I have a datatable with morethan 100o records and around 6 to 7 columns. When I get the data into datatable, I use each field to get distinct values and display in different drodownlists. When all the dropdown lists are filled with data, user selects one of them to filter other dropdown lists with the selected value. I want to know how can I keep datatable data stored till I get all the filtering done. I dont want to store the datatable in session as it may occupy so much of memory. Is there any other way to store the datatable till the end of the process.
I have a procedure where I am building a table to store rows of data. I did not think this was to memory intensive. However my form does not seem load effortlessly. I call this procedure in the Form Load Event. Is there a more optimal place (Form Loading Event Procedure) to put code that may require a little more memory than usual?
Im trying to retrieve a datatable that I put into a session variable, however when i do it apears that there are no columns... I have done this before in VB.NET, I'n now using C#, and it worked perfectly, and as far as i can see there is no change in the code other than the obvious syntax changes.
EDIT: The dt (in part 2) variable has the right data when i look in the data visulization window, but i have noticed that the other properties associated with a datatable are abscent. When i hover over a normal looking datatable with my mouse it looks like the following: " dt ----- {System.Data.DataTable}" but in the class im working on it just looks like "dt ----- {}". Also, after I return the session variable into the dt I clone it (dtclone = dt.clone(); ) and the clone is empty in the data visulizer.... what on earth!
EDIT 2: I have now also tried converting the first datatable to a dataset, putting this in the session variable, and recoverting it back to a datatable in the class. Am starting to wonder if it is a probelm with: dt.Load(sqlReader); The data does appear after this step though in the dataset visualiser, but not after being cloned. Code below.
1) SQL command in a webhandler, the results of which populate the datatable to be put into the session variable.
DataTable dt = new DataTable(); SqlDataReader sqlReader= default(SqlDataReader); SqlDataAdapter sqlAdapter = new SqlDataAdapter(); sqlReader = storedProc.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior.CloseConnection); dt.Load(sqlReader); System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Session["ResultsTable"] = dt;
2) Part of the code in a class which performs calculations on the table:
I have a datatable dt1 which has 3 columns a,b,c( of datatype string , float ,float resp). Then I've a datatable dt2 which is clone of dt1 , and the values of dt1 is merged into dt2.
Now the issue is for a particular condition :
when the first row is this
dt1.Rows.Add("xyz", 0.0, 0.0);
But I can see the value is taken as xyz,0,0 in the datatable. This i am merging to dt2 as
make a query which will give me 200,000 results and bind it to the datatable but the error will pop out saying out of memory or request timed out.Can datatable/dataset handle these records or is my current server's hardware needs a little upgrade?Actually we are gettings millions of data and i dont have any idea how to solve this one? Have you worked on this kind of data? Do you have any idea on how to send my command from server A to server B while server A also processing request and will not wait for server B's result and server B will just update the records in my database, i think this can solve my problem if doing it in parallel.
i have a list for my shopping cart which i currently store in my datatable and then store it in a session. to avoid using sessions is it best to create a class where the datatable is stored and can be accessed from anywhere?
I have an application which was recently ported from Classic ASP to .NET 3.5. I'm pulling some data from a stored procedure and once retrieved, I'm doing using the Select method on the DataTable in a loop so I don't have to keep going back to the database.It appears that there's something wrong here as I can refresh the page repeatedly and see the memory usage increase by a few megabytes, up to the point where we get an error. If we recycle the app pool in IIS, it starts working again, for a little while.
Is there a memory leak in this method? I did some research on the subject and Microsoft said there was an issue like that in .NET 1.0 and 1.1, but I'm using a higher version.Or, is this something else, such as not managing resources correctly? Here's a snipped of my code:
[Code]....
Initially, this app was using XML instead of a datatable and using XPATH to query the data, but it was too slow. I thought using a dataset with DataTable selects was a better option, but now we found this issue. I was thinking since the loop executes several hundred times that getting all the data and filtering through it on the client was a better choice instead of calling several web methods to get the subsets of data.
I am storing Datatable in Session variable in my project. Is it good practise to do so? The datatable has 20 fields and can run into 1000+ records. Will it hamper my application performance?
Consider my dataTable contains 10,000 rows and i want to know the pitfall of storing datatable in a session variable... I want to use it until a new row has been added...What type of session mode should i use?
If I create a DataTable and give each column a type, such as Boolean, String, Int32, when I store it to a ViewState Variable will those types persist?
I'm using the DataTable in conjunction with a GridView that has an add row button. I'd like to store the current state in the DataTable then bind the GridView with the previous state.
