Why we say compiled code in ASP.NET using C# or VB.NET means high performance and in the other side the server controls make the website slower! so if we combine server controls + compiled code the result will be the same as other interpreted technologies, so where is the speed and performance in ASP.NET? From this point of viwe it seems to be the same as others technologies, right?
View 9 RepliesI have been asked to support a legacy app and I can't get access to the code behind files. I need to add a new feature that gets a list of items from the database on page_load, what way would adding an "in-page" page_load affect the compiled page_load?
View 2 RepliesI recently upgraded my development machine to Windows 7 and have been having a bit of trouble setting up my web services locally in IIS 7.5.
The following error keeps occuring:
parse error message: type 'ClassNameHere' cannot be created.
Line 1: <%@ WebService Language="C#" CodeBehind="~/App_Code/ACCOUNT/AccountService.cs" %>
My compiled app_code.dll is sitting in the /bin directory at the root of my virtual directory and in IIS 5.0 and IIS 6.0 I never experienced any problem like this. To me it seems as if the code from my dlls isnt being loaded or recognized for some reason.
I have web projects build in VS2003/1.1 framework and deployed in a webserver with IIS setting specified to 1.1 framework.lets say project X
I also have another web project which is build with VS2008/2.0. IIS setting - ASP version 2.0 is selected and all pages are assigned to run with 2.0* dlls. Lets say project Y
Now the problem seem to be when I hit project x, sometimes it throws errors like "error BC30456: 'Initialize Culture' is not a member of 'ASP.**"
During troubleshooting this issue, I browsed through 2.0 Temporary ASP.Net files "C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Files" and found temp files generated for project X. (HUH?)
How/why 1.1 project gets compiled in 2.0 only when it errors out.( or we could put it this way that it errors out every time it gets compiled in 2.0 which it is not supposed to)
I'm confused as to why this is happening when project X has nothing to do with .net 2.0.
Adding this info:
IIS version 6.0
I forgot to mention that project X works 95 percent of the time without any errors under 1.1. This error throws randomly which we could not recreate. The time the project error out is at the same time it gets compiled with 2.0
Does code in an .aspx page (in between <% %> tags) get compiled in a web application or is it treated like markup where you can just change it without recompiling the solution? Does compiling only compile the code behind code in the .cs and designer.cs files ?
View 2 Repliesi have never encrypted any dlls. How to protect and secure compiled code, that cann't be extracted with the help of software like .net reflectors
View 1 RepliesI have an MVC application which allows appointment booking. The user can click on a slot in the diary view, which takes them to a page to select the practitioner and confirm.The query string for this page contains a DateTime which is the time the appointment is to start. This is automatically formatted in US format by Html.ActionLink(...), like so:
/assign?date=04%2F06%2F2011%2009%3A00%3A00
This is correctly deserialised and the view reports that the appointment time will be the 6th of April. It is also stored in a hidden field in the view to be posted to the confirm action; the hidden field has the value: 04/06/2011 09:00:00, rendered by Html.HiddenFor(...). Again, looks like US format.However, when the form gets posted, the appointment is booked for the 4th of June, presumably interpreting the date as en-GB.
I have a tricky situation. My application got deployed in production. A lable value needs to be changed but the problem is am setting the label value dyanamically from page load of my page. Is there way to change the label value withour redeploying? i can change the logic on codebehind but that requires another deployement which i don't want to do that as it is production.
View 1 Replies.aspx file that I would have never even thought to look. It was occuring because of a control(ListView I believe) that had been "completely" commented out using the <!-- --> tags. The text was all green which gave me the re-assuring feeling that this code would not be included in the website. I finally decided to search my entire .aspx page for any occurences of the variable it kept insisting couldn't be "databound" and sure enough it was inside a template of a ListView control that was commented out.
View 2 RepliesRunning Windows Server 2008 R2 (IIS 7.5). This is happening at a client's site and works fine on our internal servers with the same OS configuration. We are using the following work-around for now:Modify the Advanced Settings of the Application Pool that the site uses, and change the Identity used by the Process Model from ApplicationPoolIdentity to NetworkService
View 1 RepliesComplete newbie with asp.net using 2008 express edition.I made a master page and one simple page, and used the ftp copy web site tool to load the pages to my web site.When I try to open the one page, I get the message has not been pre-compiled, and cannot be requestedI havedone some searching on the error message, and most places talk about missing things from the Bin directory. I don't have a bin directory on my local machine.
View 8 RepliesWe deployed a UserControl to our testing server. Then made a change to the UserControl and re-deployed. I cannot get the change to take. We have cycled the ASP.NET server, deleted the file completely and re-copied, and also tried a suggestion to change the web.config in order to force all files to be re-compiled.
I definitely know that we are changing the correct file. At one point, I removed the UserControl file altogether and received the "File not found error" when trying to load the user control. The file IS the correct version on the testing server.
[ASP.NET 4.0, Windows Server 2003 SP2, IIS (I think 6?)]
My XSLT was compiled via xsltc, the performance is hugely improved. However, I am wondering how the compiled XSLT works on IIS? Will there any cached of the compiled XSLT instance on the IIS after 1st JIT'ing. As I am seeing my page slightly slow in response from server, but if the page after being called once, subsequent access to the page will faster. So I am suspecting all the transformation processes was not cached for long time on server side.
