ADO.NET :: Performance Hit From An ORM Worth Worrying About?

Dec 21, 2010

I'm wondering how much performance suffers form using an ORM. It only makes sense that straight ADO.net would be faster than an ORM since they are built on top of ADO.net.

I'm not building any high traffic sites or using any incredibly large record sets. I'm seriously considering using LINQ after having to add a number of classes to my DAL and my BAL. The ease and reduction of work from an ORM seems very advantageous. I'm thinking it would far out weigh any performance concerns for me.

How much of a performance hit does using an ORM create? I would think that this would depend on the number of users and size of the record sets but I would like to get an idea of the impact of this. How many hits per day/ size of the record sets would be the threshold?

Do any of you have any complaints about the performance hit from an ORM? Do you prefer the reduction in work over any performance hits?

View 3 Replies


Similar Messages:

C# - When Is It Worth Compressing The ViewState

Nov 16, 2010

I agree that the best way to shorten the ViewState is to disable it on the ASP.Net controls that don't need it. Keeping it small from the beginning is a great habit.I have also heard that it is already compressed (although can be true... there are ways of compressing it even more, has described in this Stack Overflow question).

My question here is not if it should be compressed... is: when should ViewState be compressed?If we have a ViewState of 410 characters it will weight 410 bytes in a page, while a ViewState of 13.843 characters equals 13.5 KB.13.5KB is a considerable weight already. And if I compress a CSS file that height 10KB, I think it is also worthy compressing a ViewState of 13.5KB, even if that means a little extra "thinking" on the server.But is 410 bytes of ViewState worth the extra processing on the server?

View 2 Replies

Is ViewState Compresssion Worth It With .NET WebForms?

Nov 12, 2010

Obviously, first priority is disabling and not using Viewstate as much as possible, but if you have to, is this worthwhile? Also considering that IIS is gzipping everything for you as well. ViewState is smaller however is the trade off of CPU worth it?

http://www.dotnetcurry.com/ShowArticle.aspx?ID=67

Trying to give a client some guidance based on this.

PS: They are using .NET 2.0

View 2 Replies

For Dynamically Created Forms - MVC 2 Worth Learning Curve?

Mar 10, 2011

I have to create a web application that allows you to create specific XML documents. To generate a document, the user must be able to fill out fields that will be the XML content, using dropdown lists, text input fields, calendar controls ... Some fields will be validated. use some default values (text, new GUID, current date ...) add or remove sub nodes. The minimum an maximum number of nodes will be validated. All fields, relations and validations should be configurable by using config files. I have an idea of how to implement this in a homebrew MVP or MVVM pattern way.

Now I wonder if MVC 2 can help me enough to justify the learning curve. (MVC 3 is not an option, as my client still uses VS2008.) In two weeks I should have a working application. It is for internal "power user" use, so it doesn't have to look too fancy, but the main concept and functionality should be waterproof. My background: I have many years of experience with Win Forms developement and basic knowledge of ASP.NET (did some smaller apps with it).

View 2 Replies

Configuration :: .Net Website Performance Of 2 Sites - Rectify The DB Performance While Insertion?

Sep 20, 2010

I have developed a website in asp.net framework 2 . This website is being hosted in two different servers without any change in code. My issue is about the performance of these 2 sites. One website is taking much time for inserting datas to the DB (SQL server 2005). 2 websites are having different DB server.

I think the issue is for the DB server. How can we rectify the DB performance while insertion and Is there any other cause for this permance issue?

View 1 Replies

DataSource Controls :: LINQ Performance Application Performance Is Not Up To Par?

Apr 29, 2010

I am not sure if this is the right forum. I can not find a forum for LINQ.

I am working on an application using LINQ. Application performance is not up to par and my tests show that it is LINQ queries that are slow. I was wondering if anybody can recommend where I can find an article about optimizing LINQ performance maybe by compilation or other methods.

View 1 Replies

WCF / ASMX :: Wcf Performance Vs Page Events Performance?

Mar 20, 2011

I am creating a service oriented application where trying to have everything using services....however there is something I am not sure of , I am having a page that calls the database at the page load...so what would be better and faster?? to call database in pageload , or to call wcf service from javascript during javascript load ??btw , I am using a repeater in the page , but I have created somekind of an engine to create the suitable html so...I'll be creating the repeaters html using the wcf and resend it back to the page If I am using a wcf service at the start.

View 1 Replies

C# - ASP.NET Performance Issue

May 20, 2010

I am working on an ASP.NET 3.5, C#, ASP.NET AJAX, JQUERY web application which currently is having some performance issues. I have a screen with the forms view control and when I edit the form and save it for the first time the POST takes 4.89 seconds and when I perform the same operation again for the second time the POST only takes 1.09 seconds. What could be the reason for this strange behavior?

