separate application pool without changing the URL for private users.I tried making the private folder a virtual directory but then the pages in the private folder did not render(I think because it did not find a web.config in the private folder).Is the answer to simply put a copy of the web.config that resides at the root in the private folder or is that problematic?
View 4 Replies
Feb 15, 2011
I've been asked to upgrade a few applications and I'm planning on merging all of them into one asp.net application. I'm fine with this decision and have spoken with fellow workers and they also think it's the best option to go with.
The application will be accessed from a small group of users which belong to a larger domain. I'm currently planning on using Windows authentication and only allow this small set of users to access the asp.net application. Also there must be some role management, so that only certain users can view certain functionality.
I really don't want to have many different windows groups; so I want to avoid having to assign different windows groups to different folders and control permissions in the web.config.
What I'd like to do is:
- Assign one windows group to the small group of users who will access the page.
- Create a custom membership provider and control the user who accesses the application. Depending on the user I will then assign his current set of roles.
- Add an application setting to the web.config, with the name of the current administrator, so if he logs in, he will be assigned all roles, and will be able to create and assign roles to other users.
View 1 Replies
Nov 11, 2010
I'm trying to deploy my MVC 2.0 web application to a Windows 2003 server with IIS6, and can't find the means to do it. I read about clicking Build/Deploy, but I don't have this showing on my menu, and I have the professional version.
View 1 Replies
Jul 8, 2010
This is a really odd situation, so hopefully I can explain it well enough.
I am deploying an ASP.NET 4 webforms application to a Windows Server 2003 SP2 server running IIS6.
Here's the problem -- when the application pool recycles its worker process (w3wp.exe), about 80% of the time, I will get an ReflectionTypeLoadException error trying to access any page in the app that contains an EntityDataSoure every time I try to view it.
However (this is the interesting part) -- the other 20%, it works just fine. I've actually resorted to turning off recycling the worker process entirely for this application pool and just add/remove whitespace from web.config forcing the site to recompile until I get a "good" w3wp.exe.
If this isn't clear, what I'm saying is: the actual worker process doesn't work at all for pages containing an EntityDataSource for about 4/5 times it starts, but still manages to serve all other pages just fine. Once you get a worker process that manages to serve a page with an EntityDataSource, it works every time until that process gets recycled.
My question is, how can I debug this? It works fine on my dev machine, it works fine on the server as long as you get a good process running, but iisreset or a server restart or anything that kills the worker process is almost guaranteed to cause the site to not come back up and throw this ReflectionTypeLoadException.
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
Aug 18, 2010
We usually catch unhandled exceptions in Global.asax, and then we redirect to a nice friendly error page. This is fine for the Live environment, but in our development environment we would like to check if CustomErrors are Off, and if so, just throw the ugly error.
Is there an easy way to check if CustomErrors are Off through code?
View 3 Replies
Nov 4, 2010
I need to dynamically instantiate a web application from a console application. By this definition, I mean that my console application contains a web application that is not bound to IIS/XSP.Currently, I create the web application into a temporary directory and copy some forged files into it. These are a special Global.asax that maps to my own implementation of HttpApplication to use in the web application (I need to do some initialization at app start), then I forge special .asmx files that map to my own skeleton classes and dynamic plugins
foreach (IPlugin plugin in _target.Plugins)
{
WsdlSkeletonDefinition[] defs = plugin.GetWsdlSkeletons();
My approach works, but I'm not so satisfied by it because I have to write lots of garbage into file system, even if I eventually delete it all.I know I can control HTTP handlers via Web.config, but I don't want to forge a Web.config for that. I would like to create a mapping such as I can remove the .asmx extension from web services' URLs and still get them.For example, one of the default scripts is "LogbusManagement.asmx", which must be hard-coded into client APIs and the .asmx prevents portability to other platforms such as PHP. I want to make "LogbusManagement.asmx" equivalent to "LogbusManagement" and any extension. For this, I might use an HttpHandlerFactory.
