ASP.NET 3.5 C# I am joining two tables using Linq. Table names are MapAssets and ExitPoint. In Database they are related with 'has a relationship'
I am writing a function in my BLL to return the joined table
public List<ExitPoints> GetExitPointDetailsByProjectID(int iProjectID) { ctx = new CoreDBDataContext(); var exitPointDetails = from ma in ctx.MapAssets join ep in ctx.ExitPoints on ma.MapAssetID equals ep.MapAssetID where ma.ProjectID == iProjectID select new { //would like to have data from both tables here ctx.MapAssets, ctx.ExitPoints }; return exitPointDetails.ToList(); }
This obviuosly doesn't work. And I dont know what to return at all. All constraint I have for the return is to be able to be bound to a gridview. is this the correct way? Or else whats the correct way?
At debug time I would like to see what are the keys in my InitParams collection - I can't seem to be able to list them.
EDIT:As Jon suggests below, this might be a bug within the Silverlight debugger. To reproduce, just create a new Silverlight Application within Visual Studio 2010 and just edit code
{ public partial class MainPage : UserControl { [code]...
Question: I want to call a generic function, defined as:
Public Shared Function DeserializeFromXML(Of T)(Optional ByRef strFileNameAndPath As String = Nothing) As T
Now when I call it, I wanted to do it with any of the variants below:
Dim x As New XMLserialization.cConfiguration x = XMLserialization.XMLserializeLDAPconfig.DeserializeFromXML(Of x)() x = XMLserialization.XMLserializeLDAPconfig.DeserializeFromXML(GetType(x))() x = XMLserialization.XMLserializeLDAPconfig.DeserializeFromXML(Of GetType(x))()
But it doesn't work. I find it very annoying and unreadable having to type
x = XMLserialization.XMLserializeLDAPconfig.DeserializeFromXML(Of XMLserialization.cConfiguration)()
Is there a way to call a generic function by getting the type from the instance ?
I have a generic list which contains a class called Parameter. Parameter contains 2 integers, ParamType and ParamValue. A generic list is built containing a small number of values List<Parameter> myList I have created a function which passes in 2 parameters. These are passed individually but are used to create a new Parameter within the function. The Parameter is tested against myList, and if it is found removed. In order to do this I have used the remove function, the syntax being:
I am currently binding a Nullable bit column to a listview control. When you declare a list view item I need to handle the case when the null value is used instead of just true or false.
This works fine but I need to use this in several pages so I tried creating a utility class with a static HandleNullableBool. But using it in the asp page does not work. Is there a way to do this in another class instead of the ASPX page?
i followed this link [URL] and i get selected value from dropdownlist using jquery
i created 3 partial views .
i need depend's on dropdownvalue redirect to partial page , so how can i implement in jquery with conditions?? or how can i implement in this function Public Function FetchData(ByVal dropdownValue As String) As ActionResult??
I'm trying to use a Generic list for my class but I'm getting this error "Conversion from type 'EnumerableQuery(Of VB$AnonymousType_105(Of String))' to type 'String' is not valid."
I wish to change the attribute foo to something else, and the attribute bar to something else. How can I easily do this? My current version (below) stack overflows with large documents, and has an awful smell to it.
string dd=LoadedXDocument.ToString(); foreach (var s in AttributeReplacements) dd = dd.Replace(s.Old+"=", s.New+"=");
I have written an insert stored procedure which is called by my business logic layer, I want to return the new ID to the function once it has executed but i'm not sure how.
My SP uses RETURN SCOPE and when I have tested this it works but how I get that into a variable in the BLL function I don't know.
Without giving away specifics: basically, I have a bunch of users adding content to my site. What happens now is ajax sends the text to a web service which does its thing, sends the info to the DB, Sends the user an e-mail, and then returns a response to the browser to do something.
What I would like to do is change that order. I want to return a response to the browser so the user is not waiting on the e-mail to send before they get their response. Basically, I'm trying to gain every milisecond I can to quicken the response, and there's no reason for the user to wait for the server to send their e-mail before it tells them that everything worked ok. If the info went to the DB, that's all the user needs to know, they'll know the e-mail sent when it shows up in their inbox. I notice this is an issue on my local machine which has no SMTP server and can actually hang the page response up for a few extra seconds because it's throwing errors trying to send something with no SMTP server.
So, I know in my function when I say
[Code]....
it WORKS, but I want to send the e-mail after the return. Is there ANY way to get this to happen?
I am looking for a c# function to return a portion of the html. Say I have pages that render html of about 60 k in length, I want to email to users showing only the first 2k and add a link to the original page.
Sure there is a Substring function with String, but it will give me a lot of unclosed html tags.