Ignore ThreadAbortException When Logging Exceptions?
Jul 19, 2010What's the correct way of ignoring ThreadAbortException when logging exceptions?
Is it safe to just catch it in an empty catch block to make it disappear?
What's the correct way of ignoring ThreadAbortException when logging exceptions?
Is it safe to just catch it in an empty catch block to make it disappear?
I am getting this error:
Server Application Unavailable The web application you are attempting to access on this web server is currently unavailable. hit the "Refresh" button in your web browser to retry your request.
Administrator Note: An error message detailing the cause of this specific request failure can be found in the application event log of the web server. review this log entry to discover what caused this error to occur.
However there is no error in the application event logs. So I am wondering if there's a specific setting in IIS or for the virtual site that enables logging?
Changing the customerror setting in the web.config seems to have no effect. I don't think it's even getting that far. IIS 6, Windows Server 2003
I'm debugging some unexpected behavior and while tracing in to the .NET framework I see a bunch of stuff like this:
if (Logging.On) {
Logging.PrintInfo(Logging.Web, this, SR.GetString(SR.net_log_n_certs_after_filtering, filteredCerts.Count));
...
}
But (as expected by default) the execution steps right over these. Is there some way to turn on the logging? Or is that just something that the framework developers can do while making special builds of the framework?
I'm building the standard 3-tier ASP.NET web application but I'm struggling as to where to do certain things - specifically handling exceptions.
I've tried to have a look around on the web for some examples but can't find any which go as far as a whole project showing how everything links together.
In my data-tier I'm connecting to SQL Server and doing some stuff. I know I need to catch exceptions that could be raised as a result but I'm not sure where to do it.
From what I've read I should be doing it in the UI tier but in that case I'm not sure how to ensure that the connection to the database is closed. Is anyone able to clarify how to do this? Also if anyone knows as to where I could find an example 3-tier web application that follows best practices that would be great too.
We have a asp.net application and want to implement logging. The first idea was to use the Application_Error method in the global.asax file.
The problem is that ASP.NET very often seem to throw exceptions internally that are not caused by the application and which seem not to interfer with the users normal workflow. For example we often get HTTPExceptions, UnauthorizedAccessExceptions and others caught in this method, although there is no real error in the application.
I'm using MS Enterprise Logging Application Block in an ASP.NET website.
For production launch, I will set up a log listener in one of these locations:
Sql Server database
Windows event log
Text files
Which has the least impact on performance?
NB - I can't switch to Log4Net or ELMAH at this point, so don't suggest that in your response.
Hi,
I need some explanations regarding the above exception.
I understood that if you place a response.redirect inside a try catch block, u will get the exception and the aspnet will handle the exception silently without the user knowing. But the thing is that right now i am having a hard time thinking of a reason
why the error will occur after some changes has been made and the codes with the response.redirect has not been touched.
Regards,
Poh Wei Xiang
I spent a day trying to make Ent Lib Logging work and log anything into database or event log. I have a web application and console application with the same Ent Lib config but only the console application is capable to log into the Event Log. I tried everything with permissions but I don't know what exactly I am doing — which services should have what. It does not work!
I read articles like this[URL] and I want to try to give the ASPNET account those permissions. I am using Windows 7 and I cannot find ASPNET user account. So where is it?
This is the config file which is automatically generated from Ent Lib utility and it works only on App.config, not on web.config:
[code]....
I have a web app that makes a call to a webservice, and it is causing a ThreadAbortException. Why is this? This does not happen when calling the webservice in a windows form application.
View 1 RepliesI know all about this exception, read the msdn article here [URL] but I do not know how to handle this when my boss does not want me to throw in false for the Response.End.
Here's what I have:
else
{
try
{
VoidlOrder(transactionID);
}
[Code]....
I m getting the error System.Threading.ThreadAbortException while exporting datatable to CSV. But export to CSV is completed sucessfully.Here is my Code:
Dim dt As DataTable
Dim sb As New StringBuilder
dt = objsqlds.Tables(0)
[code]...
Referencing my Earlier Question, regarding downloading a file from a server and handling exceptions properly. I am positive that I had this solved, then in classic programming fashion, returned days later to frustratingly find it broken
Updated code:
private static void GoGetIt(HttpContext context)
{
var directoryInfoOfWhereTheDirectoryFullOfFilesShouldBe = new FileInfo(......); [code]....
This was working fine, and returning the zip, otherwise if the file didn't exist returning 404. Then on the client side I could handle this:
public bool Download()
{
try
{
using (var client = new WebClient()) [code]....
But the problem now is two things.
1) I get System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted in the server side try-catch block. Usually this was just a file not found exception. I have no idea what or why that new exception is throwing?
2) Now that a different exception is throwing on the server side instead of the file not found, it would seem I can't use this set up for the application, because back on client side, any exception is assumed to be filenotfound.]