My straight question is,like asked here by somebody else: is there a way to programmatically, possibly from Global.asax, to set IHttpHandlers or IHttpHandlerFactories for web applications?
View 1 Replies
Dec 2, 2010
I have a folder in my application (UploadsFolder) in which I've been adding images I use for y application. Is it possible to add more images to this folder programmatically online?
View 3 Replies
Dec 15, 2010
i am using windows server 2003 and 2008 am about to install a web application on a server that is connected to other computers using simple wired network i.e. no active directory, no domain controller etc..
my question is:
is there a way to prevent mac addresses outside my specified list from accessing my application ? should it be through IIS or Web.config or should i put certain code in the page load events.another concern: if i use an SSL to secure my application, is it enough along with a reputable anti virus to prevent a virus to access my server through any network computer using my web application
View 3 Replies
Jan 28, 2011
I have worked on a timesheet application application in MVC 2 for internal use in our company. Now other small companies have showed interest in the application. I hadn't considered this use of the application, but it got me interested in what it might imply.
I believe I could make it work for several clients by modifying the database (Sql Server accessed by Entity Framework model). But I have read some people advocating multiple databases (one for each client).
Intuitively, this feels like a good idea, since I wouldn't risk having the data of various clients mixed up in the same database (which shouldn't happen of course, but what if it did...). But how would a multiple database solution be implemented specifically?
I.e. with a single database I could just have a client register and all the data needed would be added by the application the same way it is now when there's just one client (my own company).
But with a multiple database solution, how would I create a new database programmatically when a user registers? I have done all database stuff using Linq to Sql, and I am not very familiar with regular SQL programming...
how this could be done (as well as input on whether it is a good idea or if a single database would be better for some reason).
EDIT:
I have also seen discussions about the single database alternative, suggesting that you would then add ClientId to each table... But wouldn't that be hard to maintain in the code? I would have to add "where" conditions to a lot of linq queries I assume... And I assume having a ClientId on each table would mean that each table would have need to have a many to one relationship to the Client table? Wouldn't that be a very complex database structure? As it is right now (without the Client table) I have the following tables (1 -> * designates one to many relationship):
Customer 1 -> * Project 1 -> * Task 1 -> * TimeSegment 1 -> * Employee
Also, Customer has a one to many relationship directly with TimeSegment, for convenience to simplify some queries.
This has worked very well so far. Wouldn't it be possible to simply have a Client table (or UserCompany or whatever one might call it) with a one to many relationship with Customer table? Wouldn't the data integrity be sufficient for the other tables since the rest is handled by the relationships?
View 2 Replies
Feb 24, 2010
In my CMS application, I'm trying to intercept all ASP.NET requests, inspect them and then assign custom HttpHandler if necessary or leave default handling when appropriate.I tried setting HttpContext.Current.Handler in Application_BeginRequest but it doesn't seem to work.There is MapRequestHandler event in HttpApplication but it is not available in the Global application class.
View 1 Replies
Jul 8, 2010
I have a virtual folder containing an administration application, like
[URL]
which requires SSL. In the IIS manager properties for the folder, under "Authentication and access control", Anonymous Access is disabled and "Authenticated Access" is set to "Integrated Windows authentication."
When I connect to the site in Chrome, I receive two login boxes. The first is from mysite.com/alpha:443, and the second is from mysite.com/alpha:80. Firefox appears to re-send my credentials for the second box so it is never shown.
View 2 Replies
Dec 15, 2010
I have an MVC2 application where i post a DELETE to MyController/Delete/ID.This is working fine if I debug the application, however, when I put it on the application server (IIS6), I keep "Unauthorized" as a result. I googled a lot, but I didn't find any problems the same as mine.
View 21 Replies
May 28, 2010
I have a site .net 2.0 and I redirected users to alogin page when the hit the site. (I think the default.aspx page)
But i cant remember how i did it.
I am now wanting upgrade to asp.net mvc appbut the redirect is still there to a nonexistent page.
View 1 Replies
