While updating table Un handled exception was raised (asp.net with c# and SQLServer 2005)
Error Message: "Transaction (Process ID 91) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction."
I have an invoke function that I call. It On the client side it reads a file and then sends the line to the server side function here and waits for a return. Here is the server side code:
[Code]....
What I find is that I will keep getting these error message as posted in the subject... It will work for some but others I get this message. Thoughts on how to avoid that, or is that just something I'll need to work around with timing?
I have a stored procedure which fetches data after joining 8-9 tables and inserts that into a temp table. It was running fine till now, but now when the amount of data fetched have exceeded 20000, the SP is breaking. I have debugged the sp and found that this main query is failing after returning arround 15000-16000 records.
The error message says Transaction (Process ID) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction. I know what is deadlock, but when i checked with SP_LOCK stored proc i only found that my process is running on database only. So how is this getting deadlocked when there are no other processes running simultaneously on server.
I using System.Transactions on webservices hosted on different domains.Transaction on same domain works fine.But problem is with the distributed/different domains.
I ve tested with the dtctester and the output is as follows...
Initializing DTC
Beginning DTC Transaction
Enlisting Connection in Transaction
Error:
SQLSTATE=25S12,Native error=-2147168242,msg='[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]
Distributed transaction error'
Error:
SQLSTATE=24000,Native error=0,msg=[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Invalid cur
sor state
Typical Errors in DTC Output When
a. Firewall Has Ports Closed
-OR-
b. Bad WINS/DNS entries
-OR-
c. Misconfigured network
-OR-
d. Misconfigured SQL Server machine that has multiple netcards.
Aborting DTC Transaction
Releasing DTC Interface Pointers
Successfully Released pTransaction Pointer.
I develop an application using LINQ to SQL. Recently I deploy the application on server and starts performance testing using WAPT for 100 users. Unfortunately, 90 requests are failed while placing an order and only 10 are passed. I analyse and found that for every failed request I got an error "System Exception: Transaction (Process Id 68) was Deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction."
View 5 RepliesI was facing some serious deadlock issues in a high transaction table.For some select statement i have added nolock .But for few i can not put nolock, as i need accurate data.this select statement becomes a deadlock victim at times.
View 3 RepliesReposting my unanswered in technet.microsoft question?
MSDN "ASP.NET Delegation" article tells:
1) "When you configure to use a particular account as the process identity, ASP.NET attempts to delegate that account. If it is a local account that is identical (including password) to a local account on a remote machine, delegation is possible. If such an account does not exist on the remote machine, to the network it appears as the Windows anonymous account (NT AUTHORITYANONYMOUS LOGON). In addition, delegation is also possible if the account is a domain account that has access to the remote machine, in which case it uses the domain network identity of that account."
The same frequently repeated story as in case of manually/interactively accessing remote computer (server resource) in workgroup - it is necessary to create local account with the same username, the same password. But why?
If a workgroup Windows client process cannot access resources on server machine without having duplicate of such (local) account on target machine already pre-created,does it mean that client (process, machine, or user) can access server resources only by/after having logged (opening logon session) into server machine? Or, how to understand that such access is impossible without having corresponding duplicate local account on server machine?
The same MSDN "ASP.NET Delegation" article tells:
"NetworkService account. It behaves the same as the System account. This account possesses the network credentials associated with the machine account (domainnamemachinename) in the domain of which it is a member"
Does not any Windows have accounts ((NT AUTHORITYNETWORK SERVICE)? as well as many other common pre-built accounts? Why are they installed (before any joining to domain) but cannot be used for remote network access and client identification ? And what is identity used when the process from workgroup Windows under identity ((NT AUTHORITYNETWORK SERVICE) accesses a remote server?
