, i created a html helper in mvc3 project with razor view
[Code]....
and i am using this in view but error is occuring.
but it works in aspx view engine and mvc2.
I'm trying to have all my views inherit from a custom class so that I can add certain behaviour and values to all pages, but I'm having some issues. I tried subclassing System.Web.Mvc.WebViewPage but I'm forced to implement an Execute procedure that I don't know what it should do. Also, if I try to access the Context variable, I get a null reference (really weird). This leads me to think that I may have the wrong base class.
View 1 RepliesI have a custom Html Helper that takes a few parameters and generates some Html. For example:
[Code]....
This would render something like:
[Code]....
I would like to be able to define a Razor Template so the Html Helper renders the Html differenlty:
[Code]....
This would render:
[Code]....
Would like to add a third party test framework (such as NUnit or MbUnit) to the drop-down list of test projects for the ASP.NET MVC3 type project in Visual Studio 2010.
This had worked before for ASP.NET MVC2 and prior, but the msdn instructions are not accurate and does not work. Creating the registry keys in the HKEY_CURRENT_USER seem to delete the keys every time the VS-2010 starts, the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE does not follow the same tree structure.
how to add a third party framework under ASP.NET MVC3?
With Razor, how do you conditionally quit or end or return or break a partial view?
@if (Model == null)
{
return;
}
I currently trying to convert a ASP.NET MVC2 application to ASP.NET MVC3 razor. I have a lot custom Html helper methods, which render html output, like the one below, which renders a button with some markup :
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("<input type='submit' id='") .Append(buttonId) .Append("' name='" ) .Append(buttonId) .Append("' value='") .Append(buttonValue) .AppendLine("' class='myclass1 myclass2' />");return MvcHtmlString.Create(sb.ToString());
How convert a project created in asp.net MVC to Asp.Net MVC Razor?
View 2 RepliesI have an application which has been built in MVC 2.0. I need to upgrade it to MVC 3.0 and that too by using Razor CSHTML engine. All the information which I got on the net was for MVC 3.0 Webform engine but nothing much for migrating to Razor.
View 37 Replieshow do I change the view engine from aspx to razor in an existing project? If I just change the file extension to cshtml I always get "The controller for path '/path/About' was not found or does ..."
View 2 RepliesI have retrieved an array of data that I want to display in my view in checkbox format.
[Code]....
HtmlHelperExtensions in MVC2 return a HTML string, unencoded.
In MVC3 this string is encoded! How can I return unencoded HTML to a Razor view in MVC3?
I have this C# code in a Razor view:
@(Html.CheckBoxFor<RazorSamplesWeb.Models.SamplesModel>(i => i.IsActive))
I tried translating it to this:
@Code Html.CheckBoxFor(Of RazorSamplesWeb.Models.SamplesModel)(Function(i) i.IsActive)End Code
But it's complaining. Why, and what is the right statement?
I have an aspx web page that renders correctly. When converted to razor, it does not. Here is a simplified example (stripped of all extraneous stuff).
aspx:
<asp:Content ID="indexContent" ContentPlaceHolderID="ToolContent" runat="server">
<% string test = "<div><b>Tag Test</b></div>"; %>
<h2><%= test %></h2>
</asp:Content>
razor:
@section ToolContent {
@{ string test = "<div><b>Tag Test</b></div>"; }
<h2>@test</h2>
}
The aspx renders as expected. The razor just displays the content of "test" (<div><b>Tag Test</b></div>) in the header tag.
I assume that my understanding of razor is flawed. If someone could enlighten me and/or show me a solution/work around.
Why are Razor views not generated as partial classes? Making them partial classes gives us the option to have a code behind where we can do some of the stuff we're forced to do in the template itself in the code behind file.
Yes, I know the standard "go-to" thing is Html helper but I don't want to use Html helpers for these things as they are too specific to the view in question and besides, having a clutter of extension methods is just not the way to go.
I'd like to see Razor views generated as partial classes.
Following this tutorial: [URL]
Under "Sending a File Using Email" section what exactly is the code trying to do.
1: The SendFile.cshtml does not have any option to select file.
2: ProcessFile.cshtml is running fine. I am getting the email but no attachement.
I tried changing fileAttachment input to type="file" but not file is being sent to my email. I just get the message send in body.
Question: How exactly this file attachment works using Email Helper in WebPages.
I think I need to drop in some escape characters, but I'm not quite sure where. Here is the javascript function I'm attempting to call:
function setData(associateValue, reviewDateValue) {
var associate = document.getElementById("Associate");
var reviewDate = document.getElementById("ReviewDate");
associate.value = associateValue;
reviewDate.value = reviewDateValue;
}
Here is the asp .net mvc line where I'm attempting to create a Radio button with a click event that calls the above function and passes data from the model as javascript parameter values.
<%= Html.RadioButton("Selected", item.Selected, new { onClick="setData('<%=item.Associate%>','<%=item.ReviewDate%>' )" } )%>
The above throws a bunch of compile issues and doesn't work. A call such as the following does call the javascript, but doesn't get the data from the model.
<%= Html.RadioButton("Selected", item.Selected, new { onClick="setData('item.Associate','item.ReviewDate' )" } )%>
<%= Html.RadioButton("Selected", item.Selected, new { onClick="setData('item.Associate','item.ReviewDate' )" } )%>
<% String functionCall = String.Format("setData('{0}','{1}')", Html.Encode(item.Associate), Html.Encode(item.ReviewDate )) ; %>
<%= Html.RadioButton("Selected", item.Selected, new { onClick=functionCall } )%>
I have been using LINQ to SQL for quite a while (about two years). Every thing was fine until now. As usual, I created LINQ to SQL classes and built the project, then created an aspx page. However, I cannot see the DataClassesDataContext in the code behind file. It is not listed in the intellisense list.
View 5 Repliesonething is not clear to me that in asp.net 1.1 there was asp.net project type but from 2.0 there is no asp.net project type option rather
there is option called website. in website type project no solution is created and no link is created with IIS.
why microsoft design in this way from 2.0. i think there must be soldin reason & advantage behind it.
It's a little unclear for me on when to use a custom helper method and when to use RenderAction and also when to simply use ViewData instead. Some of their functions overlap slightly.
For example, if I were to create a Category navigation bar, would I create a new helper method and place that in some partial view? I had initially though of doing this, but I read on some blog to use RenderAction instead.
Assume the list of categories is coming from some data source.
<%= Html.RouteLink(">>>", new { page = (Model.PageIndex + 1) },null)%>
Is it possible to set image instead ">>>" and how?
I am working on 2 projects. One that is in MVC2 that is an existing application, and then I have the MVC3 application that I am trying to build. After hearing that I could get intellisense for my work in VS2010, I went to install the VS tools for MVC3. Now my old project will not work. I'm not trying to move my MVC2 project to MVC3 right now either.
I didn't actually change anything about the MVC2 project, but now I get this error whenever I try to open a page:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Parser Error
Description:
An error occurred during the parsing of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific parse error details and modify your source file appropriately.
Parser Error Message:
The type 'System.Web.Mvc.ViewMasterPage' is ambiguous: it could come from assembly 'C:WindowsassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Web.Mvc2.0.0.0__31bf3856ad364e35System.Web.Mvc.dll' or from assembly 'C:WindowsMicrosoft.NetassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Web.Mvcv4.0_3.0.0.0__31bf3856ad364e35System.Web.Mvc.dll'.
Please specify the assembly explicitly in the type name.
Source Error:
[Code]....
using Mschart on my MVC project,when i use the first index page of project to render for the partial view name index2 the code is
<% Html.RenderPartial("Index2"); %>
But when i run it the error is occur which the message is
CS0029: Cannot implicitly convert type 'ASP.views_home_index2_ascx' to 'System.Web.UI.Page'
-it said that the problem line of code is
: // Render chart control
Line 52: Chart2.Page = this;
[code]...
But when i put all of code in Index2.ascx to the index.aspx and not to render the partial view it work fine
Code of Index2.ascx is
<%
System.Web.UI.DataVisualization.Charting.Chart Chart2 = new System.Web.UI.DataVisualization.Charting.Chart();
Chart2.Width = 412;
Chart2.Height = 296;
[code]...
I have looked all over for elegant solutions to this not so age-old question. How can I lock down form elements within an ASP.Net MVC View, without adding if...then logic all over the place? Ideally the BaseController, either from OnAuthorization, or OnResultExecultion, would check the rendering form elements and hide/not render them based on role and scope. Another approach I have considered is writing some sort of custom attributes, so as to stay consistent with how how we lock down ActionResults with [Authorize]. Is this even possible without passing a list of hidden objects to the view and putting if's all over? Other background info: We will have a database that will tell us at execution time (based on user role/scope) what elements will be hidden. We are using MVC3 with Razor Viewengine. We're utilizing a BaseController where any of the Controller methods can be overridden.
View 1 RepliesI am trying to use a partial view for a file upload in a Create View.
Here is my partial view, I removed the submit button, as the view it is rendered in, should activat the form post:
@model dynamic
what is the best way to migrate MVC2 project to MVC 3.
View 4 Replies