View 1 Repliesmy asp.net site uses resource files for a referenced project with the user controls in it.
so i have one website project, and one dll project with usercontrols + the resource files.
The website references the dll project.
So far so good.
When i publish, the dll with the usercontrols gets compiled in a dll (what else) but the resource files also get compiled (a separate dll for every language)
Is there a way to edit the resource strings in the dll once deployed?
I'm using "VS 2010 Ultimate" "Web Application" project.
The problem is that web application compilation occurs at run-time.
My steps:
1) change Wep Application source code (*.cs files)
2) rebuild "Web Application" in Visual Studio
3) run web site's(mapped under IIS 7.5) start page via browser
4) Problem: CSC.EXE starts compiling wep application for the second time! Despite I've done it on step 2)
What should I do to escape step 4) ? I don't need re-compilation at run-time!
I've tried "to play" with <compilation batch="false" but it seems to be ignored.
I have read under: Compiling Web Application Projects [URL]
... this compilation model creates a single assembly, you can specify attributes, such as assembly name and version.
You can supply a PATH (directory name only) in the Visual Studio "Build Options".
But where can the file name for the assembly be specified?
There is a pattern in ASP.NET - whenever there is a piece of markup that generates code (like the .aspx/.ascx files in WebForms or .cshtml files in MVC3), these files are dynamically compiled at runtime. aspnet_compiler will produce another assembly for them, which references your code-behind assembly. This approach seems awkward to me and I don't understand why it hasn't been discontinued already. A much better approach (in my opinion) is like in Winforms or resource files - you have your .whatever file, and then there is .whatever.desginer.cs file. This designer file is created at runtime as you type. When you compile, the compiler doesn't care about your .whatever file, it just takes the .whatever.designer.cs file and produces a single solid assembly. This provides several benefits:
You can inherit your forms from each other, similar to windows forms;
You can always see the code that is being generated, possibly adjusting your markup to generate better code;
You can easily instantiate strongly typed instances of your forms;
The only benefit I can see from dynamic compilation is that You can change the markup file anytime and don't need to recompile the app.To be honest, I've often wanted for one of the first three benefits, but never for the last one. Recompiling the app to see your changes isn't that big of a deal. Especially since you have to do it anyway when working with code-behind, where the most of your time will be. And when you deliver your app to the client, you deliver it as a monolithic, precompiled block. When you update, you update everything, not just individual .aspx files - there's no point to. why is it like this? What am I missing?
We have a company product (asp.net website) that gets compiled and distributed to our clients. I need to figure out a way to allow us to add in an ad hoc aspx webpage into the website (so it recognizes the master page, the forms authentication, assemblies, etc) without having to provide them with an un-compiled version of the website product.Is this possible. Is there a better method than having a special compiled version of the website on their server.
View 1 RepliesUsing ASP.NET 3.5 / VS 2008.I have an app that has been deployed on 13 different servers at client sites with no issues. One of the modules is an aspx file that generates a crystal report.When I deployed the app to a Windows 2008 server-64 bit/ IIS 7, the aspx page that uses crystal reports errors out with the message:The file 'xyz.aspx' has not been pre-compiled, and cannot be requested. (All other aspx pages load just fine).
View 1 Replieshow can i bind data to gridview when using compiles query?
load all country
[code]....
I was commissioned to write a search asp.net page for a company. Page works great, they finally ask me to deploy to the web server. I RDP out to the web server, and instead of finding a normal deployment, I see all the aspx pages along with their code-behind files. They do not pre-compile their pages.
So in an environment like this, how do I deploy my asp.net page? I can get pages to run that don't have dependencies on other things, but this particular page uses Linq. So in my web project, I have a dbml file, and it's generated pages. I have put the dbml and related files on the webserver. The page fails when it encounters the using datacontext statement.
How can I tell my page where this code is?
Anyway, I need to pick up on another person's project who has left and essentially what I have is his code base which compiles under Visual Studio2010 Ultimate. I need to dig into his code (VisualBasic) in order to fix some minor problem & make some enhancements. So anyway, I started it up and compiled everything. Then I press the little green arrow button, and the project starts up and launch the browser which then access and run this project. However I need to run this under IIS because I have to try access the webservice from a remote platform. Meaning this has to serve a remote connection and not just the browser from within VisualStudio. Could someone give me a little howto in order to set this up and running under IIS?
View 2 RepliesI am a beginner in MVC. I downloaded a project & compiled it. The browser window came. But now when I compile, the browser window is not coming. I am using VS2008.
View 2 Repliesi need to make some changes to an asp.net website developed by another person - he is on a windows machine, i am using a mac.i need to make some fairly minor changes to the asp, but obviously i can't without being able to at least run the project, and hopefully open it in some development environment (although i'm not adverse to doing it all with a text editor if that's 'easier').i have installed monodevelop, but can't see how to open the project, let alone run it!maybe it's easier to do this in parallels in a windows environment?
View 1 RepliesA page get compiled(aspx) then till when it will be exists in the cache?
View 3 Replies