MVC :: URL Routing Compatibility With Different Versions Of IIS?
Nov 7, 2010
I have an asp.net mvc2 project that will be deployed on several servers. Some may run on IIS6, IIS7 (Classic), or IIS7 (Integrated).read this article on how to deploy to these servers, but I was wondering if my routing can be set up in such a way that it can handle any version of IIS. That way, I only need to use the same routing in my global.asax. This is my routing right now.
[Code]....
I decided to use the option of handling the aspx extension so I don't need to do anything anymore to the IIS settings. Unfortunately, I can't test it right now because my IIS isn't functioning right (dunno why). So, I'd really appreciate some help on this one.
View 5 Replies
Similar Messages:
Jul 20, 2010
I tried everything I could find, but still does not work on IIS routing.
View 2 Replies
Dec 12, 2010
I am using:
ASP.NET 3.5 SP1 with Web Forms Routing thru Global.asax (System.Web.Routing and RegisterRoutes)IIS 7
Everything is working fine in my local machine, but it gives the following error in my hosting environment:
Could not load file or assembly 'System.Web.Routing, Version=3.5.0.0, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified.
I did everything inside my web.config file mentioned in the following link:
[URL]
But I am still getting the above error.
What else am I supposed to do fix the error?
View 1 Replies
Jun 6, 2010
vss version 6.0.81.69 is not working with vs 2008? is there any solution to make them compatible.
View 1 Replies
Dec 4, 2010
I'm developing one web app and for that i need to use UNICODE connect in asp.net,my requirement is end user can enter text in any Indian language like Marathi,Hindi,Gujarati etc.for e.g like "orkut" has an option that user can write text in Hindi .How can i do this in asp.net.
View 3 Replies
Feb 22, 2011
I have a Web application where i have added a reference to a RESTful WCF. I got the WCF url Routing to work in my webapplication by adding Inherits="RestService.Global" to the Web applications Global.asax.
<%@ Application Codebehind="Global.asax.cs" Inherits="RestService.Global" Language="C#" %>
But then i tried to create url Routing for the Web application and it does not work with the Inherits="RestService.Global" in the Global.asax. If i take it away it works fine. Is there a correct way to do this.
View 1 Replies
Jan 31, 2011
I'm trying to create my own CMS and I've gotten a little bit stuck at the stage of URL routing.
I want clean URLs without extensions and I'd like to be able to create and modify them in a web based interface without any messing around with IIS or actual files.
I've seen how to create a static route, but for that I need to go into my Global.asax file and manually add it.I would like to have all of these routes stored in a database so that I can easily modify them later.
Does anyone know how this can be achieved?
Just for extra information, I will be attempting to create a feature so that if a path exists, but is later changed, a 301 redirect is created to the new URL, is this also possible? (My first problem is the main issue, but thought I might ask this as well just in case it makes a difference)
View 2 Replies
Sep 2, 2010
How to handle asp.net mvc routing along with asp.net webform routing. I have merged my mvc app into my existing web application. In my web application i have implement routing as below:
routes.Add("View Product Details", new Route("Product/{City}/{Manufacturer}/{Name}/{ProductID}/{*ProductType}"));
Similarly i have implemented routing in mvc as below
routes.MapRoute("Product Details",
"Product/{City}/{Manufacturer}/{Name}/{ProductID}/{ProductType}",
new
{
controller = "Home",
action = "ProductDetails",
City= UrlParameter.Optional,
Manufacturer= UrlParameter.Optional,
Name= UrlParameter.Optional,
ProductID= UrlParameter.Optional,
ProductType= UrlParameter.Optional
});
How to handle both pages, as one is custom web form while other is asp.net mvc view?
View 1 Replies
Mar 2, 2010
I develop a project for a web site that be use framework 1 1. Number must be either non-negative or -1. Parameter name: millisecondsTimeout
[Code]....
2. Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
View 1 Replies
Mar 16, 2010
in my application i got this error.i got it when i do postback in iframe in this pagewhat can be the reason for this error. and how can i slove this problemanother important point.this error not append all times.this error append in the first proccess , but the other run ok with no errors!
View 1 Replies
Sep 14, 2010
is there a way that i can add tag in my .aspx page to Enable Compatibility View for Web sites by using Internet Explorer 8 ? without using click on "compatibility" icon on the browser?
