WCF / ASMX :: Wcf Performance Vs Page Events Performance?
Mar 20, 2011
I am creating a service oriented application where trying to have everything using services....however there is something I am not sure of , I am having a page that calls the database at the page load...so what would be better and faster?? to call database in pageload , or to call wcf service from javascript during javascript load ??btw , I am using a repeater in the page , but I have created somekind of an engine to create the suitable html so...I'll be creating the repeaters html using the wcf and resend it back to the page If I am using a wcf service at the start.
View 1 Replies
Similar Messages:
Sep 20, 2010
I have developed a website in asp.net framework 2 . This website is being hosted in two different servers without any change in code. My issue is about the performance of these 2 sites. One website is taking much time for inserting datas to the DB (SQL server 2005). 2 websites are having different DB server.
I think the issue is for the DB server. How can we rectify the DB performance while insertion and Is there any other cause for this permance issue?
View 1 Replies
Apr 29, 2010
I am not sure if this is the right forum. I can not find a forum for LINQ.
I am working on an application using LINQ. Application performance is not up to par and my tests show that it is LINQ queries that are slow. I was wondering if anybody can recommend where I can find an article about optimizing LINQ performance maybe by compilation or other methods.
View 1 Replies
Jun 14, 2010
In my webpage, the page uses lots of images and css. The time taken to load the initial home page is huge.What are the ways,which can be done in IIS 6.0 to improve the performance?I checked few results in google, which talked about File expiration policy and enabling http compression in IIS 6.0. In the Enable content expiration, what value should be ideally used?In the Custom Http header, what should be added to improve the performance.
View 4 Replies
Dec 2, 2010
We have one page which is about 300 KB after compression of viewstate. It's loading very slow. We are using telerik tabstrip. There are 8 user controls being loaded for this tab. Is there anyway we can improve the performance of this page?
View 5 Replies
Jan 20, 2010
Every now and then (always after a long period of idle-time, e.g. overnight) when I access a site built using asp.net - it takes around 15 seconds to load the page (15 seconds before I see any progress whatsoever, then the page comes up fast).Further pages on that site, or refreshes, are quick as usual - they are also fast on other machines, only the first one seems to take the 'hit'.
Page tracing never through anything up (whole cycle was a fraction of a second) So my question is where else should I be looking? Perhaps IIS? Or could it still be my asp.net app and I'm just looking in the wrong place (the trace) for clues?As I don't have much control over the IIS server, anything I can check through asp.net would be more helpful, before I go ask that particular admin.
View 7 Replies
Aug 3, 2010
I needed to test the performance of my site on a remote server (do not have IIS access). I am also using Visula Web Developer / Studio Professional 2008 (But not team system version).
View 2 Replies
Sep 29, 2010
I am creating a site whose content is dynamic and has images in it.How much performance hit will my DB (MSSQL) take if I save content/Images in DB?
View 3 Replies
Oct 26, 2010
I have to test my asp.net web application for performance when there are simultaneous requests for the web site in my developer machine before deploy in production. How can I achieve this using Visual Studio?.(without using third party tools preferably Visual studio 2010 professional edition
View 3 Replies
Jan 8, 2010
I have a relatively simple page that will do most of its operations on the client side using Javascript or JQuery. However, initially I do need to retrieve some data from the DB server based on QueryString parameters.
I plan on passing this data in the form of a JSON string to the script by an old-fashioned ASP manner ( var severData = <%=MyPublicData %>) block where MyPublicData is defined in CodeBehind as:
Public string MyPublicData;
The question is, which event in the ASP.NET page lifecycle is the best for this? Page_Init ? Page_Load? Also, is it worth the effort to do this in ASP.NET MVC. I did look at this possiblity but it seemed a little too much for a simple page like this where I do more 90% of the work on the client.
View 4 Replies
Jun 23, 2010
I am using the timer inside UpdatePanel to check the time every second and enter it to a label control.
But I must ask, How this is going to effect performance? Bandwidth of the site?
View 6 Replies
May 14, 2010
I am having trouble with the performance of a web site... Some SQL queries are killing the server. But, as the title of this post mention, I looked at the OutputCache page directive to improve performance of the site. Although, I came across some questions regarding this directive:
1- If I have a web-user control that declares an OuputCache directive in a page that has one too, which one will "win"?
2- What's the best pratice regarding the duration ? I'd love to have a sliding window too.
View 2 Replies
Feb 10, 2010
I am dynamically creating a table of checkboxes on my test.aspx page. The dimensions (row and column count) of the table are determined by querying the database. In test.aspx page, I do the following:
<script language="C#" runat="server">
protected void Page_Load ( object src, EventArgs e ) {
//Query the database to get the data for rows and columns
CheckBox[] chkBox = new CheckBox[rows * columns]; //creates a collection of checkboxes
//Iterate over the query set in a double for loop to create dynamic checkboxes
}
</script>
Right now I have the number of rows=20 and columns=10, but it can increase (with the columns more likely). I used the Net tab in Firebug to ascertain the time taken by different events and found that GetTest.aspx is taking close to 4 minutes, which is too long a time to wait. Is there a way to being down the page load time? Is my approach to create dynamic check boxes correct?
View 4 Replies
Dec 8, 2010
I have requirement in website, where i need to provide around 60 textbox inside form.
I woud like to know whether it make performance down when i put such large count of textbox (60) in form.
Is there any alternate way to meet this requirement.
