Web Forms :: Code In An .aspx File That Has Literally Been Commented Out Is Being Compiled Anyway...Why?
Oct 22, 2010
.aspx file that I would have never even thought to look. It was occuring because of a control(ListView I believe) that had been "completely" commented out using the <!-- --> tags. The text was all green which gave me the re-assuring feeling that this code would not be included in the website. I finally decided to search my entire .aspx page for any occurences of the variable it kept insisting couldn't be "databound" and sure enough it was inside a template of a ListView control that was commented out.
Does code in an .aspx page (in between <% %> tags) get compiled in a web application or is it treated like markup where you can just change it without recompiling the solution? Does compiling only compile the code behind code in the .cs and designer.cs files ?
I have been asked to support a legacy app and I can't get access to the code behind files. I need to add a new feature that gets a list of items from the database on page_load, what way would adding an "in-page" page_load affect the compiled page_load?
may i know how can i let people to edit my compiled aspx page?let said i have upload my web application to server, and i wanna let web designer download it and change content of my page by using dreamweaver. (like juz update address, add tel number)
I am working solo on an Asp.net/C# project created by someone in the past. I created two new web forms, and then built the prjocect and did the deploy using a TFS team build project. For some strange reason, my Aspx file is not getting copied to the destination DEV server. It does get copied to a temp folder on that server, but in the end, the team build is failing and not copying over the new Aspx file.
So until I figure out how to fix the team build script, is their a way to just copy the Aspx file out to the desired server location? That as well as copying out a dll which is associated with the build file?
Running Windows Server 2008 R2 (IIS 7.5). This is happening at a client's site and works fine on our internal servers with the same OS configuration. We are using the following work-around for now:Modify the Advanced Settings of the Application Pool that the site uses, and change the Identity used by the Process Model from ApplicationPoolIdentity to NetworkService
We have a company product (asp.net website) that gets compiled and distributed to our clients. I need to figure out a way to allow us to add in an ad hoc aspx webpage into the website (so it recognizes the master page, the forms authentication, assemblies, etc) without having to provide them with an un-compiled version of the website product.Is this possible. Is there a better method than having a special compiled version of the website on their server.
I have a tricky situation. My application got deployed in production. A lable value needs to be changed but the problem is am setting the label value dyanamically from page load of my page. Is there way to change the label value withour redeploying? i can change the logic on codebehind but that requires another deployement which i don't want to do that as it is production.
Anyone know why after content has been commented out it still displays in the browser. Design view as you would expect does not show the content. Here is the commented out data:
The code I have entered below works fine in an .aspx file, however when I seperate the C# code into an aspx.cs file I get the red underlining for both 'UserAccountWizard' and 'RegisterPatientWizard'. Is there any solution to this as I'm completely baffled right now. Here is all of the code in the .aspx file:
Using ASP.NET 3.5 / VS 2008.I have an app that has been deployed on 13 different servers at client sites with no issues. One of the modules is an aspx file that generates a crystal report.When I deployed the app to a Windows 2008 server-64 bit/ IIS 7, the aspx page that uses crystal reports errors out with the message:The file 'xyz.aspx' has not been pre-compiled, and cannot be requested. (All other aspx pages load just fine).
I want to publish my web application as a single .dll file without all the source code and .aspx markup pages.
I am using VS 2010 with the "Web Deployment Project" add-in. In the compilation settings, I unchecked "make this site updatable" because I want the .aspx files to be compiled as well.
Publishing my web application using the publish feature in VS 2010 works fine, and a single .dll file is created in the "bin" directory.
But all the .aspx markup files are still copied to the web server! I've read that those files are merely marker files which can be deleted, but not in my case. They still contain the whole markup and when I delete them, my application won't run anymore.
It's like I had checked the "make this site updatable" option, but I haven't!
I have created an aspx file using in Visual Studio. I did this by doing NEW | Website | ASP.net Website and designing it. How do I create the C# code to handle the click events
Why we say compiled code in ASP.NET using C# or VB.NET means high performance and in the other side the server controls make the website slower! so if we combine server controls + compiled code the result will be the same as other interpreted technologies, so where is the speed and performance in ASP.NET? From this point of viwe it seems to be the same as others technologies, right?