I was having trouble at first trying to store objects in the DataTable, but now I'm treating like the SQL table I will eventually write to and it's making much more sense. That's why it has fields like boolean, for checkboxes.
it is apparent that "string builder" is better for building large string compared to sMyString = sMyString + "something";
what is a better way to search large in memory datasets? (like the example above - i know i could use loops, is there another way that i dont now about?)
Does dataset store all its datatables' records into server memory if I just call one datatable from it?Lets make an example, a dataset with three datatables - tbCompany, tbCompanyStaffs, tbSalesOrderwhere tbCompany is the parent of tbCompanyStaffs. tbSalesOrder is an independant table.Does dataset load all tbCompanyStaffs records into the server memory as well when a class retrive data from tbCompany?
I am building an asp.net application, using II6 on windows server 2003 (vps hosting).
I am confronted with an error I didn't receive on my development machine (windows 7, iis 7.5, 64 bit).
When my wcf service tries launching my query running against a local sql server this is the error I receive:
Memory gates checking failed because the free memory (43732992 bytes) is less than 5% of total memory. As a result, the service will not be available for incoming requests. To resolve this, either reduce the load on the machine or adjust the value of minFreeMemoryPercentageToActivateService on the serviceHostingEnvironment config element.
I have both VS 2005 and 2008 installed on my machine. 2005 is fine. For 2008, literally any asp.net project I try to create gets this eror. I try stepping into the code, and the error occurs apparently before anything that I can trap is loaded. There is no information written to the event log. I have tried this with a "Hello World" webpage with nothing else going on. Seems unique to my Windows Server 2003 machine.
I am getting a weird error in asp.net while using leadtools imaging api. Here's the stack trace.
System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at SetThreadData(_THREADDATA* ) at Leadtools.Codecs.CodecsOptions.Use() at Leadtools.Codecs.RasterCodecs.DoSave(SaveParams saveParams) at Leadtools.Codecs.RasterCodecs.Save(RasterImage image, Stream stream, RasterImageFormat format, Int32 bitsPerPixel)........
I am maintaining C# .NET code written by somebody else, I get following exception few times,Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corruptThe code structure where I get the above exception is somethign like this,- it is using ref variables in following sequence,Variable-1 and variable-2 are local variables in App1, - App1: func1() which passes these variables reference to func2(), - App1: func2() passes same variables reference via .net remoting to another application (App2).-App2: does the same passes same received reference to another call 2 times.- The execption is occured while returning from App2.
(App1:func1(ref Var1, ref Var2) --> App1:func2(ref Var1, ref Var2) <---App1 .net remoting to App2--> App2:func3(ref Var1, ref Var2)--> App2:func4(ref Var1, ref Var2)-->variables getting updated and function returned to original caller)
My doubts are ,1. Is passing reference variables in such chain is correct? will it cause such exeption? Does .net support ref variable call directly?
I have a File Uploader in my ASP.NET application Using C#, we can upload any type like images, documents, pdf etc.
I m storing it in the Filesystem and having only the Name of the File in DB.My doubt is can we store the entire file, images in DB. State me Which is good practice and why we need to use it.
I have a memory leak somewhere that I cant find. Every few days my server will crash, and just before that I log a ton of SQL errors stating that it is "out of memory".
I cant find it anywhere, all of my connections are being disposed like so:
[Code].... Then I call the connection from my pages like so:[Code]....
That is all pretty straight forward. The connection is disposed because it is implementing the USING clause. I am opening the connection in my connection manager class, and not where it is being utilized?Or, could the problem be in the below method I am using to populate a SqlDataReader:[Code]....
Now, at first it appears as though this could be the problem because the Connection isn't part of a USING clause, however doesn't the 'Data.CommandBehavior.CloseConnection' pretty much do the same thing. This makes sure that the connection is closed when the reader is closed, right? Here is how I call that above reader from my login page code behind:[Code]....
So the DataReader will get closed even without the .Close() because it is in the USING, and the connection should get closed because I specified it in the ExecuteReader paramters right?
I have a memory issue on my websites and am trying to get to the bottom of it. I have downloaded the 14 day trial of ANTS Memory Profiler and have been playing with it to get a grip of what it's telling me. In the memory options on the timeline, I can see Bytes in All Heaps and Private Bytes etc but I am not sure which ones I should be focusing on to see where the memory spikes and doesn't go back down.I am profiling a ASP.NET website using ASP.NET 2.0.
i have the dataset with one table.Table contains three column like 'Name','Location','Pin'.I would like to move the data from another table based on schema.
If I am passed a datatable and I cant change the column structure..is there anyway to set an existing column to a Primary key so I can easily Find() the row I am looking for?