View 2 Replies
Nov 29, 2010
From; ASP.NET Ignores IE7 Compatibility Mode Tag in Web.config
<system.web>
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<clear />
<add name="X-UA-Compatible" value="IE=EmulateIE7" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
</system.web>
Related to the answer Chris Shouts added;
When I attempt to add the <httpProtocols> sections into the <system.web> I get
Parser Error Message: Unrecognized configuration section system.web/httpProtocol.
I ideally need to be able to add customHeaders through the IIS6 web.config (I however am assuming this won't work)
View 2 Replies
Jan 18, 2011
I have created an intranet site that has a reorder list.IE8 defaults to running intranet sites in compatibility mode. My reorderlist does not like this. Basically the drag/drop function goes away.
Now, i have tried adding the <meta
http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8" /> but it does not fix it. It fixes most of my issues, but not the drag/drop.If i tell the browser to NOT use compatibility mode, everything seems to work as intended, but there is no way i can force all the users to disable it.
View 2 Replies
Mar 21, 2011
when I launched my site within Internet Explorer 9 I began receiving script error messages. I read the support for Internet Explorer and found out that because some sites are designed for older browsers there'll be compatibility issues until the sites are updated for Internet Explorer 9.
I found that I could add this code :
void Application_BeginRequest()
{
Response.AppendHeader("X-UA-Compatible", "IE=EmulateIE8");
}
to the Global.asax file to deal with the issue. The errors I received were from IE9.
EDIT: The errors were fixed but I want to know if there is an alternative method to making a website compatible with IE9? Also what are the differences between the way IE8 interprets Javascript code and IE9?
View 1 Replies
Oct 29, 2010
method to check my site in developing against the 3 major browsers: IE, FF & Chrome.
I don't want to install all 3 of them, so I was wondering if there any way to emulate the environment of the browser?
View 2 Replies
Mar 8, 2010
We have a problem that in IE8 some of table rows (made by Reporting Services) are cut if compatibility mode of a browser is set to on (exactly a page is cut on bottom and left side and it is not visible). So we have to explain at every customer to disable compatibility mode. Does exist any way to display report page correctly even if a compatibility mode is on? Is this a bug?
View 1 Replies
Oct 26, 2010
To begin with I work on the large application, that has a WinForms client and server. Server in our case is the set of WCF services. There is one service that is responsible for authentication of users. The logic of authentication is custom and complex and authentication service uses different membership providers.
We want to protect the access to server services for non-authenticated users. The users must firstly authenticate and than use other services (users in this case are the other systems, services, WinForms client, etc.). On this basis, we decided to use the ASP.NET Url/File Authorization feature.
So, I set on the ASP.NET compatibility mode, allowed cookie in all binding configurations, added AspNetCompatibilityRequirements attribute to our services and added the followingconfigurations to config:
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms cookieless="UseCookies">
<credentials passwordFormat="Clear" />
</forms>
</authentication>
<authorization>
<deny users="?" />
</authorization>
...
<location path="AuthenticationService.svc">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
In the authenticate method of our authentication service I add the following code:
public AuthenticationResult AuthenticateUser(string username, string password)
{
AuthenticationResult result = new AuthenticationResult();
result = Authenticate(username, password);
if (result.IsAuthenticated)
FormsAuthentication.SetAuthCookie(username, true);
return result;
}
Next, I wrote the following code:
var authClient = new AuthenticationServiceClient();
var result = authClient.AuthenticateUser("user", "password");
var otherClient = new OtherServiceClient();
var temp = otherClient.DoSomething();
But after authentication I can't access to OtherServiceClient...
So, how can I share the call context between the WCF services calls? Could anybody provide some useful articles about this question?
View 1 Replies
Dec 15, 2010
I have a table with 3 rows, each with an ASP.NET panel with a gridview in it. For some reason, this is causing IE8 to go into compatibility view mode. If I change the table to 3 seperate divs, this works but if I use divs some functionality (i.e. max height) doesn't work as it does on tables. I've also tried 3 seperate tables but to no avail.
View 2 Replies
Mar 27, 2010
I ceareted website asp.net .in internet explorer 8 works fine , but it does not work well firefox . I'm using ajax toolkithow to compatibility the asp.net page work with all browser types e.g (firefox,opare,.... etc)
View 2 Replies
Sep 20, 2010
I maintain a web application that is painful to upgrade. It's not painful because the code is bad, but because there are a lot of devices connected to this application via the web and getting them to update their clients is a lot like moving concrete.
