in my application i got this error.i got it when i do postback in iframe in this pagewhat can be the reason for this error. and how can i slove this problemanother important point.this error not append all times.this error append in the first proccess , but the other run ok with no errors!
View 1 RepliesI am building a website that isnt displaying properly accros browsers. It displays fine in FireFox and IE but does not display correctly in IE compatibility view or Safari. The problem is that I have a background header image that is different on the left and right so I cant do a repeat and center the content div. I was able to acheif the effect by building a table with three columns. But on safari, the backround of the outside columns does not show because there is no content in those columns. In IE compatibiliy mode, the columns disappear and the center column is shifted to the left. Anyone have any ideas? HEre is my code.
<body>
<form id="form1" runat="server">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 100%">
<tr>
<td style="background-image: url(Images/MasterPage/BKGbodyLeft.png); background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: left top">
</td>
<td style="width: 1020px">
<div>
<div id="Header">
</div>
<div id="Content" style="padding-top: 20px; height: 630px">
<asp:ContentPlaceHolder ID="ContentPlaceHolder1" runat="server">
</asp:ContentPlaceHolder>
</div>
<div id="Footer">
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td style="background-image: url(Images/MasterPage/BKGbodyRight.png); background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: left top">
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</form>
</body>
i have master page that when i run this with ie(in compatibility view) page correct load and my menu bgground repeate as true!
but when compatibility view is disable page dont show in correct and menu section bgground not repeate and a part of page show empty page bgground(bgground for this section can't show)!!!
how i can set in code behind a command for compatibility view for all time active?
and in firefox or google Chrome howto?(in these browser page show like ie normal mode)
is there a way that i can add tag in my .aspx page to Enable Compatibility View for Web sites by using Internet Explorer 8 ? without using click on "compatibility" icon on the browser?
View 2 RepliesI have a table with 3 rows, each with an ASP.NET panel with a gridview in it. For some reason, this is causing IE8 to go into compatibility view mode. If I change the table to 3 seperate divs, this works but if I use divs some functionality (i.e. max height) doesn't work as it does on tables. I've also tried 3 seperate tables but to no avail.
View 2 Repliesvss version 6.0.81.69 is not working with vs 2008? is there any solution to make them compatible.
View 1 RepliesI'm developing one web app and for that i need to use UNICODE connect in asp.net,my requirement is end user can enter text in any Indian language like Marathi,Hindi,Gujarati etc.for e.g like "orkut" has an option that user can write text in Hindi .How can i do this in asp.net.
View 3 RepliesI develop a project for a web site that be use framework 1 1. Number must be either non-negative or -1. Parameter name: millisecondsTimeout
[Code]....
2. Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
I have an asp.net mvc2 project that will be deployed on several servers. Some may run on IIS6, IIS7 (Classic), or IIS7 (Integrated).read this article on how to deploy to these servers, but I was wondering if my routing can be set up in such a way that it can handle any version of IIS. That way, I only need to use the same routing in my global.asax. This is my routing right now.
[Code]....
I decided to use the option of handling the aspx extension so I don't need to do anything anymore to the IIS settings. Unfortunately, I can't test it right now because my IIS isn't functioning right (dunno why). So, I'd really appreciate some help on this one.
From; ASP.NET Ignores IE7 Compatibility Mode Tag in Web.config
<system.web>
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<clear />
<add name="X-UA-Compatible" value="IE=EmulateIE7" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
</system.web>
Related to the answer Chris Shouts added;
When I attempt to add the <httpProtocols> sections into the <system.web> I get
Parser Error Message: Unrecognized configuration section system.web/httpProtocol.
I ideally need to be able to add customHeaders through the IIS6 web.config (I however am assuming this won't work)
I have created an intranet site that has a reorder list.IE8 defaults to running intranet sites in compatibility mode. My reorderlist does not like this. Basically the drag/drop function goes away.
Now, i have tried adding the <meta
http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=8" /> but it does not fix it. It fixes most of my issues, but not the drag/drop.If i tell the browser to NOT use compatibility mode, everything seems to work as intended, but there is no way i can force all the users to disable it.
when I launched my site within Internet Explorer 9 I began receiving script error messages. I read the support for Internet Explorer and found out that because some sites are designed for older browsers there'll be compatibility issues until the sites are updated for Internet Explorer 9.
I found that I could add this code :
void Application_BeginRequest()
{
Response.AppendHeader("X-UA-Compatible", "IE=EmulateIE8");
}
to the Global.asax file to deal with the issue. The errors I received were from IE9.
EDIT: The errors were fixed but I want to know if there is an alternative method to making a website compatible with IE9? Also what are the differences between the way IE8 interprets Javascript code and IE9?
method to check my site in developing against the 3 major browsers: IE, FF & Chrome.
I don't want to install all 3 of them, so I was wondering if there any way to emulate the environment of the browser?
We have a problem that in IE8 some of table rows (made by Reporting Services) are cut if compatibility mode of a browser is set to on (exactly a page is cut on bottom and left side and it is not visible). So we have to explain at every customer to disable compatibility mode. Does exist any way to display report page correctly even if a compatibility mode is on? Is this a bug?
View 1 RepliesTo begin with I work on the large application, that has a WinForms client and server. Server in our case is the set of WCF services. There is one service that is responsible for authentication of users. The logic of authentication is custom and complex and authentication service uses different membership providers.
