My company is interested in using C# to build their intranet website. I am searching around to find out what software we might need and how much they cost.his website http://www.asp.net/downloads/ mentioned the following software is free. anyone know if these are free for development only or both dev and prod?
View 1 RepliesWe are developping with .net framework 2.0 on our dev station and we deploy on web server and client desktop a 3 tiers smart client app. what is the impact of ugrading to .net framework 2.0 sp2 on our web servers WITHOUT upgrading on dev station and compilation servers?
View 2 RepliesIs ASP.NET a sunset web development framework?
View 6 RepliesI am a developer and in search of open source asp.net frame work that can be totally customized as need and have user fraindly UImangement.
View 2 RepliesGenerally what is m.v.c model in software application development and entity framework in asp.net and are these diffrent form 3 layer d architecture(UI layer, Business access layer, Data access layer)
View 2 RepliesI have a requirement to automate the testing of .net application that generates some output files in pdf or html based on account number. How can I automate it to compare the results from DEV environment and the production environment? What is the best way to do so?
View 4 Replieswhats a good way to be able to keep 2 connection strings to SQL server in the web .comfig and have the app pick the correct one when its in the prod and dev servers?
i think i saw once some cool ways to keep variables like app settings holding two sets of values just like i am trying to do with my connection string to SQL... but i diont remmeber where i saw it..
my dev and prod servers vary by the port they use. so i have mysite.com and mysite.com:81
I have a simple datatable with 2 fields, one a primary key which I will call PK and other which I will call COL1. I have used the dataset designer to generate update/insert/delete methods on the tableadapter. On my development system two update methods are generated wit hthe follow signatures:
Update(PK as System.String, COL1 as System.Bool, Original_PK as System.String)
Update(COL1 as System.Bool, Original_PK as System.String)
On the production system, however, the latter signature is not generated. What is more preplexing is that prior to today, production operated similar to test. Obviously somethign changed, but I have been unable to identify what.
Unfortunately the method being used now is the latter. Now I can create my own method with a similar signature, but this problem isn't unique to this datatable/tableadapter. I am very hesitent to make thsi change throughout the application, and even more so in touching the several other applications which I fear may have similar issues (though those rely less on generated udpates).
I am writing a program that uses a .dotx template and does a merge of data in an aspx page. The program works perfect on my Dev workstation locally but when I deploy it to a test IIS server, it fails on the second line below giving me an Object Reference error.
I ran into problems earlier because the Word Com object was not on the IIS server so I loaded Word onto the server and set permission in DCom and got past that problem. But now I get this error on the line that starts with wRange = . As I said, the program works perfectly locally in debug mode.
Microsoft.Office.Interop.Word.DocumentClass
System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object
lines of code:
Document BaseDocument = oWord.Documents.Open(ref oTemplate, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing, ref oMissing);
wRange = BaseDocument.Bookmarks.get_Item(ref endOfDoc).Range;
We have a largely asp.net web form team (With some Oracle developers thrown in).
Question 1:
Is it a good idea to start using asp.net MVC which will mean redevelopment of a number of standard controls for not much benefit.
Question 2:
Is it a good idea to hire developers where there most recent skills are with asp.net MVC?
I doubt there is any benefit adopting MVC now, given the 100+ applications in this suite of products, and the maintenance/rework this will cause. Given this, is there any particular reason to hire MVC developers, as they won't be hitting the ground running, which is what I need now.
My web.config is set up so that I don't have to change anything between deploy from UAT and Production. I can determine what machine it is running on and then programatically pick the correct connection string etc from the web.config based on the name.
Now we are adding a call to a web service which now causes us to have to make a change at deploy time. We set a "Region" flag in the web.config and then in coded an IF statement to call the appropriate webservice based on the flag so all we'd have to change is the "T" to a "P" when moving to production. But then hardcoding a web service in the application is not what we want to do. Nor do we want to change the web service address in the web.config.
Is there any way we can do something like the following to be able to not have to change the web.config at deploy?
It would be something like:
1. Grab current Machine name
2. Look in web.config for corresponding machine name web service reference (like we do for connection strings etc)
3. Use that web service in the processing.
In development I installed "ODAC Entity Framework and LINQ Beta (11.2.0.2.30)" so that we could have a 32 bit version of Oracle.DataAccess for ODP.Net. In Visual Studio 2010 (on Windows Server 2008 R2) I made a reference to:
C:Oracleodp.netin4Oracle.DataAccess.dll.This adds: <add assembly="Oracle.DataAccess, Version=4.112.2.30, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89B483F429C47342" /> to the assembly in the web.config.
We set the AppPool to Enable 32 bit applications and everything works great. For anyone who doesn't know the story here, we do this because Visual Studio 2010 runs in 32 bit so you need the 32 bit ODAC/ODP.net components to get a development environment running. I then publish the files and move to a 64 bit machine.
I downloaded the "ODAC112021Xcopy_x64.zip" Then ran: install.bat odp.net4 c:oracle odac and I can see the Oracle.DataAccess.dll file at: C:Oracleodp.netin4Oracle.DataAccess.dll. Then added c:oracle;c:oraclein;c:oraclein4 to the System Path.
At this point I would think I just replace the version and PulbicKeyToken in: <add assembly="Oracle.DataAccess, Version=4.112.2.30, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89B483F429C47342" />
on production to the versioin installed on prod. So first thing I do is just remove that line on production to see what error I will get. And I still get the same error:
System.IO.FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly 'Oracle.DataAccess, Version=4.112.2.30, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89b483f429c47342' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)
Actually this is if I move the new dll into the applicaitons bin directory. If I remove the dll from the directory I get: Could not load file or assembly 'Oracle.DataAccess, Version=4.112.2.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89b483f429c47342' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
So I put the line back in.