View 1 Replies
Sep 17, 2010
I have some serious performance Issues with Windows controls loading first time on IE Browser then subsequent request's. When ever i open Browser first time , mywebsite takes 7 seconds to load, but on subsequent request without closing browser it loads with-in 2 seconds.I Knew IIS on first time it re-compiles the process and for subsequent request's it wont perform and it cahches .I'm looking for better options to improve performance, when ever first time reqest's comes to web server.
On IIS 7 Server,I was using both Dynamic and Static compression enabled.Also,On application pool ,I set "ShutDown Time(Limit)" and "Startup Time(Limit") to 90 (seconds).Here is web.config i disable below to improve performance issues.
<trace enabled="false" pageOutput="false" />
<compilation debug="false"/>
Here is the Server Configuration
Windows 2008 Server
IIS 7 64 bit
Upto Date patches.
.Net Framework 2.0,3.0,3.5
Need inputs to improve performance when user call website for first time.
View 2 Replies
Apr 10, 2012
In my website for one project we have 5000+ records in sql database. If I give page size is 100 for gridview then the paze size showing 800kb in firebug net panel and it is taking 20-30 seconds to load webpage. If I give page size is 10 for gridview then the paze size showing 160kb in firebug net panel and it is taking 5-6 seconds to load webpage. If I give page size is 5for gridview then the paze size showing 130kb in firebug net panel and it is taking less than 6 seconds to load webpage. I noticed that due to heavy paze size the performance decreasing but as per my requirent the paze size should be 100 or above and the page should be load less than 2 seconds.
Note: I am using Ajax Update panels
View 1 Replies
May 1, 2010
I designed a web page in that i'm getting the query and executing the query, if a single user enters some query then the time won't be a matter, but if more than one person is accessing the webpage, then it will make delays to execute the queries,
how can i improve the performance of this page like making the results to be displayed more faster?
View 6 Replies
Jan 20, 2011
I am using gridview. In which i m entering some value in textbox in Gridview.According to that value, i m generating datatable and binding it to the Gridview(Child Gridview).But when i m doing this, the performance of the page is very slow. How do i improve the performance.
View 3 Replies
Jan 8, 2010
I have a query that hit my mind when I was adding an asp.net web page in a project. Normally we place the server side code in the codebehind file. Could there be any improvement in the server side processing if we place both the code and the page design markup in the same page? I am referring to the practice like this:
[code]....
If we use separate codebehind file, we would do all these in the page load event and make div elements visible, invisible according to the test. We could even have only one div in the design page and set its inner text accordingly.
View 2 Replies
Aug 2, 2010
Okay so my situation at work is that I've written about 200 or so lines of additional functionality into an aspx page's code-behind that is currently not to be implemented. It is in a subroutine that handles an event that currently has zero chance of occurring.
Because this code is not being used, I've gotten curious. Should I comment out the subroutine that has zero chance of firing? Would it do anything to enhance the performance of the page or anything like that if I did indeed comment it out? Or could/should I just leave it as is?
View 4 Replies
Oct 4, 2010
i am using data gridview asp.net control and i bind it dynamically, gird displayed 80,000 thousands records so i am using paging techniques,on each page gird display 10 record so when i am change page each time gird should filled 80.000 thousands records so how could i bind gird from pageIndex,pageSize rather than bind it whole records
Code]....
it works properly but when i change page or grdTender_PageIndexChanging event fire each time gird fill with 80.000 records now i want to bind it from current pageIndex to current page size to improve the performance of datagird
View 5 Replies
May 20, 2010
I am working on an ASP.NET 3.5, C#, ASP.NET AJAX, JQUERY web application which currently is having some performance issues. I have a screen with the forms view control and when I edit the form and save it for the first time the POST takes 4.89 seconds and when I perform the same operation again for the second time the POST only takes 1.09 seconds. What could be the reason for this strange behavior?
Note: I am using firebug and I am disregarding the page resources (like js, images) load time.
EDIT: I am using the Web Deployment Project to precompile the application.
View 3 Replies
Mar 14, 2011
I'm now getting into EF and from what I'm seeing so far, I wouldn't have to worry about writing stored procedures any more. Looks like EF takes care of all of that -- including INSERT's that store data in multiple tables. One of the things they taught us when learning stored procedures was that they're compiled which has performance benefits. How does EF 4 fare against using stored procedures?
View 3 Replies
Oct 12, 2010
I'm trying to make a decision about how to display my data. What I have now is a list of products displayed in a repeater. But for code-maintenance I've put my product items in a seperate usercontrol and loading them in a loop with db results using LoadControl.The product control itself is very simple, just a few public properties like title, url, rating but I'm not sure if this will affect my performance. I did some reading here and on forums and some people say it's not the best practice especially if you have more then 20 or 30 of these controls. So, is it really a performance hit using this method or does it stay ok with around 10.000 hits a day.
View 2 Replies
Feb 16, 2011
I have developed a gridview which has displays 8,000 records. However, the user is compaining that it is too slow. A major function of this gridview is to filter on two of the columns. It seems to me that if the records were stored in memory it would be much faster. This is caching, I think. Is that the case? Since filtering is being done I don't think custom paging will help much. When they submit a filter, with custom paging wouldn't the entire table be read again? So I was thinking of trying caching which is available on SQL Server. Am I on the right track? Can you cache with an Access database? Can you think of any other ways to improve performance of a gridview?
View 1 Replies