We want to protect the access to server services for non-authenticated users. The users must firstly authenticate and than use other services (users in this case are the other systems, services, WinForms client, etc.). On this basis, we decided to use the ASP.NET Url/File Authorization feature.
So, I set on the ASP.NET compatibility mode, allowed cookie in all binding configurations, added AspNetCompatibilityRequirements attribute to our services and added the followingconfigurations to config:
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms cookieless="UseCookies">
<credentials passwordFormat="Clear" />
</forms>
</authentication>
<authorization>
<deny users="?" />
</authorization>
...
<location path="AuthenticationService.svc">
<system.web>
<authorization>
<allow users="*" />
</authorization>
</system.web>
</location>
In the authenticate method of our authentication service I add the following code:
public AuthenticationResult AuthenticateUser(string username, string password)
{
AuthenticationResult result = new AuthenticationResult();
result = Authenticate(username, password);
if (result.IsAuthenticated)
FormsAuthentication.SetAuthCookie(username, true);
return result;
}
Next, I wrote the following code:
var authClient = new AuthenticationServiceClient();
var result = authClient.AuthenticateUser("user", "password");
var otherClient = new OtherServiceClient();
var temp = otherClient.DoSomething();
But after authentication I can't access to OtherServiceClient...
So, how can I share the call context between the WCF services calls? Could anybody provide some useful articles about this question?
I ceareted website asp.net .in internet explorer 8 works fine , but it does not work well firefox . I'm using ajax toolkithow to compatibility the asp.net page work with all browser types e.g (firefox,opare,.... etc)
View 2 RepliesI recently set up a new development machine for myself back in November, and naively downloaded the then-current versions of VWD Express (2010) and SQL Server Express (2008 R2). Bummer to find out that they are not compatible. VWDE 2010 won't deal with a database version beyond 655, while SQL Server 2008 R2 is 661. It's puzzling that Microsoft shows the following in its Express website [URL]Powerful Set of Free ToolsMicrosoft® Visual Web Developer® 2010 Express provides you with everything you need to start building standards-friendly Web applications.SQL Server® 2008 R2 Express Edition is a lightweight, feature-rich, powerful database for your Web data-enabled needs.
Has the issue already been fixed (i.e. if I reinstall VWD 2010 Express today, will it now handle version 661 databases? Or will the issue be fixed at some point in the future? Or is it necessary (and even possible) to remove R2 and install plain SQL Server 2008 to get databases that VWDE 2010 will work with?
Does the released ASP.NET AJAX 4.0 include client side data binding including sorting, paging, etc. ? Also, can ASP.NET AJAX 4.0 installed on top of IIS 5 and .NET framework 3.5 SP1 ?
View 3 RepliesWe have a web-service written in .net v2 which has two simple methods, Request and RequestTyped. The first of these items return a structured XML document which may include error information. The second of these methods returns and object which contain the node information of the first, but in a typed format? This service has several hundred clients and has been operational for some time.
I was wondering what the implications would be to adding an additional node to the response of both methods. Obviously the object returned by the second of these two methods will also now include this data as an additional property. What are the implications for our clients?
1)Will the additional node returned by the first method be ignored by those consuming the services that have not refreshed their WSDL?
2)Will the additional property returned by the object in the typed method break existing models which have not refreshed the WSDL?
I'm using ASP.NET to have a panel that can expand downwards to a certain point, at which point the user can scroll within the panel, both vertically and horizontally (horizontally because one GridView has a lot of columns which would be impossible to display without horizontal scrollbars in the panel/div)Problem is, if I set the panel (asp:Panel control) that holds the GridView to have Scrollbars="Both", and have a max-height set on the panel, IE8 refreshes into compatibility mode. If I remove the max height, or have only vertical scrollbars, it works fine. Any workarounds for this?
View 1 RepliesWe have following ASP.Net 2.0 HyperLink Control:
asp:HyperLink ID="FolderLink" runat="server" CssClass="cursor" Enabled="false"
ImageUrl="/_layouts/1033/images/selectlink.gif" ToolTip="Folder Links">
On server side, following script is attached:
FolderLink.Attributes.Add("onclick", "javascript:setURL('Control');");
Issue is that HyperLink Control is disbale in IE 8 but not in IE compatibility mode.
Would adding "X-UA-Compatible: IE=EmulateIE7" as an http header to trigger IE9 to render in compatibility mode negatively affect performance on the server? I made the change today, adding it, but now some areas of our site are behaving sluggishly, though we did have a large number of changes come in overnight. I know that we can't single out this as the problem, but my boss seems to think it is.
View 3 RepliesI am looking at developing using Visual Studio 2010/2008 and SQL Server 2008 on Windows 7. Should I be able to do this on Windows 7 Professional, or do you need Windows 7 Ultimate?
View 2 RepliesCan I use the latest AJAX Control Toolkit on a .net 2.0 project which will be deployed to a server with framework 2.0 only? If not, where can I download the latest AJAX Control Toolkit for framework 2.0?
View 4 RepliesI'm trying to execute a schema file on a SQL Server machine. I currently have both SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008 installed. When I try to execute the .sql file (meant to execute on the 2008 version) I get the following error.
Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Common.ConnectionFailureException:
Failed to connect to server . --->
Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Common.ConnectionFailureException: This SQL Server
version (10.0) is not supported
Is there a way to specify which version the Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.dll looks at when you execute the program or some other workaround other than uninstalling the 2005 version?
[Code].....