DataSource Controls :: Sproc Insert Into Multiple Tables
Jan 11, 2010
I have a sproc that will insert a new record into Table1. Next I need to Insert into another table the scope_identity of the inserted record. How do I incorporate the scope_identity value as the insert parameter in the second insert statement?
I've got a TextBox to capture the value of "Name" in Table A.
Ive got a CheckBoxList that displays all the pre-determined values of Table B.
When the user selects an item from the CheckBoxList i want to populate Table C with the value of the selected item from the CheckBoxList and the cooresponding ID associated with the user name for that person's entry.
I do have a details view, which insert data to a database table using SQL Datasource. Now i need the data to be inserted in to 2 tables instead of one.
I have a Winform that has fields need to be filled by a user. All the fields doesn't belong to one table, the data will go to Customer table and CustomerPhone table, so i decided to do multiple inserts. I will insert appropriate data to CustomerPhone first then Insert the rest data to Customer table.
I have a details view form inserting data into one table successfully with no problems and picking up the ID parameter from a session.
What i would like to do is one insert SOME of the fields NOT ALL get inserted into another table.
Table 1 = course
table 2 = matrixoneantwo
I tried creating a datasource which inserted data into Matrixoneanttwo and called it from the detailsview_inserting event (sqldatasource.insert() but then i realised that this data source is seperate to my current one and therefore cannot use its parameters.
i have a form view that takes fields from two tables 'Contract' and 'volunteers', however because i used a query builder,i have to input an insert statement. How do i create an insert statement for two tables in one query?
I have a insert into statement thats inserting my numbers from a numeric text box on my aspx page. I am choosing the Amount Type then putting in a a number.
So i have a drop down that i select example Direct Charge then i enter 600.00 and click add it puts that in to the databse for me woot..
I then put in say Misc Credit and enter 200.00 it inserts in that into the database woot.
The look up table that has my amount types has a field called numeric opperator which is either + or - the Credit being a - and the Charge being a + then my stored procedure takes all my + numbers and adds them up and subtracts all the - numbers.
I want to change that so that it actuall be inserted into the table as a - number form the start. So I want choose Misc Credit enter 200.00 and click add then my event says o yea thats a credit insert 200.00 as -200.00
I have hard time trying to find the solution to retrieve data from multiple tables in one database.
table Kategorije has fields: idKategorija, naziv, opis table Clanak has fields: idClanak, idKategorija, naslov, autor,...
Kategorije.idKategorijais joined with Clanak.idKategorija, but that isn't the solution because I want my web site to show the Kategorije.naziv instead of Kategorije.idKategorija. This is the code I'm currently using to get idKategorije shown on my web site:
I have a dataset with 3 tables that are inner joined. Thsi dataset is connected to an object datasource which is connected to a gridview. So at runtime it displays data from the database. The problem is when I click on a save button to add information to the database it throughs me an error saying Failed to enable constraints. One or more rows contain values violating non-null, unique, or foreign-key constraints. But if i have two tables in my dataset it works 100%. But the problem i need that 3 tables in order to pull the required information. And if i populate the gridview using code to select the information from the database and insert information it also works 100%.
I am using ASP.NET 2.0, C# and Sql Server 2005.I have 2 tables retruned by the stored procedure to the application. I am returning an Array from my datalayer to my bussiness layer and then to my UI layer.I have added the first table into the array and passing it to the UI layer. This is my current code:
[Code]....
How to pass the second table details to the same array, NameArrayKeyEntity .
I am writting a directory website that advertises fitness classes. These classes are listed by Class Type, and Geographical Area. Each Class Type can satisfy one or more of four Fitness Goals such as Loose Weight etc...
I have a table for Classes (classid, classname, classdesc, classtypeid, geoareaid) I have a table for geographic areas (geoareaid, geoarea) And I have a table for ClassTypes (classtypeid, classtypename, classtypedesc)
Which obviously links geographic area via the classes.geoareaid as a forgien key and classtypes by classes.classtypeid as a forgien key.
I can list all classes by type and also by geo area no problem, the problem arrises when I then also want to filter by goal.
The Goals Table (goalid, goal, goaldesc) is linked to the classtypes table via another table classtypes_goals (classtypeid, goalid) as each classtype can satisfy any of the 4 goals.
I am using a DataSet to fetch the data from a Stored Procedure in the SQL Database but because the classtypes can be linked to multiple goals I am getting duplication in my list depending on how many goals a classtype satisfies.
All I need in my data list is class name, class type and area I don't even need to display the goal I just want a drop down above the table that will filter the list and show only classes of classtype that satisfy the goal chosen.
I have a dataset that comprises of multiple tables (about 20) linked together with constraints to reflect the relational database. My question(s):
1) Will having multiple tables affect performance? I'm asking this as there are often times I would not need to get data for all the tables, but only for specific tables.
2) If it does affect performance, would breaking up the tables into their own datasets be the best solution. It seems to me that by doing that, you would lose the ability to apply constraints among tables and tables that might exist in multiple datasets will be subjected to replication.
I would like to have everything in one dataset as I get a view of the related tables and their relationships and also because the Fill method allow me to fill tables, maintaining the hierarchy of the data, but performance is still a key factor.
I'm looking for ideas on deleting data from the multiple SQL tables with LINQ (C#).
My existing solution does the following:
1. DeleteAllOnSubmit( Subset of the data from the child table)
2. DeleteAllOnSubmit( Subset of the data from another child table)
3. DeleteAllOnSubmit( Data from the parent table)
4. CommitChanges()
All this resides within a single method, which makes it ugly and not re-usable.
I have considered the following alternatives, but I decided not to use them:
1. Cascade delete on the tables.
2. Do a join on all tables from which I will remove the data, but I'm not sure yet whether I could pass a join query to DeleteAllOnSubmit().
3. Write stored procedure(s) to delete data from each table. I don't have the time to implement this due to a large number of tables and the time constraints.
I am using mysql as my database.From one of my web pages I want to insert data to 4 tables.All the data should be inserted to these different tables on a single button click from the web page.How can I achieve this?Which is most reliable way to insert data to multiple tables on a single click event?
Will the sql operation with 4 'insert' statements separated by semicolon work for me?
After creating a dataset, which has CRUD statements generated two or more tables, which Data Control should I use that will allow me to insert data into fields into 2 or more tables from a single web form. I'm trying to create a web form that will allow the user to input student information, such as general information, medical information, etc.
I am confused about why I would need to wrap the DataContext's SubmitChanges within a transactionScope when modifying multiple tables. I was under the impression that the DataContext would track these changes and would therefore create its own transaction if need be.
In other words, if a change was made to update table A, B and C or if I made changes to 10 out of 20 items in a collection of rows, that the datacontext would track these changes and create its own transaction. If that is correct then why have I seen examples that wrapped these types of updates in a TransactionScope?