My related questions:
domained LocalSystem vs. non-domained LocalSystem account in Windows-es ? how to check group membership of an "NT AUTHORITY" account ? Is client LocalSystem (SYSTEM) identified by target/server machine? and in which context? Window workgroup LocalSystem vs. domain (AD) LocalSystem [closed]how to better set up machine for development both in workgroup and Windows domain? [closed] interoperating with Windows domain computer from workrgroup Windows [closed] the context of local user of AD-joined machine? Is it of domain machine account or of local machine account? RunAs under domain account from non-AD Windows [closed] how to better set up machine for development both in workgroup and Windows domain? [closed] how to share the same domain machine account with multi-boot workgroup Windows setup?
I am using Http handler page to get images from database into gridview using C# in asp.net.I am trying to delete the selected row from database, when I click on delete button the row is deleted and the page redirecting to http handler page and firing the error "'Buffer cannot be null. Parameter name:Buffer'".And one more thing is I don't want to go to execute every time pageload event, how can I control this event also.
View 1 RepliesI have a deadlock problem that occurs every 5 minutes on SQL update. I get the following error randomly - means qurey failed one time every 200 calls. I'm using transaction scope to manage transaction.
code:
using(TransactionScope scope =
new
TransactionScope())
{
SELECT ... FROM TABLE1
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
scope.Complete();
}
error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Transaction (Process ID 51) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction
stack trace:
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.FinishExecuteReader(SqlDataReader ds, RunBehavior runBehavior, String resetOptionsString)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReaderTds(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, Boolean async)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteReader(CommandBehavior cmdBehavior, RunBehavior runBehavior, Boolean returnStream, String method, DbAsyncResult result)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(DbAsyncResult result, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe)
at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()
at DAL.RunSQL(String query, SqlParameter[] parameters, Boolean openTransact) in C:prjDAL.cs:line 215
I took trace in SQL about deadlock and same SQL query is mentioned bu deadlock. I do not understand how to resolve this deadlock.
SQL log:
deadlock-list
deadlock victim=process5462718
process-list
process taskpriority=0 logused=0 waitresource=KEY: 20:72057597472604160 (ce004d0b917a) waittime=30 ownerId=5937428 transactionname=user_transaction lasttranstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.050 XDES=0x5d00280 lockMode=X schedulerid=2 kpid=2168 status=suspended
spid=65 sbid=0 ecid=0 priority=0 trancount=2 lastbatchstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.110 lastbatchcompleted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.110 clientapp=.Net SqlClient Data Provider hostname=IPTBEWKS017 hostpid=3112 loginname=iptuserjde isolationlevel=serializable (4) xactid=5937428
currentdb=20 lockTimeout=4294967295 clientoption1=671088672 clientoption2=128056
executionStack
frame procname=adhoc line=1 stmtstart=222 sqlhandle=0x0200000086adfa0c959ccbdd7ef0e31e854e3a987706ae38
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
frame procname=unknown line=1 sqlhandle=0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
unknown
inputbuf
(@UId nvarchar(9),@F1 nvarchar(9),@F2 nvarchar(9),@F3 int,@F4 int,@F5 datetime)UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
process taskpriority=0 logused=0 waitresource=KEY: 20:72057597472604160 (cc0078aef293) waittime=88 ownerId=5937412 transactionname=user_transaction lasttranstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04 XDES=0x2b028280 lockMode=X schedulerid=1 kpid=6788 status=suspended
spid=74 sbid=0 ecid=0 priority=0 trancount=2 lastbatchstarted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.050 lastbatchcompleted=2010-10-20T16:29:04.050 clientapp=.Net SqlClient Data Provider hostname=IPTBEWKS017 hostpid=3112 loginname=iptuserjde isolationlevel=serializable (4) xactid=5937412
currentdb=20 lockTimeout=4294967295 clientoption1=671088672 clientoption2=128056
executionStack
frame procname=adhoc line=1 stmtstart=222 sqlhandle=0x0200000086adfa0c959ccbdd7ef0e31e854e3a987706ae38
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
frame procname=unknown line=1 sqlhandle=0x000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
unknown
inputbuf
(@UId nvarchar(9),@F1 nvarchar(9),@F2 nvarchar(9),@F3 int,@F4 int,@F5 datetime)
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
resource-list
keylock hobtid=72057597472604160 dbid=20 objectname=dbipt_rc41_02.dbo.TABLE1 indexname=PK_TABLE1 mode=RangeS-U associatedObjectId=72057597472604160
owner-list
owner id=processdbbe40 mode=RangeS-S
waiter-list
waiter mode=X requestType=convert
keylock hobtid=72057597472604160 dbid=20 objectname=dbipt_rc41_02.dbo.TABLE1 indexname=PK_TABLE10 mode=RangeS-U associatedObjectId=72057597472604160
owner-list
owner mode=RangeS-S
waiter-list
waiter id=processdbbe40 mode=X requestType=convert
I have tried to analyse the trace with this post but unsuccessfully: [URL] UId is my primary key - I do select on F3 column just before in same transaction but i have also an index on F3 column.