Note: I am using firebug and I am disregarding the page resources (like js, images) load time.

EDIT: I am using the Web Deployment Project to precompile the application.

View 3 Replies

ADO.NET :: Performance Advantage To Using EF?

Mar 14, 2011

I'm now getting into EF and from what I'm seeing so far, I wouldn't have to worry about writing stored procedures any more. Looks like EF takes care of all of that -- including INSERT's that store data in multiple tables. One of the things they taught us when learning stored procedures was that they're compiled which has performance benefits. How does EF 4 fare against using stored procedures?

View 3 Replies

Performance: Using LoadControl In For-each?

Oct 12, 2010

I'm trying to make a decision about how to display my data. What I have now is a list of products displayed in a repeater. But for code-maintenance I've put my product items in a seperate usercontrol and loading them in a loop with db results using LoadControl.The product control itself is very simple, just a few public properties like title, url, rating but I'm not sure if this will affect my performance. I did some reading here and on forums and some people say it's not the best practice especially if you have more then 20 or 30 of these controls. So, is it really a performance hit using this method or does it stay ok with around 10.000 hits a day.

View 2 Replies

How To Improve Performance Of A Gridview

Feb 16, 2011

I have developed a gridview which has displays 8,000 records. However, the user is compaining that it is too slow. A major function of this gridview is to filter on two of the columns. It seems to me that if the records were stored in memory it would be much faster. This is caching, I think. Is that the case? Since filtering is being done I don't think custom paging will help much. When they submit a filter, with custom paging wouldn't the entire table be read again? So I was thinking of trying caching which is available on SQL Server. Am I on the right track? Can you cache with an Access database? Can you think of any other ways to improve performance of a gridview?

View 1 Replies

Looking For Data Layer To Use For Performance?

Jul 29, 2010

I did not post this in database forum because the data will run on an asp.net site.I have 3 solution in my mind and i would like some opinions.What i want to do is create a parent-child relationship on 2 controls.A listbox and a textbox.I will populate the listbox with data(this is taken care of so ignore) and what i want to do is when i click on an item in the listbox then the textbox to show it's joined related item(one item only).This is not a problem in windows forms app but in asp, since i'm new i don't know what would be better for a faster retrieval on the page.So the 3 options i have in mind are:

1)DAL.The standard create a query and let one @parameter wait for the id.

2)ADO.NET with possibly an sqldatasource.In standard forms i would have chosen simple ado.net but in asp?So either constantly open,close the db and retrieve the item or use an sqldatasource and chance the parameter.

3)Asynchronous handler page.Bind the textbox to an asynchronous page that contains the connection and expect the @id parameter.

I admit that i'm not fond of DAL but if it will boost speed then i will use it.But i have a though that says that simple ADO will be faster.

View 16 Replies

Performance - Application Slow But CPU Is At 40% Max?

Nov 19, 2010

I have a strange situation on a production server. Connection for asp.net get queued but the CPU is only at 40%. Also the database runs fine at 30% CPU.

Some more history as requested in the comments:

In the peak hours the sites gets around 20,000 visitors an hour.
The site is an asp.net webforms application with a lot of AJAX/POSTs
The site uses a lot of User generated content
We measure the performance of the site with a testpage which does hit the database and the webservices used by the site. This page get served within a second on normal load. Whe define the application as slow when the request takes more than 4 seconds.
From the measurements we can see that the connectiontime is fast, but the processing time is large.
We can't pinpoint the slowresponse the a single request, the site runs fine during normal hours but gets slow during peak hours
We had a problem that the site was CPU bound (aka running at 100%), we fixed that
We also had problems with exceptions maken the appdomain restart, we fixed that do
During peak hours I take a look at the asp.net performance counters. We can see behaviour that we have 600 current connections with 500 queued connections.
At peak times the CPU is around 40% (which makes me the think that it is not CPU bound)
Physical memory is around 60% used
At peak times the DatabaseServer CPU is around 30% (which makes me think it is not Database bound)

My conclusion is that something else is stopping the server from handling the requests faster. Possible suspects:

Deadlocks (!syncblk only gives one lock)
Disk I/O (checked via sysinternals procesexplorer: 3.5 mB/s)
Garbage collection (10~15% during peaks)
Network I/O (connect time still low)

To find out what the proces is doing I created to minidumps.

I managed to create two MemoryDumps 20 seconds apart. This is the output of the first:

!threadpool
CPU utilization 6%
Worker Thread: Total: 95 Running: 72 Idle: 23 MaxLimit: 200 MinLimit: 100
Work Request in Queue: 1
Number of Timers: 64

and the output of the second:

!threadpool
CPU utilization 9%
Worker Thread: Total: 111 Running: 111 Idle: 0 MaxLimit: 200 MinLimit: 100
Work Request in Queue: 1589

View 3 Replies

How To Performance Test An Application

Nov 12, 2010

Performance testing best practices for an ap .net application

View 1 Replies

Trying To Add Some Performance Counters To Website?