So I had an idea that I could simply present a different version of the application to different customers. The session stores the client information. So what I'd ultimately like to do is peak at that session and then use that to present the "correct" version of my app to them.
Physically the apps are stored in a manner like such:
C:Program FilesCompanyProgramVersionWebWebApp
So you can see that I could have multiple versions installed at once. Basically if customer A goes to the site they get presented with C:Program FilesCompanyProgram1.0.0.0WebWebAppfoo.aspx And if customer B visits the site, they get to see C:Program FilesCompanyProgram2.0.0.0WebWebAppfoo.aspx.
I initially thought of using the IIS rewrite module, but I really don't want to redirect them. I want this to be seamless. how this can be implemented?
update:
After further research, I thought it would be clever to use the Global.asax.cs to accomplish my goal. So in the Application_BeginRequest event handler, I wrote the following:
[code]...
By the way, /art/ is a virtual directory that I grafted into this directory via IIS. This would be similar to how I would set it up in production. Anyway, I get the following error when I try this.
The virtual path '/art/test.html' maps to another application, which is not allowed.
So how do I do this then? Is there an "allowed" strategy for accomplishing this? Doing it through the Global.asax.cs would be ideal since I could use the HTTP Context to "know" which customer is connecting to the app.
View 1 Replies
Jul 5, 2010
My new assignment at work is to create a second version of our existing web application. Currently, our application supports only full time brokers, but now we our launching a second site specifically for part time brokers.
The new site will be almost identical to our existing site with the following exceptions:
It will have it's own branding. A couple of the user controls used for displaying information will be different (but none of the pages will be different). Our existing users should not have access to the new site and vice versa. It needs to be easy to test both versions of the website from within Visual Studio easily. We want to reuse as much our existing code as possible. I have 2 weeks to do this. I'm hoping that this is a common scenario and someone out there has some advice for how to accomplish this.
View 4 Replies
Dec 19, 2010
i'm programming an application where an action is done if i access with a version equal or higher than other and another action if i access with a lower version; but the problem is that the lines to indicate the versions doesn´t work. The code is the following:
[Code]....
As you can see, an action should be done if the version is the 9.0 or higher and other if it is lower, but these lines doesn't work and only works the detection of the web browsers (no the versions of them, action that doesn't works).
View 2 Replies
Jan 30, 2011
I recently set up a new development machine for myself back in November, and naively downloaded the then-current versions of VWD Express (2010) and SQL Server Express (2008 R2). Bummer to find out that they are not compatible. VWDE 2010 won't deal with a database version beyond 655, while SQL Server 2008 R2 is 661. It's puzzling that Microsoft shows the following in its Express website [URL]Powerful Set of Free ToolsMicrosoft® Visual Web Developer® 2010 Express provides you with everything you need to start building standards-friendly Web applications.SQL Server® 2008 R2 Express Edition is a lightweight, feature-rich, powerful database for your Web data-enabled needs.
Has the issue already been fixed (i.e. if I reinstall VWD 2010 Express today, will it now handle version 661 databases? Or will the issue be fixed at some point in the future? Or is it necessary (and even possible) to remove R2 and install plain SQL Server 2008 to get databases that VWDE 2010 will work with?
View 1 Replies
Apr 20, 2010
Does the released ASP.NET AJAX 4.0 include client side data binding including sorting, paging, etc. ? Also, can ASP.NET AJAX 4.0 installed on top of IIS 5 and .NET framework 3.5 SP1 ?
View 3 Replies
Jan 7, 2011
We have a web-service written in .net v2 which has two simple methods, Request and RequestTyped. The first of these items return a structured XML document which may include error information. The second of these methods returns and object which contain the node information of the first, but in a typed format? This service has several hundred clients and has been operational for some time.
I was wondering what the implications would be to adding an additional node to the response of both methods. Obviously the object returned by the second of these two methods will also now include this data as an additional property. What are the implications for our clients?
1)Will the additional node returned by the first method be ignored by those consuming the services that have not refreshed their WSDL?
2)Will the additional property returned by the object in the typed method break existing models which have not refreshed the WSDL?
View 1 Replies