->
Spid 65 is running this query (line 2 of proc [p1]):
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
Spid 74 is running this query (line 2 of proc [p2]):
UPDATE TABLE1 SET [F1] = @F1, [F2] = @F2, [F3] = @F3, [F4] = @F4, [F5] = @F5 WHERE UId = @UId
The architecture of the application is straight forward. There is a web application which maintain account holder data. This data is processed and the status of account holders is updated based on number of business rules. This process is initiated using a button on the page and is a long running process (say 15 mins). A component is developed to do this data processing which internally calls stored procedures. Most of the business rules are kept in stored procedure.
View 2 Repliesi have a method that do bunch of inserts in a table
these inserts done through a transaction (with default isolation level)
meanwhile i need to read some committed records from this table by using another method, i create another transaction for 2th method with a ReadCommitted isolation level but it just fails and return a timeout error and also, the DoTransaction cause the entire table inaccessible, how could i apply a row-level lock ?
[Code]....
if there's any documentation/resources the describes the complete process flow of an ASP.Net application? Looking for something that describes IIS handing off the HttpRequest and the usage of the PageParserFilters and such.
View 1 Replieshow to prevent deadlock? read from other forum knowing that even a simple select statement will cause deadlock, but i confuse on how can i prevent it?
View 8 RepliesMy application is a survey application and I am using asp.net 2.0 and sql server 2005 version. There are many users taking survey at a single point of time. Some times delock is coming at a single method where i am deleting some records in a loop one by one(This delete statement may be executed for about 20 question in a page). This is a simple delete statement as below
delete table_name where column_name1='' and column_name2=''
column_name1 has foriegn key constraint, column_name2 also has foriegn key constraint.
The exception is as below.
Transaction (Process ID 204) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction
I have a customized data import executable in .NET 3.5 which the SqlBulkCopy to basically do faster inserts on large amounts of data. The app basically takes an input file, massages the data and bulk uploads it into a SQL Server 2000. It was written by a consultant who was building it with a SQL 2008 database environment. Would that env difference be causing this? SQL 2000 does have the bcp utility which is what BulkCopy is based on. So, When we ran this, it triggered a Deadlock error.
Error details: Transaction (Process ID 58) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
I've tried numerous ways to try to resolve it. like temporarily setting the connection string variable MultipleActiveResultSets=true, which wasn't ideal, but it still gives a Deadlock error. I also made sure it wasn't a connection time out problem. here's the function.
/// <summary>
/// Bulks the insert.
/// </summary>[code].....
The topic of sql server deadlock has been discussed many times, however, I was unsure that even two simultaneous inserts on a table can end up in a deadlock situation. Scenario: While testing our application (SQL Server 2005 as backend, ASP.net 3.5) we inserted records into a table simultaneously (simplified overview) and that resulted into a deadlock for more than 70% of users.