Jan 12, 2010

I'm trying to add some performance counters to my asp.net website. Now, I know how to increment/decrement some custom counter I make .. but my problem is that if I get my ASP.NET website to create these counters, if they do not exist (eg. i do this check in the global.asax App start method) then add/create them.

But, it doesn't work - access to the registry is denied/forbidden.

I'm assuming this is because the asp.net process is so stripped down (for security) that u can't touch that type of thing. Therefore, i'm wondering if the only other solution is to make a quick console or winform app which does one thing -> add's the perf counters. running this as my normal logged in user would me i have admin rights, so it will work. or is there something else i can do?

View 2 Replies

C# - Performance When Web.config Is Really Huge?

Apr 6, 2010

Does it have any major effect on performance/ memory if my web.config is really huge (say, 1000+ entries in <appSettings>)? Is it a good idea to maintain a different custom xml config file for all business specific settings for my app?

View 3 Replies

Web Forms :: How To Get Better Performance From .NET Autocomplete

Sep 9, 2010

I am using ASP.NET AJAX Autocomplete to load the data. I am fetching data from a Dataset, which is store in Session. The table length is approx 1000 rows.I use DataView to and Table.Select ("Data Like '"+ inputvalue +"'") to filter data on each keystroke.I am wondering, what's the best and fastest way to store and fetch data for Autocomplete?

View 5 Replies

MVC :: How To Increase Modelbinding Performance

Sep 7, 2010

Does Modelbinding increase performance that much? I have a large table which I have split into 4 details/edit screens, and want to load only information that is needed on the particular screen.

View 1 Replies

Databases :: Very Slow Performance With Sql?

Nov 22, 2010

I'm using MySql with asp.net 2.0. Every page witch has a database operation take long time to complete. How can i increase the performance.

View 1 Replies

How To Use Caching To Improve Performance

Mar 30, 2011

My scenario is : WebApp -> WCF Service -> EDMX -> Oracle DB

When I want to bind grid I fetch records from Oracle DB using EDMX i.e LINQ Query. But, this degrades performance as multiple layers take place between WebApp & Oracle DB. Can I use caching mechanism to improve the performance? But as far as I know cache is shared across the whole application. So, if I update cache other user might receive wrong information. Can we use caching per user? Or is there any other way to improve performance of the application?

View 2 Replies

Is There A Performance Testing Tool For Dll's

Feb 18, 2010

I know red-gate's ANTS Performance Profiler but it works with source code. I have an ASP.NET web application that is deployed on a remote server. I'm going to test its performance while it is working on the server.

My main goal is to detect what method of what class is slow and then is a bottleneck. Is there a way or a tool?

View 1 Replies

Variation In Performance When Using GetDirectories?

Sep 1, 2010

I support an inherited asp.net web application that retrieves files from a shared network drive. One particular folder [we'll call it FOLDERA] I've chosen to troubleshoot against contains about 300mb of files and multiple subfolders. FOLDERA is considered large for this application. Starting recently, the users have been having slow performance when retrieving files from FOLDERA on a production network share. I narrowed the code down to the GetDirectories method within the asp.net application.

RootDir.GetDirectories("*", SearchOption.AllDirectories);

In production, the FOLDERA read takes about 8-10 seconds. Prior to the recent performance degradation it was about 1 second. In the test environment it takes 1-2 seconds with the same amount of data.

View 1 Replies

Improving The Web Site Performance?

Jun 29, 2010

I have a pretty big web site (asp.net web) and I have used JavaScript intensively (jquery,custom javascipt, etc) and also The theme and CSS. Right now I have a huge amount of js and css files in my system and I am thinking about minifying and smashing the js and css to improve the performance. So, please advice me the suitable tools and technologies to be used and please suggest me the best practices to be applied in these scenario.

View 4 Replies

Databases :: C# Vs. PL/SQL Performance Difference?

Feb 17, 2011

I am working on an ASP.NET project that has significant backend processing existing in PLSQL. I was wondering if I re-write this code properly in C# can I get similar performance results or is the PL/SQL code going to beat my C# code every time?

View 5 Replies

.net - Can A 32 Bit Only DLL In Web Application Cause Performance Decrease

Dec 7, 2010

Web forms .NET application, is starting to meet 64 bits Windows servers and we have a 32bit DLL from one of our component vendors (its a hardware key, actually). I checked the instructions here "compiling a .net application with either a 32-bit or 64-bit dll". It is also what our vendor sugested. question: is there a performance impact on compiling a web application to run on x86 mode ?Please don't flame me for using a hardware key

View 1 Replies







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved