I have 2 tables t1 and t2. In t1 I have 4 columns from that I want to insert only 2 columns to another table t2. I only want to send data which is in the form of IP address like (123.123.123.123). After eliminating nulls and other data.
View 7 RepliesI am using this code to fill my datalist:
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Dim myConnection As SqlConnection Dim myCommand As SqlDataAdapter
myConnection = New SqlConnection("mydb")
myCommand = New SqlDataAdapter("SELECT * FROM Posts", myConnection)
Dim ds As DataSet = New DataSet() myCommand.Fill(ds)
DataList1.DataSource = ds DataList1.DataBind()
End Sub
It works and fills the datalist with the whole table. When this page opens the address bar is like [URL].Ii would like the datalist to show all contents in the table with this specific thread ID.
I'm making an application with server sided variables that change every second. Every second those new variable need to be shown at all the clients that have the webpage open. Now most people told me to go with comet because I need to push/pull the data every second, now I've got a few questions: What would be a better solution looking at the fact that I need the new data EVERY SECOND, pulling from the client or pushing with the server?
Also the item ID's that are on the server side (with the variable's that ID got) can change and when the client refreshes the page he needs to get the oldest (and living) ID's. This would mean that my jquery/javascript on the client side must know which ID's he got on the page, what is best way to do this? Last thing is that I can't find a good (not to expensive) comet library/api for asp.net (C#). Anyone ever used a comet library with good results? We're looking at a site that should be able to have 2000 comet connections at every moment.
I have a table think as table1, with 3 columns
col1 col2 col3 -- Columns
Y N 1 -- Data
but i want
colname val
col1 Y
col2 N
col3 1
I have tow colums
nickname, and name, and I allready filled them with information, like this
nikname = gino
name = longinos
What I want now is both to have the same information
nikname = longinos
name = longinos
I thought of somethig like this
update
Customer set name
= nikname
where custID
= custID
but it does not work, and I can't think of something good
I am using dynamic data entities linq to sql project. For my test project I have one table, with 10 columns and a single primary key for example. Almost all the columns are varchars.I can get the basic project up and running fine - update, delete, insert etc.ince it has no foreign keys, there are no search filters rendered. I was wondering if there was an easy way to generate a set of filters for the columns for this table. So a First name and last name search box. Is there a way to generate these filters for chosen columns and is there a way to generate these for all the columns
for example, above each of the columns in the grid there might be a text box ( I am not too fussed where the text boxes are rendered as such). Each of the text boxes will act as a filter for that column (doing a SQL 'like')
How can i select all columns of table but to distinct by one column? i am tryin to figure it out without success, i know how to make distinct (select distinct column from table, but i need all the values from the table and to distinct by Delcompany.
my line is:
[Code]....
How can I search a word in all the columns of a table?
View 4 RepliesTable1
t1c1 t1c2 t1c3
1 1 jim
2 2 ruth
3 4 paul
4 8 sam
5 16 NA
Table2 ( Need this)
t2c1 t2c2 t2c3 t2c4 t2c5
10 1 1 jim 2010-02-03
10 2 1 ruth 2010-02-03
10 4 1 paul 2010-02-03
10 8 1 sam 2010-02-03
The tricky part I have to perform is to copy rows( only t1c2 -> t2c2, t1c3->t2c4 columns) untill I see NA(Not applicable string) in t1c3 to Table2 putting (10 in t2c1, 1 in t2c3, current date in t2c5 columns for all rows).
I have data for the payment system:
- Credit card number (Visa, Mastercard, etc ...)
- Paypal
- Moneybookers
- NETeller
- Etc ...
how to set the table and columns.
Current proposal:
Column AttributeName, in which I have text (credit card number, name on credit, email, etc ...)
Column Value, in which I have data about a particular attribute.
I wish that all data is stored in one table.I do not wish for any payment system, use the new table, as for example:
tbl_creditcardnumber, tbl_paypal, tbl_moneybookers, tbl_neteller ....
I have a package which imports several files on a regular bases . For the import I use a staging table. Now I want to split that stagingtable into two other (existing) tables with keeping the relation ( third table??) . In each record there is a dealerID which has to be injected also in the other two tables (the splittables).
How can I use a conditional split to extract the right columns to the right table? I only see that i can enter a expression for each column, but in fact i only want to split the table by "fingerpointing" the right columns. is that possible? And how should i put the relation between them in 'relation' table?
I am creating a temp table and populating it's two columns manually and the rest of the table from the data returned by the stored procedure. When I added the first column called custno as @CustNumber, it allowed me to add it fine and the rest of the columns were filled by the stored procedure as expected. I then needed to add another column called RepeatCustomer the same way but it keeps saying:
Msg 207, Level 16, State 1 Invalid column name 'Repeatcustomer' So eventhough I have added Repeatcustomer column it's not seeing it. Any one has seen this error before or know what's wrong with this code. Note when I parse the query it's fine, it only fails upon the execution.
[Code]....
I have two data tables and I need to compare the dataRows and insert all the unequals into a table. See the codes below. Goal: if the checkbox is true I loop through the ItemData table and store that data into x.Data. Next I look for all records that has row("ItemRandomize") = True and finally I add those records to xData table. There is an if statement in my for loop that checks for duplicate records -- This is were the application fails. How to compare both tables and store the unmatched rows.
[Code]....
I M New to Linq, I M Searching articles using
DBSearchDataContext db = new DBSearchDataContext();
object q = from b in db.Articles
where b.Tags.Contains(val) |
b.NewsTitle.Contains(val) |
b.EnglishContent.Contains(val)
select b;
I cannot exclude results where category = video or photos. H to exclude category where value is "videos" or "Photographs"
I'm creating a table in an asp.net code behind dynamically, and I want to have a footer row that only has 2 cells. The first should span all the columns in the table-1. Is there some way other then keeping track of the # of columns in the table manually for me to set the colspan to be # of all the columns in the table-1? Preferably a HTML or CSS solution?
View 2 RepliesI've the following code which successfully makes an average for all the columns from a table. What I need to do though is ignore certain columns in this equation.
Dim totalNumber as Double = 0
Dim count as Integer = 0
For x = 0 To xyz123.Tables(0).Columns.Count - 1
Dim current as Double = 0
If Double.TryParse(xyz123.Tables(0).Rows(0)(x).ToString(), current) AndAlso current <> 0 Then
count += 1
totalNumber += current
End If
Next
Dim averageRating as Double = totalNumber / count
I want to make a filtering table. It will be a table where below each column it will have a textbox. I want to, while the person type a word in the filter textbox, the table refresh, displaying only the items (rows) with that word. I think AJAX is a good idea. Just put the table and the textbox in a UpdatePanel, and then write a code to refresh the table on textbox_changetext event. The problem is that you have to take the cursor out of textbox to have the event fired, and I want the table update while text typing.
View 4 RepliesI tried to filter the data table and order by the records based on ID.
Ny filter string will looks like this.
sFilter= "ORDER BY Column1"
when i tried this, i got the following error."Missing operand after 'ORDER' operator."
I save dates as a string in a varchar data field named "TilDato" in a SQLServer-express table. I want to filter the records smaller than a specific date from a variable in the script. I try the following statement, but it does not seems function logically.
objCmd = new
SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM Reservering WHERE @laanedato<=TilDato",myConn2);
objCmd.Parameters.Add("@laanedato", laanedato);
objRdr = objCmd.ExecuteReader();
Here Am Using This Query to
SELECT COLUMN_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE (TABLE_NAME = 'TableName')
But Am getting Total Records instead of i need Specific Columns.....
i have a table that has some columns and rows i want this table to have borders that are visible inside it i want every column an row to be closed in borders how can i do that?
View 1 Replies I have a standard gridview, with the standard paging and sorting interface enabled.The application holds appointments for three organisational units, with a maximum of 3000 appointment records being returned across all three units. The appointment records are quite small.
The choice I am faced with is to:
1. Have an Org Unit dropdown which returns to the datasource on change of selection and at inital databind, and returns appointment records for one org unit at a time i.e. approx 1000 records.
2. Have the objectdatasource return all 3000 appointment records for all org units at initial databind, and filter the objectdatasource by org unit on change of selection, thereby saving a trip to the datasource.
I guess the question boils down to identifying the point at which querying the datasource by org unit is more efficient than filtering the records returned by org unit.
Is 3000 records a lot for a gridview to be paging and sorting etc.
I have a web server with more than a few ASP.NET sites running on it. Every so often, i notice that IIS is pushing the server's CPU to 100%. The sites share application pools, per .NET version they are running.
What i'm looking for is a way to be able to pinpoint which site it is that is doing this, using some tool. If that tool happened to get down into the code to show it, that would also be nice. If not, i'm happy just knowing which site is causing the issue.
I've already tried using ANTS. However, with ANTS you need to know which site it is, and then have it running and waiting on said CPU-crashing web app. Not perfectly ideal.
Trying to push some coordinates, as well as some stuff specified in a form by the user, to an an array called "seatsArray". Here's my code:
<div>
<img onLoad="shiftzoom.add(this,{showcoords:true,relativecoords:true,zoom:100});" id="image" src="plan1.bmp" width="1024" height="768">
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var seatsArray = [];
</script>
<br><input id="backnave" type="radio" name="area" value="backnave" /> Back Nave<br>
<input id="frontnave" type="radio" name="area" value="frontnave" /> Front nave<br>
<input id="middlenave" type="radio" name="area" value="middlenave" /> Middle nave<br>
<input type="radio" id="standardseat" name="seat" /><label for="radio1">Standard</label><br>
<input type="radio" id="wheelchairseat" name="seat" checked="checked" /><label for="radio2">Wheelchair</label><br>
<form id="my_form" action="savetext.aspx" method="post" onsubmit="return prepare()">
<input type="text" id="file_name" name="file_name" rows="1" cols="20" />
<input type="hidden" name="seatsArray" />
<input type="submit" value="Save" />
</form>
<form id="my_form" action="savetext.aspx" method="post" onsubmit="return prepare()">
<input type="text" id="file_name" name="file_name" rows="1" cols="20" />
<input type="hidden" name="seatsArray" />
<input type="submit" value="Save" />
</form>
<script type="text/javascript">
function prepare();
{
document.getElementById('seatsArray').value = seatsArray.join();
return true;
}
</script>
<script type="text/javascript">
var coordinates = document.getElementById("image");
coordinates.onclick = function(e) {
e = e || window.event;
if (e && e.pageX && e.pageX) {
e.posX = e.pageX;
e.posY = e.pageY;
} else if (e && e.clientX && e.clientY) {
var scr = {x:0,y:0},
object = e.srcElement || e.target;
//legendary get scrolled
for (;object.parentNode;object = object.parentNode) {
scr['x'] += object.scrollLeft;
scr['y'] += object.scrollTop;
}
e.posX = e.clientX + scr.x;
e.posY = e.clientY + scr.y;
}
var desc = "";
if(document.getElementByID("backnave").checked) {
desc = "BN, "+desc;
} else if(document.getElementByID("middlenave").checked) {
desc = "MN, "+desc;
} else if(document.getElementByID("frontnave").checked) {
desc = "FN, "+desc;
}
if(document.getElementById('wheelchairseat').checked) {
//Wheelchair seat is checked
desc = "Wheelchair "+desc;
}
seatsArray.push(desc + e.posX, e.posY);
}
</script>
But simply nothing is getting pushed to the array. I can tell this as I am using the following ASP.NET to write the array to a text file:
<script runat="server">
protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
string path = Server.MapPath(".")+"/"+Request.Form["file_name"] + ".txt";
if (!File.Exists(path))
{
using (StreamWriter sw = File.CreateText(path))
{
sw.WriteLine(Request.Form["seatsArray"]);
sw.WriteLine("");
}
}
using (StreamReader sr = File.OpenText(path))
{
string s = "";
while ((s = sr.ReadLine()) != null)
{
Response.Write(s);
}
}
}
</script>
The name of the text file is correct according to what the user put in the form "file_name". As you can see I made seatsArray a hidden form object so thats what the ASP.NET is trying to call.
Is something in the javascript in the wrong order or something? Because I just can't get it to fill up that text file.
I need to let a company push information up to my site.The best way to explain what I am talking about is to explain how it is currently done with their previous website:This company uploads a CSV file to an FTP set up by the website. The website then processes the CSV file and puts it into an SQL database so that it can be used by the website.In this case, I am the website and I am working with the company. Both sides are willing to change what they do. So my question is...
What is the best way to accept batch information like this? Is there a more automated way that doesn't involve FTP? In the future I may have a lot of companies wanting to do this, and I'd hate to have to setup accounts for each one.The project is C# ASP.NET MSSQL