I think my subject line explains my problem in a nutshell.. I have a login page, I login like I should and everything works.I logout and when I type/paste the address to the page, in the address field, I still reach it just like if I was still logged in..The page I type in the address field is in a subfolder, only suppose to be able to be reached by logged in users and in this folder,ith it's own web.config-file:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<configuration>
<system.web>
[code]...
Say I have a DisplayTemplate called String.ascx and all string properties get rendered using this style, even if I don't have a UIHint attribute on the model class.
Now, I want a way to say..
'for this particular string property, don't use the template and render normally'.
I don't want to create another template with a default rendering.
So is there any [UIHint(Ignore)] or some such way?
I am tring to ignore the textbox error message that textbox mode is multiline .
Here code that ignore normal textbox
$('#aspnetForm input[type=text]').addClass('ignore');
what the code for textbox mode is multiline ?
I am currently using Server.CreateObject("MSXML2.ServerXMLHTTP.3.0") to get information via XML. The App was built connecting from Point A to Point B, with A & B being 2 servers in different locations. Through a cloud, we setup both locations on the same server with different hostheaders... Since this happened, we are getting an "invalid cert." error when we try and make the XML connection. I changed to code to invoke SXH_OPTION_IGNORE_SERVER_SSL_CERT_ERROR_FLAGS, but it was recently brought to my attention that this could in fact be invalidating the SSL, and the connection is no longer secure. Does anyone know if thats the case?
If so, is there typically a problem with 1 server establishing an SSL connection between itself? The certificate has remained the same (a wildcard cert. enabling *.mysite.com) just the physical location of the servers is what moved (And technically the version of IIS was upped to 7).
If i have 3 asp.net checkboxes in my asp.net webform namely : CheckBox1, Checkbox2, Checkbox3 and a textbox namely textbox1
If Checkbox1.text ="1"
Checkbox2.text ="2"
Checkbox3.text ="3"
I WANT :
if checkbox1 is already checked ... if checkbox is remain checked and even after i check checkbox2 and checkbox3 then the output in textbox would be 2,3 ..... by ignoring already checked checkbox text ...
LOGIC I WANT : Ignore already check checkboxes and insert recent checkbox text to textbox1 as comma seperated string ...
Is there any way to completely ignore line break and tab characters etc. in RegEx?
For instance, the line break and tab characters could be found anywhere and in any order in the content string.
[code].....
Ignore RequiredFieldValidator for professional?
View 2 RepliesI built an assembly, and that assembly refereces a DLL in my bin folder (lets call it Bob.dll). so multiple users may have different versions of Bob.dll...but by and large they all function the same.
However when my assembly gets dumped into the bin folder, it wants the version it was compiled against.
Is there a way to compile a reference such that it'll just be happy with ANY version?
I know it can be done with assembly binding in the webconfig, but I dont want users to have to do that.
I've got a ajax page with 2 panels on it. On Panel1 there is a next button. On that panel there is a pref. button and a next button. But if i put the pref. button he should do an action, but thats not possible because there are requestedfieldvalidators on that page. So i need to fill the page first, and then i can go back.
But on the next i want the validators. How can i make this possible?
I am working on my CMS project based on ASP.Net MVC2, I have implemented my VirtualPathProvider and VirtualFile for my master page, to use a master page in db.
It works as below:
I indicate the MasterPageFile in the aspx/ascx file.
<%@ Page MasterPageFile="/Content.master"
Then override VirtualPathProvider.GetFile to load the master page from db, "/Content.master" is the key to search in the db.
Everything works fine for me, except
IF I click "Build Web Site" in the context menu in VS2010, I will get an error says "The file '/Content.master' does not exist."
My master page is stored in db and this error is normal, Is there a way that VS2010 can ignore this error?
I am looking into the BuildManager relative code, seems complicated.
I am trying to populate an asp:Menu control using an XML file. I want the menu node's to display horizontally across the control in a static view, and have the SubMenu nodes expand dynamically from them.
The problem is I don't want the Top node to show up at all. Right now my menu has the Top node show and everything else expands dynamically from that. How do I tell it to ignore the Top node for my menu?
[Code]....
I've tried the following two methods to try and ignore my "Assets" folder, but I keep coming up with errors. Can anyone tell me exactly how the Ignore Regex is supposed to look?
routes.IgnoreRoute("/Assets/")
routes.IgnoreRoute("{*assets}", New With {.assets = "/Assets/(.*)"})
I am currently working on a CMS application that has multiple web user controls. If a user select a Master Page then Script Manager will be already available with them but if they select simple page the web user control's ScriptManager should be used. When I place ScriptManager inside Web user control it create conflict when used with master page. Can we do something to ignore usercontrol's script manager if scriptmanager already exist on the page. I hope I have explained my point clearly.
View 6 Replies