I recently upgraded my development machine to Windows 7 and have been having a bit of trouble setting up my web services locally in IIS 7.5.
The following error keeps occuring:
parse error message: type 'ClassNameHere' cannot be created.
Line 1: <%@ WebService Language="C#" CodeBehind="~/App_Code/ACCOUNT/AccountService.cs" %>
My compiled app_code.dll is sitting in the /bin directory at the root of my virtual directory and in IIS 5.0 and IIS 6.0 I never experienced any problem like this. To me it seems as if the code from my dlls isnt being loaded or recognized for some reason.
I have web projects build in VS2003/1.1 framework and deployed in a webserver with IIS setting specified to 1.1 framework.lets say project X
I also have another web project which is build with VS2008/2.0. IIS setting - ASP version 2.0 is selected and all pages are assigned to run with 2.0* dlls. Lets say project Y
Now the problem seem to be when I hit project x, sometimes it throws errors like "error BC30456: 'Initialize Culture' is not a member of 'ASP.**"
During troubleshooting this issue, I browsed through 2.0 Temporary ASP.Net files "C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Files" and found temp files generated for project X. (HUH?)
How/why 1.1 project gets compiled in 2.0 only when it errors out.( or we could put it this way that it errors out every time it gets compiled in 2.0 which it is not supposed to)
I'm confused as to why this is happening when project X has nothing to do with .net 2.0.
Adding this info:
IIS version 6.0
I forgot to mention that project X works 95 percent of the time without any errors under 1.1. This error throws randomly which we could not recreate. The time the project error out is at the same time it gets compiled with 2.0
I have code that needs to run in two deployments. Let's call them deployment H and deployment W.
The code is already running in deployment H, and there's an aspx page and an aspx.cs code-behind file. The code is compiled for framework 2.0 which is the lowest common denominator of the two deployments. Deployment H has its own logos and styling which are coded in its aspx file.
Deployment W now wants to use this same page, but it wants its own logos and styling. There are also additional fields on the page that deployment H doesn't need.
I think it's easier to maintain one code base which is why I want the same code-behind file, but I am having trouble figuring out how to set this up in Visual Studio. Orginally, I was going to have two projects, one for W and one for H, but I'd have to make the same changes to both files when some of the common areas changes.
I want to use authntication which apparently only work on folders. Thus, I wanted to move the Default.asp file into a new folder that I created. When I tried doing this by cut and paste I ran into problems. I changed the reference in the first line of the aspx file "Page" but the code behind VB file no longer sees the aspx page. In other words, the reference to contorls like Listbox1 show up being undeclared.
Is there a way to move the Default file and the related code behind file to a folder so everything works?
my asp.net site uses resource files for a referenced project with the user controls in it.
so i have one website project, and one dll project with usercontrols + the resource files.
The website references the dll project.
So far so good.
When i publish, the dll with the usercontrols gets compiled in a dll (what else) but the resource files also get compiled (a separate dll for every language)
Is there a way to edit the resource strings in the dll once deployed?
We have encountered this difference in file creation while using a HttpHandler Versus a Code Behind Aspx page. We are reading a saved jpg/png picture as byte array from a 'Image' field in sql server database and create a physical file in the server. Both the Aspx Page and Httphandler use the same code pasted below.
//Begin int docID = Convert.ToInt32(Request.QueryString["DocID"]); var docRow = documentDB.GetDocument(docID); // Retrieve the physical directory path for the Uploads subdirectory string destDir = Server.MapPath("../../Uploads").ToString() + "\"; string strFileName = destDir + DateTime.Now.ToFileTime() + "_" + docRow.DocName.ToString(); FileStream fs = new FileStream(strFileName, FileMode.CreateNew, FileAccess.Write); fs.Write(docRow.DocData, 0, docRow.DocData.Length); fs.Flush(); fs.Close(); // End
After the file is created, it is viewable as a jpg/png Image only in Aspx Code Behind. While in case of HttpHandler it is not a valid Image.