I right click on on the new Oracle.DataAccess.dll and click properties. In the details tab I see verion is 4.112.2.0. That makes sense. The 64 bit XCopy version is an earlier build then the 32 bit Beta that comes with Entity Framework and LINQ(Version=4.112.2.30).
So on production I change the Version attribute to: 4.112.2.0. But now I get the same error: System.IO.FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly 'Oracle.DataAccess, Version=4.112.2.30, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=89b483f429c47342' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)
(This is with the new dll back in the web app's bin directory as is the rest of the thread).
It's still looking for the same version of the assembly. Why is it doing that? The web.config has a connection string with the ODP.Net provider type (Oracle.DataAccess.Client). Which would take from the assembly reference. It should not care what the version number is. Could there be something in code somewhere that is specifically looking for the old dev box version? Just what is the way to make it use the new assembly?
I would think the system would just know where to find the new dll. Just as in development the add reference dialog knew that the dll was in c:oracle... rather then c:program files(x86)... like out-of-the-box Microsoft assemblies.
Kindly let me know why my appln redirects me to Session TimeOut page on a simple postback. This doesnot happen on my local pc but happens only on prod. Here is the code I m using on my PageBase.cs 's Init method
[Code]....
And in my web.config:
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms name=".MY-AUTHPORTALNAME"
slidingExpiration="true"
defaultUrl="Default.aspx"
loginUrl="Login.aspx"
protection="All"
timeout="9999"
path="/"/>
</authentication>
<sessionState mode="InProc" cookieless="false" timeout="9999" />
I setup paging in GridView and it works oK in VS2005 locally but does not show when I move the page to prod server. I use masterpage, so GridView in in the Content placeholder...
View 5 RepliesI am planning to develop a social networking website for student of a particular university with following facilities.
Forum, Blog, Creating profile, creating groups , Adding Friends, managing groups, dating, chatting etc.
Now if I start developing it from scratch, this will take a lot of time..
I couldnt find any CMS which can in developing social networking website.
Additionally, I would like the website to have my own custom design. Also it should have support for AJAX, SEO and integrating third party applications.
How do you know what is better to use for writing new programs? We are now using Access 2007 frontend with an SQL backend and we are going to VB.Net, what would be our next logical step?
View 4 RepliesLocally I have the cascading dropdown which loads countries in a cascading dropdown working.
But as soon as I place the code on the hosting server, Firebug shows me an:
500 Internal Server Error - [URL]
The cascading dropdown just shows "[Method error 500]"
REMEMBER: IT WORKS ON MY LOCAL SERVER!!!
local configuration:
Windows 7
IIS7.5
ASP.NET4
server configuration:
Windows Server 2008
IIS7.5
ASP.NET4
So it almost MUST be something on my hosting server! :s I dont know what to configure though...
[code]....
We recently migrated a web app from one Prod server (Prod 1) to another server (Prod 2). There is a session varialbe checked inside the page load event of the default master page. I have enabled session state both in web.config as well inside the pagedirective. The compilation went through without any issue. The web app is also running just fine on the server but the log file keeps logging a warning message. There is no run time error.
"System.Web.HttpException: Session state can only be used when enableSessionState is set to true, either in a configuration file or in the Page directive. Please also make sure that System.Web.SessionStateModule or a custom session state module is included in the <configuration><system.web><httpModules> section in the application configuration."Any idea why this is happening on one server vs other?
I host a website that has recently been upgraded from .NET Framework 2.0 to .NET Framework 4.0. Within the website, I have an instance of BlogEngine which still requires .NET Framework 2.0. Each website is in it's own application pool. My issue is that when I browse to the blog portion of my website, I receive a 500.19 error with the following information...
The configuration section 'system.web.extensions' cannot be read because it is missing a section declaration The web.conf file that is listed in the error message is the config file that belongs to my root website which is running .NET Framework 4.0. How do I get the two websites to run together in the same website using different versions of the .NET Framework?
I have this cenario:One server (machine) that have framework 3.5. And one site (website) developed for framework 3.5.This site can not be modified (rebuild in other FW version, or others changes).
I'll developer a new webapplication (WAP) in framework 4.0 (using microsoft visual web developer 2010).
As I know, the new webaplication work in the server, if I install framework 4.0 in the server.
My question is: Can I install the framework 4.0 on the machine that already have framework 3.5. And continue have sites working with other frameworks version?Or, should I develop my new webapplication in framawork 3.5 ?If I can install the framework 4.0, do I need make some specify configuration during the installation?
what is Features added in Framework 2.0 over the framework 1.1? i want in Details?
View 2 RepliesDifference between .net framework 2.0 and .net framework 2.0 with service pack 2
View 4 RepliesI recently I have upgraded my web application from 1.1 to 3.5.
Now the problem is support DLLs used in this application still in 1.1 only.
There is no way to change it. While accessing from 3.5 it is not showing any error msg.
But not giving expected results.
Is there any way to run this particular assembly in 1.1 and other in 3.5 ?
I have an old Web application which is using net framework 2.0(build with vs2005), now i need to move the old Web application to production server which has .net framwork 3.5 installed. Do I need recompile the web application with vs2008 or i can just go head move the the Web application without recompiling, it will automatically work?
View 4 RepliesIs there a way to export a EF 4.0 Data Model to EF 3.5?
I looked around and found that we are not able to access EF 4.0 from a ASP.Net 3.5 project here: [URL]
Our project is the 1st to go to .Net 4.0 using Entity Framework and we (the team) were wondering if there was a way for the other projects that "might" need to access our data that are still using the .Net 3.5 framework.