I could not get a hang of this as how an insert is being deadlock as this is not a case of multiple resources. After a detailed analysis (of reproducing the bug by two users) I found that both the processes were holding a RangeS-S lock on the primary key index of the table and were trying to convert this into RangeI-N lock, that resulted into a deadlock and one transaction being killed.
Question: Can we avoid or reduce these kind of deadlocks as this is not a case of change in order of access of resources? Cant' we force the transaction to get exclusive lock initially so that it blocks the other process and avoid deadlock? What (adverse) effects that may have? Also could some one explain more about RangeI-N lock.
Isolation Level for this was "Serializable".
I have a DTS script which transforms a Tab delimited text file to a table. I get the following error when trying to transform the data of a field that is greater than 255 chars:
[Code]....
I have seen this issue with importing from Excel with the jet 4.0 engine, however I am importing a text file.
one of my stored procedure has 4 select statments and gets data from large tables,
can i explicitly store result of stored procedure into buffer cache?,
and when calling stored procedure, than returns data from buffer cache?
a script which creates a deadlock in a Sql Server 2008 database?I want to do a trace in a customer environment using a trace flag but first I want to test it in my own environment.
View 4 RepliesI m getting following error in my eventvwr . I couldnt find reasons of the following error.
"Transaction (Process ID 110) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction. "
The only thing my page is doing is inserting/updating data into a table in sql and the thing I can think of is because multiple users are using the same page to insert/update data? Will that cause deadlock?
I would like to know how deadlock is happen, i have facing alot of sql deadlock in my event handle on server computer.
View 3 RepliesI have a web service with several web methods, each web method requires client machine to send their MAC Address and the server will validate this client base on this information (if not valid then return error) before proceeding to further operations. The communication between client and server is HTTPS. I only have about 20 clients or so. The question is is my way of doing this right/secure or not? If not then is there any simple way to do this?
View 3 RepliesI am planning a SaaS system, to be written in C#, ASP.NET using WCF that has two separate components:
On a static IP web server in the cloud will be a web app, common to all clients. Inside each client's office will be another app, installed on a server with IIS.
The site app will obviously be able to connect to the web services published on the web site. But here's the rub - I also want the web app to be able to initiate a connection to the site app... and the on-site server may not necessarily have a static IP. I can't control this, because we may have hundreds of clients at some point in the future, and we cannot limit our saleability by insisting that the customer has a server with fixed IP.
So, how to do this?
I could have the site apps "checking in" with the web every minute or so, to give the web app the possibility of responding with a "while you're here, do x,y,z..." but that seems very inelegant. Also, if we're talking about hundreds of clients, I don't want to be bombarding my web server with all these "hi there!" messages if they're not actually required.
I've got all of my ASP.NET requests wrapped in a Session and a Transaction that gets commited only at the very end of the request. At some point during execution of the request, I would like to insert an object and make it visible to other potential threads - i.e. split the insertion into a new transaction, commit that transaction, and move on. The reason is that the request in question hits an API that then chain hits another one of my pages (near-synchronously) to let me know that it processed, and thus double submits a transaction record, because the original request had not yet finished, and thus not committed the transaction record.
So I've tried wrapping the insertion code with a new SessionScope, TransactionScope(TransactionMode.New), combination of both, flushing everything manually, etc. However, when I call Refresh on the object I'm still getting the old object state. Here's some code sample for what I'm seeing:
Post outsidePost = Post.Find(id); // status of this post is Status.Old
using (TransactionScope transaction = new TransactionScope(TransactionMode.New))
{
Post p = Post.Find(id);
p.Status = Status.New; // new status set here
p.Update();
SessionScope.Current.Flush();
transaction.Flush();
transaction.VoteCommit();
}
outsidePost.Refresh();
// refresh doesn't get the new status, status is still Status.Old
How to get data (read file) chosen in FileUpload control without FileUpload.SaveAs Method on the server? Is it possible write it at once to some object?
View 2 Replies
